Discussion:
Trump Pardons Convicted Cop Killers
Add Reply
AlleyCat
2025-01-23 14:34:07 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 22:33:48 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda says...
On January 6, 2021, members of a fascist militia group, in the course of
attempting a coup d'etat, beat Mr. Sicknick, an officer of the Capitol
Police who was on duty at the time, with a fire extinguisher so severely
that he threw a clot that ultimately proved fatal.
Nope. No clot. Stroke. NATURAL stroke.
In simpler language, they beat him to death, and at least one other to
within an inch of his life too.
Under the felony murder rule, every single person who participated could
and *should* have been found guilty of first-degree murder
LOL... what subjective leftist garbage site posted that horse shit?

MotherJones?

Axios?

The Daily Beast?

The Daily Kos?

Media Matters?

Salon?

Slate?

Vice?

Vox

NPR?

LOL

=====

Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick Died Of Natural Causes, MEDICAL EXAMINER RULES

Updated April 19, 20217:00 PM ET

By

Alana Wise

U.S. Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick, who engaged with pro-Trump rioters during the Jan. 6 insurrection, died of natural causes the day after
the attack, WASHINGTON, D.C.'S CHIEF MEDICAL EXAMINER announced Monday.

Sicknick died after suffering strokes, the Office of Chief Medical Examiner, Dr. Francisco Diaz, said in a report. In an interview, Diaz told The
Washington Post, which first reported on the determination, that Sicknick suffered two strokes.

Sicknick, 42, was sprayed with a chemical substance outside the Capitol at around 2:20 p.m. ET on Jan. 6, the report said.

HE DID NOT SUFFER AN ALLERGIC REACTION TO THE CHEMICAL IRRITANTS DISPENSED BY RIOTERS, Diaz told the Post, nor was there evidence of internal or
external injuries.

(speculative and subjective matter snipped)

===============================================================================

1. Interior Department Overtaken

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/hDWGFMEoZjs?feature=share

Can you spot the difference between these two insurrection photos?

https://thefederalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/final_
61d768025ecc2100b1336204_187628-1024x461.png

Didn't think so. One of them was compared to Pearl Harbor and 9/11 by our vice
president. The other one barely made the news and was referred to as a mere
"sit-in." Both were attacks by political activists on government buildings.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FBxKm8xWUAI3fX4?format=png&name=900x900

"Multiple injuries were sustained by security personnel, and one officer has
been transported to a nearby hospital. Medics representing both the Department
and the protesters were present. Secretary Haaland is traveling and not in
Washington, D.C.

=====

Protesters Arrested After Sit-In At Interior Department

Dozens of protesters were arrested after they waged a sit-in at the Interior
Department on Thursday to protest fossil fuel projects.

People vs. Fossil Fuels, which organized a five-day protest event aimed at
pressing President Biden to declare climate change an emergency and compel him
to stop approving fossil fuel projects, reported on Thursday that 55 people had
been arrested during the sit-in.

The group alleged that police had "acted aggressively with the water
protectors" and had used stun guns on at least two people. They alleged that
others had been hit with batons.

Footage and photos circulated online of people being arrested inside the
building.

21 water protectors remain after most of the group has been arrested. Police
will not tell us what charges they are being held on or where they are taking
them #occupybia #expectus pic.twitter.com/TwycW8P5Z2

- Jennifer K. Falcon (@JenniferKFalcon) October 14, 2021

Arrests have started inside the BIA.
Police are threatening press and taking equipment. Announcing they will arrest
Indigenous press. #occupythebia #expectus pic.twitter.com/sYmACFbwor

- Jennifer K. Falcon (@JenniferKFalcon) October 14, 2021

"For the land, for our waters, for our future- we must fight now so our young
will thrive. You can arrest us, tear gas us, poison us but there will always be
more hearts to continue the song until we are all free," Indigenous leaders who
led the sit-in said in a statement.

In a statement following the event, Interior Department spokesperson Melissa
Schwartz said that "multiple injuries were sustained by security personnel, and
one officer has been transported to a nearby hospital."

She said Interior Secretary Deb Haaland, who is Native American, had been
traveling and was not in Washington, D.C., during the event,

"Interior Department leadership believes strongly in respecting and upholding
the right to free speech and peaceful protest. Centering the voices of lawful
protesters is and will continue to be an important foundation of our
democracy," Schwartz said. "It is also our obligation to keep everyone safe. We
will continue to do everything we can to de-escalate the situation while
honoring first amendment rights."

Statement from the Interior Dept: "Early this afternoon, a group of protesters
entered the Stewart Lee Udall Main Interior Building. Federal Protective
Service personnel responded to the area to mitigate the situation.

- Melissa Schwartz (@MSchwartz3) October 14, 2021

The Federal Protective Service (FPS) did not indicate how many people had been
arrested but noted in a statement that several other law enforcement agencies
had assisted them in efforts "to detain, prosecute or take action against
anyone who caused harm and attempted to disrupt the business of the federal
government yesterday."

"FPS is committed to the safety of demonstrators participating in lawful
protests and fully supports the peaceful expression of all people. FPS will
continue to pursue our mission of ensuring the safety and security of federal
employees and facilities, consistent with the law," the FPS said in a
statement.


2. President Moved to Bunker After White House Fence Breach

In June 2020, then-President Donald Trump, First Lady Melania Trump, and their
son Barron were reportedly rushed to a secure bunker when a group of protesters
breached temporary barricades that had been set up around the White House
complex.

Secret Service reportedly arrested and charged at least four protesters with
unlawful entry at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.

Protesters' Breach Of Temporary Fences Near White House Complex Prompted Secret
Service To Move Trump To Secure Bunker

President Trump was rushed to a secure bunker in the White House on Friday
evening after a group of protesters hopped over temporary barricades set up
near the Treasury Department grounds, according to arrest records and people
familiar with the incident.

The security move came after multiple people crossed over fences that had been
erected to create a larger barrier around the White House complex around 7 p.m.


3. Wisconsin Capitol Overwhelmed

In 2011, thousands of people opposed to Republican Gov. Scott Walker filled the
Wisconsin state Capitol, screaming in opposition to the governor's budget
repair bill.

The Occupy movement didn't start on Wall Street in September 2011. It started
on my street in Wisconsin's capital seven months earlier. At one point, more
than 100,000 protesters occupied our state Capitol and square.

Protesters Take State Capital in Wisconsin

Wisconsin Senate Democratic Leader Mark Miller says, "This is a disaster."

Feb. 18, 2011 Crowds protesting proposed budget-cutting moves that threaten the
bargaining rights of many Wisconsin state employees grew to nearly 40,000
today, helping paralyze Madison, the state capital, for yet another day.

Despite the protests, and an exodus of Democratic state senators that has
prevented a vote on a controversial Republican proposal, Republican Gov. Scott
Walker remains committed to a plan to curb the state's unions and force them to
contribute more for benefits and believes it will pass the legislature.

Walker told reporters Friday that he would not "allow protesters to drown out
the voice of the taxpayers," adding that he had received 19,000 supportive e-
mails this week and that a "quiet majority" of the state's residents are behind
his plan.

Madison, Wis., has become a magnet in the national and emotional debate over
budget priorities, drawing figures including the Rev. Jesse Jackson and the
head of the national AFL-CIO.

Even President Obama has injected himself into the growing fracas.

"Some of what I've heard coming out of Wisconsin, where you're just making it
harder for public employees to collectively bargain generally, seems like more
of an assault on unions," Obama told Milwaukee's WTMJ-TV in an interview
Wednesday at the White House.

Key Democrats still are missing in action, holed up at a hotel across the
border in Illinois after fleeing a vote in the Wisconsin Senate on Thursday.
Republicans outnumber Democrats in the state Senate 19-14, but 20 state
senators need to be present to hold a vote.

"This might be the only option we really have to try to say to the governor,
'Let's slow this down, you're ramming this through,'" said state Sen. Dave
Hansen.

"The idea is to sit down and negotiate," said state Senate Minority Leader Mark
Miller, one of the Democrats who left the state. "We've heard over 1,000 people
testify about the impact this is going to have on their lives. It's
heartbreaking. People break down in tears. This is a disaster and we're being
asked to swallow it in just four days."

On Thursday night, more public workers, including firefighters, poured into the
capital. Some families camped out overnight in a last-ditch effort to protest
the moves they feared would cripple their union rights.

"I want to do anything in my power to raise awareness that this can't happen,"
said one protester.

"We've taken less pay for the benefits, so now simply to cut our benefits is
just totally unfair," said a retired teacher, Jim Thompson.

On Thursday, Republicans were poised to pass an austerity budget requiring
state workers to pay more for pensions and health care.

But what really has protesters steamed is a dramatic move by the Republican
governor to eliminate union bargaining on everything from wages to work rules.

"He's trying to dictate what we'll do, how we'll do it, when it'll be done,"
said Deborah Caldwell, a teacher.

"It's about stripping away our rights to have a union," said a local union
steward identified as Aniel.


4. Portland Federal Courthouse Overtaken by Violence

The federal courthouse in Portland has been a repeated target of violent Antifa
rioters. In July 2020, a mob began setting fires inside the fence protecting
the courthouse, shaking the fence, launching projectiles over it, and even
trying to take it down. Several people even breached it, with rioters launching
projectiles and flashing lasers at the federal police officers who responded.

The next month, the courthouse was shut down completely over domestic terrorism
threats that someone might drive a vehicle filled with explosives into the
building.

Just hours after a security fence was removed from the courthouse in March
2021, rioters broke glass and lit fires once again.

https://twitter.com/MrAndyNgo/status/1370281113239891969

Antifa had previously attempted to menace people inside the federal courthouse
on the afternoon of March 11, yelling "come outside," "you don't scare me
bitch," "death to America," and "f-ck the United States" while hurling water
and other liquids inside the glass doors, banging on them, and attempting to
get inside.

https://ktvz.com/news/crime-courts/2020/07/24/fires-set-inside-portland-
federal-courthouse-fence-18-arrested-on-federal-charges/

https://thefederalist.com/2020/08/21/portland-closes-federal-courthouse-over-
threats-of-domestic-terrorism/

https://thefederalist.com/2021/03/12/come-outside-you-dont-scare-me-b-tch-
watch-antifa-menace-portland-courthouse-in-another-fiery-night/

https://www.oregonlive.com/portland/2021/03/federal-officers-deploy-impact-
munitions-tear-gas-at-downtown-portland-protesters.html

https://twitter.com/JenDowlingNews/status/1370250288641183747

https://twitter.com/JenDowlingNews/status/1370255202993938432


5. Democracy Halted at the Texas Capitol

In July 2013, an unruly mob of pro-abortion demonstrators interfered with the
democratic process when thousands of them occupied the Texas Capitol and
screamed at the top of their lungs, "grinding the Senate to a halt" with the
noise.

How Activists Yelled an Abortion Bill to Death

When efforts by state Sen. Wendy Davis, D-Fort Worth, and other Senate
Democrats to run out the clock on an abortion bill fell short, protesters made
enough noise to grind the Senate chamber to a halt.

Minutes before midnight in the Texas Capitol on Tuesday, thousands of
protesters stopped a restrictive abortion bill in its tracks by yelling at the
top of their lungs.

The remarkable and surprisingly successful moment had not been planned by the
established groups like Planned Parenthood, NARAL Pro-Choice Texas and the
Texas Democratic Party that had done much of the organizing for the protests
against Senate Bill 5. Instead, it grew organically with the help of a smaller
coalition of groups - including local chapters of the Occupy movement and the
International Socialist Organization, or ISO - that helped goad the crowd to a
level of civil disobedience not seen in the Texas Capitol in decades.

https://twitter.com/CommieChan/status/349748705248829440




6. SCOTUS Police Lines Breached, Senate Overwhelmed by Anti-Kavanaugh Activists

During the dust-up over now-Justice Brett Kavanaugh's nomination and
confirmation to the Supreme Court, which was radically amplified thanks to the
Christine Blasey Ford circus, demonstrators forced their way past law
enforcement, breaching police lines at both the Senate and the Supreme Court,
where they stormed the steps and beat on the doors.

After announcing that he planned to vote for Kavanaugh's confirmation, then-
Sen. Jeff Flake, R-Ariz., was accosted on an elevator by several women, who
shouted in his face and wouldn't let him move.

At the beginning of October, shortly before the Senate voted to confirm
Kavanaugh, a mob of protesters took over a part of the Hart Senate Office
Building, which is part of the Capitol complex.

How many of these people were thrown in solitary confinement for obstructing a
democratic process?

https://twitter.com/greg_price11/status/1479193384292175874

Some even made their way into the gallery during the final vote.






7. Senate Bombed by Left-Wing Terrorists

Linda Evans and Susan Rosenberg, two left-wing extremists, along with five
others planted a bomb outside the Senate chamber inside the U.S. Capitol, where
it detonated and caused $1 million in damage in 1983.

On his last day as president, Jan. 20, 2001, Bill Clinton commuted the
sentences of the violent pair, spurred on by his Democrat buddy Jerry Nadler.
As Tristan Justice wrote:

According to the New York Post in 2001, New York Democratic Rep. Jerry Nadler,
who today serves as the House Judiciary Committee chairman, played a 'crucial
role' in Clinton's decision to commute Rosenberg's sentence. Nadler's rabbi, a
Nadler spokesman at the time told the Post, gave 'compelling information from
[Rosenberg's] parole hearing' to the Manhattan congressman, who, in turn,
passed on the material to the White House counsel's office. That transfer, the
Post reported, played a 'key role' in the president's decision to include
Rosenberg on his list of 140 last-minute pardons just moments before George W.
Bush took the White House.

Each of the women served only 16 years of her long sentence. Rosenberg escaped
42 years of a 58-year sentence, and Evans trimmed 24 years off her 40-year
sentence.


8. Senate Chamber Breached by Biden Himself

In now-President Joe Biden's farewell address to the Senate in 2009, he claimed
to have broken into the chamber and sat in the vice president's chair when he
was 21 years old. The first time he stood on the Senate floor was when he
visited with friends in the early 1960s, he said.

"I remember vividly the first time I walked in this chamber. I walked through
those doors, but I walked through those doors as a 21-year-old tourist," Biden
claimed. "In those days, you could literally drive right up to the front steps.
... I drove up to the steps and there had been a rare Saturday session. It had
just ended. So I walked up the steps, found myself in front of what we call the
elevators, and I walked to the right to the Reception Room."

"There was no one there. The glass doors, those French doors that lead behind
the chamber, were open. There were no signs then. I just walked," Biden
continued. "... I sat in the presiding officer's chair. I was mesmerized."

He was then caught by a Capitol Police officer. I wonder if Biden thinks his
self-guided Capitol tour "borders on sedition"?

===============================================================================

Trump WINS!

Donald Trump is the 47th U.S. president, defeating Vice President Kamala Harris.

Republican Donald Trump was elected President of the United States in the 2024 election, defeating Vice President Kamala Harris.

Trump, 78, will begin his second term early next year.

Donald Trump will be inaugurated as the U.S. President on Monday, January 20, 2025, on the West Front of the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C.

A Second Trump Administration
Alan
2025-01-23 19:53:06 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 04:31:49 -0500, JTEM says...
https://www.cnn.com/2025/01/21/politics/what-to-know-pardons-january-6-trump/index.html
So much for the "conservative" "party of law and order", eh, kooks?
They didn't kill any cops.
On guard had a heart attack. Even if the excitement triggered
it, he had a heart condition.
Literally EVERYTHING you think you know it utter bullshit.
They gaslight you, and you in return let them get away with
it.
Sicknick died of stroke.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gh57sy6XAAA0Vpl?format=jpg&name=large
So it's OK to pardon people who are convicted of assaulting police
officers...

...as long as the officers don't die?
JTEM
2025-01-23 20:35:30 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
So it's OK to pardon people who are convicted of assaulting police
officers...
It's even okay to pardon your own son after swearing you wouldn't,
or pardon government officials who haven't even been charged with
any crime, yet.

