Obama's Ugly Closing Argument - Will insulting voters persuade them to back Harris?

[Ubiquitous]

Worried that the presidential race may be slipping away from them, Democrats
now express contempt for the people whose votes they need to win in November.
Especially annoying to the party’s leadership is that they have to try to
persuade Pennsylvanians. On Tuesday vice presidential candidate Gov. Tim Walz
(D., Minn.) lamented to wealthy California donors that their party has to win
votes in Western Pennsylvania’s Beaver County, and also persuade people in
York, in the eastern half of the Keystone State. To diminish the power of
such voters, Mr. Walz wants to get rid of the Constitution’s Electoral
College. Now former President Barack Obama has arrived in Pittsburgh to scold
some of the locals for not supporting current Vice President Kamala Harris.

Mr. Obama is now employing the rhetorical tactics he once used against
congressional Republicans to attempt to shame voters into obeying his
political instruction. Mr. Obama’s oratory has always been much more refined
than that of either of his presidential successors—but at least as nasty. The
standard Obama approach is to assume that no one could possibly have an
informed and honest disagreement with him and therefore his opponents must be
ignorant or driven by concealed base motives.

Gregory Krieg, Edward-Isaac Dovere and Eva McKend report for CNN:

Former President Barack Obama on Thursday admonished Black men who
are hesitating to back Vice President Kamala Harris’ presidential
campaign, telling them it’s “not acceptable” to sit out this election
and suggesting they might be reluctant to vote for Harris because she’s
a woman.

The striking comments by Obama, made to a small group of voters in a
surprise stop at a local Harris campaign office in Pittsburgh, were
part of a more forceful campaign message delivered by the former
president on Thursday as polls continue to show a neck-and-neck race.
At a rally in the city later that evening, Obama issued some of his
most searing public criticisms of his successor to date.

The lack of energy some see around Harris’ campaign, Obama first told
the smaller group, “seems to be more pronounced with the brothers.”

Mr. Obama then launched a fact-free attack on their motivations. CNN reports:

“You’re coming up with all kinds of reasons and excuses, I’ve got a
problem with that,” Obama said. “Because part of it makes me think –
and I’m speaking to men directly – part of it makes me think that,
well, you just aren’t feeling the idea of having a woman as president,
and you’re coming up with other alternatives and other reasons for
that.”

The vice president’s significant role in creating a 40-year-high in inflation
that ravaged incomes isn’t a legitimate reason to oppose her? And of course
there are many other legitimate reasons to find fault with the incumbent vice
president in a world in crisis. Emma Bowman at National Public Radio has more
on Mr. Obama’s insults to Pennsylvanians:

“On the one hand, you have somebody who grew up like you, knows you,
went to college with you, understands the struggles and pain and joy
that comes from those experiences,” adding that Harris, who is Black
and Asian American, is focused on policy that will benefit Black
communities, such as affordable housing and health care. “And on the
other side, you have someone who has consistently shown disregard, not
just for the communities, but for you as a person.”

Maybe voters of all backgrounds have had just about all the Biden-Harris
“affordability” they can stand and are nostalgic about the real income gains
of the Trump era.

It’s also very possible that Pennsylvania voters of all backgrounds don’t
think their communities will be well served by Ms. Harris, a San Francisco
leftist who has backed seemingly every zany idea favored by those California
donors, and then some.

Regardless, it’s up to the voters to decide which candidates are most likely
to enable prosperity. Maybe Mr. Walz and Mr. Obama should try winning over
these voters, rather than trying to reduce their electoral power or tossing
them into a 2024 version of Hillary Clinton’s “basket of deplorables.”

These days that basket is looking more and more like a broad, multiracial
coalition.

As for the Democrats, the country desperately needs Mr. Obama and his party
to turn away from the poisonous ideological mindset which holds that every
setback for their political agenda represents a failure of our form of
government or our people.

--
Let's go Brandon!

[John Doe]

Post by Ubiquitous
Worried that the presidential race may be slipping away from them, Democrats
now express contempt for the people whose votes they need to win in November.
Especially annoying to the party’s leadership is that they have to try to
persuade Pennsylvanians. On Tuesday vice presidential candidate Gov. Tim Walz
(D., Minn.) lamented to wealthy California donors that their party has to win
votes in Western Pennsylvania’s Beaver County, and also persuade people in
York, in the eastern half of the Keystone State. To diminish the power of
such voters, Mr. Walz wants to get rid of the Constitution’s Electoral
College. Now former President Barack Obama has arrived in Pittsburgh to scold
some of the locals for not supporting current Vice President Kamala Harris.
Mr. Obama is now employing the rhetorical tactics he once used against
congressional Republicans to attempt to shame voters into obeying his
political instruction. Mr. Obama’s oratory has always been much more refined
than that of either of his presidential successors—but at least as nasty. The
standard Obama approach is to assume that no one could possibly have an
informed and honest disagreement with him and therefore his opponents must be
ignorant or driven by concealed base motives.
Former President Barack Obama on Thursday admonished Black men who
are hesitating to back Vice President Kamala Harris’ presidential
campaign, telling them it’s “not acceptable” to sit out this election
and suggesting they might be reluctant to vote for Harris because she’s
a woman.
The striking comments by Obama, made to a small group of voters in a
surprise stop at a local Harris campaign office in Pittsburgh, were
part of a more forceful campaign message delivered by the former
president on Thursday as polls continue to show a neck-and-neck race.
At a rally in the city later that evening, Obama issued some of his
most searing public criticisms of his successor to date.
The lack of energy some see around Harris’ campaign, Obama first told
the smaller group, “seems to be more pronounced with the brothers.”
“You’re coming up with all kinds of reasons and excuses, I’ve got a
problem with that,” Obama said. “Because part of it makes me think –
and I’m speaking to men directly – part of it makes me think that,
well, you just aren’t feeling the idea of having a woman as president,
and you’re coming up with other alternatives and other reasons for
that.”
The vice president’s significant role in creating a 40-year-high in inflation
that ravaged incomes isn’t a legitimate reason to oppose her? And of course
there are many other legitimate reasons to find fault with the incumbent vice
president in a world in crisis. Emma Bowman at National Public Radio has more
“On the one hand, you have somebody who grew up like you, knows you,
went to college with you, understands the struggles and pain and joy
that comes from those experiences,” adding that Harris, who is Black
and Asian American, is focused on policy that will benefit Black
communities, such as affordable housing and health care. “And on the
other side, you have someone who has consistently shown disregard, not
just for the communities, but for you as a person.”
Maybe voters of all backgrounds have had just about all the Biden-Harris
“affordability” they can stand and are nostalgic about the real income gains
of the Trump era.
It’s also very possible that Pennsylvania voters of all backgrounds don’t
think their communities will be well served by Ms. Harris, a San Francisco
leftist who has backed seemingly every zany idea favored by those California
donors, and then some.
Regardless, it’s up to the voters to decide which candidates are most likely
to enable prosperity. Maybe Mr. Walz and Mr. Obama should try winning over
these voters, rather than trying to reduce their electoral power or tossing
them into a 2024 version of Hillary Clinton’s “basket of deplorables.”
These days that basket is looking more and more like a broad, multiracial
coalition.
As for the Democrats, the country desperately needs Mr. Obama and his party
to turn away from the poisonous ideological mindset which holds that every
setback for their political agenda represents a failure of our form of
government or our people.

I personally can't imagine voting for Trump's stated plan of jailing the
people who have criticized him. He's no longer using statements like
Nazi Germany, he's virtually quoting them now. That should disturb
patriots in every party.

Post by Ubiquitous
--

[NoBody]

Post by John Doe

Post by Ubiquitous
Worried that the presidential race may be slipping away from them, Democrats
now express contempt for the people whose votes they need to win in November.
Especially annoying to the party’s leadership is that they have to try to
persuade Pennsylvanians. On Tuesday vice presidential candidate Gov. Tim Walz
(D., Minn.) lamented to wealthy California donors that their party has to win
votes in Western Pennsylvania’s Beaver County, and also persuade people in
York, in the eastern half of the Keystone State. To diminish the power of
such voters, Mr. Walz wants to get rid of the Constitution’s Electoral
College. Now former President Barack Obama has arrived in Pittsburgh to scold
some of the locals for not supporting current Vice President Kamala Harris.
Mr. Obama is now employing the rhetorical tactics he once used against
congressional Republicans to attempt to shame voters into obeying his
political instruction. Mr. Obama’s oratory has always been much more refined
than that of either of his presidential successors—but at least as nasty. The
standard Obama approach is to assume that no one could possibly have an
informed and honest disagreement with him and therefore his opponents must be
ignorant or driven by concealed base motives.
Former President Barack Obama on Thursday admonished Black men who
are hesitating to back Vice President Kamala Harris’ presidential
campaign, telling them it’s “not acceptable” to sit out this election
and suggesting they might be reluctant to vote for Harris because she’s
a woman.
The striking comments by Obama, made to a small group of voters in a
surprise stop at a local Harris campaign office in Pittsburgh, were
part of a more forceful campaign message delivered by the former
president on Thursday as polls continue to show a neck-and-neck race.
At a rally in the city later that evening, Obama issued some of his
most searing public criticisms of his successor to date.
The lack of energy some see around Harris’ campaign, Obama first told
the smaller group, “seems to be more pronounced with the brothers.”
“You’re coming up with all kinds of reasons and excuses, I’ve got a
problem with that,” Obama said. “Because part of it makes me think –
and I’m speaking to men directly – part of it makes me think that,
well, you just aren’t feeling the idea of having a woman as president,
and you’re coming up with other alternatives and other reasons for
that.”
The vice president’s significant role in creating a 40-year-high in inflation
that ravaged incomes isn’t a legitimate reason to oppose her? And of course
there are many other legitimate reasons to find fault with the incumbent vice
president in a world in crisis. Emma Bowman at National Public Radio has more
“On the one hand, you have somebody who grew up like you, knows you,
went to college with you, understands the struggles and pain and joy
that comes from those experiences,” adding that Harris, who is Black
and Asian American, is focused on policy that will benefit Black
communities, such as affordable housing and health care. “And on the
other side, you have someone who has consistently shown disregard, not
just for the communities, but for you as a person.”
Maybe voters of all backgrounds have had just about all the Biden-Harris
“affordability” they can stand and are nostalgic about the real income gains
of the Trump era.
It’s also very possible that Pennsylvania voters of all backgrounds don’t
think their communities will be well served by Ms. Harris, a San Francisco
leftist who has backed seemingly every zany idea favored by those California
donors, and then some.
Regardless, it’s up to the voters to decide which candidates are most likely
to enable prosperity. Maybe Mr. Walz and Mr. Obama should try winning over
these voters, rather than trying to reduce their electoral power or tossing
them into a 2024 version of Hillary Clinton’s “basket of deplorables.”
These days that basket is looking more and more like a broad, multiracial
coalition.
As for the Democrats, the country desperately needs Mr. Obama and his party
to turn away from the poisonous ideological mindset which holds that every
setback for their political agenda represents a failure of our form of
government or our people.

I personally can't imagine voting for Trump's stated plan of jailing the
people who have criticized him. He's no longer using statements like
Nazi Germany, he's virtually quoting them now. That should disturb
patriots in every party.

Citation required.

Post by John Doe

Post by Ubiquitous
--

[pothead]

Post by NoBody

Post by John Doe

Post by Ubiquitous
Worried that the presidential race may be slipping away from them, Democrats
now express contempt for the people whose votes they need to win in November.
Especially annoying to the party’s leadership is that they have to try to
persuade Pennsylvanians. On Tuesday vice presidential candidate Gov. Tim Walz
(D., Minn.) lamented to wealthy California donors that their party has to win
votes in Western Pennsylvania’s Beaver County, and also persuade people in
York, in the eastern half of the Keystone State. To diminish the power of
such voters, Mr. Walz wants to get rid of the Constitution’s Electoral
College. Now former President Barack Obama has arrived in Pittsburgh to scold
some of the locals for not supporting current Vice President Kamala Harris.
Mr. Obama is now employing the rhetorical tactics he once used against
congressional Republicans to attempt to shame voters into obeying his
political instruction. Mr. Obama’s oratory has always been much more refined
than that of either of his presidential successors—but at least as nasty. The
standard Obama approach is to assume that no one could possibly have an
informed and honest disagreement with him and therefore his opponents must be
ignorant or driven by concealed base motives.
Former President Barack Obama on Thursday admonished Black men who
are hesitating to back Vice President Kamala Harris’ presidential
campaign, telling them it’s “not acceptable” to sit out this election
and suggesting they might be reluctant to vote for Harris because she’s
a woman.
The striking comments by Obama, made to a small group of voters in a
surprise stop at a local Harris campaign office in Pittsburgh, were
part of a more forceful campaign message delivered by the former
president on Thursday as polls continue to show a neck-and-neck race.
At a rally in the city later that evening, Obama issued some of his
most searing public criticisms of his successor to date.
The lack of energy some see around Harris’ campaign, Obama first told
the smaller group, “seems to be more pronounced with the brothers.”
“You’re coming up with all kinds of reasons and excuses, I’ve got a
problem with that,” Obama said. “Because part of it makes me think –
and I’m speaking to men directly – part of it makes me think that,
well, you just aren’t feeling the idea of having a woman as president,
and you’re coming up with other alternatives and other reasons for
that.”
The vice president’s significant role in creating a 40-year-high in inflation
that ravaged incomes isn’t a legitimate reason to oppose her? And of course
there are many other legitimate reasons to find fault with the incumbent vice
president in a world in crisis. Emma Bowman at National Public Radio has more
“On the one hand, you have somebody who grew up like you, knows you,
went to college with you, understands the struggles and pain and joy
that comes from those experiences,” adding that Harris, who is Black
and Asian American, is focused on policy that will benefit Black
communities, such as affordable housing and health care. “And on the
other side, you have someone who has consistently shown disregard, not
just for the communities, but for you as a person.”
Maybe voters of all backgrounds have had just about all the Biden-Harris
“affordability” they can stand and are nostalgic about the real income gains
of the Trump era.
It’s also very possible that Pennsylvania voters of all backgrounds don’t
think their communities will be well served by Ms. Harris, a San Francisco
leftist who has backed seemingly every zany idea favored by those California
donors, and then some.
Regardless, it’s up to the voters to decide which candidates are most likely
to enable prosperity. Maybe Mr. Walz and Mr. Obama should try winning over
these voters, rather than trying to reduce their electoral power or tossing
them into a 2024 version of Hillary Clinton’s “basket of deplorables.”
These days that basket is looking more and more like a broad, multiracial
coalition.
As for the Democrats, the country desperately needs Mr. Obama and his party
to turn away from the poisonous ideological mindset which holds that every
setback for their political agenda represents a failure of our form of
government or our people.

I personally can't imagine voting for Trump's stated plan of jailing the
people who have criticized him. He's no longer using statements like
Nazi Germany, he's virtually quoting them now. That should disturb
patriots in every party.

Citation required.

"I think the bigger problem are the people from within. We have some very bad
people. We have some sick people. Radical left lunatics. I think it should be
very easily handled by, if necessary, by National Guard, or if really
necessary, by the military, because they can’t let that happen."

https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/13/politics/trump-military-enemy-from-within-election-day/index.html


Over the weekend, Donald Trump crystalized his authoritarian vision for the
nation when he suggested siccing the military on his political opponents and
American citizens to destroy the “enemy from within.” Despite the former
president’s direct appeal to full-blown fascism, Republicans are lining up to
defend and downplay his comments.