If Fauici is guilty, he slaughtered countless people. And, if he's
not guilty then what was he pardoned for?
--
https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5
Alan
2025-01-23 22:49:41 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by JTEM
Post by Alan
So it's OK to pardon people who are convicted of assaulting police
officers...
It's even okay to pardon your own son after swearing you wouldn't,
or pardon government officials who haven't even been charged with
any crime, yet.
If Fauici is guilty, he slaughtered countless people. And, if he's
not guilty then what was he pardoned for?
Because Trump has threatened to jail him regardless of the rule of law...

...which we know Trump doesn't care about.
Skeeter
2025-01-23 23:00:42 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by JTEM
Post by Alan
So it's OK to pardon people who are convicted of assaulting police
officers...
It's even okay to pardon your own son after swearing you wouldn't,
or pardon government officials who haven't even been charged with
any crime, yet.
If Fauici is guilty, he slaughtered countless people. And, if he's
not guilty then what was he pardoned for?
Because Trump has threatened to jail him regardless of the rule of law...
...which we know Trump doesn't care about.
"no one is above the law"

Joe Biden
AlleyCat
2025-01-24 17:22:08 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 14:49:41 -0800, Alan says...
Because Trump has threatened to jail him regardless of the rule of law which we know Trump doesn't care about.
So, why is he deporting ILLEGAL aliens?

Do you have a quote of Trump saying he doesn't care about law and order?

Yeah... didn't think so.

=====

Trump WINS!

Donald Trump is the 47th U.S. president, defeating Vice President Kamala Harris.

Republican Donald Trump was elected President of the United States in the 2024 election, defeating Vice President Kamala Harris.

Trump, 78, will begin his second term early next year.

Donald Trump will be inaugurated as the U.S. President on Monday, January 20, 2025, on the West Front of the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C.

A Second Trump Administration
Alan
2025-01-24 18:09:18 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 14:49:41 -0800, Alan says...
Because Trump has threatened to jail him regardless of the rule of law which we know Trump doesn't care about.
So, why is he deporting ILLEGAL aliens?
Do you have a quote of Trump saying he doesn't care about law and order?
Yeah... didn't think so.
Actions speak louder than words.
Skeeter
2025-01-24 18:48:52 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 14:49:41 -0800, Alan says...
Because Trump has threatened to jail him regardless of the rule of law which we know Trump doesn't care about.
So, why is he deporting ILLEGAL aliens?
Do you have a quote of Trump saying he doesn't care about law and order?
Yeah... didn't think so.
Actions speak louder than words.
So you got nothing. OK then.
Alan
2025-01-24 18:53:11 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 14:49:41 -0800, Alan says...
Because Trump has threatened to jail him regardless of the rule of law which we know Trump doesn't care about.
So, why is he deporting ILLEGAL aliens?
Do you have a quote of Trump saying he doesn't care about law and order?
Yeah... didn't think so.
Actions speak louder than words.
So you got nothing. OK then.
Trump signed and executive order (an action) which directly contradicts
that US constitution.

That is NOT being for law and order.
AlleyCat
2025-01-24 19:58:47 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Fri, 24 Jan 2025 10:09:18 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 14:49:41 -0800, Alan says...
Because Trump has threatened to jail him regardless of the rule of law which we know Trump doesn't care about.
So, why is he deporting ILLEGAL aliens?
Do you have a quote of Trump saying he doesn't care about law and order?
Yeah... didn't think so.
Actions speak louder than words.
What "actions", then?

Oh... you mean those "actions" he was indicted for, that MANY Democrats, who did the same things as Trump, weren't?

Gotcha.

Go ahead... list them all, then I'll list those who mirrored Trump and had NOTHING done to them.

Using his own money to hush a whore?

Half of Congress used at least $17 million of TAXPAYER money to hush their whores.

Classified documents?

Puhleeze.

Gahead... show us your list of "actions" that show Trump doesn't "care" about the law.

=====

Trump WINS!

Donald Trump is the 47th U.S. president, defeating Vice President Kamala Harris.

Republican Donald Trump was elected President of the United States in the 2024 election, defeating Vice President Kamala Harris.

Trump, 78, will begin his second term early next year.

Donald Trump will be inaugurated as the U.S. President on Monday, January 20, 2025, on the West Front of the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C.

A Second Trump Administration
Rudy Canoza
2025-01-24 19:33:57 UTC
Reply
Permalink
[*all* of shitbag's gratuitous bullshit crossposts removed]

[subject line vandalism by squat-to-piss communist cocksucker repaired]

On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the narcissist, aka
Neutered Pussy — *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a
golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been
laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-piss shrieking estrogen-oozing
fairy — *capitulated* and *submitted* to Rudy and then lied:

I *always* get the better of AlleyPussyBitch, the psycho squat-to-piss
zero-achieving no-fight histrionical faggot narcissist!
Post by AlleyCat
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 14:49:41 -0800, Alan says...
Because Trump has threatened to jail him regardless of the rule of law which we know Trump doesn't care about.
So, why is he deporting ILLEGAL aliens?
He hasn't deported any, you liar.
Post by AlleyCat
Do you have a quote of Trump saying he doesn't care about law and order?
We *see* by what he does that he doesn't care about law and order. Pardoning
violent felons who have only served a fraction of their sentences, then lying
and saying the sentences were "excessive," proves he doesn't care about law and
order. Trump only wants to *subvert* the law for his benefit. You know this.
--
I *always* get the better of AlleyPussyBitch, the psycho squat-to-piss
zero-achieving no-fight histrionical faggot narcissist!
JTEM
2025-01-23 20:37:44 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
So it's OK to pardon people who are convicted of assaulting police
officers...
The 2020 Summer of Love:

https://abcnews.go.com/US/60000-officers-assaulted-2020-31-sustaining-injuries-fbi/story?id=80661264

What's odd about 2020 is that assaults on police went UP despite the
lockdowns.
--
https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5
Alan
2025-01-24 03:46:00 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by JTEM
Post by Alan
So it's OK to pardon people who are convicted of assaulting police
officers...
https://abcnews.go.com/US/60000-officers-assaulted-2020-31-sustaining-
injuries-fbi/story?id=80661264
What's odd about 2020 is that assaults on police went UP despite the
lockdowns.
Why do you think that would be odd?

From your own source:

'Most of the assaults on officers happened after they responded to
disturbance calls, including family quarrels...'

You don't suppose that people being cooped up couldn't possibly have
resulted in more "family quarrels"...

...do you?

Also, there were a lot of protests after a police officer straight up
murdered a black man.
JTEM
2025-01-24 03:57:15 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by JTEM
What's odd about 2020 is that assaults on police went UP despite the
lockdowns.
Why do you think that would be odd?
LeftTards supported the lockdown, went wild opening wishing an agonizing
death on freedom lovers for protesting the unconstitutional and (now)
admittedly totally unnecessary lockdowns.

Remember? Of course not. You're a LeftTard! You're lucky if you
remember to drop your fly before you pee!

There were a couple of very peaceful gatherings -- rallies -- that
appealed to more of your redneck type, and LeftTards went ape insisting
that they were spreading the China Virus everywhere! And then they
gathered in their masses and burned cities, because they're idiot
LeftTards...

What about the guy who brought a plastic bag to a gun fight? The smart
one brought a skateboard, but he didn't do too well either...

The third one, very unChristian but I saw that a number of people online
took to calling him "Little Arm." You know, because Kyle Rittenhouse
blew off a chunk of the guy's arm, and all the die did was try to
execute him at point-blank range with an illegally concealed weapon...

AND IT WAS LEGAL TO CARRY IN THE OPEN! Conceal-carry required a permit
which the guy did NOT have, the guy who tried to execute Rittenhouse and
was caught in the act on camera...

What was he convicted of? The illegally concealing a gun and caught on
video trying to shoot someone poor kid in the head with it? What was he
convicted of? What was he charged with?

"LeftTards," am I right?
--
https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5
Alan
2025-01-24 04:16:25 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by JTEM
What's odd about 2020 is that assaults on police went UP despite the
lockdowns.
Why do you think that would be odd?
LeftTards supported the lockdown...
Put back the rest of my post.

Reply to THAT.
Skeeter
2025-01-24 16:50:19 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Alan
Post by JTEM
What's odd about 2020 is that assaults on police went UP despite the
lockdowns.
Why do you think that would be odd?
LeftTards supported the lockdown...
Put back the rest of my post.
Reply to THAT.
Says the king of snipping.
Skeeter
2025-01-23 22:42:36 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 04:31:49 -0500, JTEM says...
https://www.cnn.com/2025/01/21/politics/what-to-know-pardons-january-6-trump/index.html
So much for the "conservative" "party of law and order", eh, kooks?
They didn't kill any cops.
On guard had a heart attack. Even if the excitement triggered
it, he had a heart condition.
Literally EVERYTHING you think you know it utter bullshit.
They gaslight you, and you in return let them get away with
it.
Sicknick died of stroke.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gh57sy6XAAA0Vpl?format=jpg&name=large
So it's OK to pardon people who are convicted of assaulting police
officers...
Or your own "innocent" family like Joe did.
Post by Alan
...as long as the officers don't die?
Alan
2025-01-23 22:58:34 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 04:31:49 -0500, JTEM says...
https://www.cnn.com/2025/01/21/politics/what-to-know-pardons-january-6-trump/index.html
So much for the "conservative" "party of law and order", eh, kooks?
They didn't kill any cops.
On guard had a heart attack. Even if the excitement triggered
it, he had a heart condition.
Literally EVERYTHING you think you know it utter bullshit.
They gaslight you, and you in return let them get away with
it.
Sicknick died of stroke.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gh57sy6XAAA0Vpl?format=jpg&name=large
So it's OK to pardon people who are convicted of assaulting police
officers...
Or your own "innocent" family like Joe did.
Do you have any actual evidence of any wrongdoing beyond an income tax
issue that typically doesn't result in any charges at all, let alone
conviction?
AlleyCat
2025-01-23 23:03:25 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 14:58:34 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Or your own "innocent" family like Joe did.
Do you have any actual evidence of any wrongdoing
No "wrongdoing"?

Then, why were they pardoned.

If they did nothing wrong, Trump CAN'T put them in jail or even charge them with anything.

So, why DID feeble Joe pardon his family and others who were never charged with anything?

=====

Trump WINS!

Donald Trump is the 47th U.S. president, defeating Vice President Kamala Harris.

Republican Donald Trump was elected President of the United States in the 2024 election, defeating Vice President Kamala Harris.

Trump, 78, will begin his second term early next year.

Donald Trump will be inaugurated as the U.S. President on Monday, January 20, 2025, on the West Front of the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C.

A Second Trump Administration

===============================================================================

"Trump Derangement Syndrome" Is a Real Mental Condition

All you need to know about "Trump Derangement Syndrome," or TDS.

"Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) is a mental condition in which a person has been driven effectively insane due to their dislike of Donald Trump, to
the point at which they will abandon all logic and reason."

Justin Raimondo, the editorial director of Antiwar.com, wrote a piece in the Los Angeles Times in 2016 that broke TDS down into three distinct phases
or stages:

"In the first stage of the disease, victims lose all sense of proportion. The president-elect's every tweet provokes a firestorm, as if 140
characters were all it took to change the world."

"The mid-level stages of TDS have a profound effect on the victim's vocabulary: Sufferers speak a distinctive language consisting solely of
hyperbole."

"As TDS progresses, the afflicted lose the ability to distinguish fantasy from reality."

The Point here is simple: TDS is, in the eyes of its adherents, the knee-jerk opposition from liberals to anything and everything Trump does. If
Trump announced he was donating every dollar he's ever made, TDS sufferers would suggest he was up to something nefarious, according to the logic of
TDS. There's nothing - not. one. thing. - that Trump could do or say that would be received positively by TDSers.

The history of Trump Derangement Syndrome actually goes back to the early 2000s - a time when the idea of Trump as president was a punch line for
late-night comics and nothing more.

Wikipedia traces its roots to "Bush Derangement Syndrome" - a term first coined by the late conservative columnist Charles Krauthammer back in 2003.
The condition, as Krauthammer defined it, was "the acute onset of paranoia in otherwise normal people in reaction to the policies, the presidency -
nay - the very existence of George W. Bush."

Added Krauthammer:

"Some clinicians consider this delusion - that Americans can only get their news from one part of the political spectrum - the gravest of all. They
report that no matter how many times sufferers in padded cells are presented with flash cards with the symbols ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC, NPR, PBS,
Time, Newsweek, New York Times, Washington Post, L.A. Times - they remain unresponsive, some in a terrifying near-catatonic torpor."

(If you don't realize the idea of TDS or BDS is - in no small part - meant in a tongue-in-cheek manner then, well, you may well have it.)

Trump allies believe that TDS is worse than ODS or BDS - by a lot. Wrote conservative pundit Bernie Goldberg on Real Clear Politics in early 2017:

"Before the election, the victims of TDS routinely compared Donald Trump to Hitler. Guess what. They're still doing it. Articles in respectable
publications written by professors at elite universities are warning us to be on guard, that a Trump presidency could imperil democracy-as-we-know-it
and may very well spell doom for American civilization.

"On election night, as it became obvious that their worst nightmare was about to come true, some libs fainted. Some vomited. Many more threatened to
leave the country, but I'm pretty sure none actually did. As Donald Trump might say in a tweet: so sad!"

The truth is that TDS is just the preferred nomenclature of Trump defenders who view those who oppose him and his policies as nothing more than the
blind hatred of those who preach tolerance and free speech. Viewed more broadly, the rise of presidential derangement syndromes is a function of
increased polarization - not to mention our national self-sorting - at work in the country today.

We no longer live around, work around or pal around with people who think any differently than us. We watch cable news that affirms what we already
think. We read ideological "news" sites that tell us how good our side is and how bad the other one is. And on and on and on.

Is it any wonder then that we are increasingly willing to lump those who disagree with us into the "deranged" category? To say that those who don't
share our views are mentally deficient in some way?

What does it say about a President - and about a country - when the standard response to those with whom you disagree is that they must be crazy?
Nothing good, for sure.

=====

Many clinicians, political commentators, and members of the public have speculated upon the mental health of President Donald Trump. Indeed, over
70,000 people self-identifying as "mental health professionals" have signed a petition declaring that "Trump is mentally ill and must be removed." In
sociological terms, the "medical gaze" has been hitherto focused on President Trump, and to a lesser extent his ardent supporters.

However, in recent months, many have been questioning the direction of this "medical gaze." In fact, more and more people are suggesting that this
"medical gaze" should be reversed and refocused on President Trump's most embittered and partisan opponents. Some have even suggested that these
opponents are experiencing a specific mental condition-a condition which has been labelled "Trump Derangement Syndrome" (TDS).
What does DSM-5 say about "Trump Derangement Syndrome"?

Mental illnesses are officially classified in a dense and dry book published by the American Psychiatric Association (APA) known as the Diagnostic
and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5). This book contains 947 pages and lists hundreds of mental disorders; TDS is
nowhere to be seen. Similarly, a review of scholarly databases such as MEDLINE and Google Scholar reveal no academic papers on this alleged syndrome.
Officially at least, TDS is not a real, diagnosable, or treatable mental disorder.

That said, medical anthropologists and critical sociologists have convincingly argued that DSM-5 is a flawed document. Indeed, social scientists have
long recognized that there are numerous "folk categories" of mental disorders that are considered real conditions by the general public, even though
they are not recognized as such in the DSM. These include categories such as "burnout" or "nervous breakdown."

As such, lack of official recognition does not mean that TDS is not a real mental condition.


Lay Understandings of "Trump Derangement Syndrome"

There is no shared lay understanding of TDS, mainly because it is a folk category rather than a professional category. As such, there is currently
much armchair speculation about the nature and existence of TDS, without consensus.

The name itself explicitly suggests a "syndrome," which the Oxford English Dictionary defines as "a characteristic combination of opinions, emotions,
or behavior." Several commentators have run with this, putting forth suggestions about opinions, emotions and behaviors characterizing TDS.

Shared amongst these is a notion that the everyday activities of President Trump trigger some people into distorted opinions, extreme emotions and
hysterical behaviors. Well-known writer Bernard Goldberg gives supposed behavioral examples of TDS among Trump's political opponents, including
fainting, vomiting, students retreating to "safe spaces" and others demanding "therapy dogs." Political commentator Justin Raimondo focuses on
opinions, language and cognition, writing in the LA Times that "sufferers speak a distinctive language consisting of hyperbole [leading to] a
constant state of hysteria... the afflicted lose touch with reality."

Such forms of highly emotional reaction could be something akin to the fainting and screaming characterizing American Beatlemania in the 1960s.
Unlike the Beatles, however, the extreme emotional reaction alleged to characterize TDS is not based on adoration and admiration, but on fear and
loathing.

Contrariwise, many others ridicule the notion that TDS is anything but a malicious slur term used to discredit and delegitimize criticism of
President Trump. For example, CNN's Chris Cillizza may speak for many when he stated: "The truth is that TDS is just the preferred nomenclature of
Trump defenders who view those who oppose him and his policies as nothing more than blind hatred." Likewise, Adam Gopnik writes that "our problem is
not TDS; our problem is Deranged Trump Self-Delusion."

In other words, there are polarized opinions about the nature, reality and existence of TDS.


Conclusion

The wider public may be unaware that psychiatrists and social scientists spend considerable time and energy behind closed doors pondering over the
existence and reality of mental conditions. This has led the APA to revise the DSM five times since 1952, considerably expanding the list of official
mental disorders with each revision. As far as I am aware, few psychiatrists are currently arguing that DSM-6 should contain TDS as a mental
disorder.

That said, in its official definition of mental disorder, the DSM-5 states that "a mental disorder is a syndrome characterized by clinically
significant disturbance in an individual's cognition, emotion regulation, or behavior... mental disorders are usually associated with significant
distress in social, occupational, or other important activities."

Many have argued that some people have been seriously disturbed and distressed by the policies, speech, behavior, and tweets of President Trump, so
much so that it has affected their cognitive, affective, and behavioral functioning. Such people may need mental health support. As such, further
research is necessary to investigate the extreme reactions toward President Trump, in the same way that researchers investigate other extreme social
phenomena, such as Beatlemania or the like. This will shed light on the reality of this emerging folk category that has been labelled by many as
"Trump Derangement Syndrome."
Alan
2025-01-23 23:32:22 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 14:58:34 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Or your own "innocent" family like Joe did.
Do you have any actual evidence of any wrongdoing
No "wrongdoing"?
Then, why were they pardoned.
If they did nothing wrong, Trump CAN'T put them in jail or even charge them with anything.
So, why DID feeble Joe pardon his family and others who were never charged with anything?
Cart before the horse.

Do YOU have any actual EVIDENCE that any Biden family member is guilty
of anything beyond an income tax issue for Hunter Biden.

Bear in mind that the Republicans spent pretty much all of 2023 looking
for such evidence and didn't find it.
pothead
2025-01-24 00:10:31 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 14:58:34 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Or your own "innocent" family like Joe did.
Do you have any actual evidence of any wrongdoing
No "wrongdoing"?
Then, why were they pardoned.
If they did nothing wrong, Trump CAN'T put them in jail or even charge them with anything.
So, why DID feeble Joe pardon his family and others who were never charged with anything?
Cart before the horse.
Do YOU have any actual EVIDENCE that any Biden family member is guilty
of anything beyond an income tax issue for Hunter Biden.
https://oversight.house.gov/the-bidens-influence-peddling-timeline/

Read it for a change.
--
pothead

Why did Joe Biden pardon his family?
Read below to learn the reason.
The Biden Crime Family Timeline here:
https://oversight.house.gov/the-bidens-influence-peddling-timeline/
Alan
2025-01-24 01:16:29 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 14:58:34 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Or your own "innocent" family like Joe did.
Do you have any actual evidence of any wrongdoing
No "wrongdoing"?
Then, why were they pardoned.
If they did nothing wrong, Trump CAN'T put them in jail or even charge them with anything.
So, why DID feeble Joe pardon his family and others who were never charged with anything?
Cart before the horse.
Do YOU have any actual EVIDENCE that any Biden family member is guilty
of anything beyond an income tax issue for Hunter Biden.
https://oversight.house.gov/the-bidens-influence-peddling-timeline/
Read it for a change.
I asked you before to produce the strongest piece of evidence you think
it contains...

...and you punked.
pothead
2025-01-24 01:31:40 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 14:58:34 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Or your own "innocent" family like Joe did.
Do you have any actual evidence of any wrongdoing
No "wrongdoing"?
Then, why were they pardoned.
If they did nothing wrong, Trump CAN'T put them in jail or even charge them with anything.
So, why DID feeble Joe pardon his family and others who were never charged with anything?
Cart before the horse.
Do YOU have any actual EVIDENCE that any Biden family member is guilty
of anything beyond an income tax issue for Hunter Biden.
https://oversight.house.gov/the-bidens-influence-peddling-timeline/
Read it for a change.
I asked you before to produce the strongest piece of evidence you think
it contains...
...and you punked.
Just because you refuse to accept the facts posted in my link means nothing.
If it walks like a duck etc....

And BTW it's far more incriminating evidence than some wackadoodle kook
accusing Trump of rape.
She can't remember dates.
Lied about the dress she was wearing.
Can't remember specifics.
Accused another man of rape.
etc.
--
pothead

Why did Joe Biden pardon his family?
Read below to learn the reason.
The Biden Crime Family Timeline here:
https://oversight.house.gov/the-bidens-influence-peddling-timeline/
Alan
2025-01-24 01:51:16 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 14:58:34 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Or your own "innocent" family like Joe did.
Do you have any actual evidence of any wrongdoing
No "wrongdoing"?
Then, why were they pardoned.
If they did nothing wrong, Trump CAN'T put them in jail or even charge them with anything.
So, why DID feeble Joe pardon his family and others who were never charged with anything?
Cart before the horse.
Do YOU have any actual EVIDENCE that any Biden family member is guilty
of anything beyond an income tax issue for Hunter Biden.
https://oversight.house.gov/the-bidens-influence-peddling-timeline/
Read it for a change.
I asked you before to produce the strongest piece of evidence you think
it contains...
...and you punked.
Just because you refuse to accept the facts posted in my link means nothing.
If it walks like a duck etc....
Nope.

The difference is that the only way /I/ could satisfy you is to read the
entire thing and refute every piece of it.

YOU, on the other hand, get to pick whichever item is most damning...

...but you won't.
Post by pothead
And BTW it's far more incriminating evidence than some wackadoodle kook
accusing Trump of rape.
She can't remember dates.
Lied about the dress she was wearing.
Can't remember specifics.
Accused another man of rape.
etc.
Skeeter
2025-01-24 16:44:17 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 14:58:34 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Or your own "innocent" family like Joe did.
Do you have any actual evidence of any wrongdoing
No "wrongdoing"?
Then, why were they pardoned.
If they did nothing wrong, Trump CAN'T put them in jail or even charge them with anything.
So, why DID feeble Joe pardon his family and others who were never charged with anything?
Cart before the horse.
Do YOU have any actual EVIDENCE that any Biden family member is guilty
of anything beyond an income tax issue for Hunter Biden.
https://oversight.house.gov/the-bidens-influence-peddling-timeline/
Read it for a change.
I asked you before to produce the strongest piece of evidence you think
it contains...
...and you punked.
Just because you refuse to accept the facts posted in my link means nothing.
If it walks like a duck etc....
Nope.
The difference is that the only way /I/ could satisfy you is to read the
entire thing and refute every piece of it.
YOU, on the other hand, get to pick whichever item is most damning...
...but you won't.
Post by pothead
And BTW it's far more incriminating evidence than some wackadoodle kook
accusing Trump of rape.
She can't remember dates.
Lied about the dress she was wearing.
Can't remember specifics.
Accused another man of rape.
etc.
So why did Joe pardon all those people?
Michael A Terrell
2025-01-24 18:32:01 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On 1/24/2025 8:44 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 14:58:34 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Or your own "innocent" family like Joe did.
Do you have any actual evidence of any wrongdoing
No "wrongdoing"?
Then, why were they pardoned.
If they did nothing wrong, Trump CAN'T put them in jail or even charge them with anything.
So, why DID feeble Joe pardon his family and others who were never charged with anything?
Cart before the horse.
Do YOU have any actual EVIDENCE that any Biden family member is guilty
of anything beyond an income tax issue for Hunter Biden.
https://oversight.house.gov/the-bidens-influence-peddling-timeline/
Read it for a change.
I asked you before to produce the strongest piece of evidence you think
it contains...
...and you punked.
Just because you refuse to accept the facts posted in my link means nothing.
If it walks like a duck etc....
Nope.
The difference is that the only way /I/ could satisfy you is to read the
entire thing and refute every piece of it.
YOU, on the other hand, get to pick whichever item is most damning...
...but you won't.
Post by pothead
And BTW it's far more incriminating evidence than some wackadoodle kook
accusing Trump of rape.
She can't remember dates.
Lied about the dress she was wearing.
Can't remember specifics.
Accused another man of rape.
etc.
So why did Joe pardon all those people?
Asked and answered, Skeeter-Shit
--
Another content-free post from Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing
fuzzy lion
2025-01-24 20:34:27 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Michael A Terrell
On 1/24/2025 8:44 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 14:58:34 -0800,  Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Or your own "innocent" family like Joe did.
Do you have any actual evidence of any wrongdoing
No "wrongdoing"?
Then, why were they pardoned.
If they did nothing wrong, Trump CAN'T put them in jail or even
charge them with anything.
So, why DID feeble Joe pardon his family and others who were
never charged with anything?
Cart before the horse.
Do YOU have any actual EVIDENCE that any Biden family member is guilty
of anything beyond an income tax issue for Hunter Biden.
https://oversight.house.gov/the-bidens-influence-peddling-timeline/
Read it for a change.
I asked you before to produce the strongest piece of evidence you think
it contains...
...and you punked.
Just because you refuse to accept the facts posted in my link means nothing.
If it walks like a duck etc....
Nope.
The difference is that the only way /I/ could satisfy you is to read the
entire thing and refute every piece of it.
YOU, on the other hand, get to pick whichever item is most damning...
...but you won't.
Post by pothead
And BTW it's far more incriminating evidence than some wackadoodle kook
accusing Trump of rape.
She can't remember dates.
Lied about the dress she was wearing.
Can't remember specifics.
Accused another man of rape.
etc.
So why did Joe pardon all those people?
Asked and answered, Skeeter-Shit
Preemptive excuses are not answers.
Michael A Terrell
2025-01-24 20:37:01 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by fuzzy lion
Post by Michael A Terrell
On 1/24/2025 8:44 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 14:58:34 -0800,  Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Or your own "innocent" family like Joe did.
Do you have any actual evidence of any wrongdoing
No "wrongdoing"?
Then, why were they pardoned.
If they did nothing wrong, Trump CAN'T put them in jail or even charge
them with anything.
So, why DID feeble Joe pardon his family and others who were never
charged with anything?
Cart before the horse.
Do YOU have any actual EVIDENCE that any Biden family member is guilty
of anything beyond an income tax issue for Hunter Biden.
https://oversight.house.gov/the-bidens-influence-peddling-timeline/
Read it for a change.
I asked you before to produce the strongest piece of evidence you think
it contains...
...and you punked.
Just because you refuse to accept the facts posted in my link means nothing.
If it walks like a duck etc....
Nope.
The difference is that the only way /I/ could satisfy you is to read the
entire thing and refute every piece of it.
YOU, on the other hand, get to pick whichever item is most damning...
...but you won't.
Post by pothead
And BTW it's far more incriminating evidence than some wackadoodle kook
accusing Trump of rape.
She can't remember dates.
Lied about the dress she was wearing.
Can't remember specifics.
Accused another man of rape.
etc.
So why did Joe pardon all those people?
Asked and answered, Skeeter-Shit
Preemptive excuses are not answers.
Fuck off, you incompetent trolling blowjob.
--
Another content-free post from Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing
Skeeter
2025-01-24 16:42:57 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 14:58:34 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Or your own "innocent" family like Joe did.
Do you have any actual evidence of any wrongdoing
No "wrongdoing"?
Then, why were they pardoned.
If they did nothing wrong, Trump CAN'T put them in jail or even charge them with anything.
So, why DID feeble Joe pardon his family and others who were never charged with anything?
Cart before the horse.
Do YOU have any actual EVIDENCE that any Biden family member is guilty
of anything beyond an income tax issue for Hunter Biden.
https://oversight.house.gov/the-bidens-influence-peddling-timeline/
Read it for a change.
I asked you before to produce the strongest piece of evidence you think
it contains...
...and you punked.
and you wont read what she posted because it would slap you silly.
pothead
2025-01-24 16:55:29 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 14:58:34 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Or your own "innocent" family like Joe did.
Do you have any actual evidence of any wrongdoing
No "wrongdoing"?
Then, why were they pardoned.
If they did nothing wrong, Trump CAN'T put them in jail or even charge them with anything.
So, why DID feeble Joe pardon his family and others who were never charged with anything?
Cart before the horse.
Do YOU have any actual EVIDENCE that any Biden family member is guilty
of anything beyond an income tax issue for Hunter Biden.
https://oversight.house.gov/the-bidens-influence-peddling-timeline/
Read it for a change.
I asked you before to produce the strongest piece of evidence you think
it contains...
...and you punked.
and you wont read what she posted because it would slap you silly.
At the very least, that timeline stinks of money laundering.
Legitimate businesses do not operate like that.
And BTW, several US banks in conjunction with the US Treasuray Dept.
flagged over 150 suspicious transactions involving the Biden family.


And again, so what was the Biden's selling in order to get foreign countries
and leaders, powerful influential people to transfer millions into Biden family
accounts?
It certainly wasn't Hunter's expertise because for a lot of that time he was a strung out
crack addict blowing tons of money on prostitutes.
--
pothead

Why did Joe Biden pardon his family?
Read below to learn the reason.
The Biden Crime Family Timeline here:
https://oversight.house.gov/the-bidens-influence-peddling-timeline/
Skeeter
2025-01-24 16:06:42 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 14:58:34 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Or your own "innocent" family like Joe did.
Do you have any actual evidence of any wrongdoing
No "wrongdoing"?
Then, why were they pardoned.
If they did nothing wrong, Trump CAN'T put them in jail or even charge them with anything.
So, why DID feeble Joe pardon his family and others who were never charged with anything?
Cart before the horse.
Do YOU have any actual EVIDENCE that any Biden family member is guilty
of anything beyond an income tax issue for Hunter Biden.
and the weapons charge.
Post by Alan
Bear in mind that the Republicans spent pretty much all of 2023 looking
for such evidence and didn't find it.
Then why the pardon?
Michael A Terrell
2025-01-24 18:30:41 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On 1/24/2025 8:06 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 14:58:34 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Or your own "innocent" family like Joe did.
Do you have any actual evidence of any wrongdoing
No "wrongdoing"?
Then, why were they pardoned.
If they did nothing wrong, Trump CAN'T put them in jail or even charge them with anything.
So, why DID feeble Joe pardon his family and others who were never charged with anything?
Cart before the horse.
Do YOU have any actual EVIDENCE that any Biden family member is guilty
of anything beyond an income tax issue for Hunter Biden.
and the weapons charge.
Post by Alan
Bear in mind that the Republicans spent pretty much all of 2023 looking
for such evidence and didn't find it.
Then why the pardon?
Asked and answered, Skeeter-Shit
--
Another content-free post from Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing
fuzzy lion
2025-01-24 20:32:26 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Michael A Terrell
On 1/24/2025 8:06 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 14:58:34 -0800,  Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Or your own "innocent" family like Joe did.
Do you have any actual evidence of any wrongdoing
No "wrongdoing"?
Then, why were they pardoned.
If they did nothing wrong, Trump CAN'T put them in jail or even
charge them with anything.
So, why DID feeble Joe pardon his family and others who were never
charged with anything?
Cart before the horse.
Do YOU have any actual EVIDENCE that any Biden family member is guilty
of anything beyond an income tax issue for Hunter Biden.
and the weapons charge.
Post by Alan
Bear in mind that the Republicans spent pretty much all of 2023 looking
for such evidence and didn't find it.
Then why the pardon?
Asked and answered, Skeeter-Shit
What crimes did they need to be pardoned for?
Michael A Terrell
2025-01-24 20:36:19 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by fuzzy lion
Post by Michael A Terrell
On 1/24/2025 8:06 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 14:58:34 -0800,  Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Or your own "innocent" family like Joe did.
Do you have any actual evidence of any wrongdoing
No "wrongdoing"?
Then, why were they pardoned.
If they did nothing wrong, Trump CAN'T put them in jail or even charge them
with anything.
So, why DID feeble Joe pardon his family and others who were never charged
with anything?
Cart before the horse.
Do YOU have any actual EVIDENCE that any Biden family member is guilty
of anything beyond an income tax issue for Hunter Biden.
and the weapons charge.
Post by Alan
Bear in mind that the Republicans spent pretty much all of 2023 looking
for such evidence and didn't find it.
Then why the pardon?
Asked and answered, Skeeter-Shit
What crimes did they need to be pardoned for?
Asked and answered, you stupid trolling blowjob.
--
Another content-free post from Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing
AlleyCat
2025-01-24 17:22:10 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:32:22 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
So, why DID feeble Joe pardon his family and others who were never charged with anything?
Cart before the horse.
So... what's the "horse"?
Post by Alan
Do YOU have any actual EVIDENCE that any Biden family member is guilty
of anything beyond an income tax issue for Hunter Biden.
Not the topic.