​​“I think the bigger problem is the enemy from within,” Trump told Fox News’
Maria Bartiromo on Sunday when asked if he anticipated “chaos on Election
Day” from undocumented immigrants. “We have some very bad people, some sick
people, radical left lunatics. … And it should be easily handled by, if
necessary, by National Guard, or if really necessary, by the military.”

On Monday, Virginia’s Republican Governor Glenn Youngkin attempted to rewrite
Trump’s comments as concerns about immigration, telling CNN’s Jake Tapper
that what the former president was talking about was the “people coming over
the border,” and that Tapper was “misrepresenting and misinterpreting”
Trump’s comments.

Tapper countered: “I’m literally reading his quotes to you, and I played them
earlier so you could hear that they were not made up by me. He’s literally
talking about ‘radical left lunatics,’ and then one of those ‘lunatics’ he
mentioned was Congressman Adam Schiff.”

The governor insisted that he didn’t “believe” that that’s what Trump meant.

“You can wish that he wasn’t saying that, but that’s what he said,” Tapper
replied.

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/republicans-trump-military-against-citizens-election-1235134231/


Former President Trump’s suggestion that U.S. troops could be used to go
after “radical-left lunatics” following the presidential election has alarmed
those in the military community and bolstered Democratic warnings about a
second Trump term.

Trump, who on Sunday warned he could deploy active or National Guard troops
to counter the “enemy from within,” quickly drew condemnation from Vice
President Harris’s campaign, which said the comments “should alarm every
American who cares about their freedom and security.” Harris herself called
Trump “increasingly unstable and unhinged” during her Monday campaign rally
in Erie, Pa.

Trump has suggested deploying the military within U.S. borders before, and
his former Defense Secretary Mark Esper said the public should take Trump
“seriously.”

“Yes I do, of course,” Esper said Monday evening on CNN when asked whether he
fears Trump would try to utilize the military against U.S. citizens.

“Because I lived through that, and I saw over the summer of 2020 where
President Trump and those around him wanted to use the National Guard in
various capacities in cities such as Chicago and Portland and Seattle,” Esper
said.

https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/4935363-trump-proposes-deploying-troops-radical-left/


Fuck off, you seditious little cunt. You are going to be *taken out*. You have
been spewing your fascist threats to the Constitution for far too long, and we
are not going to tolerate it any longer.

[Skeeter]

Post by pothead

Post by NoBody

Post by John Doe

Post by Ubiquitous
Worried that the presidential race may be slipping away from them, Democrats
now express contempt for the people whose votes they need to win in November.
Especially annoying to the party?s leadership is that they have to try to
persuade Pennsylvanians. On Tuesday vice presidential candidate Gov. Tim Walz
(D., Minn.) lamented to wealthy California donors that their party has to win
votes in Western Pennsylvania?s Beaver County, and also persuade people in
York, in the eastern half of the Keystone State. To diminish the power of
such voters, Mr. Walz wants to get rid of the Constitution?s Electoral
College. Now former President Barack Obama has arrived in Pittsburgh to scold
some of the locals for not supporting current Vice President Kamala Harris.
Mr. Obama is now employing the rhetorical tactics he once used against
congressional Republicans to attempt to shame voters into obeying his
political instruction. Mr. Obama?s oratory has always been much more refined
than that of either of his presidential successors?but at least as nasty. The
standard Obama approach is to assume that no one could possibly have an
informed and honest disagreement with him and therefore his opponents must be
ignorant or driven by concealed base motives.
Former President Barack Obama on Thursday admonished Black men who
are hesitating to back Vice President Kamala Harris? presidential
campaign, telling them it?s ?not acceptable? to sit out this election
and suggesting they might be reluctant to vote for Harris because she?s
a woman.
The striking comments by Obama, made to a small group of voters in a
surprise stop at a local Harris campaign office in Pittsburgh, were
part of a more forceful campaign message delivered by the former
president on Thursday as polls continue to show a neck-and-neck race.
At a rally in the city later that evening, Obama issued some of his
most searing public criticisms of his successor to date.
The lack of energy some see around Harris? campaign, Obama first told
the smaller group, ?seems to be more pronounced with the brothers.?
?You?re coming up with all kinds of reasons and excuses, I?ve got a
problem with that,? Obama said. ?Because part of it makes me think ?
and I?m speaking to men directly ? part of it makes me think that,
well, you just aren?t feeling the idea of having a woman as president,
and you?re coming up with other alternatives and other reasons for
that.?
The vice president?s significant role in creating a 40-year-high in inflation
that ravaged incomes isn?t a legitimate reason to oppose her? And of course
there are many other legitimate reasons to find fault with the incumbent vice
president in a world in crisis. Emma Bowman at National Public Radio has more
?On the one hand, you have somebody who grew up like you, knows you,
went to college with you, understands the struggles and pain and joy
that comes from those experiences,? adding that Harris, who is Black
and Asian American, is focused on policy that will benefit Black
communities, such as affordable housing and health care. ?And on the
other side, you have someone who has consistently shown disregard, not
just for the communities, but for you as a person.?
Maybe voters of all backgrounds have had just about all the Biden-Harris
?affordability? they can stand and are nostalgic about the real income gains
of the Trump era.
It?s also very possible that Pennsylvania voters of all backgrounds don?t
think their communities will be well served by Ms. Harris, a San Francisco
leftist who has backed seemingly every zany idea favored by those California
donors, and then some.
Regardless, it?s up to the voters to decide which candidates are most likely
to enable prosperity. Maybe Mr. Walz and Mr. Obama should try winning over
these voters, rather than trying to reduce their electoral power or tossing
them into a 2024 version of Hillary Clinton?s ?basket of deplorables.?
These days that basket is looking more and more like a broad, multiracial
coalition.
As for the Democrats, the country desperately needs Mr. Obama and his party
to turn away from the poisonous ideological mindset which holds that every
setback for their political agenda represents a failure of our form of
government or our people.

I personally can't imagine voting for Trump's stated plan of jailing the
people who have criticized him. He's no longer using statements like
Nazi Germany, he's virtually quoting them now. That should disturb
patriots in every party.

Citation required.

"I think the bigger problem are the people from within. We have some very bad
people. We have some sick people. Radical left lunatics. I think it should be
very easily handled by, if necessary, by National Guard, or if really
necessary, by the military, because they can?t let that happen."
https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/13/politics/trump-military-enemy-from-within-election-day/index.html
Over the weekend, Donald Trump crystalized his authoritarian vision for the
nation when he suggested siccing the military on his political opponents and
American citizens to destroy the ?enemy from within.? Despite the former
president?s direct appeal to full-blown fascism, Republicans are lining up to
defend and downplay his comments.
???I think the bigger problem is the enemy from within,? Trump told Fox News?
Maria Bartiromo on Sunday when asked if he anticipated ?chaos on Election
Day? from undocumented immigrants. ?We have some very bad people, some sick
people, radical left lunatics. ? And it should be easily handled by, if
necessary, by National Guard, or if really necessary, by the military.?
On Monday, Virginia?s Republican Governor Glenn Youngkin attempted to rewrite
Trump?s comments as concerns about immigration, telling CNN?s Jake Tapper
that what the former president was talking about was the ?people coming over
the border,? and that Tapper was ?misrepresenting and misinterpreting?
Trump?s comments.
Tapper countered: ?I?m literally reading his quotes to you, and I played them
earlier so you could hear that they were not made up by me. He?s literally
talking about ?radical left lunatics,? and then one of those ?lunatics? he
mentioned was Congressman Adam Schiff.?
The governor insisted that he didn?t ?believe? that that?s what Trump meant.
?You can wish that he wasn?t saying that, but that?s what he said,? Tapper
replied.
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/republicans-trump-military-against-citizens-election-1235134231/
Former President Trump?s suggestion that U.S. troops could be used to go
after ?radical-left lunatics? following the presidential election has alarmed
those in the military community and bolstered Democratic warnings about a
second Trump term.
Trump, who on Sunday warned he could deploy active or National Guard troops
to counter the ?enemy from within,? quickly drew condemnation from Vice
President Harris?s campaign, which said the comments ?should alarm every
American who cares about their freedom and security.? Harris herself called
Trump ?increasingly unstable and unhinged? during her Monday campaign rally
in Erie, Pa.
Trump has suggested deploying the military within U.S. borders before, and
his former Defense Secretary Mark Esper said the public should take Trump
?seriously.?
?Yes I do, of course,? Esper said Monday evening on CNN when asked whether he
fears Trump would try to utilize the military against U.S. citizens.
?Because I lived through that, and I saw over the summer of 2020 where
President Trump and those around him wanted to use the National Guard in
various capacities in cities such as Chicago and Portland and Seattle,? Esper
said.
https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/4935363-trump-proposes-deploying-troops-radical-left/
Fuck off, you seditious little cunt. You are going to be *taken out*. You have
been spewing your fascist threats to the Constitution for far too long, and we
are not going to tolerate it any longer.

Bring it bitch. You got nothing.

[TruthBarker]

Post by Skeeter

Post by pothead

Post by NoBody

Post by John Doe

Post by Ubiquitous
Worried that the presidential race may be slipping away from them, Democrats
now express contempt for the people whose votes they need to win in November.
Especially annoying to the party?s leadership is that they have to try to
persuade Pennsylvanians. On Tuesday vice presidential candidate Gov. Tim Walz
(D., Minn.) lamented to wealthy California donors that their party has to win
votes in Western Pennsylvania?s Beaver County, and also persuade people in
York, in the eastern half of the Keystone State. To diminish the power of
such voters, Mr. Walz wants to get rid of the Constitution?s Electoral
College. Now former President Barack Obama has arrived in Pittsburgh to scold
some of the locals for not supporting current Vice President Kamala Harris.
Mr. Obama is now employing the rhetorical tactics he once used against
congressional Republicans to attempt to shame voters into obeying his
political instruction. Mr. Obama?s oratory has always been much more refined
than that of either of his presidential successors?but at least as nasty. The
standard Obama approach is to assume that no one could possibly have an
informed and honest disagreement with him and therefore his opponents must be
ignorant or driven by concealed base motives.
Former President Barack Obama on Thursday admonished Black men who
are hesitating to back Vice President Kamala Harris? presidential
campaign, telling them it?s ?not acceptable? to sit out this election
and suggesting they might be reluctant to vote for Harris because she?s
a woman.
The striking comments by Obama, made to a small group of voters in a
surprise stop at a local Harris campaign office in Pittsburgh, were
part of a more forceful campaign message delivered by the former
president on Thursday as polls continue to show a neck-and-neck race.
At a rally in the city later that evening, Obama issued some of his
most searing public criticisms of his successor to date.
The lack of energy some see around Harris? campaign, Obama first told
the smaller group, ?seems to be more pronounced with the brothers.?
?You?re coming up with all kinds of reasons and excuses, I?ve got a
problem with that,? Obama said. ?Because part of it makes me think ?
and I?m speaking to men directly ? part of it makes me think that,
well, you just aren?t feeling the idea of having a woman as president,
and you?re coming up with other alternatives and other reasons for
that.?
The vice president?s significant role in creating a 40-year-high in inflation
that ravaged incomes isn?t a legitimate reason to oppose her? And of course
there are many other legitimate reasons to find fault with the incumbent vice
president in a world in crisis. Emma Bowman at National Public Radio has more
?On the one hand, you have somebody who grew up like you, knows you,
went to college with you, understands the struggles and pain and joy
that comes from those experiences,? adding that Harris, who is Black
and Asian American, is focused on policy that will benefit Black
communities, such as affordable housing and health care. ?And on the
other side, you have someone who has consistently shown disregard, not
just for the communities, but for you as a person.?
Maybe voters of all backgrounds have had just about all the Biden-Harris
?affordability? they can stand and are nostalgic about the real income gains
of the Trump era.
It?s also very possible that Pennsylvania voters of all backgrounds don?t
think their communities will be well served by Ms. Harris, a San Francisco
leftist who has backed seemingly every zany idea favored by those California
donors, and then some.
Regardless, it?s up to the voters to decide which candidates are most likely
to enable prosperity. Maybe Mr. Walz and Mr. Obama should try winning over
these voters, rather than trying to reduce their electoral power or tossing
them into a 2024 version of Hillary Clinton?s ?basket of deplorables.?
These days that basket is looking more and more like a broad, multiracial
coalition.
As for the Democrats, the country desperately needs Mr. Obama and his party
to turn away from the poisonous ideological mindset which holds that every
setback for their political agenda represents a failure of our form of
government or our people.

I personally can't imagine voting for Trump's stated plan of jailing the
people who have criticized him. He's no longer using statements like
Nazi Germany, he's virtually quoting them now. That should disturb
patriots in every party.

Citation required.

"I think the bigger problem are the people from within. We have some very bad
people. We have some sick people. Radical left lunatics. I think it should be
very easily handled by, if necessary, by National Guard, or if really
necessary, by the military, because they can?t let that happen."
https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/13/politics/trump-military-enemy-from-within-election-day/index.html
Over the weekend, Donald Trump crystalized his authoritarian vision for the
nation when he suggested siccing the military on his political opponents and
American citizens to destroy the ?enemy from within.? Despite the former
president?s direct appeal to full-blown fascism, Republicans are lining up to
defend and downplay his comments.
???I think the bigger problem is the enemy from within,? Trump told Fox News?
Maria Bartiromo on Sunday when asked if he anticipated ?chaos on Election
Day? from undocumented immigrants. ?We have some very bad people, some sick
people, radical left lunatics. ? And it should be easily handled by, if
necessary, by National Guard, or if really necessary, by the military.?
On Monday, Virginia?s Republican Governor Glenn Youngkin attempted to rewrite
Trump?s comments as concerns about immigration, telling CNN?s Jake Tapper
that what the former president was talking about was the ?people coming over
the border,? and that Tapper was ?misrepresenting and misinterpreting?
Trump?s comments.
Tapper countered: ?I?m literally reading his quotes to you, and I played them
earlier so you could hear that they were not made up by me. He?s literally
talking about ?radical left lunatics,? and then one of those ?lunatics? he
mentioned was Congressman Adam Schiff.?
The governor insisted that he didn?t ?believe? that that?s what Trump meant.
?You can wish that he wasn?t saying that, but that?s what he said,? Tapper
replied.
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/republicans-trump-military-against-citizens-election-1235134231/
Former President Trump?s suggestion that U.S. troops could be used to go
after ?radical-left lunatics? following the presidential election has alarmed
those in the military community and bolstered Democratic warnings about a
second Trump term.
Trump, who on Sunday warned he could deploy active or National Guard troops
to counter the ?enemy from within,? quickly drew condemnation from Vice
President Harris?s campaign, which said the comments ?should alarm every
American who cares about their freedom and security.? Harris herself called
Trump ?increasingly unstable and unhinged? during her Monday campaign rally
in Erie, Pa.
Trump has suggested deploying the military within U.S. borders before, and
his former Defense Secretary Mark Esper said the public should take Trump
?seriously.?
?Yes I do, of course,? Esper said Monday evening on CNN when asked whether he
fears Trump would try to utilize the military against U.S. citizens.
?Because I lived through that, and I saw over the summer of 2020 where
President Trump and those around him wanted to use the National Guard in
various capacities in cities such as Chicago and Portland and Seattle,? Esper
said.
https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/4935363-trump-proposes-deploying-troops-radical-left/
Fuck off, you seditious little cunt. You are going to be *taken out*. You have
been spewing your fascist threats to the Constitution for far too long, and we
are not going to tolerate it any longer.

Bring it bitch. You got nothing.

trying to sound tough like Trump. It is laughable!