YOU'RE saying that Trump would go after the Biden family, so that's why feeble Joe pardoned them.

WHAT did they DO that would cause Trump to "threaten them with retribution"?

I see you never answered these questions, chicken shit faggot.

Retribution?

"Retribution", for what?

What crime(s) did they commit, that would cause Trump to seek "retribution"?

You have to have committed a crime to be pardoned... right?

How is what Biden did legal?

Show us the law Biden was following to pardon those who don't NEED pardoning.

Has Trump pardoned pelpe who havn't committed a crime?

Chicken shit faggot, will faggot out and not answer.

=====

Trump WINS!

Donald Trump is the 47th U.S. president, defeating Vice President Kamala Harris.

Republican Donald Trump was elected President of the United States in the 2024 election, defeating Vice President Kamala Harris.

Trump, 78, will begin his second term early next year.

Donald Trump will be inaugurated as the U.S. President on Monday, January 20, 2025, on the West Front of the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C.

A Second Trump Administration
pothead
2025-01-23 23:46:43 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 14:58:34 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Or your own "innocent" family like Joe did.
Do you have any actual evidence of any wrongdoing
No "wrongdoing"?
Then, why were they pardoned.
If they did nothing wrong, Trump CAN'T put them in jail or even charge them with anything.
So, why DID feeble Joe pardon his family and others who were never charged with anything?
Biden pardoned them because they are the direct link to his crimes and at this point all he and Jill
cares about is his legacy.

Personally if I were Trump I would leave the Biden's alone.
They are totally disgraced and when the books begin to get released it will tarnish him forever.

Concentrate on the deep state instead.
Track them down, weed them out and fire them.
Trump is off to a good start already.

Ford pardoned Nixon and let it all go because the country needed healing at the time.
Trump should do likewise.
--
pothead

Why did Joe Biden pardon his family?
Read below to learn the reason.
The Biden Crime Family Timeline here:
https://oversight.house.gov/the-bidens-influence-peddling-timeline/
Alan
2025-01-24 01:15:51 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by pothead
Post by AlleyCat
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 14:58:34 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Or your own "innocent" family like Joe did.
Do you have any actual evidence of any wrongdoing
No "wrongdoing"?
Then, why were they pardoned.
If they did nothing wrong, Trump CAN'T put them in jail or even charge them with anything.
So, why DID feeble Joe pardon his family and others who were never charged with anything?
Biden pardoned them because they are the direct link to his crimes and at this point all he and Jill
cares about is his legacy.
Alleged crimes for which you cannot cite a shred of evidence.
Post by pothead
Personally if I were Trump I would leave the Biden's alone.
They are totally disgraced and when the books begin to get released it will tarnish him forever.
Concentrate on the deep state instead.
Track them down, weed them out and fire them.
Trump is off to a good start already.
Ford pardoned Nixon and let it all go because the country needed healing at the time.
Trump should do likewise.
Nixon actually WAS a crook.
pothead
2025-01-24 01:29:06 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by AlleyCat
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 14:58:34 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Or your own "innocent" family like Joe did.
Do you have any actual evidence of any wrongdoing
No "wrongdoing"?
Then, why were they pardoned.
If they did nothing wrong, Trump CAN'T put them in jail or even charge them with anything.
So, why DID feeble Joe pardon his family and others who were never charged with anything?
Biden pardoned them because they are the direct link to his crimes and at this point all he and Jill
cares about is his legacy.
Alleged crimes for which you cannot cite a shred of evidence.
So you actually believe all of this is simply a coincidence?
Wake up.

If it walks like a duck etc.......

The Biden Crime Family Timeline here:
https://oversight.house.gov/the-bidens-influence-peddling-timeline/
--
pothead

Why did Joe Biden pardon his family?
Read below to learn the reason.
The Biden Crime Family Timeline here:
https://oversight.house.gov/the-bidens-influence-peddling-timeline/
Alan
2025-01-24 01:50:04 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by AlleyCat
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 14:58:34 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Or your own "innocent" family like Joe did.
Do you have any actual evidence of any wrongdoing
No "wrongdoing"?
Then, why were they pardoned.
If they did nothing wrong, Trump CAN'T put them in jail or even charge them with anything.
So, why DID feeble Joe pardon his family and others who were never charged with anything?
Biden pardoned them because they are the direct link to his crimes and at this point all he and Jill
cares about is his legacy.
Alleged crimes for which you cannot cite a shred of evidence.
So you actually believe all of this is simply a coincidence?
Wake up.
If it walks like a duck etc.......
https://oversight.house.gov/the-bidens-influence-peddling-timeline/
Why is it you cannot pick a single fact from that link that you think is
damning?
Skeeter
2025-01-24 16:46:28 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by AlleyCat
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 14:58:34 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Or your own "innocent" family like Joe did.
Do you have any actual evidence of any wrongdoing
No "wrongdoing"?
Then, why were they pardoned.
If they did nothing wrong, Trump CAN'T put them in jail or even charge them with anything.
So, why DID feeble Joe pardon his family and others who were never charged with anything?
Biden pardoned them because they are the direct link to his crimes and at this point all he and Jill
cares about is his legacy.
Alleged crimes for which you cannot cite a shred of evidence.
So you actually believe all of this is simply a coincidence?
Wake up.
If it walks like a duck etc.......
https://oversight.house.gov/the-bidens-influence-peddling-timeline/
Why is it you cannot pick a single fact from that link that you think is
damning?
Pardoning his family is damning enough.
Michael A Terrell
2025-01-24 18:34:30 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On 1/24/2025 8:46 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by AlleyCat
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 14:58:34 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Or your own "innocent" family like Joe did.
Do you have any actual evidence of any wrongdoing
No "wrongdoing"?
Then, why were they pardoned.
If they did nothing wrong, Trump CAN'T put them in jail or even charge them with anything.
So, why DID feeble Joe pardon his family and others who were never charged with anything?
Biden pardoned them because they are the direct link to his crimes and at this point all he and Jill
cares about is his legacy.
Alleged crimes for which you cannot cite a shred of evidence.
So you actually believe all of this is simply a coincidence?
Wake up.
If it walks like a duck etc.......
https://oversight.house.gov/the-bidens-influence-peddling-timeline/
Why is it you cannot pick a single fact from that link that you think is
damning?
Pardoning his family is damning enough.
Those were preemptive pardons to prevent the criminal Trump from going after
them. We know this.
--
Another content-free post from Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing
fuzzy lion
2025-01-24 20:37:53 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Michael A Terrell
On 1/24/2025 8:46 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 14:58:34 -0800,  Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Or your own "innocent" family like Joe did.
Do you have any actual evidence of any wrongdoing
No "wrongdoing"?
Then, why were they pardoned.
If they did nothing wrong, Trump CAN'T put them in jail or even
charge them with anything.
So, why DID feeble Joe pardon his family and others who were
never charged with anything?
Biden pardoned them because they are the direct link to his crimes
and at this point all he and Jill
cares about is his legacy.
Alleged crimes for which you cannot cite a shred of evidence.
So you actually believe all of this is simply a coincidence?
Wake up.
If it walks like a duck etc.......
https://oversight.house.gov/the-bidens-influence-peddling-timeline/
Why is it you cannot pick a single fact from that link that you think is
damning?
Pardoning his family is damning enough.
Those were preemptive pardons to prevent the criminal Trump from going
after them. We know this.
A pardon is just a piece of paper. It's not body armor.
Siri Cruise
2025-01-24 05:53:56 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Biden pardoned them because they are the direct link to his crimes and at this point all he and Jill
cares about is his legacy.
Alleged crimes for which you cannot cite a shred of evidence.
So you actually believe all of this is simply a coincidence?
Is that your proof beyond reasonable doubt?
--
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed
Skeeter
2025-01-24 16:45:37 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by AlleyCat
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 14:58:34 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Or your own "innocent" family like Joe did.
Do you have any actual evidence of any wrongdoing
No "wrongdoing"?
Then, why were they pardoned.
If they did nothing wrong, Trump CAN'T put them in jail or even charge them with anything.
So, why DID feeble Joe pardon his family and others who were never charged with anything?
Biden pardoned them because they are the direct link to his crimes and at this point all he and Jill
cares about is his legacy.
Alleged crimes for which you cannot cite a shred of evidence.
Post by pothead
Personally if I were Trump I would leave the Biden's alone.
They are totally disgraced and when the books begin to get released it will tarnish him forever.
Concentrate on the deep state instead.
Track them down, weed them out and fire them.
Trump is off to a good start already.
Ford pardoned Nixon and let it all go because the country needed healing at the time.
Trump should do likewise.
Nixon actually WAS a crook.
and was pardoned. Innocent people don't need pardons.
Michael A Terrell
2025-01-24 18:33:15 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On 1/24/2025 8:45 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by AlleyCat
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 14:58:34 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Or your own "innocent" family like Joe did.
Do you have any actual evidence of any wrongdoing
No "wrongdoing"?
Then, why were they pardoned.
If they did nothing wrong, Trump CAN'T put them in jail or even charge them with anything.
So, why DID feeble Joe pardon his family and others who were never charged with anything?
Biden pardoned them because they are the direct link to his crimes and at this point all he and Jill
cares about is his legacy.
Alleged crimes for which you cannot cite a shred of evidence.
Post by pothead
Personally if I were Trump I would leave the Biden's alone.
They are totally disgraced and when the books begin to get released it will tarnish him forever.
Concentrate on the deep state instead.
Track them down, weed them out and fire them.
Trump is off to a good start already.
Ford pardoned Nixon and let it all go because the country needed healing at the time.
Trump should do likewise.
Nixon actually WAS a crook.
and was pardoned. Innocent people don't need pardons.
Innocent people who face malicious prosecution from a tyrant do.
--
Another content-free post from Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing
fuzzy lion
2025-01-24 20:35:37 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Michael A Terrell
On 1/24/2025 8:45 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 14:58:34 -0800,  Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Or your own "innocent" family like Joe did.
Do you have any actual evidence of any wrongdoing
No "wrongdoing"?
Then, why were they pardoned.
If they did nothing wrong, Trump CAN'T put them in jail or even
charge them with anything.
So, why DID feeble Joe pardon his family and others who were never
charged with anything?
Biden pardoned them because they are the direct link to his crimes
and at this point all he and Jill
cares about is his legacy.
Alleged crimes for which you cannot cite a shred of evidence.
Post by pothead
Personally if I were Trump I would leave the Biden's alone.
They are totally disgraced and when the books begin to get released
it will tarnish him forever.
Concentrate on the deep state instead.
Track them down, weed them out and fire them.
Trump is off to a good start already.
Ford pardoned Nixon and let it all go because the country needed healing at the time.
Trump should do likewise.
Nixon actually WAS a crook.
and was pardoned. Innocent people don't need pardons.
Innocent people who face malicious prosecution from a tyrant do.
Like when Biden and Harris tried to hang Trump.
Michael A Terrell
2025-01-24 21:23:09 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by fuzzy lion
Post by Michael A Terrell
On 1/24/2025 8:45 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 14:58:34 -0800,  Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Or your own "innocent" family like Joe did.
Do you have any actual evidence of any wrongdoing
No "wrongdoing"?
Then, why were they pardoned.
If they did nothing wrong, Trump CAN'T put them in jail or even charge
them with anything.
So, why DID feeble Joe pardon his family and others who were never charged
with anything?
Biden pardoned them because they are the direct link to his crimes and at
this point all he and Jill
cares about is his legacy.
Alleged crimes for which you cannot cite a shred of evidence.
Post by pothead
Personally if I were Trump I would leave the Biden's alone.
They are totally disgraced and when the books begin to get released it will
tarnish him forever.
Concentrate on the deep state instead.
Track them down, weed them out and fire them.
Trump is off to a good start already.
Ford pardoned Nixon and let it all go because the country needed healing at
the time.
Trump should do likewise.
Nixon actually WAS a crook.
and was pardoned. Innocent people don't need pardons.
Innocent people who face malicious prosecution from a tyrant do.
Like when
No, spammy.

Blow it out your gaping HIV-oozing asshole, spammy.
--
Another content-free post from Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing
John Smyth
2025-01-24 02:54:41 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On 1/23/2025 3:46 PM, "pothole," chromosomally and anatomically male but not the
Post by pothead
Post by AlleyCat
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 14:58:34 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Or your own "innocent" family like Joe did.
Do you have any actual evidence of any wrongdoing
No "wrongdoing"?
Then, why were they pardoned.
Asked and answered.
Post by pothead
Post by AlleyCat
If they did nothing wrong, Trump CAN'T put them in jail or even charge them with anything.
So, why DID feeble Joe pardon his family and others who were never charged with anything?
Biden pardoned them because they are the direct link to his crimes and
No. He pardoned them to prevent Trump from launching baseless meritless
prosecutions of them for crimes they didn't commit. Trump would have done it. He
*said* he would.

There is no evidence of any Biden "crimes". The House oversight committee said
as much.
Skeeter
2025-01-24 16:47:18 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by John Smyth
On 1/23/2025 3:46 PM, "pothole," chromosomally and anatomically male but not the
Post by pothead
Post by AlleyCat
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 14:58:34 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Or your own "innocent" family like Joe did.
Do you have any actual evidence of any wrongdoing
No "wrongdoing"?
Then, why were they pardoned.
Asked and answered.
Post by pothead
Post by AlleyCat
If they did nothing wrong, Trump CAN'T put them in jail or even charge them with anything.
So, why DID feeble Joe pardon his family and others who were never charged with anything?
Biden pardoned them because they are the direct link to his crimes and
No. He pardoned them to prevent Trump from launching baseless meritless
prosecutions of them for crimes they didn't commit. Trump would have done it. He
*said* he would.
There is no evidence of any Biden "crimes". The House oversight committee said
as much.
Then no need for a pardon stupid.
AlleyCat
2025-01-24 17:22:14 UTC
Reply
Permalink
['oh.no.this.definitely.is.NOT.going.to.can.politics' psycho gratuitous bullshit crosspost removed]

[subject line vandalism by commie tip-toeing to suck boyfriend's cock, repaired]

=====

On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 18:54:41 -0800, Rudy Canoza, forever the mental and physical midget, who was *NEVER* a three sport letterman, like me, and who
was *NEVER* a bouncer, like me, and who was *NEVER* an assistant golf pro, like me, and who was *NEVER* a lifeguard, like me, and who *NEVER* dunked
a basketball, like me, and has *NEVER* laid as many women as me, says...
Post by John Smyth
Post by pothead
Biden pardoned them because they are the direct link to his crimes and
No. He pardoned them to prevent Trump from launching baseless meritless
prosecutions of them for crimes they didn't commit.
If they committed no crimes, then, how could Trump "prosecute" them?