[Skeeter]

Post by TruthBarker

Post by Skeeter

Post by pothead

Post by NoBody

Post by John Doe

Post by Ubiquitous
Worried that the presidential race may be slipping away from them, Democrats
now express contempt for the people whose votes they need to win in November.
Especially annoying to the party?s leadership is that they have to try to
persuade Pennsylvanians. On Tuesday vice presidential candidate Gov. Tim Walz
(D., Minn.) lamented to wealthy California donors that their party has to win
votes in Western Pennsylvania?s Beaver County, and also persuade people in
York, in the eastern half of the Keystone State. To diminish the power of
such voters, Mr. Walz wants to get rid of the Constitution?s Electoral
College. Now former President Barack Obama has arrived in Pittsburgh to scold
some of the locals for not supporting current Vice President Kamala Harris.
Mr. Obama is now employing the rhetorical tactics he once used against
congressional Republicans to attempt to shame voters into obeying his
political instruction. Mr. Obama?s oratory has always been much more refined
than that of either of his presidential successors?but at least as nasty. The
standard Obama approach is to assume that no one could possibly have an
informed and honest disagreement with him and therefore his opponents must be
ignorant or driven by concealed base motives.
Former President Barack Obama on Thursday admonished Black men who
are hesitating to back Vice President Kamala Harris? presidential
campaign, telling them it?s ?not acceptable? to sit out this election
and suggesting they might be reluctant to vote for Harris because she?s
a woman.
The striking comments by Obama, made to a small group of voters in a
surprise stop at a local Harris campaign office in Pittsburgh, were
part of a more forceful campaign message delivered by the former
president on Thursday as polls continue to show a neck-and-neck race.
At a rally in the city later that evening, Obama issued some of his
most searing public criticisms of his successor to date.
The lack of energy some see around Harris? campaign, Obama first told
the smaller group, ?seems to be more pronounced with the brothers.?
?You?re coming up with all kinds of reasons and excuses, I?ve got a
problem with that,? Obama said. ?Because part of it makes me think ?
and I?m speaking to men directly ? part of it makes me think that,
well, you just aren?t feeling the idea of having a woman as president,
and you?re coming up with other alternatives and other reasons for
that.?
The vice president?s significant role in creating a 40-year-high in inflation
that ravaged incomes isn?t a legitimate reason to oppose her? And of course
there are many other legitimate reasons to find fault with the incumbent vice
president in a world in crisis. Emma Bowman at National Public Radio has more
?On the one hand, you have somebody who grew up like you, knows you,
went to college with you, understands the struggles and pain and joy
that comes from those experiences,? adding that Harris, who is Black
and Asian American, is focused on policy that will benefit Black
communities, such as affordable housing and health care. ?And on the
other side, you have someone who has consistently shown disregard, not
just for the communities, but for you as a person.?
Maybe voters of all backgrounds have had just about all the Biden-Harris
?affordability? they can stand and are nostalgic about the real income gains
of the Trump era.
It?s also very possible that Pennsylvania voters of all backgrounds don?t
think their communities will be well served by Ms. Harris, a San Francisco
leftist who has backed seemingly every zany idea favored by those California
donors, and then some.
Regardless, it?s up to the voters to decide which candidates are most likely
to enable prosperity. Maybe Mr. Walz and Mr. Obama should try winning over
these voters, rather than trying to reduce their electoral power or tossing
them into a 2024 version of Hillary Clinton?s ?basket of deplorables.?
These days that basket is looking more and more like a broad, multiracial
coalition.
As for the Democrats, the country desperately needs Mr. Obama and his party
to turn away from the poisonous ideological mindset which holds that every
setback for their political agenda represents a failure of our form of
government or our people.

I personally can't imagine voting for Trump's stated plan of jailing the
people who have criticized him. He's no longer using statements like
Nazi Germany, he's virtually quoting them now. That should disturb
patriots in every party.

Citation required.

"I think the bigger problem are the people from within. We have some very bad
people. We have some sick people. Radical left lunatics. I think it should be
very easily handled by, if necessary, by National Guard, or if really
necessary, by the military, because they can?t let that happen."
https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/13/politics/trump-military-enemy-from-within-election-day/index.html
Over the weekend, Donald Trump crystalized his authoritarian vision for the
nation when he suggested siccing the military on his political opponents and
American citizens to destroy the ?enemy from within.? Despite the former
president?s direct appeal to full-blown fascism, Republicans are lining up to
defend and downplay his comments.
???I think the bigger problem is the enemy from within,? Trump told Fox News?
Maria Bartiromo on Sunday when asked if he anticipated ?chaos on Election
Day? from undocumented immigrants. ?We have some very bad people, some sick
people, radical left lunatics. ? And it should be easily handled by, if
necessary, by National Guard, or if really necessary, by the military.?
On Monday, Virginia?s Republican Governor Glenn Youngkin attempted to rewrite
Trump?s comments as concerns about immigration, telling CNN?s Jake Tapper
that what the former president was talking about was the ?people coming over
the border,? and that Tapper was ?misrepresenting and misinterpreting?
Trump?s comments.
Tapper countered: ?I?m literally reading his quotes to you, and I played them
earlier so you could hear that they were not made up by me. He?s literally
talking about ?radical left lunatics,? and then one of those ?lunatics? he
mentioned was Congressman Adam Schiff.?
The governor insisted that he didn?t ?believe? that that?s what Trump meant.
?You can wish that he wasn?t saying that, but that?s what he said,? Tapper
replied.
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/republicans-trump-military-against-citizens-election-1235134231/
Former President Trump?s suggestion that U.S. troops could be used to go
after ?radical-left lunatics? following the presidential election has alarmed
those in the military community and bolstered Democratic warnings about a
second Trump term.
Trump, who on Sunday warned he could deploy active or National Guard troops
to counter the ?enemy from within,? quickly drew condemnation from Vice
President Harris?s campaign, which said the comments ?should alarm every
American who cares about their freedom and security.? Harris herself called
Trump ?increasingly unstable and unhinged? during her Monday campaign rally
in Erie, Pa.
Trump has suggested deploying the military within U.S. borders before, and
his former Defense Secretary Mark Esper said the public should take Trump
?seriously.?
?Yes I do, of course,? Esper said Monday evening on CNN when asked whether he
fears Trump would try to utilize the military against U.S. citizens.
?Because I lived through that, and I saw over the summer of 2020 where
President Trump and those around him wanted to use the National Guard in
various capacities in cities such as Chicago and Portland and Seattle,? Esper
said.
https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/4935363-trump-proposes-deploying-troops-radical-left/
Fuck off, you seditious little cunt. You are going to be *taken out*. You have
been spewing your fascist threats to the Constitution for far too long, and we
are not going to tolerate it any longer.

Bring it bitch. You got nothing.

trying to sound tough like Trump. It is laughable!

just showing you how dumb you sound

[TruthBarker]

Post by Skeeter

Post by TruthBarker

Post by Skeeter

Post by pothead

Post by NoBody

Post by John Doe

Post by Ubiquitous
Worried that the presidential race may be slipping away from them, Democrats
now express contempt for the people whose votes they need to win in November.
Especially annoying to the party?s leadership is that they have to try to
persuade Pennsylvanians. On Tuesday vice presidential candidate Gov. Tim Walz
(D., Minn.) lamented to wealthy California donors that their party has to win
votes in Western Pennsylvania?s Beaver County, and also persuade people in
York, in the eastern half of the Keystone State. To diminish the power of
such voters, Mr. Walz wants to get rid of the Constitution?s Electoral
College. Now former President Barack Obama has arrived in Pittsburgh to scold
some of the locals for not supporting current Vice President Kamala Harris.
Mr. Obama is now employing the rhetorical tactics he once used against
congressional Republicans to attempt to shame voters into obeying his
political instruction. Mr. Obama?s oratory has always been much more refined
than that of either of his presidential successors?but at least as nasty. The
standard Obama approach is to assume that no one could possibly have an
informed and honest disagreement with him and therefore his opponents must be
ignorant or driven by concealed base motives.
Former President Barack Obama on Thursday admonished Black men who
are hesitating to back Vice President Kamala Harris? presidential
campaign, telling them it?s ?not acceptable? to sit out this election
and suggesting they might be reluctant to vote for Harris because she?s
a woman.
The striking comments by Obama, made to a small group of voters in a
surprise stop at a local Harris campaign office in Pittsburgh, were
part of a more forceful campaign message delivered by the former
president on Thursday as polls continue to show a neck-and-neck race.
At a rally in the city later that evening, Obama issued some of his
most searing public criticisms of his successor to date.
The lack of energy some see around Harris? campaign, Obama first told
the smaller group, ?seems to be more pronounced with the brothers.?
?You?re coming up with all kinds of reasons and excuses, I?ve got a
problem with that,? Obama said. ?Because part of it makes me think ?
and I?m speaking to men directly ? part of it makes me think that,
well, you just aren?t feeling the idea of having a woman as president,
and you?re coming up with other alternatives and other reasons for
that.?
The vice president?s significant role in creating a 40-year-high in inflation
that ravaged incomes isn?t a legitimate reason to oppose her? And of course
there are many other legitimate reasons to find fault with the incumbent vice
president in a world in crisis. Emma Bowman at National Public Radio has more
?On the one hand, you have somebody who grew up like you, knows you,
went to college with you, understands the struggles and pain and joy
that comes from those experiences,? adding that Harris, who is Black
and Asian American, is focused on policy that will benefit Black
communities, such as affordable housing and health care. ?And on the
other side, you have someone who has consistently shown disregard, not
just for the communities, but for you as a person.?
Maybe voters of all backgrounds have had just about all the Biden-Harris
?affordability? they can stand and are nostalgic about the real income gains
of the Trump era.
It?s also very possible that Pennsylvania voters of all backgrounds don?t
think their communities will be well served by Ms. Harris, a San Francisco
leftist who has backed seemingly every zany idea favored by those California
donors, and then some.
Regardless, it?s up to the voters to decide which candidates are most likely
to enable prosperity. Maybe Mr. Walz and Mr. Obama should try winning over
these voters, rather than trying to reduce their electoral power or tossing
them into a 2024 version of Hillary Clinton?s ?basket of deplorables.?
These days that basket is looking more and more like a broad, multiracial
coalition.
As for the Democrats, the country desperately needs Mr. Obama and his party
to turn away from the poisonous ideological mindset which holds that every
setback for their political agenda represents a failure of our form of
government or our people.

I personally can't imagine voting for Trump's stated plan of jailing the
people who have criticized him. He's no longer using statements like
Nazi Germany, he's virtually quoting them now. That should disturb
patriots in every party.

Citation required.

"I think the bigger problem are the people from within. We have some very bad
people. We have some sick people. Radical left lunatics. I think it should be
very easily handled by, if necessary, by National Guard, or if really
necessary, by the military, because they can?t let that happen."
https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/13/politics/trump-military-enemy-from-within-election-day/index.html
Over the weekend, Donald Trump crystalized his authoritarian vision for the
nation when he suggested siccing the military on his political opponents and
American citizens to destroy the ?enemy from within.? Despite the former
president?s direct appeal to full-blown fascism, Republicans are lining up to
defend and downplay his comments.
???I think the bigger problem is the enemy from within,? Trump told Fox News?
Maria Bartiromo on Sunday when asked if he anticipated ?chaos on Election
Day? from undocumented immigrants. ?We have some very bad people, some sick
people, radical left lunatics. ? And it should be easily handled by, if
necessary, by National Guard, or if really necessary, by the military.?
On Monday, Virginia?s Republican Governor Glenn Youngkin attempted to rewrite
Trump?s comments as concerns about immigration, telling CNN?s Jake Tapper
that what the former president was talking about was the ?people coming over
the border,? and that Tapper was ?misrepresenting and misinterpreting?
Trump?s comments.
Tapper countered: ?I?m literally reading his quotes to you, and I played them
earlier so you could hear that they were not made up by me. He?s literally
talking about ?radical left lunatics,? and then one of those ?lunatics? he
mentioned was Congressman Adam Schiff.?
The governor insisted that he didn?t ?believe? that that?s what Trump meant.
?You can wish that he wasn?t saying that, but that?s what he said,? Tapper
replied.
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/republicans-trump-military-against-citizens-election-1235134231/
Former President Trump?s suggestion that U.S. troops could be used to go
after ?radical-left lunatics? following the presidential election has alarmed
those in the military community and bolstered Democratic warnings about a
second Trump term.
Trump, who on Sunday warned he could deploy active or National Guard troops
to counter the ?enemy from within,? quickly drew condemnation from Vice
President Harris?s campaign, which said the comments ?should alarm every
American who cares about their freedom and security.? Harris herself called
Trump ?increasingly unstable and unhinged? during her Monday campaign rally
in Erie, Pa.
Trump has suggested deploying the military within U.S. borders before, and
his former Defense Secretary Mark Esper said the public should take Trump
?seriously.?
?Yes I do, of course,? Esper said Monday evening on CNN when asked whether he
fears Trump would try to utilize the military against U.S. citizens.
?Because I lived through that, and I saw over the summer of 2020 where
President Trump and those around him wanted to use the National Guard in
various capacities in cities such as Chicago and Portland and Seattle,? Esper
said.
https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/4935363-trump-proposes-deploying-troops-radical-left/
Fuck off, you seditious little cunt. You are going to be *taken out*. You have
been spewing your fascist threats to the Constitution for far too long, and we
are not going to tolerate it any longer.

Bring it bitch. You got nothing.

trying to sound tough like Trump. It is laughable!

just showing you how dumb you sound

[NoBody]

On Wed, 16 Oct 2024 09:12:16 -0600, Skeeter

Post by Skeeter

Post by pothead

Post by NoBody

Post by John Doe

Post by Ubiquitous
Worried that the presidential race may be slipping away from them, Democrats
now express contempt for the people whose votes they need to win in November.
Especially annoying to the party?s leadership is that they have to try to
persuade Pennsylvanians. On Tuesday vice presidential candidate Gov. Tim Walz
(D., Minn.) lamented to wealthy California donors that their party has to win
votes in Western Pennsylvania?s Beaver County, and also persuade people in
York, in the eastern half of the Keystone State. To diminish the power of
such voters, Mr. Walz wants to get rid of the Constitution?s Electoral
College. Now former President Barack Obama has arrived in Pittsburgh to scold
some of the locals for not supporting current Vice President Kamala Harris.
Mr. Obama is now employing the rhetorical tactics he once used against
congressional Republicans to attempt to shame voters into obeying his
political instruction. Mr. Obama?s oratory has always been much more refined
than that of either of his presidential successors?but at least as nasty. The
standard Obama approach is to assume that no one could possibly have an
informed and honest disagreement with him and therefore his opponents must be
ignorant or driven by concealed base motives.
Former President Barack Obama on Thursday admonished Black men who
are hesitating to back Vice President Kamala Harris? presidential
campaign, telling them it?s ?not acceptable? to sit out this election
and suggesting they might be reluctant to vote for Harris because she?s
a woman.
The striking comments by Obama, made to a small group of voters in a
surprise stop at a local Harris campaign office in Pittsburgh, were
part of a more forceful campaign message delivered by the former
president on Thursday as polls continue to show a neck-and-neck race.
At a rally in the city later that evening, Obama issued some of his
most searing public criticisms of his successor to date.
The lack of energy some see around Harris? campaign, Obama first told
the smaller group, ?seems to be more pronounced with the brothers.?
?You?re coming up with all kinds of reasons and excuses, I?ve got a
problem with that,? Obama said. ?Because part of it makes me think ?
and I?m speaking to men directly ? part of it makes me think that,
well, you just aren?t feeling the idea of having a woman as president,
and you?re coming up with other alternatives and other reasons for
that.?
The vice president?s significant role in creating a 40-year-high in inflation
that ravaged incomes isn?t a legitimate reason to oppose her? And of course
there are many other legitimate reasons to find fault with the incumbent vice
president in a world in crisis. Emma Bowman at National Public Radio has more
?On the one hand, you have somebody who grew up like you, knows you,
went to college with you, understands the struggles and pain and joy
that comes from those experiences,? adding that Harris, who is Black
and Asian American, is focused on policy that will benefit Black
communities, such as affordable housing and health care. ?And on the
other side, you have someone who has consistently shown disregard, not
just for the communities, but for you as a person.?
Maybe voters of all backgrounds have had just about all the Biden-Harris
?affordability? they can stand and are nostalgic about the real income gains
of the Trump era.
It?s also very possible that Pennsylvania voters of all backgrounds don?t
think their communities will be well served by Ms. Harris, a San Francisco
leftist who has backed seemingly every zany idea favored by those California
donors, and then some.
Regardless, it?s up to the voters to decide which candidates are most likely
to enable prosperity. Maybe Mr. Walz and Mr. Obama should try winning over
these voters, rather than trying to reduce their electoral power or tossing
them into a 2024 version of Hillary Clinton?s ?basket of deplorables.?
These days that basket is looking more and more like a broad, multiracial
coalition.
As for the Democrats, the country desperately needs Mr. Obama and his party
to turn away from the poisonous ideological mindset which holds that every
setback for their political agenda represents a failure of our form of
government or our people.

I personally can't imagine voting for Trump's stated plan of jailing the
people who have criticized him. He's no longer using statements like
Nazi Germany, he's virtually quoting them now. That should disturb
patriots in every party.

Citation required.

"I think the bigger problem are the people from within. We have some very bad
people. We have some sick people. Radical left lunatics. I think it should be
very easily handled by, if necessary, by National Guard, or if really
necessary, by the military, because they can?t let that happen."
https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/13/politics/trump-military-enemy-from-within-election-day/index.html
Over the weekend, Donald Trump crystalized his authoritarian vision for the
nation when he suggested siccing the military on his political opponents and
American citizens to destroy the ?enemy from within.? Despite the former
president?s direct appeal to full-blown fascism, Republicans are lining up to
defend and downplay his comments.
???I think the bigger problem is the enemy from within,? Trump told Fox News?
Maria Bartiromo on Sunday when asked if he anticipated ?chaos on Election
Day? from undocumented immigrants. ?We have some very bad people, some sick
people, radical left lunatics. ? And it should be easily handled by, if
necessary, by National Guard, or if really necessary, by the military.?
On Monday, Virginia?s Republican Governor Glenn Youngkin attempted to rewrite
Trump?s comments as concerns about immigration, telling CNN?s Jake Tapper
that what the former president was talking about was the ?people coming over
the border,? and that Tapper was ?misrepresenting and misinterpreting?
Trump?s comments.
Tapper countered: ?I?m literally reading his quotes to you, and I played them
earlier so you could hear that they were not made up by me. He?s literally
talking about ?radical left lunatics,? and then one of those ?lunatics? he
mentioned was Congressman Adam Schiff.?
The governor insisted that he didn?t ?believe? that that?s what Trump meant.
?You can wish that he wasn?t saying that, but that?s what he said,? Tapper
replied.
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/republicans-trump-military-against-citizens-election-1235134231/
Former President Trump?s suggestion that U.S. troops could be used to go
after ?radical-left lunatics? following the presidential election has alarmed
those in the military community and bolstered Democratic warnings about a
second Trump term.
Trump, who on Sunday warned he could deploy active or National Guard troops
to counter the ?enemy from within,? quickly drew condemnation from Vice
President Harris?s campaign, which said the comments ?should alarm every
American who cares about their freedom and security.? Harris herself called
Trump ?increasingly unstable and unhinged? during her Monday campaign rally
in Erie, Pa.
Trump has suggested deploying the military within U.S. borders before, and
his former Defense Secretary Mark Esper said the public should take Trump
?seriously.?
?Yes I do, of course,? Esper said Monday evening on CNN when asked whether he
fears Trump would try to utilize the military against U.S. citizens.
?Because I lived through that, and I saw over the summer of 2020 where
President Trump and those around him wanted to use the National Guard in
various capacities in cities such as Chicago and Portland and Seattle,? Esper
said.
https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/4935363-trump-proposes-deploying-troops-radical-left/
Fuck off, you seditious little cunt. You are going to be *taken out*. You have
been spewing your fascist threats to the Constitution for far too long, and we
are not going to tolerate it any longer.

Bring it bitch. You got nothing.

Rudely couldn't help but show his true colors. I was wondering how
long I'd have to play with him before he did.

[AlleyCat]

Post by NoBody
On Wed, 16 Oct 2024 09:12:16 -0600, Skeeter

Post by Skeeter

Post by pothead

Post by NoBody

Post by John Doe

Post by Ubiquitous
Worried that the presidential race may be slipping away from them, Democrats
now express contempt for the people whose votes they need to win in November.
Especially annoying to the party?s leadership is that they have to try to
persuade Pennsylvanians. On Tuesday vice presidential candidate Gov. Tim Walz
(D., Minn.) lamented to wealthy California donors that their party has to win
votes in Western Pennsylvania?s Beaver County, and also persuade people in
York, in the eastern half of the Keystone State. To diminish the power of
such voters, Mr. Walz wants to get rid of the Constitution?s Electoral
College. Now former President Barack Obama has arrived in Pittsburgh to scold
some of the locals for not supporting current Vice President Kamala Harris.
Mr. Obama is now employing the rhetorical tactics he once used against
congressional Republicans to attempt to shame voters into obeying his
political instruction. Mr. Obama?s oratory has always been much more refined
than that of either of his presidential successors?but at least as nasty. The
standard Obama approach is to assume that no one could possibly have an
informed and honest disagreement with him and therefore his opponents must be
ignorant or driven by concealed base motives.
Former President Barack Obama on Thursday admonished Black men who
are hesitating to back Vice President Kamala Harris? presidential
campaign, telling them it?s ?not acceptable? to sit out this election
and suggesting they might be reluctant to vote for Harris because she?s
a woman.
The striking comments by Obama, made to a small group of voters in a
surprise stop at a local Harris campaign office in Pittsburgh, were
part of a more forceful campaign message delivered by the former
president on Thursday as polls continue to show a neck-and-neck race.
At a rally in the city later that evening, Obama issued some of his
most searing public criticisms of his successor to date.
The lack of energy some see around Harris? campaign, Obama first told
the smaller group, ?seems to be more pronounced with the brothers.?
?You?re coming up with all kinds of reasons and excuses, I?ve got a
problem with that,? Obama said. ?Because part of it makes me think ?
and I?m speaking to men directly ? part of it makes me think that,
well, you just aren?t feeling the idea of having a woman as president,
and you?re coming up with other alternatives and other reasons for
that.?
The vice president?s significant role in creating a 40-year-high in inflation
that ravaged incomes isn?t a legitimate reason to oppose her? And of course
there are many other legitimate reasons to find fault with the incumbent vice
president in a world in crisis. Emma Bowman at National Public Radio has more
?On the one hand, you have somebody who grew up like you, knows you,
went to college with you, understands the struggles and pain and joy
that comes from those experiences,? adding that Harris, who is Black
and Asian American, is focused on policy that will benefit Black
communities, such as affordable housing and health care. ?And on the
other side, you have someone who has consistently shown disregard, not
just for the communities, but for you as a person.?
Maybe voters of all backgrounds have had just about all the Biden-Harris
?affordability? they can stand and are nostalgic about the real income gains
of the Trump era.
It?s also very possible that Pennsylvania voters of all backgrounds don?t
think their communities will be well served by Ms. Harris, a San Francisco
leftist who has backed seemingly every zany idea favored by those California
donors, and then some.
Regardless, it?s up to the voters to decide which candidates are most likely
to enable prosperity. Maybe Mr. Walz and Mr. Obama should try winning over
these voters, rather than trying to reduce their electoral power or tossing
them into a 2024 version of Hillary Clinton?s ?basket of deplorables.?
These days that basket is looking more and more like a broad, multiracial
coalition.
As for the Democrats, the country desperately needs Mr. Obama and his party
to turn away from the poisonous ideological mindset which holds that every
setback for their political agenda represents a failure of our form of
government or our people.

I personally can't imagine voting for Trump's stated plan of jailing the
people who have criticized him. He's no longer using statements like
Nazi Germany, he's virtually quoting them now. That should disturb
patriots in every party.

Citation required.

"I think the bigger problem are the people from within. We have some very bad
people. We have some sick people. Radical left lunatics. I think it should be
very easily handled by, if necessary, by National Guard, or if really
necessary, by the military, because they can?t let that happen."
https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/13/politics/trump-military-enemy-from-within-election-day/index.html
Over the weekend, Donald Trump crystalized his authoritarian vision for the
nation when he suggested siccing the military on his political opponents and
American citizens to destroy the ?enemy from within.? Despite the former
president?s direct appeal to full-blown fascism, Republicans are lining up to
defend and downplay his comments.
???I think the bigger problem is the enemy from within,? Trump told Fox News?
Maria Bartiromo on Sunday when asked if he anticipated ?chaos on Election
Day? from undocumented immigrants. ?We have some very bad people, some sick
people, radical left lunatics. ? And it should be easily handled by, if
necessary, by National Guard, or if really necessary, by the military.?
On Monday, Virginia?s Republican Governor Glenn Youngkin attempted to rewrite
Trump?s comments as concerns about immigration, telling CNN?s Jake Tapper
that what the former president was talking about was the ?people coming over
the border,? and that Tapper was ?misrepresenting and misinterpreting?
Trump?s comments.
Tapper countered: ?I?m literally reading his quotes to you, and I played them
earlier so you could hear that they were not made up by me. He?s literally
talking about ?radical left lunatics,? and then one of those ?lunatics? he
mentioned was Congressman Adam Schiff.?
The governor insisted that he didn?t ?believe? that that?s what Trump meant.
?You can wish that he wasn?t saying that, but that?s what he said,? Tapper
replied.
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/republicans-trump-military-against-citizens-election-1235134231/
Former President Trump?s suggestion that U.S. troops could be used to go
after ?radical-left lunatics? following the presidential election has alarmed
those in the military community and bolstered Democratic warnings about a
second Trump term.
Trump, who on Sunday warned he could deploy active or National Guard troops
to counter the ?enemy from within,? quickly drew condemnation from Vice
President Harris?s campaign, which said the comments ?should alarm every
American who cares about their freedom and security.? Harris herself called
Trump ?increasingly unstable and unhinged? during her Monday campaign rally
in Erie, Pa.
Trump has suggested deploying the military within U.S. borders before, and
his former Defense Secretary Mark Esper said the public should take Trump
?seriously.?
?Yes I do, of course,? Esper said Monday evening on CNN when asked whether he
fears Trump would try to utilize the military against U.S. citizens.
?Because I lived through that, and I saw over the summer of 2020 where
President Trump and those around him wanted to use the National Guard in
various capacities in cities such as Chicago and Portland and Seattle,? Esper
said.
https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/4935363-trump-proposes-deploying-troops-radical-left/
Fuck off, you seditious little cunt. You are going to be *taken out*. You have
been spewing your fascist threats to the Constitution for far too long, and we
are not going to tolerate it any longer.

Bring it bitch. You got nothing.

Rudely couldn't help but show his true colors. I was wondering how
long I'd have to play with him before he did.

Rudy dances you around like a busted puppet. You always claim you "knew" that it
was him, and you *never* know it's him until deep into the game.

[Skeeter]

Post by AlleyCat

Post by NoBody
On Wed, 16 Oct 2024 09:12:16 -0600, Skeeter

Post by Skeeter

Post by pothead

Post by NoBody

Post by John Doe

Post by Ubiquitous
Worried that the presidential race may be slipping away from them, Democrats
now express contempt for the people whose votes they need to win in November.
Especially annoying to the party?s leadership is that they have to try to
persuade Pennsylvanians. On Tuesday vice presidential candidate Gov. Tim Walz
(D., Minn.) lamented to wealthy California donors that their party has to win
votes in Western Pennsylvania?s Beaver County, and also persuade people in
York, in the eastern half of the Keystone State. To diminish the power of
such voters, Mr. Walz wants to get rid of the Constitution?s Electoral
College. Now former President Barack Obama has arrived in Pittsburgh to scold
some of the locals for not supporting current Vice President Kamala Harris.
Mr. Obama is now employing the rhetorical tactics he once used against
congressional Republicans to attempt to shame voters into obeying his
political instruction. Mr. Obama?s oratory has always been much more refined
than that of either of his presidential successors?but at least as nasty. The
standard Obama approach is to assume that no one could possibly have an
informed and honest disagreement with him and therefore his opponents must be
ignorant or driven by concealed base motives.
Former President Barack Obama on Thursday admonished Black men who
are hesitating to back Vice President Kamala Harris? presidential
campaign, telling them it?s ?not acceptable? to sit out this election
and suggesting they might be reluctant to vote for Harris because she?s
a woman.
The striking comments by Obama, made to a small group of voters in a
surprise stop at a local Harris campaign office in Pittsburgh, were
part of a more forceful campaign message delivered by the former
president on Thursday as polls continue to show a neck-and-neck race.
At a rally in the city later that evening, Obama issued some of his
most searing public criticisms of his successor to date.
The lack of energy some see around Harris? campaign, Obama first told
the smaller group, ?seems to be more pronounced with the brothers.?
?You?re coming up with all kinds of reasons and excuses, I?ve got a
problem with that,? Obama said. ?Because part of it makes me think ?
and I?m speaking to men directly ? part of it makes me think that,
well, you just aren?t feeling the idea of having a woman as president,
and you?re coming up with other alternatives and other reasons for
that.?
The vice president?s significant role in creating a 40-year-high in inflation
that ravaged incomes isn?t a legitimate reason to oppose her? And of course
there are many other legitimate reasons to find fault with the incumbent vice
president in a world in crisis. Emma Bowman at National Public Radio has more
?On the one hand, you have somebody who grew up like you, knows you,
went to college with you, understands the struggles and pain and joy
that comes from those experiences,? adding that Harris, who is Black
and Asian American, is focused on policy that will benefit Black
communities, such as affordable housing and health care. ?And on the
other side, you have someone who has consistently shown disregard, not
just for the communities, but for you as a person.?
Maybe voters of all backgrounds have had just about all the Biden-Harris
?affordability? they can stand and are nostalgic about the real income gains
of the Trump era.
It?s also very possible that Pennsylvania voters of all backgrounds don?t
think their communities will be well served by Ms. Harris, a San Francisco
leftist who has backed seemingly every zany idea favored by those California
donors, and then some.
Regardless, it?s up to the voters to decide which candidates are most likely
to enable prosperity. Maybe Mr. Walz and Mr. Obama should try winning over
these voters, rather than trying to reduce their electoral power or tossing
them into a 2024 version of Hillary Clinton?s ?basket of deplorables.?
These days that basket is looking more and more like a broad, multiracial
coalition.
As for the Democrats, the country desperately needs Mr. Obama and his party
to turn away from the poisonous ideological mindset which holds that every
setback for their political agenda represents a failure of our form of
government or our people.