============================================================================

AlleyCat is one of the several people who dominate Rudy on a daily basis, keeping their bootheels on his little pencil neck to the amusement of all.

[I Just *LOVE* The Way This Sig-file Makes Boi-Fucker Lose His Fucking Mind]

Rudy's Little Man's Disease: A disease of short males marked by aggressive antisocial behavior and constant overcompensation resulting in pompous
mannerisms such as spitting, twitching, swearing, speaking loudly and tough talk.

"I can kill you with one hand. You know this." - Rudy

The disease only affects teenagers or men who are less than 5' 6" tall.

"I'm about eight inches shorter than Trump [6' 2"]." - Rudy

The severity of this disease is inversely proportional to the height of the sufferer. Other characteristics of this scourge are a very short penis,
acne, low I.Q and bad etiquette.

Often these males are homophobic to the point of insanity because of latent sexual orientation issues.

**FAGGOT!** - Rudy Canoza

"Fixed your lie, you you no-fight faggot." - Rudy Canoza

"Thanks for kicking my faggot ass." - Rudy Canoza

"'Self' is redundant, you toothless squat-to-piss no-fight faggot. - Rudy Canoza

"I've beaten *you* to a bloody pulp, you squat-to-piss *no-fight* faggot - every fucking time. You're a zero, as every, stale, squat-to-piss *no-
fight* faggot who incessantly bleats about "mommy's basement" *ALWAYS* is." - Rudy Canoza

"... you you no-fight faggot." - Rudy Canoza

"... you toothless squat-to-piss no-fight faggot" - Rudy Canoza

"Kicked your flabby faggot ass again. Yes." - Rudy Canoza

"You a Squat-to-Piss Faggot." - Rudy Canoza

"The disgusting gurgling, slurping sounds below are just the faggots Hartung, Sanitary Napkin and Bit of Nothingness enjoying a three-way" - Rudy
Canoza

"YOU lose, Nazi faggot." - Rudy Canoza

Little Man's Disease is an untreatable epidemic in this country.

This is Rudy Canoza: https://i.imgur.com/kDtydh1.mp4

===============================================================================

"Trump Derangement Syndrome" Is a Real Mental Condition

All you need to know about "Trump Derangement Syndrome," or TDS.

"Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) is a mental condition in which a person has been driven effectively insane due to their dislike of Donald Trump, to
the point at which they will abandon all logic and reason."

Justin Raimondo, the editorial director of Antiwar.com, wrote a piece in the Los Angeles Times in 2016 that broke TDS down into three distinct phases
or stages:

"In the first stage of the disease, victims lose all sense of proportion. The president-elect's every tweet provokes a firestorm, as if 140
characters were all it took to change the world."

"The mid-level stages of TDS have a profound effect on the victim's vocabulary: Sufferers speak a distinctive language consisting solely of
hyperbole."

"As TDS progresses, the afflicted lose the ability to distinguish fantasy from reality."

The Point here is simple: TDS is, in the eyes of its adherents, the knee-jerk opposition from liberals to anything and everything Trump does. If
Trump announced he was donating every dollar he's ever made, TDS sufferers would suggest he was up to something nefarious, according to the logic of
TDS. There's nothing - not. one. thing. - that Trump could do or say that would be received positively by TDSers.

The history of Trump Derangement Syndrome actually goes back to the early 2000s - a time when the idea of Trump as president was a punch line for
late-night comics and nothing more.

Wikipedia traces its roots to "Bush Derangement Syndrome" - a term first coined by the late conservative columnist Charles Krauthammer back in 2003.
The condition, as Krauthammer defined it, was "the acute onset of paranoia in otherwise normal people in reaction to the policies, the presidency -
nay - the very existence of George W. Bush."

Added Krauthammer:

"Some clinicians consider this delusion - that Americans can only get their news from one part of the political spectrum - the gravest of all. They
report that no matter how many times sufferers in padded cells are presented with flash cards with the symbols ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC, NPR, PBS,
Time, Newsweek, New York Times, Washington Post, L.A. Times - they remain unresponsive, some in a terrifying near-catatonic torpor."

(If you don't realize the idea of TDS or BDS is - in no small part - meant in a tongue-in-cheek manner then, well, you may well have it.)

Trump allies believe that TDS is worse than ODS or BDS - by a lot. Wrote conservative pundit Bernie Goldberg on Real Clear Politics in early 2017:

"Before the election, the victims of TDS routinely compared Donald Trump to Hitler. Guess what. They're still doing it. Articles in respectable
publications written by professors at elite universities are warning us to be on guard, that a Trump presidency could imperil democracy-as-we-know-it
and may very well spell doom for American civilization.

"On election night, as it became obvious that their worst nightmare was about to come true, some libs fainted. Some vomited. Many more threatened to
leave the country, but I'm pretty sure none actually did. As Donald Trump might say in a tweet: so sad!"

The truth is that TDS is just the preferred nomenclature of Trump defenders who view those who oppose him and his policies as nothing more than the
blind hatred of those who preach tolerance and free speech. Viewed more broadly, the rise of presidential derangement syndromes is a function of
increased polarization - not to mention our national self-sorting - at work in the country today.

We no longer live around, work around or pal around with people who think any differently than us. We watch cable news that affirms what we already
think. We read ideological "news" sites that tell us how good our side is and how bad the other one is. And on and on and on.

Is it any wonder then that we are increasingly willing to lump those who disagree with us into the "deranged" category? To say that those who don't
share our views are mentally deficient in some way?

What does it say about a President - and about a country - when the standard response to those with whom you disagree is that they must be crazy?
Nothing good, for sure.

=====

Many clinicians, political commentators, and members of the public have speculated upon the mental health of President Donald Trump. Indeed, over
70,000 people self-identifying as "mental health professionals" have signed a petition declaring that "Trump is mentally ill and must be removed." In
sociological terms, the "medical gaze" has been hitherto focused on President Trump, and to a lesser extent his ardent supporters.

However, in recent months, many have been questioning the direction of this "medical gaze." In fact, more and more people are suggesting that this
"medical gaze" should be reversed and refocused on President Trump's most embittered and partisan opponents. Some have even suggested that these
opponents are experiencing a specific mental condition-a condition which has been labelled "Trump Derangement Syndrome" (TDS).
What does DSM-5 say about "Trump Derangement Syndrome"?

Mental illnesses are officially classified in a dense and dry book published by the American Psychiatric Association (APA) known as the Diagnostic
and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5). This book contains 947 pages and lists hundreds of mental disorders; TDS is
nowhere to be seen. Similarly, a review of scholarly databases such as MEDLINE and Google Scholar reveal no academic papers on this alleged syndrome.
Officially at least, TDS is not a real, diagnosable, or treatable mental disorder.

That said, medical anthropologists and critical sociologists have convincingly argued that DSM-5 is a flawed document. Indeed, social scientists have
long recognized that there are numerous "folk categories" of mental disorders that are considered real conditions by the general public, even though
they are not recognized as such in the DSM. These include categories such as "burnout" or "nervous breakdown."

As such, lack of official recognition does not mean that TDS is not a real mental condition.


Lay Understandings of "Trump Derangement Syndrome"

There is no shared lay understanding of TDS, mainly because it is a folk category rather than a professional category. As such, there is currently
much armchair speculation about the nature and existence of TDS, without consensus.

The name itself explicitly suggests a "syndrome," which the Oxford English Dictionary defines as "a characteristic combination of opinions, emotions,
or behavior." Several commentators have run with this, putting forth suggestions about opinions, emotions and behaviors characterizing TDS.

Shared amongst these is a notion that the everyday activities of President Trump trigger some people into distorted opinions, extreme emotions and
hysterical behaviors. Well-known writer Bernard Goldberg gives supposed behavioral examples of TDS among Trump's political opponents, including
fainting, vomiting, students retreating to "safe spaces" and others demanding "therapy dogs." Political commentator Justin Raimondo focuses on
opinions, language and cognition, writing in the LA Times that "sufferers speak a distinctive language consisting of hyperbole [leading to] a
constant state of hysteria... the afflicted lose touch with reality."

Such forms of highly emotional reaction could be something akin to the fainting and screaming characterizing American Beatlemania in the 1960s.
Unlike the Beatles, however, the extreme emotional reaction alleged to characterize TDS is not based on adoration and admiration, but on fear and
loathing.

Contrariwise, many others ridicule the notion that TDS is anything but a malicious slur term used to discredit and delegitimize criticism of
President Trump. For example, CNN's Chris Cillizza may speak for many when he stated: "The truth is that TDS is just the preferred nomenclature of
Trump defenders who view those who oppose him and his policies as nothing more than blind hatred." Likewise, Adam Gopnik writes that "our problem is
not TDS; our problem is Deranged Trump Self-Delusion."

In other words, there are polarized opinions about the nature, reality and existence of TDS.


Conclusion

The wider public may be unaware that psychiatrists and social scientists spend considerable time and energy behind closed doors pondering over the
existence and reality of mental conditions. This has led the APA to revise the DSM five times since 1952, considerably expanding the list of official
mental disorders with each revision. As far as I am aware, few psychiatrists are currently arguing that DSM-6 should contain TDS as a mental
disorder.

That said, in its official definition of mental disorder, the DSM-5 states that "a mental disorder is a syndrome characterized by clinically
significant disturbance in an individual's cognition, emotion regulation, or behavior... mental disorders are usually associated with significant
distress in social, occupational, or other important activities."

Many have argued that some people have been seriously disturbed and distressed by the policies, speech, behavior, and tweets of President Trump, so
much so that it has affected their cognitive, affective, and behavioral functioning. Such people may need mental health support. As such, further
research is necessary to investigate the extreme reactions toward President Trump, in the same way that researchers investigate other extreme social
phenomena, such as Beatlemania or the like. This will shed light on the reality of this emerging folk category that has been labelled by many as
"Trump Derangement Syndrome."
Skeeter
2025-01-24 16:05:32 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 04:31:49 -0500, JTEM says...
https://www.cnn.com/2025/01/21/politics/what-to-know-pardons-january-6-trump/index.html
So much for the "conservative" "party of law and order", eh, kooks?
They didn't kill any cops.
On guard had a heart attack. Even if the excitement triggered
it, he had a heart condition.
Literally EVERYTHING you think you know it utter bullshit.
They gaslight you, and you in return let them get away with
it.
Sicknick died of stroke.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gh57sy6XAAA0Vpl?format=jpg&name=large
So it's OK to pardon people who are convicted of assaulting police
officers...
Or your own "innocent" family like Joe did.
Do you have any actual evidence of any wrongdoing beyond an income tax
issue that typically doesn't result in any charges at all, let alone
conviction?
Then why pardon them?
Michael A Terrell
2025-01-24 18:29:36 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On 1/24/2025 8:05 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 04:31:49 -0500, JTEM says...
https://www.cnn.com/2025/01/21/politics/what-to-know-pardons-january-6-trump/index.html
So much for the "conservative" "party of law and order", eh, kooks?
They didn't kill any cops.
On guard had a heart attack. Even if the excitement triggered
it, he had a heart condition.
Literally EVERYTHING you think you know it utter bullshit.
They gaslight you, and you in return let them get away with
it.
Sicknick died of stroke.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gh57sy6XAAA0Vpl?format=jpg&name=large
So it's OK to pardon people who are convicted of assaulting police
officers...
Or your own "innocent" family like Joe did.
Do you have any actual evidence of any wrongdoing beyond an income tax
issue that typically doesn't result in any charges at all, let alone
conviction?
Then why pardon them?
Asked and answered, Skeeter-Shit, you squat-to-piss faggot.
--
Another content-free post from Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing
fuzzy lion
2025-01-24 20:21:34 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Michael A Terrell
On 1/24/2025 8:05 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 04:31:49 -0500,  JTEM says...
https://www.cnn.com/2025/01/21/politics/what-to-know-pardons-january-6-trump/index.html
So much for the "conservative" "party of law and order", eh, kooks?
They didn't kill any cops.
On guard had a heart attack. Even if the excitement triggered
it, he had a heart condition.
Literally EVERYTHING you think you know it utter bullshit.
They gaslight you, and you in return let them get away with
it.
Sicknick died of stroke.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gh57sy6XAAA0Vpl?format=jpg&name=large
So it's OK to pardon people who are convicted of assaulting police
officers...
Or your own "innocent" family like Joe did.
Do you have any actual evidence of any wrongdoing beyond an income tax
issue that typically doesn't result in any charges at all, let alone
conviction?
Then why pardon them?
Asked and answered, Skeeter-Shit, you squat-to-piss faggot.
Then you admit the Bidens are guilty of treason?
Michael A Terrell
2025-01-24 20:38:29 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Michael A Terrell
On 1/24/2025 8:05 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 04:31:49 -0500,  JTEM says...
https://www.cnn.com/2025/01/21/politics/what-to-know-pardons-january-6-
trump/index.html
So much for the "conservative" "party of law and order", eh, kooks?
They didn't kill any cops.
On guard had a heart attack. Even if the excitement triggered
it, he had a heart condition.
Literally EVERYTHING you think you know it utter bullshit.
They gaslight you, and you in return let them get away with
it.
Sicknick died of stroke.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gh57sy6XAAA0Vpl?format=jpg&name=large
So it's OK to pardon people who are convicted of assaulting police
officers...
Or your own "innocent" family like Joe did.
Do you have any actual evidence of any wrongdoing beyond an income tax
issue that typically doesn't result in any charges at all, let alone
conviction?
Then why pardon them?
Asked and answered, Skeeter-Shit, you squat-to-piss faggot.
Then I admit Trump is guilty of insurrection.
Good, spammy, you stupid blowjob, because he is.
--
Another content-free post from Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing
AlleyCat
2025-01-23 22:58:11 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 11:53:06 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
So it's OK to pardon people who are convicted of assaulting police
officers...
...as long as the officers don't die?
So it's OK to pardon murders and rapists who are convicted?

=====

Trump WINS!

Donald Trump is the 47th U.S. president, defeating Vice President Kamala Harris.

Republican Donald Trump was elected President of the United States in the 2024 election, defeating Vice President Kamala Harris.

Trump, 78, will begin his second term early next year.

Donald Trump will be inaugurated as the U.S. President on Monday, January 20, 2025, on the West Front of the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C.

A Second Trump Administration

=====

Joe Biden: Pedophile



=====

Joe Biden: Criminal

Phone Calls: Testimony from witnesses who told lawmakers Biden joined on "multiple phone calls and had multiple interactions, dinners" with his son's
business partners, which the speaker alleged led to millions of dollars in payments and cars to Hunter Biden and his associates.

Hunter Biden's former business partner Devon Archer testified to the House Oversight Committee in July that he witnessed then-Vice President Biden
and his son have multiple "casual conversations" in the presence of Hunter's business partners, including on speakerphone, but Archer said they did
not involve any business discussions.

Payments to Family Members: Bank records show Hunter Biden and his business partners received $20 million in payments from various foreign entities
and about $7 million went directly to Biden family members, according to a Washington Post analysis.

Bank Records: Suspicious Activity Reports detail various foreign transactions Hunter Biden and his business partners engaged in-banks are required to
file these reports on a routine basis with the federal government to flag potential illegal activity.

Bribery: Bribery allegation brought by an FBI source that alleges the CEO of Burisma, a Ukrainian energy company Hunter Biden sat on the board of,
paid $10 million to members of the Biden family to help remove a Ukrainian corruption prosecutor.

The Bidens and their associates have received over $20 million in payments from foreign entities.