I personally can't imagine voting for Trump's stated plan of jailing the
people who have criticized him. He's no longer using statements like
Nazi Germany, he's virtually quoting them now. That should disturb
patriots in every party.

Citation required.

"I think the bigger problem are the people from within. We have some very bad
people. We have some sick people. Radical left lunatics. I think it should be
very easily handled by, if necessary, by National Guard, or if really
necessary, by the military, because they can?t let that happen."
https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/13/politics/trump-military-enemy-from-within-election-day/index.html
Over the weekend, Donald Trump crystalized his authoritarian vision for the
nation when he suggested siccing the military on his political opponents and
American citizens to destroy the ?enemy from within.? Despite the former
president?s direct appeal to full-blown fascism, Republicans are lining up to
defend and downplay his comments.
???I think the bigger problem is the enemy from within,? Trump told Fox News?
Maria Bartiromo on Sunday when asked if he anticipated ?chaos on Election
Day? from undocumented immigrants. ?We have some very bad people, some sick
people, radical left lunatics. ? And it should be easily handled by, if
necessary, by National Guard, or if really necessary, by the military.?
On Monday, Virginia?s Republican Governor Glenn Youngkin attempted to rewrite
Trump?s comments as concerns about immigration, telling CNN?s Jake Tapper
that what the former president was talking about was the ?people coming over
the border,? and that Tapper was ?misrepresenting and misinterpreting?
Trump?s comments.
Tapper countered: ?I?m literally reading his quotes to you, and I played them
earlier so you could hear that they were not made up by me. He?s literally
talking about ?radical left lunatics,? and then one of those ?lunatics? he
mentioned was Congressman Adam Schiff.?
The governor insisted that he didn?t ?believe? that that?s what Trump meant.
?You can wish that he wasn?t saying that, but that?s what he said,? Tapper
replied.
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/republicans-trump-military-against-citizens-election-1235134231/
Former President Trump?s suggestion that U.S. troops could be used to go
after ?radical-left lunatics? following the presidential election has alarmed
those in the military community and bolstered Democratic warnings about a
second Trump term.
Trump, who on Sunday warned he could deploy active or National Guard troops
to counter the ?enemy from within,? quickly drew condemnation from Vice
President Harris?s campaign, which said the comments ?should alarm every
American who cares about their freedom and security.? Harris herself called
Trump ?increasingly unstable and unhinged? during her Monday campaign rally
in Erie, Pa.
Trump has suggested deploying the military within U.S. borders before, and
his former Defense Secretary Mark Esper said the public should take Trump
?seriously.?
?Yes I do, of course,? Esper said Monday evening on CNN when asked whether he
fears Trump would try to utilize the military against U.S. citizens.
?Because I lived through that, and I saw over the summer of 2020 where
President Trump and those around him wanted to use the National Guard in
various capacities in cities such as Chicago and Portland and Seattle,? Esper
said.
https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/4935363-trump-proposes-deploying-troops-radical-left/
Fuck off, you seditious little cunt. You are going to be *taken out*. You have
been spewing your fascist threats to the Constitution for far too long, and we
are not going to tolerate it any longer.

Bring it bitch. You got nothing.

Rudely couldn't help but show his true colors. I was wondering how
long I'd have to play with him before he did.

Rudy dances you around like a busted puppet. You always claim you "knew" that it
was him, and you *never* know it's him until deep into the game.

Why do you nymshift and alter the group lines? Why is it so obvious it's
you?

[NoBody]

On Thu, 17 Oct 2024 08:40:21 -0700, AlleyCat

Post by AlleyCat

Post by NoBody
On Wed, 16 Oct 2024 09:12:16 -0600, Skeeter

Post by Skeeter

Post by pothead

Post by NoBody

Post by John Doe

Post by Ubiquitous
Worried that the presidential race may be slipping away from them, Democrats
now express contempt for the people whose votes they need to win in November.
Especially annoying to the party?s leadership is that they have to try to
persuade Pennsylvanians. On Tuesday vice presidential candidate Gov. Tim Walz
(D., Minn.) lamented to wealthy California donors that their party has to win
votes in Western Pennsylvania?s Beaver County, and also persuade people in
York, in the eastern half of the Keystone State. To diminish the power of
such voters, Mr. Walz wants to get rid of the Constitution?s Electoral
College. Now former President Barack Obama has arrived in Pittsburgh to scold
some of the locals for not supporting current Vice President Kamala Harris.
Mr. Obama is now employing the rhetorical tactics he once used against
congressional Republicans to attempt to shame voters into obeying his
political instruction. Mr. Obama?s oratory has always been much more refined
than that of either of his presidential successors?but at least as nasty. The
standard Obama approach is to assume that no one could possibly have an
informed and honest disagreement with him and therefore his opponents must be
ignorant or driven by concealed base motives.
Former President Barack Obama on Thursday admonished Black men who
are hesitating to back Vice President Kamala Harris? presidential
campaign, telling them it?s ?not acceptable? to sit out this election
and suggesting they might be reluctant to vote for Harris because she?s
a woman.
The striking comments by Obama, made to a small group of voters in a
surprise stop at a local Harris campaign office in Pittsburgh, were
part of a more forceful campaign message delivered by the former
president on Thursday as polls continue to show a neck-and-neck race.
At a rally in the city later that evening, Obama issued some of his
most searing public criticisms of his successor to date.
The lack of energy some see around Harris? campaign, Obama first told
the smaller group, ?seems to be more pronounced with the brothers.?
?You?re coming up with all kinds of reasons and excuses, I?ve got a
problem with that,? Obama said. ?Because part of it makes me think ?
and I?m speaking to men directly ? part of it makes me think that,
well, you just aren?t feeling the idea of having a woman as president,
and you?re coming up with other alternatives and other reasons for
that.?
The vice president?s significant role in creating a 40-year-high in inflation
that ravaged incomes isn?t a legitimate reason to oppose her? And of course
there are many other legitimate reasons to find fault with the incumbent vice
president in a world in crisis. Emma Bowman at National Public Radio has more
?On the one hand, you have somebody who grew up like you, knows you,
went to college with you, understands the struggles and pain and joy
that comes from those experiences,? adding that Harris, who is Black
and Asian American, is focused on policy that will benefit Black
communities, such as affordable housing and health care. ?And on the
other side, you have someone who has consistently shown disregard, not
just for the communities, but for you as a person.?
Maybe voters of all backgrounds have had just about all the Biden-Harris
?affordability? they can stand and are nostalgic about the real income gains
of the Trump era.
It?s also very possible that Pennsylvania voters of all backgrounds don?t
think their communities will be well served by Ms. Harris, a San Francisco
leftist who has backed seemingly every zany idea favored by those California
donors, and then some.
Regardless, it?s up to the voters to decide which candidates are most likely
to enable prosperity. Maybe Mr. Walz and Mr. Obama should try winning over
these voters, rather than trying to reduce their electoral power or tossing
them into a 2024 version of Hillary Clinton?s ?basket of deplorables.?
These days that basket is looking more and more like a broad, multiracial
coalition.
As for the Democrats, the country desperately needs Mr. Obama and his party
to turn away from the poisonous ideological mindset which holds that every
setback for their political agenda represents a failure of our form of
government or our people.

I personally can't imagine voting for Trump's stated plan of jailing the
people who have criticized him. He's no longer using statements like
Nazi Germany, he's virtually quoting them now. That should disturb
patriots in every party.

Citation required.

"I think the bigger problem are the people from within. We have some very bad
people. We have some sick people. Radical left lunatics. I think it should be
very easily handled by, if necessary, by National Guard, or if really
necessary, by the military, because they can?t let that happen."
https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/13/politics/trump-military-enemy-from-within-election-day/index.html
Over the weekend, Donald Trump crystalized his authoritarian vision for the
nation when he suggested siccing the military on his political opponents and
American citizens to destroy the ?enemy from within.? Despite the former
president?s direct appeal to full-blown fascism, Republicans are lining up to
defend and downplay his comments.
???I think the bigger problem is the enemy from within,? Trump told Fox News?
Maria Bartiromo on Sunday when asked if he anticipated ?chaos on Election
Day? from undocumented immigrants. ?We have some very bad people, some sick
people, radical left lunatics. ? And it should be easily handled by, if
necessary, by National Guard, or if really necessary, by the military.?
On Monday, Virginia?s Republican Governor Glenn Youngkin attempted to rewrite
Trump?s comments as concerns about immigration, telling CNN?s Jake Tapper
that what the former president was talking about was the ?people coming over
the border,? and that Tapper was ?misrepresenting and misinterpreting?
Trump?s comments.
Tapper countered: ?I?m literally reading his quotes to you, and I played them
earlier so you could hear that they were not made up by me. He?s literally
talking about ?radical left lunatics,? and then one of those ?lunatics? he
mentioned was Congressman Adam Schiff.?
The governor insisted that he didn?t ?believe? that that?s what Trump meant.
?You can wish that he wasn?t saying that, but that?s what he said,? Tapper
replied.
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/republicans-trump-military-against-citizens-election-1235134231/
Former President Trump?s suggestion that U.S. troops could be used to go
after ?radical-left lunatics? following the presidential election has alarmed
those in the military community and bolstered Democratic warnings about a
second Trump term.
Trump, who on Sunday warned he could deploy active or National Guard troops
to counter the ?enemy from within,? quickly drew condemnation from Vice
President Harris?s campaign, which said the comments ?should alarm every
American who cares about their freedom and security.? Harris herself called
Trump ?increasingly unstable and unhinged? during her Monday campaign rally
in Erie, Pa.
Trump has suggested deploying the military within U.S. borders before, and
his former Defense Secretary Mark Esper said the public should take Trump
?seriously.?
?Yes I do, of course,? Esper said Monday evening on CNN when asked whether he
fears Trump would try to utilize the military against U.S. citizens.
?Because I lived through that, and I saw over the summer of 2020 where
President Trump and those around him wanted to use the National Guard in
various capacities in cities such as Chicago and Portland and Seattle,? Esper
said.
https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/4935363-trump-proposes-deploying-troops-radical-left/
Fuck off, you seditious little cunt. You are going to be *taken out*. You have
been spewing your fascist threats to the Constitution for far too long, and we
are not going to tolerate it any longer.

Bring it bitch. You got nothing.

Rudely couldn't help but show his true colors. I was wondering how
long I'd have to play with him before he did.

Rudy dances you around like a busted puppet. You always claim you "knew" that it
was him, and you *never* know it's him until deep into the game.

You misunderstand my SOP. I know it from the beginning and engage
only as long as he's civil and logical. He can't help himself and
can't stay that way and acts like a child. Once he outs himself, it's
my victory.

I love that he plays my game and falls for it everytime.

[AlleyCat]

Post by NoBody
On Thu, 17 Oct 2024 08:40:21 -0700, AlleyCat

Post by AlleyCat

Post by NoBody
On Wed, 16 Oct 2024 09:12:16 -0600, Skeeter

Post by Skeeter

Post by pothead

Post by NoBody

Post by John Doe

Post by Ubiquitous
Worried that the presidential race may be slipping away from them, Democrats
now express contempt for the people whose votes they need to win in November.
Especially annoying to the party?s leadership is that they have to try to
persuade Pennsylvanians. On Tuesday vice presidential candidate Gov. Tim Walz
(D., Minn.) lamented to wealthy California donors that their party has to win
votes in Western Pennsylvania?s Beaver County, and also persuade people in
York, in the eastern half of the Keystone State. To diminish the power of
such voters, Mr. Walz wants to get rid of the Constitution?s Electoral
College. Now former President Barack Obama has arrived in Pittsburgh to scold
some of the locals for not supporting current Vice President Kamala Harris.
Mr. Obama is now employing the rhetorical tactics he once used against
congressional Republicans to attempt to shame voters into obeying his
political instruction. Mr. Obama?s oratory has always been much more refined
than that of either of his presidential successors?but at least as nasty. The
standard Obama approach is to assume that no one could possibly have an
informed and honest disagreement with him and therefore his opponents must be
ignorant or driven by concealed base motives.
Former President Barack Obama on Thursday admonished Black men who
are hesitating to back Vice President Kamala Harris? presidential
campaign, telling them it?s ?not acceptable? to sit out this election
and suggesting they might be reluctant to vote for Harris because she?s
a woman.
The striking comments by Obama, made to a small group of voters in a
surprise stop at a local Harris campaign office in Pittsburgh, were
part of a more forceful campaign message delivered by the former
president on Thursday as polls continue to show a neck-and-neck race.
At a rally in the city later that evening, Obama issued some of his
most searing public criticisms of his successor to date.
The lack of energy some see around Harris? campaign, Obama first told
the smaller group, ?seems to be more pronounced with the brothers.?
?You?re coming up with all kinds of reasons and excuses, I?ve got a
problem with that,? Obama said. ?Because part of it makes me think ?
and I?m speaking to men directly ? part of it makes me think that,
well, you just aren?t feeling the idea of having a woman as president,
and you?re coming up with other alternatives and other reasons for
that.?
The vice president?s significant role in creating a 40-year-high in inflation
that ravaged incomes isn?t a legitimate reason to oppose her? And of course
there are many other legitimate reasons to find fault with the incumbent vice
president in a world in crisis. Emma Bowman at National Public Radio has more
?On the one hand, you have somebody who grew up like you, knows you,
went to college with you, understands the struggles and pain and joy
that comes from those experiences,? adding that Harris, who is Black
and Asian American, is focused on policy that will benefit Black
communities, such as affordable housing and health care. ?And on the
other side, you have someone who has consistently shown disregard, not
just for the communities, but for you as a person.?
Maybe voters of all backgrounds have had just about all the Biden-Harris
?affordability? they can stand and are nostalgic about the real income gains
of the Trump era.
It?s also very possible that Pennsylvania voters of all backgrounds don?t
think their communities will be well served by Ms. Harris, a San Francisco
leftist who has backed seemingly every zany idea favored by those California
donors, and then some.
Regardless, it?s up to the voters to decide which candidates are most likely
to enable prosperity. Maybe Mr. Walz and Mr. Obama should try winning over
these voters, rather than trying to reduce their electoral power or tossing
them into a 2024 version of Hillary Clinton?s ?basket of deplorables.?
These days that basket is looking more and more like a broad, multiracial
coalition.
As for the Democrats, the country desperately needs Mr. Obama and his party
to turn away from the poisonous ideological mindset which holds that every
setback for their political agenda represents a failure of our form of
government or our people.

I personally can't imagine voting for Trump's stated plan of jailing the
people who have criticized him. He's no longer using statements like
Nazi Germany, he's virtually quoting them now. That should disturb
patriots in every party.

Citation required.

"I think the bigger problem are the people from within. We have some very bad
people. We have some sick people. Radical left lunatics. I think it should be
very easily handled by, if necessary, by National Guard, or if really
necessary, by the military, because they can?t let that happen."
https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/13/politics/trump-military-enemy-from-within-election-day/index.html
Over the weekend, Donald Trump crystalized his authoritarian vision for the
nation when he suggested siccing the military on his political opponents and
American citizens to destroy the ?enemy from within.? Despite the former
president?s direct appeal to full-blown fascism, Republicans are lining up to
defend and downplay his comments.
???I think the bigger problem is the enemy from within,? Trump told Fox News?
Maria Bartiromo on Sunday when asked if he anticipated ?chaos on Election
Day? from undocumented immigrants. ?We have some very bad people, some sick
people, radical left lunatics. ? And it should be easily handled by, if
necessary, by National Guard, or if really necessary, by the military.?
On Monday, Virginia?s Republican Governor Glenn Youngkin attempted to rewrite
Trump?s comments as concerns about immigration, telling CNN?s Jake Tapper
that what the former president was talking about was the ?people coming over
the border,? and that Tapper was ?misrepresenting and misinterpreting?
Trump?s comments.
Tapper countered: ?I?m literally reading his quotes to you, and I played them
earlier so you could hear that they were not made up by me. He?s literally
talking about ?radical left lunatics,? and then one of those ?lunatics? he
mentioned was Congressman Adam Schiff.?
The governor insisted that he didn?t ?believe? that that?s what Trump meant.
?You can wish that he wasn?t saying that, but that?s what he said,? Tapper
replied.
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/republicans-trump-military-against-citizens-election-1235134231/
Former President Trump?s suggestion that U.S. troops could be used to go
after ?radical-left lunatics? following the presidential election has alarmed
those in the military community and bolstered Democratic warnings about a
second Trump term.
Trump, who on Sunday warned he could deploy active or National Guard troops
to counter the ?enemy from within,? quickly drew condemnation from Vice
President Harris?s campaign, which said the comments ?should alarm every
American who cares about their freedom and security.? Harris herself called
Trump ?increasingly unstable and unhinged? during her Monday campaign rally
in Erie, Pa.
Trump has suggested deploying the military within U.S. borders before, and
his former Defense Secretary Mark Esper said the public should take Trump
?seriously.?
?Yes I do, of course,? Esper said Monday evening on CNN when asked whether he
fears Trump would try to utilize the military against U.S. citizens.
?Because I lived through that, and I saw over the summer of 2020 where
President Trump and those around him wanted to use the National Guard in
various capacities in cities such as Chicago and Portland and Seattle,? Esper
said.
https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/4935363-trump-proposes-deploying-troops-radical-left/
Fuck off, you seditious little cunt. You are going to be *taken out*. You have
been spewing your fascist threats to the Constitution for far too long, and we
are not going to tolerate it any longer.

Bring it bitch. You got nothing.

Rudely couldn't help but show his true colors. I was wondering how
long I'd have to play with him before he did.

Rudy dances you around like a busted puppet. You always claim you "knew" that it
was him, and you *never* know it's him until deep into the game.

You misunderstand my SOP. I know it from the beginning and

Bullshit. You do not know.

[AlleyCat]

Post by NoBody
On Thu, 17 Oct 2024 08:40:21 -0700, AlleyCat

Post by AlleyCat

Post by NoBody
On Wed, 16 Oct 2024 09:12:16 -0600, Skeeter

Post by Skeeter

Post by pothead

Post by NoBody

Post by John Doe

Post by Ubiquitous
Worried that the presidential race may be slipping away from them, Democrats
now express contempt for the people whose votes they need to win in November.
Especially annoying to the party?s leadership is that they have to try to
persuade Pennsylvanians. On Tuesday vice presidential candidate Gov. Tim Walz
(D., Minn.) lamented to wealthy California donors that their party has to win
votes in Western Pennsylvania?s Beaver County, and also persuade people in
York, in the eastern half of the Keystone State. To diminish the power of
such voters, Mr. Walz wants to get rid of the Constitution?s Electoral
College. Now former President Barack Obama has arrived in Pittsburgh to scold
some of the locals for not supporting current Vice President Kamala Harris.
Mr. Obama is now employing the rhetorical tactics he once used against
congressional Republicans to attempt to shame voters into obeying his
political instruction. Mr. Obama?s oratory has always been much more refined
than that of either of his presidential successors?but at least as nasty. The
standard Obama approach is to assume that no one could possibly have an
informed and honest disagreement with him and therefore his opponents must be
ignorant or driven by concealed base motives.
Former President Barack Obama on Thursday admonished Black men who
are hesitating to back Vice President Kamala Harris? presidential
campaign, telling them it?s ?not acceptable? to sit out this election
and suggesting they might be reluctant to vote for Harris because she?s
a woman.
The striking comments by Obama, made to a small group of voters in a
surprise stop at a local Harris campaign office in Pittsburgh, were
part of a more forceful campaign message delivered by the former
president on Thursday as polls continue to show a neck-and-neck race.
At a rally in the city later that evening, Obama issued some of his
most searing public criticisms of his successor to date.
The lack of energy some see around Harris? campaign, Obama first told
the smaller group, ?seems to be more pronounced with the brothers.?
?You?re coming up with all kinds of reasons and excuses, I?ve got a
problem with that,? Obama said. ?Because part of it makes me think ?
and I?m speaking to men directly ? part of it makes me think that,
well, you just aren?t feeling the idea of having a woman as president,
and you?re coming up with other alternatives and other reasons for
that.?
The vice president?s significant role in creating a 40-year-high in inflation
that ravaged incomes isn?t a legitimate reason to oppose her? And of course
there are many other legitimate reasons to find fault with the incumbent vice
president in a world in crisis. Emma Bowman at National Public Radio has more
?On the one hand, you have somebody who grew up like you, knows you,
went to college with you, understands the struggles and pain and joy
that comes from those experiences,? adding that Harris, who is Black
and Asian American, is focused on policy that will benefit Black
communities, such as affordable housing and health care. ?And on the
other side, you have someone who has consistently shown disregard, not
just for the communities, but for you as a person.?
Maybe voters of all backgrounds have had just about all the Biden-Harris
?affordability? they can stand and are nostalgic about the real income gains
of the Trump era.
It?s also very possible that Pennsylvania voters of all backgrounds don?t
think their communities will be well served by Ms. Harris, a San Francisco
leftist who has backed seemingly every zany idea favored by those California
donors, and then some.
Regardless, it?s up to the voters to decide which candidates are most likely
to enable prosperity. Maybe Mr. Walz and Mr. Obama should try winning over
these voters, rather than trying to reduce their electoral power or tossing
them into a 2024 version of Hillary Clinton?s ?basket of deplorables.?
These days that basket is looking more and more like a broad, multiracial
coalition.
As for the Democrats, the country desperately needs Mr. Obama and his party
to turn away from the poisonous ideological mindset which holds that every
setback for their political agenda represents a failure of our form of
government or our people.

I personally can't imagine voting for Trump's stated plan of jailing the
people who have criticized him. He's no longer using statements like
Nazi Germany, he's virtually quoting them now. That should disturb
patriots in every party.

Citation required.

"I think the bigger problem are the people from within. We have some very bad
people. We have some sick people. Radical left lunatics. I think it should be
very easily handled by, if necessary, by National Guard, or if really
necessary, by the military, because they can?t let that happen."
https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/13/politics/trump-military-enemy-from-within-election-day/index.html
Over the weekend, Donald Trump crystalized his authoritarian vision for the
nation when he suggested siccing the military on his political opponents and
American citizens to destroy the ?enemy from within.? Despite the former
president?s direct appeal to full-blown fascism, Republicans are lining up to
defend and downplay his comments.
???I think the bigger problem is the enemy from within,? Trump told Fox News?
Maria Bartiromo on Sunday when asked if he anticipated ?chaos on Election
Day? from undocumented immigrants. ?We have some very bad people, some sick
people, radical left lunatics. ? And it should be easily handled by, if
necessary, by National Guard, or if really necessary, by the military.?
On Monday, Virginia?s Republican Governor Glenn Youngkin attempted to rewrite
Trump?s comments as concerns about immigration, telling CNN?s Jake Tapper
that what the former president was talking about was the ?people coming over
the border,? and that Tapper was ?misrepresenting and misinterpreting?
Trump?s comments.
Tapper countered: ?I?m literally reading his quotes to you, and I played them
earlier so you could hear that they were not made up by me. He?s literally
talking about ?radical left lunatics,? and then one of those ?lunatics? he
mentioned was Congressman Adam Schiff.?
The governor insisted that he didn?t ?believe? that that?s what Trump meant.
?You can wish that he wasn?t saying that, but that?s what he said,? Tapper
replied.
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/republicans-trump-military-against-citizens-election-1235134231/
Former President Trump?s suggestion that U.S. troops could be used to go
after ?radical-left lunatics? following the presidential election has alarmed
those in the military community and bolstered Democratic warnings about a
second Trump term.
Trump, who on Sunday warned he could deploy active or National Guard troops
to counter the ?enemy from within,? quickly drew condemnation from Vice
President Harris?s campaign, which said the comments ?should alarm every
American who cares about their freedom and security.? Harris herself called
Trump ?increasingly unstable and unhinged? during her Monday campaign rally
in Erie, Pa.
Trump has suggested deploying the military within U.S. borders before, and
his former Defense Secretary Mark Esper said the public should take Trump
?seriously.?
?Yes I do, of course,? Esper said Monday evening on CNN when asked whether he
fears Trump would try to utilize the military against U.S. citizens.
?Because I lived through that, and I saw over the summer of 2020 where
President Trump and those around him wanted to use the National Guard in
various capacities in cities such as Chicago and Portland and Seattle,? Esper
said.
https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/4935363-trump-proposes-deploying-troops-radical-left/
Fuck off, you seditious little cunt. You are going to be *taken out*. You have
been spewing your fascist threats to the Constitution for far too long, and we
are not going to tolerate it any longer.

Bring it bitch. You got nothing.

Rudely couldn't help but show his true colors. I was wondering how
long I'd have to play with him before he did.

Rudy dances you around like a busted puppet. You always claim you "knew" that it
was him, and you *never* know it's him until deep into the game.

You misunderstand my SOP. I know it from the beginning and

Bullshit. You do not know.

[NoBody]

Post by pothead

Post by NoBody

Post by John Doe

Post by Ubiquitous
Worried that the presidential race may be slipping away from them, Democrats
now express contempt for the people whose votes they need to win in November.
Especially annoying to the party’s leadership is that they have to try to
persuade Pennsylvanians. On Tuesday vice presidential candidate Gov. Tim Walz
(D., Minn.) lamented to wealthy California donors that their party has to win
votes in Western Pennsylvania’s Beaver County, and also persuade people in
York, in the eastern half of the Keystone State. To diminish the power of
such voters, Mr. Walz wants to get rid of the Constitution’s Electoral
College. Now former President Barack Obama has arrived in Pittsburgh to scold
some of the locals for not supporting current Vice President Kamala Harris.
Mr. Obama is now employing the rhetorical tactics he once used against
congressional Republicans to attempt to shame voters into obeying his
political instruction. Mr. Obama’s oratory has always been much more refined
than that of either of his presidential successors—but at least as nasty. The
standard Obama approach is to assume that no one could possibly have an
informed and honest disagreement with him and therefore his opponents must be
ignorant or driven by concealed base motives.
Former President Barack Obama on Thursday admonished Black men who
are hesitating to back Vice President Kamala Harris’ presidential
campaign, telling them it’s “not acceptable” to sit out this election
and suggesting they might be reluctant to vote for Harris because she’s
a woman.
The striking comments by Obama, made to a small group of voters in a
surprise stop at a local Harris campaign office in Pittsburgh, were
part of a more forceful campaign message delivered by the former
president on Thursday as polls continue to show a neck-and-neck race.
At a rally in the city later that evening, Obama issued some of his
most searing public criticisms of his successor to date.
The lack of energy some see around Harris’ campaign, Obama first told
the smaller group, “seems to be more pronounced with the brothers.”
“You’re coming up with all kinds of reasons and excuses, I’ve got a
problem with that,” Obama said. “Because part of it makes me think –
and I’m speaking to men directly – part of it makes me think that,
well, you just aren’t feeling the idea of having a woman as president,
and you’re coming up with other alternatives and other reasons for
that.”
The vice president’s significant role in creating a 40-year-high in inflation
that ravaged incomes isn’t a legitimate reason to oppose her? And of course
there are many other legitimate reasons to find fault with the incumbent vice
president in a world in crisis. Emma Bowman at National Public Radio has more
“On the one hand, you have somebody who grew up like you, knows you,
went to college with you, understands the struggles and pain and joy
that comes from those experiences,” adding that Harris, who is Black
and Asian American, is focused on policy that will benefit Black
communities, such as affordable housing and health care. “And on the
other side, you have someone who has consistently shown disregard, not
just for the communities, but for you as a person.”
Maybe voters of all backgrounds have had just about all the Biden-Harris
“affordability” they can stand and are nostalgic about the real income gains
of the Trump era.
It’s also very possible that Pennsylvania voters of all backgrounds don’t
think their communities will be well served by Ms. Harris, a San Francisco
leftist who has backed seemingly every zany idea favored by those California
donors, and then some.
Regardless, it’s up to the voters to decide which candidates are most likely
to enable prosperity. Maybe Mr. Walz and Mr. Obama should try winning over
these voters, rather than trying to reduce their electoral power or tossing
them into a 2024 version of Hillary Clinton’s “basket of deplorables.”
These days that basket is looking more and more like a broad, multiracial
coalition.
As for the Democrats, the country desperately needs Mr. Obama and his party
to turn away from the poisonous ideological mindset which holds that every
setback for their political agenda represents a failure of our form of
government or our people.

I personally can't imagine voting for Trump's stated plan of jailing the
people who have criticized him. He's no longer using statements like
Nazi Germany, he's virtually quoting them now. That should disturb
patriots in every party.

Citation required.

"I think the bigger problem are the people from within. We have some very bad
people. We have some sick people. Radical left lunatics. I think it should be
very easily handled by, if necessary, by National Guard, or if really
necessary, by the military, because they can’t let that happen."
https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/13/politics/trump-military-enemy-from-within-election-day/index.html

This does not support your claim. His statement is law enforcement
101. When libs riot out of control, the are procedures in place to
address them up to and including military forces. This should not be
news to you.


The rest your nonsense is snipped since it just repeats the above
which is insufficient.

[Ken]

Post by NoBody

Post by pothead

Post by NoBody

Post by John Doe

Post by Ubiquitous
Worried that the presidential race may be slipping away from them, Democrats
now express contempt for the people whose votes they need to win in November.
Especially annoying to the party’s leadership is that they have to try to
persuade Pennsylvanians. On Tuesday vice presidential candidate Gov. Tim Walz
(D., Minn.) lamented to wealthy California donors that their party has to win
votes in Western Pennsylvania’s Beaver County, and also persuade people in
York, in the eastern half of the Keystone State. To diminish the power of
such voters, Mr. Walz wants to get rid of the Constitution’s Electoral
College. Now former President Barack Obama has arrived in Pittsburgh to scold
some of the locals for not supporting current Vice President Kamala Harris.
Mr. Obama is now employing the rhetorical tactics he once used against
congressional Republicans to attempt to shame voters into obeying his
political instruction. Mr. Obama’s oratory has always been much more refined
than that of either of his presidential successors—but at least as nasty. The
standard Obama approach is to assume that no one could possibly have an
informed and honest disagreement with him and therefore his opponents must be
ignorant or driven by concealed base motives.
Former President Barack Obama on Thursday admonished Black men who
are hesitating to back Vice President Kamala Harris’ presidential
campaign, telling them it’s “not acceptable” to sit out this election
and suggesting they might be reluctant to vote for Harris because she’s
a woman.
The striking comments by Obama, made to a small group of voters in a
surprise stop at a local Harris campaign office in Pittsburgh, were
part of a more forceful campaign message delivered by the former
president on Thursday as polls continue to show a neck-and-neck race.
At a rally in the city later that evening, Obama issued some of his
most searing public criticisms of his successor to date.
The lack of energy some see around Harris’ campaign, Obama first told
the smaller group, “seems to be more pronounced with the brothers.”
“You’re coming up with all kinds of reasons and excuses, I’ve got a
problem with that,” Obama said. “Because part of it makes me think –
and I’m speaking to men directly – part of it makes me think that,
well, you just aren’t feeling the idea of having a woman as president,
and you’re coming up with other alternatives and other reasons for
that.”
The vice president’s significant role in creating a 40-year-high in inflation
that ravaged incomes isn’t a legitimate reason to oppose her? And of course
there are many other legitimate reasons to find fault with the incumbent vice
president in a world in crisis. Emma Bowman at National Public Radio has more
“On the one hand, you have somebody who grew up like you, knows you,
went to college with you, understands the struggles and pain and joy
that comes from those experiences,” adding that Harris, who is Black
and Asian American, is focused on policy that will benefit Black
communities, such as affordable housing and health care. “And on the
other side, you have someone who has consistently shown disregard, not
just for the communities, but for you as a person.”
Maybe voters of all backgrounds have had just about all the Biden-Harris
“affordability” they can stand and are nostalgic about the real income gains
of the Trump era.
It’s also very possible that Pennsylvania voters of all backgrounds don’t
think their communities will be well served by Ms. Harris, a San Francisco
leftist who has backed seemingly every zany idea favored by those California
donors, and then some.
Regardless, it’s up to the voters to decide which candidates are most likely
to enable prosperity. Maybe Mr. Walz and Mr. Obama should try winning over
these voters, rather than trying to reduce their electoral power or tossing
them into a 2024 version of Hillary Clinton’s “basket of deplorables.”
These days that basket is looking more and more like a broad, multiracial
coalition.
As for the Democrats, the country desperately needs Mr. Obama and his party
to turn away from the poisonous ideological mindset which holds that every
setback for their political agenda represents a failure of our form of
government or our people.