Romania: On September 28, 2015, Vice President Biden welcomed Romanian President Klaus Iohannis to the White House. Within five weeks of this
meeting, a Romanian businessman involved with a high-profile corruption prosecution in Romania, Gabriel Popoviciu, began depositing a Biden
associate's bank account, which ultimately made their way into Biden family accounts. Popoviciu made sixteen of the seventeen payments, totaling over
$3 million, to the Biden associate account while Joe Biden was Vice President. Biden family accounts ultimately received approximately $1.038
million. The total amount from Romania to the Biden family and their associates is over $3 million.

China- CEFC: On March 1, 2017-less than two months after Vice President Joe Biden left public office-State Energy HK Limited, a Chinese company,
wired $3 million to a Biden associate's account. This is the same bank account used in the above "Romania" section. After the Chinese company wired
the Biden associate account the $3 million, the Biden family received approximately $1,065,692 over a three-month period in different bank accounts.
Additionally, the CEFC Chairman gives Hunter Biden a diamond worth $80,000. Lastly, CEFC creates a joint venture with the Bidens in the summer of
2017. The timeline lays out the "WhatsApp" messages and subsequent wires from the Chinese to the Bidens of $100,000 and $5 million. The total amount
from China, specifically with CEFC and their related entities, to the Biden family and their associates is over $8 million.

China- Bohai Harvest RST Equity Investment Fund Management Co., Ltd. (BHR): More information will be provided in our upcoming Fourth Bank Memorandum.

Kazakhstan: On April 22, 2014, Kenes Rakishev, a Kazakhstani oligarch used his Singaporean entity, Novatus Holdings, to wire one of Hunter Biden's
Rosemont Seneca entities $142,300. The very next day-April 23, 2014-the Rosemont Seneca entity transferred the exact same amount of money to a car
dealership for a car for Hunter Biden. Hunter Biden and Devon Archer would represent Burisma in Kazakhstan in May/June of 2014 as the company
attempted to broker a three-way deal among Burisma, the Kazakhstan government, and a Chinese state-owned energy company.

Ukraine: Devon Archer joined the Burisma board of directors in spring of 2014 and was joined by Hunter Biden shortly thereafter. Hunter Biden joined
the company as counsel, but after a meeting with Burisma owner Mykola Zlochevsky in Lake Como, Italy, was elevated to the board of directors in the
spring of 2014. Both Biden and Archer were each paid $1 million per year for their positions on the board of directors. In December 2015, after a
Burisma board of directors meeting, Zlochevsky and Hunter Biden "called D.C." in the wake of mounting pressures the company was facing. Zlochevsky
was later charged with bribing Ukrainian officials with $6 million in an attempt to delay or drop the investigation into his company. The total
amount from Ukraine to the Biden family and their associates is $6.5 million.

Russia: On February 14, 2014, a Russian oligarch and Russia's richest woman, Yelena Baturina, wired a Rosemont Seneca entity $3.5 million. On March
11, 2014, the wire was split up: $750,000 was transferred to Devon Archer, and the remainder was sent to Rosemont Seneca Bohai, a company Devon
Archer and Hunter Biden split equally. In spring of 2014, Yelena Baturina joined Hunter Biden and Devon Archer to share a meal with then-Vice
President Biden at a restaurant in Washington, D.C. The total amount from Russia to the Biden family and their associates is $3.5 million.
Alan
2025-01-23 23:38:58 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 11:53:06 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
So it's OK to pardon people who are convicted of assaulting police
officers...
...as long as the officers don't die?
So it's OK to pardon murders and rapists who are convicted?
Such as...
JTEM
2025-01-24 04:02:09 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
So it's OK to pardon murders and rapists who are convicted?
Such as...
https://www.foxnews.com/us/biden-frees-radical-left-wing-killer-convicted-fbi-agents-murders-during-last-hours-president

You are a disgraceful piece of shit.

Honestly.

If you were trapped in an elevator while the building burned
down around you people would say, "But, couldn't the fire
department do something? It was a perfectly good elevator?!?"

Again and again and again and again you pretend to want information
that you already know exists, even if you're too retarded to
understand it, and too fucked-in-the-head to grasp that your
insistence that you can't figure out Google is NOT an endearing
quality.

I hope the next dog whose balls you lick bites you!
--
https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5
Alan
2025-01-24 04:19:53 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by JTEM
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
So it's OK to pardon murders and rapists who are convicted?
Such as...
https://www.foxnews.com/us/biden-frees-radical-left-wing-killer-
convicted-fbi-agents-murders-during-last-hours-president
He wasn't pardoned. His sentence was commuted.

Try again.

And while you're at it:

"The police officer who arrested Peltier, Bob Newbrook, is convinced
that he "was extradited illegally and that he didn't get a fair trial in
the United States""
AlleyCat
2025-01-24 17:22:11 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:38:58 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 11:53:06 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
So it's OK to pardon people who are convicted of assaulting police
officers...
...as long as the officers don't die?
So it's OK to pardon murders and rapists who are convicted?
Such as...
Google is your friend.

Start here: "to pardon murders and rapists who are convicted"

=====

Trump WINS!

Donald Trump is the 47th U.S. president, defeating Vice President Kamala Harris.

Republican Donald Trump was elected President of the United States in the 2024 election, defeating Vice President Kamala Harris.

Trump, 78, will begin his second term early next year.

Donald Trump will be inaugurated as the U.S. President on Monday, January 20, 2025, on the West Front of the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C.

A Second Trump Administration
Alan
2025-01-24 18:12:36 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:38:58 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 11:53:06 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
So it's OK to pardon people who are convicted of assaulting police
officers...
...as long as the officers don't die?
So it's OK to pardon murders and rapists who are convicted?
Such as...
Google is your friend.
Start here: "to pardon murders and rapists who are convicted"
Not my job...because I didn't make the claim.

But if you think it's so easy, you do it and show me how wrong I am.

You know you would if you could.

JTEM already tried...and failed.
Skeeter
2025-01-24 18:50:05 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:38:58 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 11:53:06 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
So it's OK to pardon people who are convicted of assaulting police
officers...
...as long as the officers don't die?
So it's OK to pardon murders and rapists who are convicted?
Such as...
Google is your friend.
Start here: "to pardon murders and rapists who are convicted"
Not my job...because I didn't make the claim.
But if you think it's so easy, you do it and show me how wrong I am.
You know you would if you could.
JTEM already tried...and failed.
Just admit you can't do it and you're full of shit.
Alan
2025-01-24 18:54:45 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:38:58 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 11:53:06 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
So it's OK to pardon people who are convicted of assaulting police
officers...
...as long as the officers don't die?
So it's OK to pardon murders and rapists who are convicted?
Such as...
Google is your friend.
Start here: "to pardon murders and rapists who are convicted"
Not my job...because I didn't make the claim.
But if you think it's so easy, you do it and show me how wrong I am.
You know you would if you could.
JTEM already tried...and failed.
Just admit you can't do it and you're full of shit.
I don't have to do it.

Someone is implying that Biden pardoned "murderers and rapists"...

...but can't give an example.
Alan
2025-01-23 20:02:42 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 22:33:48 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda says...
On January 6, 2021, members of a fascist militia group, in the course of
attempting a coup d'etat, beat Mr. Sicknick, an officer of the Capitol
Police who was on duty at the time, with a fire extinguisher so severely
that he threw a clot that ultimately proved fatal.
Nope. No clot. Stroke. NATURAL stroke.
Have you got your medical degree handy?

It was TWO strokes. And they were described as "acute basilar artery
thrombosis".

Let me give you the medical definition of "thrombosis"

'Thrombosis occurs when blood clots block your blood vessels. There are
2 main types of thrombosis:'

<https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/conditions-and-diseases/thrombosis>

And while the medical examiner did return a "death by natural causes"
determination, he also said:

“all that transpired played a role in his condition.”
Post by AlleyCat
In simpler language, they beat him to death, and at least one other to
within an inch of his life too.
Under the felony murder rule, every single person who participated could
and *should* have been found guilty of first-degree murder
LOL... what subjective leftist garbage site posted that horse shit?
So we'll add "felony murder" to the things you don't understand along
with "convicted felon".

'The rule of felony murder is a legal doctrine in some common law
jurisdictions that broadens the crime of murder: when someone is killed
(regardless of intent to kill) in the commission of a dangerous or
enumerated crime (called a felony in some jurisdictions), the offender,
and also the offender's accomplices or co-conspirators, may be found
guilty of murder.'
JTEM
2025-01-23 20:32:03 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Have you got your medical degree handy?
It was TWO strokes. And they were described as "acute basilar artery
thrombosis".
Let me give you the medical definition of "thrombosis"
'Thrombosis occurs when blood clots block your blood vessels.
So you're in total agreement that you're full of shit, that no
cops were killed but that a protestor was shot to death.
--
https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5
NoBody
2025-01-23 20:46:51 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by JTEM
Post by Alan
Have you got your medical degree handy?
It was TWO strokes. And they were described as "acute basilar artery thrombosis".
Let me give you the medical definition of "thrombosis"
'Thrombosis occurs when blood clots block your blood vessels.
So you're in total agreement
No.
Post by JTEM
that no cops were killed but
Sicknick's death was a direct outcome of the insurrection.
Post by JTEM
that a protestor
a violent insurrectionist...
Post by JTEM
was shot to death.
She was shot to death while in the act of committing a violent felony that she
was committing in order to commit more violent felonies. It certainly was far
more justified than the police shooting murders committed by Michael Slager,
Timothy Loehmann or Jeronimo Yanez.
Alan
2025-01-23 22:48:59 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by JTEM
Post by Alan
Have you got your medical degree handy?
It was TWO strokes. And they were described as "acute basilar artery
thrombosis".
Let me give you the medical definition of "thrombosis"
'Thrombosis occurs when blood clots block your blood vessels.
So you're in total agreement that you're full of shit, that no
cops were killed but that a protestor was shot to death.
I'm in total agreement that Pussey claiming there were "no clots" was
bullshit.


Interesting that you snipped that part of what I was replying too, huh?

Must have been an accident, right?


And that the medical examiner said:

“all that transpired played a role in his condition.”
AlleyCat
2025-01-23 22:59:45 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 14:48:59 -0800, Alan says...
?all that transpired played a role in his condition.?
But STILL no murder charges.

Thank you, that will be all, boy.

=====

Trump WINS!

Donald Trump is the 47th U.S. president, defeating Vice President Kamala Harris.

Republican Donald Trump was elected President of the United States in the 2024 election, defeating Vice President Kamala Harris.

Trump, 78, will begin his second term early next year.

Donald Trump will be inaugurated as the U.S. President on Monday, January 20, 2025, on the West Front of the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C.

A Second Trump Administration
Alan
2025-01-23 23:33:05 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 14:48:59 -0800, Alan says...
?all that transpired played a role in his condition.?
But STILL no murder charges.
Thank you, that will be all, boy.
But still not exactly JUST natural causes as you claimed.
Skeeter
2025-01-24 16:48:18 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 14:48:59 -0800, Alan says...
?all that transpired played a role in his condition.?
But STILL no murder charges.
Thank you, that will be all, boy.
But still not exactly JUST natural causes as you claimed.
No murder except for the innocent unarmed girl.
Alan
2025-01-24 18:05:21 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 14:48:59 -0800, Alan says...
?all that transpired played a role in his condition.?
But STILL no murder charges.
Thank you, that will be all, boy.
But still not exactly JUST natural causes as you claimed.
No murder except for the innocent unarmed girl.
She wasn't innocent.

She was breaking through a door via a broken window.
Skeeter
2025-01-24 18:47:41 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 14:48:59 -0800, Alan says...
?all that transpired played a role in his condition.?
But STILL no murder charges.
Thank you, that will be all, boy.
But still not exactly JUST natural causes as you claimed.
No murder except for the innocent unarmed girl.
She wasn't innocent.
She was breaking through a door via a broken window.
So? She was unarmed.
Alan
2025-01-24 18:52:20 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 14:48:59 -0800, Alan says...
?all that transpired played a role in his condition.?
But STILL no murder charges.
Thank you, that will be all, boy.
But still not exactly JUST natural causes as you claimed.
No murder except for the innocent unarmed girl.
She wasn't innocent.
She was breaking through a door via a broken window.
So? She was unarmed.
So? She was breaking into an area where people were sheltering from a
mob. If she'd been there all by herself, things would have been
different and you know it.
AlleyCat
2025-01-24 19:58:44 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Fri, 24 Jan 2025 10:05:21 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
No murder except for the innocent unarmed girl.
She wasn't innocent.
She was breaking through a door via a broken window.
So?

100s, if not 1000s of innocent people have gone to jail for killing intruders who were breaking through their home's windows.

Michael Byrd should be in jail.

Did Biden pardon him?

"Fact Check: No Evidence President Biden Pardoned Michael Byrd, Officer Who Allegedly Killed Ashley Babbitt"

Claim: Joe Biden pardon Michael Byrd, the U.S. Capitol Police officer who allegedly killed Ashli Babbitt during the January 6, 2021, protest.

Verdict: No, that's not true: None of the pardons he issued mentioned Byrd directly. Also, the blanket pardon Biden signed for police officers from
the Capitol Police who testified before the January 6 Select Committee didn't cover Byrd because he didn't testify.

Rut roh, Reorge!

LOL

=====

Trump WINS!

Donald Trump is the 47th U.S. president, defeating Vice President Kamala Harris.

Republican Donald Trump was elected President of the United States in the 2024 election, defeating Vice President Kamala Harris.

Trump, 78, will begin his second term early next year.

Donald Trump will be inaugurated as the U.S. President on Monday, January 20, 2025, on the West Front of the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C.

A Second Trump Administration
Alan
2025-01-24 22:13:27 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Fri, 24 Jan 2025 10:05:21 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
No murder except for the innocent unarmed girl.
She wasn't innocent.
She was breaking through a door via a broken window.
So?
100s, if not 1000s of innocent people have gone to jail for killing
intruders who were breaking through their home's windows.
Give an example.
Post by AlleyCat
Michael Byrd should be in jail.
Nope. He was a police officer protecting unarmed civilians.

But you tell us how they should have handled the situation instead.

Babbitt is climbing through a window that another rioter broke, and you
are where Byrd was...

...so what's your move, bright boy?
AlleyCat
2025-01-24 17:22:03 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:33:05 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 14:48:59 -0800, Alan says...
?all that transpired played a role in his condition.?
But STILL no murder charges.
Thank you, that will be all, boy.
But still not exactly JUST natural causes as you claimed.
You?

You Who??

Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick Died Of Natural Causes, Medical Examiner Rules - NPR

"He did not suffer an allergic reaction to the chemical irritants dispensed by rioters, Diaz told the Post, NOR WAS THERE EVIDENCE of internal OR
EXTERNAL INJURIES." - Medical Examiner Diaz

In a statement, the U.S. Capitol Police said it accepts the medical examiner's finding.

Thank you... that will be all.

=====

Trump WINS!

Donald Trump is the 47th U.S. president, defeating Vice President Kamala Harris.

Republican Donald Trump was elected President of the United States in the 2024 election, defeating Vice President Kamala Harris.

Trump, 78, will begin his second term early next year.

Donald Trump will be inaugurated as the U.S. President on Monday, January 20, 2025, on the West Front of the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C.

A Second Trump Administration
Alan
2025-01-24 18:01:27 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:33:05 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 14:48:59 -0800, Alan says...
?all that transpired played a role in his condition.?
But STILL no murder charges.
Thank you, that will be all, boy.
But still not exactly JUST natural causes as you claimed.
You?
You Who??
Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick Died Of Natural Causes, Medical Examiner Rules - NPR
"He did not suffer an allergic reaction to the chemical irritants dispensed by rioters, Diaz told the Post, NOR WAS THERE EVIDENCE of internal OR
EXTERNAL INJURIES." - Medical Examiner Diaz
In a statement, the U.S. Capitol Police said it accepts the medical examiner's finding.
Thank you... that will be all.
Because you want to run away from the fact that Diaz also said:

“all that transpired played a role in his condition.”
AlleyCat
2025-01-24 19:58:45 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Fri, 24 Jan 2025 10:01:27 -0800, Alan says...
Post by AlleyCat
Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick Died Of Natural Causes, Medical Examiner Rules - NPR
"He did not suffer an allergic reaction to the chemical irritants dispensed by rioters, Diaz told the Post, NOR WAS THERE EVIDENCE of internal OR
EXTERNAL INJURIES." - Medical Examiner Diaz
In a statement, the U.S. Capitol Police said it accepts the medical examiner's finding.
Thank you... that will be all.
?all that transpired played a role in his condition.?
I never posted that.