I personally can't imagine voting for Trump's stated plan of jailing the
people who have criticized him. He's no longer using statements like
Nazi Germany, he's virtually quoting them now. That should disturb
patriots in every party.

Citation required.

"I think the bigger problem are the people from within. We have some very bad
people. We have some sick people. Radical left lunatics. I think it should be
very easily handled by, if necessary, by National Guard, or if really
necessary, by the military, because they can’t let that happen."
https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/13/politics/trump-military-enemy-from-within-election-day/index.html

This does not support your claim.

It supports the claim. You always say "this does not support your claim," and
you're always lying. The material *always* supports the claim.

Trump is *bragging* that he is going to sic the military and law enforcement on
*anyone* who opposes him. He's very open about it. You're lying.

[Skeeter]

Post by Ken

Post by NoBody

Post by pothead

Post by NoBody

Post by John Doe

Post by Ubiquitous
Worried that the presidential race may be slipping away from them, Democrats
now express contempt for the people whose votes they need to win in November.
Especially annoying to the party?s leadership is that they have to try to
persuade Pennsylvanians. On Tuesday vice presidential candidate Gov. Tim Walz
(D., Minn.) lamented to wealthy California donors that their party has to win
votes in Western Pennsylvania?s Beaver County, and also persuade people in
York, in the eastern half of the Keystone State. To diminish the power of
such voters, Mr. Walz wants to get rid of the Constitution?s Electoral
College. Now former President Barack Obama has arrived in Pittsburgh to scold
some of the locals for not supporting current Vice President Kamala Harris.
Mr. Obama is now employing the rhetorical tactics he once used against
congressional Republicans to attempt to shame voters into obeying his
political instruction. Mr. Obama?s oratory has always been much more refined
than that of either of his presidential successors?but at least as nasty. The
standard Obama approach is to assume that no one could possibly have an
informed and honest disagreement with him and therefore his opponents must be
ignorant or driven by concealed base motives.
Former President Barack Obama on Thursday admonished Black men who
are hesitating to back Vice President Kamala Harris? presidential
campaign, telling them it?s ?not acceptable? to sit out this election
and suggesting they might be reluctant to vote for Harris because she?s
a woman.
The striking comments by Obama, made to a small group of voters in a
surprise stop at a local Harris campaign office in Pittsburgh, were
part of a more forceful campaign message delivered by the former
president on Thursday as polls continue to show a neck-and-neck race.
At a rally in the city later that evening, Obama issued some of his
most searing public criticisms of his successor to date.
The lack of energy some see around Harris? campaign, Obama first told
the smaller group, ?seems to be more pronounced with the brothers.?
?You?re coming up with all kinds of reasons and excuses, I?ve got a
problem with that,? Obama said. ?Because part of it makes me think ?
and I?m speaking to men directly ? part of it makes me think that,
well, you just aren?t feeling the idea of having a woman as president,
and you?re coming up with other alternatives and other reasons for
that.?
The vice president?s significant role in creating a 40-year-high in inflation
that ravaged incomes isn?t a legitimate reason to oppose her? And of course
there are many other legitimate reasons to find fault with the incumbent vice
president in a world in crisis. Emma Bowman at National Public Radio has more
?On the one hand, you have somebody who grew up like you, knows you,
went to college with you, understands the struggles and pain and joy
that comes from those experiences,? adding that Harris, who is Black
and Asian American, is focused on policy that will benefit Black
communities, such as affordable housing and health care. ?And on the
other side, you have someone who has consistently shown disregard, not
just for the communities, but for you as a person.?
Maybe voters of all backgrounds have had just about all the Biden-Harris
?affordability? they can stand and are nostalgic about the real income gains
of the Trump era.
It?s also very possible that Pennsylvania voters of all backgrounds don?t
think their communities will be well served by Ms. Harris, a San Francisco
leftist who has backed seemingly every zany idea favored by those California
donors, and then some.
Regardless, it?s up to the voters to decide which candidates are most likely
to enable prosperity. Maybe Mr. Walz and Mr. Obama should try winning over
these voters, rather than trying to reduce their electoral power or tossing
them into a 2024 version of Hillary Clinton?s ?basket of deplorables.?
These days that basket is looking more and more like a broad, multiracial
coalition.
As for the Democrats, the country desperately needs Mr. Obama and his party
to turn away from the poisonous ideological mindset which holds that every
setback for their political agenda represents a failure of our form of
government or our people.

I personally can't imagine voting for Trump's stated plan of jailing the
people who have criticized him. He's no longer using statements like
Nazi Germany, he's virtually quoting them now. That should disturb
patriots in every party.

Citation required.

"I think the bigger problem are the people from within. We have some very bad
people. We have some sick people. Radical left lunatics. I think it should be
very easily handled by, if necessary, by National Guard, or if really
necessary, by the military, because they can?t let that happen."
https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/13/politics/trump-military-enemy-from-within-election-day/index.html

This does not support your claim.

It supports the claim. You always say "this does not support your claim," and
you're always lying. The material *always* supports the claim.
Trump is *bragging* that he is going to sic the military and law enforcement on
*anyone* who opposes him. He's very open about it. You're lying.

He never said that. That is what CNN wants you to think.

[John Doe]

Post by NoBody

Post by John Doe

Post by Ubiquitous
Worried that the presidential race may be slipping away from them, Democrats
now express contempt for the people whose votes they need to win in November.
Especially annoying to the party’s leadership is that they have to try to
persuade Pennsylvanians. On Tuesday vice presidential candidate Gov. Tim Walz
(D., Minn.) lamented to wealthy California donors that their party has to win
votes in Western Pennsylvania’s Beaver County, and also persuade people in
York, in the eastern half of the Keystone State. To diminish the power of
such voters, Mr. Walz wants to get rid of the Constitution’s Electoral
College. Now former President Barack Obama has arrived in Pittsburgh to scold
some of the locals for not supporting current Vice President Kamala Harris.
Mr. Obama is now employing the rhetorical tactics he once used against
congressional Republicans to attempt to shame voters into obeying his
political instruction. Mr. Obama’s oratory has always been much more refined
than that of either of his presidential successors—but at least as nasty. The
standard Obama approach is to assume that no one could possibly have an
informed and honest disagreement with him and therefore his opponents must be
ignorant or driven by concealed base motives.
Former President Barack Obama on Thursday admonished Black men who
are hesitating to back Vice President Kamala Harris’ presidential
campaign, telling them it’s “not acceptable” to sit out this election
and suggesting they might be reluctant to vote for Harris because she’s
a woman.
The striking comments by Obama, made to a small group of voters in a
surprise stop at a local Harris campaign office in Pittsburgh, were
part of a more forceful campaign message delivered by the former
president on Thursday as polls continue to show a neck-and-neck race.
At a rally in the city later that evening, Obama issued some of his
most searing public criticisms of his successor to date.
The lack of energy some see around Harris’ campaign, Obama first told
the smaller group, “seems to be more pronounced with the brothers.”
“You’re coming up with all kinds of reasons and excuses, I’ve got a
problem with that,” Obama said. “Because part of it makes me think –
and I’m speaking to men directly – part of it makes me think that,
well, you just aren’t feeling the idea of having a woman as president,
and you’re coming up with other alternatives and other reasons for
that.”
The vice president’s significant role in creating a 40-year-high in inflation
that ravaged incomes isn’t a legitimate reason to oppose her? And of course
there are many other legitimate reasons to find fault with the incumbent vice
president in a world in crisis. Emma Bowman at National Public Radio has more
“On the one hand, you have somebody who grew up like you, knows you,
went to college with you, understands the struggles and pain and joy
that comes from those experiences,” adding that Harris, who is Black
and Asian American, is focused on policy that will benefit Black
communities, such as affordable housing and health care. “And on the
other side, you have someone who has consistently shown disregard, not
just for the communities, but for you as a person.”
Maybe voters of all backgrounds have had just about all the Biden-Harris
“affordability” they can stand and are nostalgic about the real income gains
of the Trump era.
It’s also very possible that Pennsylvania voters of all backgrounds don’t
think their communities will be well served by Ms. Harris, a San Francisco
leftist who has backed seemingly every zany idea favored by those California
donors, and then some.
Regardless, it’s up to the voters to decide which candidates are most likely
to enable prosperity. Maybe Mr. Walz and Mr. Obama should try winning over
these voters, rather than trying to reduce their electoral power or tossing
them into a 2024 version of Hillary Clinton’s “basket of deplorables.”
These days that basket is looking more and more like a broad, multiracial
coalition.
As for the Democrats, the country desperately needs Mr. Obama and his party
to turn away from the poisonous ideological mindset which holds that every
setback for their political agenda represents a failure of our form of
government or our people.

I personally can't imagine voting for Trump's stated plan of jailing the
people who have criticized him. He's no longer using statements like
Nazi Germany, he's virtually quoting them now. That should disturb
patriots in every party.

Citation required.

Post by John Doe

Post by Ubiquitous
--

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/09/09/us/politics/trump-prison-threats-opponents.html
https://demandjustice.org/trump-calls-for-supreme-court-critics-to-be-jailed/
https://newrepublic.com/article/186363/trump-threaten-supreme-court-critics
https://apnews.com/article/trump-harr
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2024/09/12/donald-trump-threatens-imprison-opponents-the-excerpt/75189473007/is-wisconsin-election-economy-a6923d6c5758dabb6d959417ea9d7d12
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2024/09/12/donald-trump-threatens-imprison-opponents-the-excerpt/75189473007/
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/story/trump-threatens-to-imprison-opponents-for-nonexistent-election-fraud
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-floats-imprisoning-political-opponents-rcna155543

[Governor Swill]

Post by John Doe
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/09/09/us/politics/trump-prison-threats-opponents.html
https://demandjustice.org/trump-calls-for-supreme-court-critics-to-be-jailed/
https://newrepublic.com/article/186363/trump-threaten-supreme-court-critics
https://apnews.com/article/trump-harr
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2024/09/12/donald-trump-threatens-imprison-opponents-the-excerpt/75189473007/is-wisconsin-election-economy-a6923d6c5758dabb6d959417ea9d7d12
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2024/09/12/donald-trump-threatens-imprison-opponents-the-excerpt/75189473007/
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/story/trump-threatens-to-imprison-opponents-for-nonexistent-election-fraud
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-floats-imprisoning-political-opponents-rcna155543
http://youtu.be/5EoFheFEzc0

More good reasons to not vote for Trump on the 5th.

NP: Beatles - Something (demo) - Unreleased recordings, 1968
--
Reinstate the Fairness Doctrine

Four more reasons to not vote for Trump in 19 days.

50) Trump said he'd hire only the best people in the world.
But his campaign chair was convicted of multiple crimes.
So was one of his closest associates. His deputy campaign
chair pleaded guilty to crimes. So did his personal lawyer,
his national security adviser, the chief financial officer of
his business campaign, a campaign foreign policy adviser, and
one of his campaign fundraisers. They all committed crimes and
Trump pardoned most of them!

51) Trump said he'd drain the swamp in Washington, D.C. but he
appointed more billionaires, CEOs, and Wall Street moguls to his
administration than any administration in history.

52) Trump intervened to get his son-in-law, Jared Kushner,
Top Secret clearance after he was denied over concerns about foreign influence.

53) Trump hosted a Russian foreign minister in the Oval Office
where Trump revealed top secret intelligence.

54) Trump promised that the average American family would see
a $4,000 pay raise because of his tax cuts for the wealthy and
big corporations. Well, how did that work out? Did you get a
$4,000 raise? Of course not! Nobody did!

[NoBody]

Post by NoBody

Post by John Doe

Post by Ubiquitous
Worried that the presidential race may be slipping away from them, Democrats
now express contempt for the people whose votes they need to win in November.
Especially annoying to the party’s leadership is that they have to try to
persuade Pennsylvanians. On Tuesday vice presidential candidate Gov. Tim Walz
(D., Minn.) lamented to wealthy California donors that their party has to win
votes in Western Pennsylvania’s Beaver County, and also persuade people in
York, in the eastern half of the Keystone State. To diminish the power of
such voters, Mr. Walz wants to get rid of the Constitution’s Electoral
College. Now former President Barack Obama has arrived in Pittsburgh to scold
some of the locals for not supporting current Vice President Kamala Harris.
Mr. Obama is now employing the rhetorical tactics he once used against
congressional Republicans to attempt to shame voters into obeying his
political instruction. Mr. Obama’s oratory has always been much more refined
than that of either of his presidential successors—but at least as nasty. The
standard Obama approach is to assume that no one could possibly have an
informed and honest disagreement with him and therefore his opponents must be
ignorant or driven by concealed base motives.
Former President Barack Obama on Thursday admonished Black men who
are hesitating to back Vice President Kamala Harris’ presidential
campaign, telling them it’s “not acceptable” to sit out this election
and suggesting they might be reluctant to vote for Harris because she’s
a woman.
The striking comments by Obama, made to a small group of voters in a
surprise stop at a local Harris campaign office in Pittsburgh, were
part of a more forceful campaign message delivered by the former
president on Thursday as polls continue to show a neck-and-neck race.
At a rally in the city later that evening, Obama issued some of his
most searing public criticisms of his successor to date.
The lack of energy some see around Harris’ campaign, Obama first told
the smaller group, “seems to be more pronounced with the brothers.”
“You’re coming up with all kinds of reasons and excuses, I’ve got a
problem with that,” Obama said. “Because part of it makes me think –
and I’m speaking to men directly – part of it makes me think that,
well, you just aren’t feeling the idea of having a woman as president,
and you’re coming up with other alternatives and other reasons for
that.”
The vice president’s significant role in creating a 40-year-high in inflation
that ravaged incomes isn’t a legitimate reason to oppose her? And of course
there are many other legitimate reasons to find fault with the incumbent vice
president in a world in crisis. Emma Bowman at National Public Radio has more
“On the one hand, you have somebody who grew up like you, knows you,
went to college with you, understands the struggles and pain and joy
that comes from those experiences,” adding that Harris, who is Black
and Asian American, is focused on policy that will benefit Black
communities, such as affordable housing and health care. “And on the
other side, you have someone who has consistently shown disregard, not
just for the communities, but for you as a person.”
Maybe voters of all backgrounds have had just about all the Biden-Harris
“affordability” they can stand and are nostalgic about the real income gains
of the Trump era.
It’s also very possible that Pennsylvania voters of all backgrounds don’t
think their communities will be well served by Ms. Harris, a San Francisco
leftist who has backed seemingly every zany idea favored by those California
donors, and then some.
Regardless, it’s up to the voters to decide which candidates are most likely
to enable prosperity. Maybe Mr. Walz and Mr. Obama should try winning over
these voters, rather than trying to reduce their electoral power or tossing
them into a 2024 version of Hillary Clinton’s “basket of deplorables.”
These days that basket is looking more and more like a broad, multiracial
coalition.
As for the Democrats, the country desperately needs Mr. Obama and his party
to turn away from the poisonous ideological mindset which holds that every
setback for their political agenda represents a failure of our form of
government or our people.