"But the official ruling of his death from natural causes will likely make homicide charges difficult to justify." - NPR

WHERE are you getting this from?

It was TWO strokes. And they were described as "acute basilar artery thrombosis".

And while the medical examiner did return a "death by natural causes" determination, he also said: "all that transpired played a role in his
condition."

Diaz said that? What's your source?

ALL you've said, is that the Medical Examiner (Diaz) said this: (taken from your posts that had ZERO citations)

And that the medical examiner said: "all that transpired played a role in his condition."

What's your source? The article that dipshit posted, with NO URL? LOLOLOL

Diaz also said: "all that transpired played a role in his condition."

If he did, why didn't NPR say that in the article I cited?

Are NPR writers, liars by omission?

Loading Image...
Alan
2025-01-24 22:24:45 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Fri, 24 Jan 2025 10:01:27 -0800, Alan says...
Post by AlleyCat
Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick Died Of Natural Causes,
Medical Examiner Rules - NPR
"He did not suffer an allergic reaction to the chemical
irritants dispensed by rioters, Diaz told the Post, NOR WAS
THERE EVIDENCE of internal OR EXTERNAL INJURIES." - Medical
Examiner Diaz
In a statement, the U.S. Capitol Police said it accepts the
medical examiner's finding.
Thank you... that will be all.
?all that transpired played a role in his condition.?
I never posted that.
I know.
Post by AlleyCat
"But the official ruling of his death from natural causes will
likely make homicide charges difficult to justify." - NPR
WHERE are you getting this from?
The medical examiner, Diaz.
Post by AlleyCat
It was TWO strokes. And they were described as "acute basilar artery thrombosis".
And while the medical examiner did return a "death by natural
causes" determination, he also said: "all that transpired played a
role in his condition."
Diaz said that? What's your source?
What? You're the one who always says that I have to Google to find YOUR
sources.
Post by AlleyCat
(taken from your posts that had ZERO citations)
And that the medical examiner said: "all that transpired played a role in his condition."
What's your source? The article that dipshit posted, with NO URL?
LOLOLOL
How many would you like?

But it's ironic that you mention posting from an article without
providing a URL...
Post by AlleyCat
Diaz also said: "all that transpired played a role in his
condition."
If he did, why didn't NPR say that in the article I cited?
...you quoted an article from NPR (which you did at least cite by name)...

...but without providing a URL.
Post by AlleyCat
Are NPR writers, liars by omission?
I didn't know exactly when the statement was made by Diaz, but have
since discovered it was some time before April 19, 2021...

Let's start with NPR:

'DREISBACH: It took months, but the D.C. medical examiner later said
that Brian Sicknick died from two strokes. Officially, natural causes -
but the medical examiner added, all that transpired on January 6 played
a role in his condition.'

<https://www.npr.org/transcripts/nx-s1-5200594>

Note the "it took months" part.

Washington Post:

'Diaz’s ruling does not mean Sicknick was not assaulted or that the
violent events at the Capitol did not contribute to his death. The
medical examiner noted Sicknick was among the officers who engaged the
mob and said “all that transpired played a role in his condition.”'

<https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/brian-sicknick-death-strokes/2021/04/19/36d2d310-617e-11eb-afbe-9a11a127d146_story.html>

The Wall Street Journal:

'The chief medical examiner, Francisco Diaz, told the Washington Post
that the autopsy had found no evidence that Mr. Sicknick suffered an
allergic reaction to the chemical spray or evidence of internal or
external injuries, but said “all that transpired played a role in his
condition.”'

<https://archive.ph/20210421150320/https://www.wsj.com/articles/officer-brian-sicknick-what-we-know-about-his-death-11619010119#selection-4419.53-4419.339>

I could go on if that's not enough.

:-)
AlleyCat
2025-01-23 22:58:12 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 12:02:42 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
And they were described as "acute basilar artery
thrombosis".
What I meant, but I guess YOU, with your inferior schooling, couldn't figger owt, meant, no clot, no stroke, as in the medical examiner didn't link
it to Jan. 6th.

=====

Trump WINS!

Donald Trump is the 47th U.S. president, defeating Vice President Kamala Harris.

Republican Donald Trump was elected President of the United States in the 2024 election, defeating Vice President Kamala Harris.

Trump, 78, will begin his second term early next year.

Donald Trump will be inaugurated as the U.S. President on Monday, January 20, 2025, on the West Front of the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C.

A Second Trump Administration
Alan
2025-01-23 23:37:44 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 12:02:42 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
And they were described as "acute basilar artery thrombosis".
What I meant, but I guess YOU, with your inferior schooling,
couldn't figger owt, meant, no clot, no stroke, as in the medical
examiner didn't link it to Jan. 6th.
No.

They found a clot.

Your early message claimed they didn't find one:

'> that he threw a clot that ultimately proved fatal.

Nope. No clot. Stroke. NATURAL stroke.'

Nothing you said indicated that you understood there was a clot.

The fact that you said "Stroke. NATURAL stroke." implies you thought it
was something other than a clot.
Siri Cruise
2025-01-24 01:30:38 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Nope. No clot. Stroke. NATURAL stroke.'
Ha ha ha ha ha ha!

What a maroon.
--
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed
AlleyCat
2025-01-24 17:22:05 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:37:44 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
They found a clot.
Medical Examiner said nothing about a clot.

"He did not suffer an allergic reaction to the chemical irritants dispensed by rioters, Diaz told the Post, NOR WAS THERE EVIDENCE of INTERNAL or
external injuries." - Medical Examiner Diaz

Wouldn't a clot be internal?
Post by Alan
'> that he threw a clot that ultimately proved fatal.
Who said that? Was it the Medical Examiner?
Post by Alan
Nope. No clot. Stroke. NATURAL stroke.'
Nothing you said indicated that you understood there was a clot.
Who said that? Was it the Medical Examiner?
Post by Alan
The fact that you said "Stroke. NATURAL stroke." implies you thought it
was something other than a clot.
Hey dumb ass... there is more one type of stroke than just having a clot.

Hemorrhagic stroke: a blood vessel in your brain ruptures or breaks, spilling blood into the surrounding tissues

Hemorrhagic stroke

A hemorrhagic stroke occurs when a blood vessel in your brain ruptures or breaks, spilling blood into the surrounding tissues. This can be due to:

an aneurysm causing a portion of the weakened blood vessel to balloon outward and sometimes rupture
an arteriovenous malformation, which is a structural problem typically present from birth
very high blood pressure causing a tear in a weakened blood vessel in your brain
hemorrhagic transformation, which is when an ischemic stroke causes bleeding

Types of hemorrhagic stroke: ICH vs. SAH

Doctors can classify hemorrhagic stroke based on where the rupture occurs - specifically, whether it happens in a blood vessel in the brain or on the
surface of the brain:

Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH): An ICH occurs when a blood vessel in the brain bursts. ICHs account for about three-quarters - Trusted Source of
hemorrhagic strokes, according to 2019 data.

Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH): An SAH involves the rupture of a blood vessel in the subarachnoid space (a layer surrounding the brain).

Do you want cites?

Look em up yourself.

=====

Trump WINS!

Donald Trump is the 47th U.S. president, defeating Vice President Kamala Harris.

Republican Donald Trump was elected President of the United States in the 2024 election, defeating Vice President Kamala Harris.

Trump, 78, will begin his second term early next year.

Donald Trump will be inaugurated as the U.S. President on Monday, January 20, 2025, on the West Front of the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C.

A Second Trump Administration
Alan
2025-01-24 18:04:46 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:37:44 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
They found a clot.
Medical Examiner said nothing about a clot.
Yes he did. You've had that explained to you already.
Post by AlleyCat
"He did not suffer an allergic reaction to the chemical irritants
dispensed by rioters, Diaz told the Post, NOR WAS THERE EVIDENCE of
INTERNAL or external injuries." - Medical Examiner Diaz
Wouldn't a clot be internal?
It would be internal...

...but it wouldn't be classed as an INJURY.
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
'> that he threw a clot that ultimately proved fatal.
Who said that? Was it the Medical Examiner?
Post by Alan
Nope. No clot. Stroke. NATURAL stroke.'
Nothing you said indicated that you understood there was a clot.
Who said that? Was it the Medical Examiner?
Post by Alan
The fact that you said "Stroke. NATURAL stroke." implies you
thought it was something other than a clot.
Hey dumb ass... there is more one type of stroke than just having a clot.
Indeed there is.

Very good!
Post by AlleyCat
Hemorrhagic stroke: a blood vessel in your brain ruptures or breaks,
spilling blood into the surrounding tissues
Hemorrhagic stroke
A hemorrhagic stroke occurs when a blood vessel in your brain
ruptures or breaks, spilling blood into the surrounding tissues.
an aneurysm causing a portion of the weakened blood vessel to
balloon outward and sometimes rupture an arteriovenous malformation,
which is a structural problem typically present from birth very high
blood pressure causing a tear in a weakened blood vessel in your
brain hemorrhagic transformation, which is when an ischemic stroke
causes bleeding
Types of hemorrhagic stroke: ICH vs. SAH
Doctors can classify hemorrhagic stroke based on where the rupture
occurs - specifically, whether it happens in a blood vessel in the
Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH): An ICH occurs when a blood vessel in
the brain bursts. ICHs account for about three-quarters - Trusted
Source of hemorrhagic strokes, according to 2019 data.
Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH): An SAH involves the rupture of a
blood vessel in the subarachnoid space (a layer surrounding the
brain).
Do you want cites?
Look em up yourself.
I already quoted the ME saying it was a clot:

'The cause was listed as “acute brainstem and cerebellar infarcts due to
acute basilar artery thrombosis.”'

"Thrombosis" means "clot".
AlleyCat
2025-01-24 19:58:48 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Fri, 24 Jan 2025 10:04:46 -0800, Alan says...
No cite, means it's a lie.

Isn't that what you liberals always say?

"No source (author), means it's a lie."
"No Cite. It MUST Be a Lie"
"No cite means you lie. As usual."
"No cite on your debunking, dumb a."
"NO cite. just bullshit OPINION."
"Also, please cite who you is. If there's no cite, it must be a lie."
"Also, please cite who you ?? alert system, which never issued "
"Cite it dwarf. No cite means it's a lie."
"No cited rebuttal seen just denialism."
"No cite means the stinking old pile of hate is lying yet again."- YOU"
"No cite. You lied."- Rudy Canoza"
"No cite means you lie yet again."- Catoni"
"As comrade" Unum "likes to say.... 'No cite means you lie.'"
"No cite means you are lying. If anything Florida OVER-reported like everyone"
"No cite... it's a lie."
"No cite (probably CNN and probably why you didn't list it) means it's a lie."
"Subject Once Again... A Lying Liberal Makes the Claim Trump Said Something But Provided No Cite and No Evidence to Back It Up"
"No cite didn't happen."
"No cite - you're lying."
"No cite means you're lying... again."
"Please don't bother me with that" no cite "bullshit like you and Alan Baker"
"No cite = fake news"
"No poll/no cite = lie"
"No cite = lie."
"No quotes No cites = fake news."
"Since you provided No cite or Trump telling people to" stop their government"
"No cited quote didn't happen."
"No cite means it's a lie."
"Don't lie... we all know you look this shit up after seeing there's No cite"
"JUST so you can say" no cite = fake news" and if there IS a cite you go even"
"No cites... all lies."
"No cite... means it's a lie."
"Subject My God!!! -No Cites -No Truth -"We Troose Truth Over Fact"
"No cites... must be truths."
"No cited means it's a lie."
"No cite... has to be a lie."
"No proof No cite... lie."
"No cite means it's a lie right?"
"and blurts out that there's No cite."
"No WONDER you provided No cite... the date(s) would have given you away."
"No cite... must be a lie."
"You provided No proof of the quote... No cite. Why IS that? After whining about"
"No WONDER there was No cite forthcoming... the dates would have PROVEN you to"
"God you're a fucking idiot. The OTHER idiot who SAID with No proof No cite"
"NO cite so I don't believe you.... Tom"
"No cite on any of this means chumpsky is lying."
"No cite means you are lying as usual ! !"
"No cite means you lie yet again... LOL You really are a piece of shitty"
"You provided No cite according to your own criteria you lied. Why do"
"No cite means he is lying."
"Sounds concrete... so why you No cite?"
"(no cite)"
"Morano cited a "total failure of the emergency alert system which never issued"
"No cite from Big Oil means it's a lie."
"No cite No author... No truth."
"No cite means you are lying."
"No cite and No comparison to fossil fuel subsidies so who cares?"
"time... where's YOURS? Citing someone with No statistics is No cite at"
"No cite means you are a lying jackass."
" Estimate. No cite. No truth. Screecher's rules... right?"
"No cite means aubrin is lying."
"I see No cite on whomever said"... server logs are showing No signs of"
"No cite anywhere means chumpsky is lying."
"WHAT GOP officials? No cite must be a lie."
"No cite means the .....dimwit is lying as usual."
"Again... make all the stupid claims you wish.... No cite means you lie....."
"No cite means you lie... as usual ! ! !"
"No cite means you tell lies again.... as usual !"
"...and you provide No cites as requested to back your claims."
"No cite means you lie as usual."
"that's IF they're doing that but since you provided No cite it must be"
"No cite means you're lying. Isn't that what YOU libtards say?"
"No cite given to show any of this. What's the matter your handlers"
"No cite so we know it's a lie."
"No cite means you're lying."
"And your OP contained No cite to show its math."

=====

Trump WINS!

Donald Trump is the 47th U.S. president, defeating Vice President Kamala Harris.

Republican Donald Trump was elected President of the United States in the 2024 election, defeating Vice President Kamala Harris.

Trump, 78, will begin his second term early next year.

Donald Trump will be inaugurated as the U.S. President on Monday, January 20, 2025, on the West Front of the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C.

A Second Trump Administration
Alan
2025-01-24 22:25:46 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Fri, 24 Jan 2025 10:04:46 -0800, Alan says...
No cite, means it's a lie.
I'll remember that for all the times you refuse to provide a citation.

But:

Let's start with NPR:

'DREISBACH: It took months, but the D.C. medical examiner later said
that Brian Sicknick died from two strokes. Officially, natural causes -
but the medical examiner added, all that transpired on January 6 played
a role in his condition.'

<https://www.npr.org/transcripts/nx-s1-5200594>

Note the "it took months" part.

Washington Post:

'Diaz’s ruling does not mean Sicknick was not assaulted or that the
violent events at the Capitol did not contribute to his death. The
medical examiner noted Sicknick was among the officers who engaged the
mob and said “all that transpired played a role in his condition.”'

<https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/brian-sicknick-death-strokes/2021/04/19/36d2d310-617e-11eb-afbe-9a11a127d146_story.html>

The Wall Street Journal:

'The chief medical examiner, Francisco Diaz, told the Washington Post
that the autopsy had found no evidence that Mr. Sicknick suffered an
allergic reaction to the chemical spray or evidence of internal or
external injuries, but said “all that transpired played a role in his
condition.”'

<https://archive.ph/20210421150320/https://www.wsj.com/articles/officer-brian-sicknick-what-we-know-about-his-death-11619010119#selection-4419.53-4419.339>

I could go on if that's not enough.

🙂

AlleyCat
2025-01-24 17:22:04 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:37:44 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
They found a clot.
Medical Examiner said nothing about a clot.