I personally can't imagine voting for Trump's stated plan of jailing the
people who have criticized him. He's no longer using statements like
Nazi Germany, he's virtually quoting them now. That should disturb
patriots in every party.

Citation required.

Post by John Doe

Post by Ubiquitous
--

<crickets.wav>

[David Hartung]

Post by NoBody

Post by NoBody

Post by John Doe

Post by Ubiquitous
Worried that the presidential race may be slipping away from them, Democrats
now express contempt for the people whose votes they need to win in November.
Especially annoying to the party’s leadership is that they have to try to
persuade Pennsylvanians. On Tuesday vice presidential candidate Gov. Tim Walz
(D., Minn.) lamented to wealthy California donors that their party has to win
votes in Western Pennsylvania’s Beaver County, and also persuade people in
York, in the eastern half of the Keystone State. To diminish the power of
such voters, Mr. Walz wants to get rid of the Constitution’s Electoral
College. Now former President Barack Obama has arrived in Pittsburgh to scold
some of the locals for not supporting current Vice President Kamala Harris.
Mr. Obama is now employing the rhetorical tactics he once used against
congressional Republicans to attempt to shame voters into obeying his
political instruction. Mr. Obama’s oratory has always been much more refined
than that of either of his presidential successors—but at least as nasty. The
standard Obama approach is to assume that no one could possibly have an
informed and honest disagreement with him and therefore his opponents must be
ignorant or driven by concealed base motives.
Former President Barack Obama on Thursday admonished Black men who
are hesitating to back Vice President Kamala Harris’ presidential
campaign, telling them it’s “not acceptable” to sit out this election
and suggesting they might be reluctant to vote for Harris because she’s
a woman.
The striking comments by Obama, made to a small group of voters in a
surprise stop at a local Harris campaign office in Pittsburgh, were
part of a more forceful campaign message delivered by the former
president on Thursday as polls continue to show a neck-and-neck race.
At a rally in the city later that evening, Obama issued some of his
most searing public criticisms of his successor to date.
The lack of energy some see around Harris’ campaign, Obama first told
the smaller group, “seems to be more pronounced with the brothers.”
“You’re coming up with all kinds of reasons and excuses, I’ve got a
problem with that,” Obama said. “Because part of it makes me think –
and I’m speaking to men directly – part of it makes me think that,
well, you just aren’t feeling the idea of having a woman as president,
and you’re coming up with other alternatives and other reasons for
that.”
The vice president’s significant role in creating a 40-year-high in inflation
that ravaged incomes isn’t a legitimate reason to oppose her? And of course
there are many other legitimate reasons to find fault with the incumbent vice
president in a world in crisis. Emma Bowman at National Public Radio has more
“On the one hand, you have somebody who grew up like you, knows you,
went to college with you, understands the struggles and pain and joy
that comes from those experiences,” adding that Harris, who is Black
and Asian American, is focused on policy that will benefit Black
communities, such as affordable housing and health care. “And on the
other side, you have someone who has consistently shown disregard, not
just for the communities, but for you as a person.”
Maybe voters of all backgrounds have had just about all the Biden-Harris
“affordability” they can stand and are nostalgic about the real income gains
of the Trump era.
It’s also very possible that Pennsylvania voters of all backgrounds don’t
think their communities will be well served by Ms. Harris, a San Francisco
leftist who has backed seemingly every zany idea favored by those California
donors, and then some.
Regardless, it’s up to the voters to decide which candidates are most likely
to enable prosperity. Maybe Mr. Walz and Mr. Obama should try winning over
these voters, rather than trying to reduce their electoral power or tossing
them into a 2024 version of Hillary Clinton’s “basket of deplorables.”
These days that basket is looking more and more like a broad, multiracial
coalition.
As for the Democrats, the country desperately needs Mr. Obama and his party
to turn away from the poisonous ideological mindset which holds that every
setback for their political agenda represents a failure of our form of
government or our people.

I personally can't imagine voting for Trump's stated plan of jailing the
people who have criticized him. He's no longer using statements like
Nazi Germany, he's virtually quoting them now. That should disturb
patriots in every party.

Citation required.

Post by John Doe

Post by Ubiquitous
--

<crickets.wav>

Kremlin Girl / Bit of Nothingness petulantly and childishly whines again that
she's being ignored by her intellectual superiors.

Kremlin Girl / Bit of Nothingness sees *every one* of these.

[Lil dwarf Rudey]

Post by David Hartung
Kremlin Girl / Bit of Nothingness

Rudey forgery.

Read it again, scumbag little man Jonathan D Ball...you are no more than
a failed solar city installer and Suckramento bungalow trash pretending
to be Phil Hendrie, but giving blow jobs at the TA glory Hole and
ducking fights at the Jolly Kone like you always do...

Explain why are you death threat prosecution exempt by the Feds so far?

And after _so many_ public death threats you issued on Trump and Vance...

Let's do our best to change that, shall we:


Governor Swill /Rudy Canoza/Lou Bricano/J Carlson/Michael A
Terrell/Chris Ahlstrom/Intelligent Party/Alan Bond/Henry Bodkin/Malte
Runz and a few dozen other socks wrote:

Multiple death threats against Trump:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Path:
eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!border-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.netnews.com!netnews.com!s1-4.netnews.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx10.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Governor Swill <***@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
talk.politics.misc,alt.politics,alt.politics.usa,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.elections
Subject: Re: Triumphant Trump Photo After Assassination Attempt
Message-ID: <***@4ax.com>
References: <***@earthlink.com>
<***@185.151.15.160>
<ONIkO.102541$***@fx11.ams4> <***@185.151.15.190>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 55
X-Complaints-To: ***@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 10:38:43 -0400

Oh poor me I got shot at ...

Swill
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Path:
eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!border-3.nntp.ord.giganews.com!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.netnews.com!s1-3.netnews.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx10.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Governor Swill <***@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
talk.politics.misc,alt.politics,alt.politics.usa,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.elections
Subject: Re: Triumphant Trump Photo After Assassination Attempt
Message-ID: <***@4ax.com>
References: <***@earthlink.com>
<***@185.151.15.160>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 31
X-Complaints-To: ***@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 10:37:51 -0400


Cheer up, maybe someone else will try.

Swill

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: J Carlson <***@gmx.com>
Newsgroups:
alt.politics.immigration,alt.politics.nationalism.white,talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: AP Lies by Ommission About Identity of Invaders Charged with
Rape, Murder of 12-Year-Old
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:35:52 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <v5f66o$1mps9$***@dont-email.me>
References: <v54h6j$39cuk$***@dont-email.me> <v54hrs$38mfs$***@dont-email.me>
<moKcnZP3dbqUm-***@giganews.com>
<v58c4f$6squ$***@dont-email.me>
<v5df1n$1caue$***@dont-email.me> <v5edju$1hv3p$***@dont-email.me>
<***@4ax.com>
<v5erpf$1jkrf$***@dont-email.me>
<O9acnRiefIZol-***@giganews.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:35:53 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me;
posting-host="f3de9d0c1e618b255237332494133eec";
logging-data="1795977";
mail-complaints-to="***@eternal-september.org";
posting-account="U2FsdGVkX195k8uMNmZfnyDG9tQmsu21WqljX3bfQxM="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:PNoPW9d+9gKJj0fX+YCk+YFslQg=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <O9acnRiefIZol-***@giganews.com>
Xref: news.eternal-september.org alt.politics.immigration:383549
alt.politics.nationalism.white:10913 talk.politics.misc:1295918
alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:3024985

Post by David Hartung
No. I am a patriotic American who wants the country and its people to

thrive. Getting rid of Trump permanently

Post by David Hartung
is an important step to getting there.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


That constitutes a DEATH THREAT against a former President, Rudey:


https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/871
18 U.S. Code § 871 - Threats against President and successors to the
Presidency
U.S. Code
Notes
prev | next
(a)Whoever knowingly and willfully deposits for conveyance in the mail
or for a delivery from any post office or by any letter carrier any
letter, paper, writing, print, missive, or document containing any
threat to take the life of, to kidnap, or to inflict bodily harm upon
the President of the United States, the President-elect, the Vice
President or other officer next in the order of succession to the office
of President of the United States, or the Vice President-elect, or
knowingly and willfully otherwise makes any such threat against the
President, President-elect, Vice President or other officer next in the
order of succession to the office of President, or Vice President-elect,
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years,
or both.
(b)The terms “President-elect” and “Vice President-elect” as used in
this section shall mean such persons as are the apparent successful
candidates for the offices of President and Vice President,
respectively, as ascertained from the results of the general elections
held to determine the electors of President and Vice President in
accordance with title 3, United States Code, sections 1 and 2. The
phrase “other officer next in the order of succession to the office of
President” as used in this section shall mean the person next in the
order of succession to act as President in accordance with title 3,
United States Code, sections 19 and 20.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 740; June 1, 1955, ch. 115, § 1, 69
Stat. 80; Pub. L. 87–829, § 1, Oct. 15, 1962, 76 Stat. 956; Pub. L.
97–297, § 2, Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1318; Pub. L. 103–322, title
XXXIII, § 330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

9-65.200 - Threats Against the President and Successors to the
Presidency; Threats Against Former Presidents; and Certain Other Secret
Service Protectees
The Counterterrorism Section of the National Security Division has
supervisory authority over 18 U.S.C. §§ 871 and 879 cases. As great
caution must be taken in matters relating to the security of the persons
protected by 18 U.S.C. § 871, United States Attorneys are encouraged to
consult with the Counterterrorism Section (CTS) of the National Security
Division when they have doubts on the prosecutive merit of a case. For
the same reason, dismissal of complaints under 18 U.S.C. § 871, when the
defendant is in custody under the Mental Incompetency Statutes (18
U.S.C. §§ 4244, 4246), requires approval from CTS. In other cases,
United States Attorneys must consult prior to dismissing a count
involving, or entering into any sentence commitment or other case
settlement involving a § 871 charge.


https://www.secretservice.gov/newsroom/releases/2024/01/phoenix-man-arrested-making-online-death-threats-against-president-and

PHOENIX –David Michael Hanson, 41, of Phoenix, was arrested on Wednesday
for making online threats against the President and Vice-President.
Hanson was charged by Federal criminal complaint on Tuesday with five
counts of Threats Against the President and Successors to the Presidency
and five counts of Interstate Communication of Threats.

The complaint alleges that in November and December of 2023, while
living in Arizona, Hanson used a social media platform to post threats
to murder the President and Vice President of the United States. On
November 19, 2023, Hanson posted online a series of threatening
statements including one that stated, “#joeAndKamala I’m asking you to
resign on Monday your alternative is death brutally murdered.” After the
U.S. Secret Service spoke to Hanson and warned him that it was a Federal
crime to post such threats, on December 23, 2023, Hanson posted another
series of similar threats aimed at the President and Vice-President.

Each count of Threats Against the President and Successors to the
Presidency carries a maximum sentence of five years in prison, a fine of
up to $250,000, and up to three years of supervised release. Each count
of Interstate Communication of Threats carries a maximum sentence of
five years in prison, a fine of up to $250,000, and up to three years of
supervised release.

A complaint is simply a method by which a person is charged with
criminal activity and raises no inference of guilt. An individual is
presumed innocent until evidence is presented to a jury that establishes
guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

The United States Secret Service is conducting the investigation in this
case. The United States Attorney’s Office, District of Arizona, is
handling the prosecution.


Those can be reported here:

https://tips.fbi.gov/home

https://www.justice.gov/action-center/report-crime-or-submit-complaint

https://www.secretservice.gov/contact

https://www.dhs.gov/see-something-say-something/reporting/california


Fellow citizens, won't you join in ending Rudey's usenet terrorism here?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Governor Swill]

Post by John Doe
I personally can't imagine voting for Trump's stated plan of jailing the
people who have criticized him. He's no longer using statements like
Nazi Germany, he's virtually quoting them now. That should disturb
patriots in every party.

Except the party that is currently taken over by Nazis and their associates.
--
Reinstate the Fairness Doctrine

Four more reasons to not vote for Trump in 21 days.

46) Trump tried to shut down the Mueller investigation by ordering
White House counsel Don McGahn to fire Mueller. McGahn refused
because that would be criminal obstruction of justice.

47) Trump ordered his staff not to turn over emails showing Don Jr.
had set up a meeting at Trump Tower before the 2016 election with
representatives of the Russian government.

48) Trump convinced Michael Cohen to lie to Congress about Trump's
plans to build a Trump Tower in Moscow, and Cohen served prison
time for lying to Congress.

49) Trump was not charged for criminal obstruction of justice
because it's the Justice Department's policy not to indict a
sitting president. But more than a thousand former federal
prosecutors who served under both Republicans and Democrats
signed a letter declaring there was more than enough evidence
to prosecute Trump.

[NoBody]

Post by Ubiquitous
Worried that the presidential race may be slipping away from them, Democrats
now express contempt for the people whose votes they need to win in November.
Especially annoying to the party’s leadership is that they have to try to
persuade Pennsylvanians. On Tuesday vice presidential candidate Gov. Tim Walz
(D., Minn.) lamented to wealthy California donors that their party has to win
votes in Western Pennsylvania’s Beaver County, and also persuade people in
York, in the eastern half of the Keystone State. To diminish the power of
such voters, Mr. Walz wants to get rid of the Constitution’s Electoral
College. Now former President Barack Obama has arrived in Pittsburgh to scold
some of the locals for not supporting current Vice President Kamala Harris.
Mr. Obama is now employing the rhetorical tactics he once used against
congressional Republicans to attempt to shame voters into obeying his
political instruction. Mr. Obama’s oratory has always been much more refined
than that of either of his presidential successors—but at least as nasty. The
standard Obama approach is to assume that no one could possibly have an
informed and honest disagreement with him and therefore his opponents must be
ignorant or driven by concealed base motives.
Former President Barack Obama on Thursday admonished Black men who
are hesitating to back Vice President Kamala Harris’ presidential
campaign, telling them it’s “not acceptable” to sit out this election
and suggesting they might be reluctant to vote for Harris because she’s
a woman.
The striking comments by Obama, made to a small group of voters in a
surprise stop at a local Harris campaign office in Pittsburgh, were
part of a more forceful campaign message delivered by the former
president on Thursday as polls continue to show a neck-and-neck race.
At a rally in the city later that evening, Obama issued some of his
most searing public criticisms of his successor to date.

Nothing like an old, black man lecturing young black men that their
mysoginististic if they don't don't vote for Harris. Somehow I think
this is falling like a lead balloon.