"He did not suffer an allergic reaction to the chemical irritants dispensed by rioters, Diaz told the Post, NOR WAS THERE EVIDENCE of INTERNAL or
external injuries." - Medical Examiner Diaz

Wouldn't a clot be internal?
Post by Alan
'> that he threw a clot that ultimately proved fatal.
Who said that? Was it the Medical Examiner?
Post by Alan
Nope. No clot. Stroke. NATURAL stroke.'
Nothing you said indicated that you understood there was a clot.
Who said that? Was it the Medical Examiner?
Post by Alan
The fact that you said "Stroke. NATURAL stroke." implies you thought it
was something other than a clot.
Hey dumb ass... there is more one type of stroke than just having a clot.

Hemorrhagic stroke: a blood vessel in your brain ruptures or breaks, spilling blood into the surrounding tissues

Hemorrhagic stroke

A hemorrhagic stroke occurs when a blood vessel in your brain ruptures or breaks, spilling blood into the surrounding tissues. This can be due to:

an aneurysm causing a portion of the weakened blood vessel to balloon outward and sometimes rupture
an arteriovenous malformation, which is a structural problem typically present from birth
very high blood pressure causing a tear in a weakened blood vessel in your brain
hemorrhagic transformation, which is when an ischemic stroke causes bleeding

Types of hemorrhagic stroke: ICH vs. SAH

Doctors can classify hemorrhagic stroke based on where the rupture occurs - specifically, whether it happens in a blood vessel in the brain or on the
surface of the brain:

Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH): An ICH occurs when a blood vessel in the brain bursts. ICHs account for about three-quarters - Trusted Source of
hemorrhagic strokes, according to 2019 data.

Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH): An SAH involves the rupture of a blood vessel in the subarachnoid space (a layer surrounding the brain).

Do you want cites?

Look em up yourself.

=====

Trump WINS!

Donald Trump is the 47th U.S. president, defeating Vice President Kamala Harris.

Republican Donald Trump was elected President of the United States in the 2024 election, defeating Vice President Kamala Harris.

Trump, 78, will begin his second term early next year.

Donald Trump will be inaugurated as the U.S. President on Monday, January 20, 2025, on the West Front of the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C.

A Second Trump Administration
Alan
2025-01-24 18:09:37 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:37:44 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
They found a clot.
Medical Examiner said nothing about a clot.
False:

'The cause was listed as “acute brainstem and cerebellar infarcts due to
acute basilar artery thrombosis.”'
AlleyCat
2025-01-24 19:58:46 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Fri, 24 Jan 2025 10:09:37 -0800, Alan says...
Post by AlleyCat
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:37:44 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
They found a clot.
Medical Examiner said nothing about a clot.
'The cause was listed as ?acute brainstem and cerebellar infarcts due to
acute basilar artery thrombosis.?'
No cite, means it's a lie.

Isn't that what you liberals always say?

"No source (author), means it's a lie."
"No Cite. It MUST Be a Lie"
"No cite means you lie. As usual."
"No cite on your debunking, dumb a."
"NO cite. just bullshit OPINION."
"Also, please cite who you is. If there's no cite, it must be a lie."
"Also, please cite who you ?? alert system, which never issued "
"Cite it dwarf. No cite means it's a lie."
"No cited rebuttal seen just denialism."
"No cite means the stinking old pile of hate is lying yet again."- YOU"
"No cite. You lied."- Rudy Canoza"
"No cite means you lie yet again."- Catoni"
"As comrade" Unum "likes to say.... 'No cite means you lie.'"
"No cite means you are lying. If anything Florida OVER-reported like everyone"
"No cite... it's a lie."
"No cite (probably CNN and probably why you didn't list it) means it's a lie."
"Subject Once Again... A Lying Liberal Makes the Claim Trump Said Something But Provided No Cite and No Evidence to Back It Up"
"No cite didn't happen."
"No cite - you're lying."
"No cite means you're lying... again."
"Please don't bother me with that" no cite "bullshit like you and Alan Baker"
"No cite = fake news"
"No poll/no cite = lie"
"No cite = lie."
"No quotes No cites = fake news."
"Since you provided No cite or Trump telling people to" stop their government"
"No cited quote didn't happen."
"No cite means it's a lie."
"Don't lie... we all know you look this shit up after seeing there's No cite"
"JUST so you can say" no cite = fake news" and if there IS a cite you go even"
"No cites... all lies."
"No cite... means it's a lie."
"Subject My God!!! -No Cites -No Truth -"We Troose Truth Over Fact"
"No cites... must be truths."
"No cited means it's a lie."
"No cite... has to be a lie."
"No proof No cite... lie."
"No cite means it's a lie right?"
"and blurts out that there's No cite."
"No WONDER you provided No cite... the date(s) would have given you away."
"No cite... must be a lie."
"You provided No proof of the quote... No cite. Why IS that? After whining about"
"No WONDER there was No cite forthcoming... the dates would have PROVEN you to"
"God you're a fucking idiot. The OTHER idiot who SAID with No proof No cite"
"NO cite so I don't believe you.... Tom"
"No cite on any of this means chumpsky is lying."
"No cite means you are lying as usual ! !"
"No cite means you lie yet again... LOL You really are a piece of shitty"
"You provided No cite according to your own criteria you lied. Why do"
"No cite means he is lying."
"Sounds concrete... so why you No cite?"
"(no cite)"
"Morano cited a "total failure of the emergency alert system which never issued"
"No cite from Big Oil means it's a lie."
"No cite No author... No truth."
"No cite means you are lying."
"No cite and No comparison to fossil fuel subsidies so who cares?"
"time... where's YOURS? Citing someone with No statistics is No cite at"
"No cite means you are a lying jackass."
" Estimate. No cite. No truth. Screecher's rules... right?"
"No cite means aubrin is lying."
"I see No cite on whomever said"... server logs are showing No signs of"
"No cite anywhere means chumpsky is lying."
"WHAT GOP officials? No cite must be a lie."
"No cite means the .....dimwit is lying as usual."
"Again... make all the stupid claims you wish.... No cite means you lie....."
"No cite means you lie... as usual ! ! !"
"No cite means you tell lies again.... as usual !"
"...and you provide No cites as requested to back your claims."
"No cite means you lie as usual."
"that's IF they're doing that but since you provided No cite it must be"
"No cite means you're lying. Isn't that what YOU libtards say?"
"No cite given to show any of this. What's the matter your handlers"
"No cite so we know it's a lie."
"No cite means you're lying."
"And your OP contained No cite to show its math."

=====

Trump WINS!

Donald Trump is the 47th U.S. president, defeating Vice President Kamala Harris.

Republican Donald Trump was elected President of the United States in the 2024 election, defeating Vice President Kamala Harris.

Trump, 78, will begin his second term early next year.

Donald Trump will be inaugurated as the U.S. President on Monday, January 20, 2025, on the West Front of the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C.

A Second Trump Administration
Message-ID: <***@news.eternal-september.org>
AlleyCat
2025-01-23 22:58:13 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 12:02:42 -0800, Alan says...
?all that transpired played a role in his condition.?
So, WHO was charged with murder.

"Murder" doesn't happen because YOU think someone should be charged with. There has to be an actual charge.

No charge... no murder.

You libertards always say, "Hillary Clinton is totally innocent because she was never charged with anything."

Don't go being all hypocritical on us now.

LOL

=====

Trump WINS!

Donald Trump is the 47th U.S. president, defeating Vice President Kamala Harris.

Republican Donald Trump was elected President of the United States in the 2024 election, defeating Vice President Kamala Harris.

Trump, 78, will begin his second term early next year.

Donald Trump will be inaugurated as the U.S. President on Monday, January 20, 2025, on the West Front of the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C.

A Second Trump Administration
Alan
2025-01-23 23:34:31 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 12:02:42 -0800, Alan says...
?all that transpired played a role in his condition.?
So, WHO was charged with murder.
"Murder" doesn't happen because YOU think someone should be charged
with. There has to be an actual charge.
No charge... no murder.
You libertards always say, "Hillary Clinton is totally innocent
because she was never charged with anything."
Don't go being all hypocritical on us now.
No one was charged with his murder.

Two men were arrested and charged with assaulting him.

You DO admit they assaulted him, don't you?

Don't go lying on us now...

...for once.
AlleyCat
2025-01-24 17:22:06 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:34:31 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
You DO admit they assaulted him, don't you?
Yes... with Bear Pepper Spray, but no murder.

Medical Examiner said nothing about a clot.

"He did not suffer an allergic reaction to the chemical irritants dispensed by rioters, Diaz told the Post,
NOR WAS THERE EVIDENCE of internal OR EXTERNAL INJURIES." - Medical Examiner Diaz

Wouldn't a clot be internal?

Wouldn't attack by fire extinguisher show external injuries?
Post by Alan
'> that he threw a clot that ultimately proved fatal.
Who said that? Was it the Medical Examiner?
Post by Alan
Nope. No clot. Stroke. NATURAL stroke.'
Nothing you said indicated that you understood there was a clot.
Who said that? Was it the Medical Examiner?
Post by Alan
The fact that you said "Stroke. NATURAL stroke." implies you thought it
was something other than a clot.
Hey dumb ass... there is more one type of stroke than just having a clot.

Hemorrhagic stroke: a blood vessel in your brain ruptures or breaks, spilling blood into the surrounding tissues

Hemorrhagic stroke

A hemorrhagic stroke occurs when a blood vessel in your brain ruptures or breaks, spilling blood into the surrounding tissues. This can be due to:

an aneurysm causing a portion of the weakened blood vessel to balloon outward and sometimes rupture
an arteriovenous malformation, which is a structural problem typically present from birth
very high blood pressure causing a tear in a weakened blood vessel in your brain
hemorrhagic transformation, which is when an ischemic stroke causes bleeding

Types of hemorrhagic stroke: ICH vs. SAH

Doctors can classify hemorrhagic stroke based on where the rupture occurs - specifically, whether it happens in a blood vessel in the brain or on the
surface of the brain:

Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH): An ICH occurs when a blood vessel in the brain bursts. ICHs account for about three-quarters - Trusted Source of
hemorrhagic strokes, according to 2019 data.

Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH): An SAH involves the rupture of a blood vessel in the subarachnoid space (a layer surrounding the brain).

Do you want cites?

Look em up yourself.

=====

Trump WINS!

Donald Trump is the 47th U.S. president, defeating Vice President Kamala Harris.

Republican Donald Trump was elected President of the United States in the 2024 election, defeating Vice President Kamala Harris.

Trump, 78, will begin his second term early next year.

Donald Trump will be inaugurated as the U.S. President on Monday, January 20, 2025, on the West Front of the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C.

A Second Trump Administration
Alan
2025-01-24 18:08:44 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:34:31 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
You DO admit they assaulted him, don't you?
Yes... with Bear Pepper Spray, but no murder.
Medical Examiner said nothing about a clot.
"He did not suffer an allergic reaction to the chemical irritants
dispensed by rioters, Diaz told the Post, NOR WAS THERE EVIDENCE of
internal OR EXTERNAL INJURIES." - Medical Examiner Diaz
'The cause was listed as “acute brainstem and cerebellar infarcts due to
acute basilar artery thrombosis.”'

Tell me: what does "thrombosis" mean? Would you like the Johns Hopkins
reference again?
Post by AlleyCat
Wouldn't a clot be internal?
Yup. But it wouldn't be termed an "injury". In medical terms, "injury"
means damage done to your body, and a clot isn't that.

A clot can be the RESULT of an injury, but it isn't itself an injury.
Post by AlleyCat
Wouldn't attack by fire extinguisher show external injuries?
Post by Alan
'> that he threw a clot that ultimately proved fatal.
Who said that? Was it the Medical Examiner?
Yes:

'The cause was listed as “acute brainstem and cerebellar infarcts due to
acute basilar artery thrombosis.”'
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
Nope. No clot. Stroke. NATURAL stroke.'
Nothing you said indicated that you understood there was a clot.
Who said that? Was it the Medical Examiner?
Yes:

'The cause was listed as “acute brainstem and cerebellar infarcts due to
acute basilar artery thrombosis.”'
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
The fact that you said "Stroke. NATURAL stroke." implies you
thought it was something other than a clot.
Hey dumb ass... there is more one type of stroke than just having a clot.
Hemorrhagic stroke: a blood vessel in your brain ruptures or breaks,
spilling blood into the surrounding tissues
Hemorrhagic stroke
A hemorrhagic stroke occurs when a blood vessel in your brain
ruptures or breaks, spilling blood into the surrounding tissues.
an aneurysm causing a portion of the weakened blood vessel to
balloon outward and sometimes rupture an arteriovenous malformation,
which is a structural problem typically present from birth very high
blood pressure causing a tear in a weakened blood vessel in your
brain hemorrhagic transformation, which is when an ischemic stroke
causes bleeding
Types of hemorrhagic stroke: ICH vs. SAH
Doctors can classify hemorrhagic stroke based on where the rupture
occurs - specifically, whether it happens in a blood vessel in the
Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH): An ICH occurs when a blood vessel in
the brain bursts. ICHs account for about three-quarters - Trusted
Source of hemorrhagic strokes, according to 2019 data.
Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH): An SAH involves the rupture of a
blood vessel in the subarachnoid space (a layer surrounding the
brain).
Do you want cites?
Look em up yourself.
I already knew all about them, thanks.

But they don't apply in this case, because:

'The cause was listed as “acute brainstem and cerebellar infarcts due to
acute basilar artery thrombosis.”'
Skeeter
2025-01-24 18:48:22 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:34:31 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
You DO admit they assaulted him, don't you?
Yes... with Bear Pepper Spray, but no murder.
Medical Examiner said nothing about a clot.
"He did not suffer an allergic reaction to the chemical irritants
dispensed by rioters, Diaz told the Post, NOR WAS THERE EVIDENCE of
internal OR EXTERNAL INJURIES." - Medical Examiner Diaz
'The cause was listed as ?acute brainstem and cerebellar infarcts due to
acute basilar artery thrombosis.?'
Tell me: what does "thrombosis" mean? Would you like the Johns Hopkins
reference again?
Post by AlleyCat
Wouldn't a clot be internal?
Yup. But it wouldn't be termed an "injury". In medical terms, "injury"
means damage done to your body, and a clot isn't that.
A clot can be the RESULT of an injury, but it isn't itself an injury.
Post by AlleyCat
Wouldn't attack by fire extinguisher show external injuries?
Post by Alan
'> that he threw a clot that ultimately proved fatal.
Who said that? Was it the Medical Examiner?
'The cause was listed as ?acute brainstem and cerebellar infarcts due to
acute basilar artery thrombosis.?'
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
Nope. No clot. Stroke. NATURAL stroke.'
Nothing you said indicated that you understood there was a clot.
Who said that? Was it the Medical Examiner?
'The cause was listed as ?acute brainstem and cerebellar infarcts due to
acute basilar artery thrombosis.?'
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
The fact that you said "Stroke. NATURAL stroke." implies you
thought it was something other than a clot.
Hey dumb ass... there is more one type of stroke than just having a clot.
Hemorrhagic stroke: a blood vessel in your brain ruptures or breaks,
spilling blood into the surrounding tissues
Hemorrhagic stroke
A hemorrhagic stroke occurs when a blood vessel in your brain
ruptures or breaks, spilling blood into the surrounding tissues.
an aneurysm causing a portion of the weakened blood vessel to
balloon outward and sometimes rupture an arteriovenous malformation,
which is a structural problem typically present from birth very high
blood pressure causing a tear in a weakened blood vessel in your
brain hemorrhagic transformation, which is when an ischemic stroke
causes bleeding
Types of hemorrhagic stroke: ICH vs. SAH
Doctors can classify hemorrhagic stroke based on where the rupture
occurs - specifically, whether it happens in a blood vessel in the
Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH): An ICH occurs when a blood vessel in
the brain bursts. ICHs account for about three-quarters - Trusted
Source of hemorrhagic strokes, according to 2019 data.
Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH): An SAH involves the rupture of a
blood vessel in the subarachnoid space (a layer surrounding the
brain).
Do you want cites?
Look em up yourself.
I already knew all about them, thanks.
'The cause was listed as ?acute brainstem and cerebellar infarcts due to
acute basilar artery thrombosis.?'
No murder except for the girl.
Loading...