Discussion:
Yankees? In Richmond?
(too old to reply)
LinuxGal
2020-06-06 14:47:59 UTC
Permalink
Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam is expected to announce plans to
remove a statue of Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee in
Richmond, an official has told @AP

The only people who are triggered about this are the same
ones that are against participation trophies. And isn¢t this
the biggest one there is?
--
Linux Geeks: Smart. Single. Sexy.
Well, two out of three ain't bad!

https://twitter.com/LinuxGal
%
2020-06-06 14:51:39 UTC
Permalink
Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam is expected to announce plans to remove a
statue of Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee in Richmond, an official has
The only people who are triggered about this are the same ones that are
against participation trophies. And isn’t this the biggest one there is?
is it bigger than the heisman trophy
Mitchell Holman
2020-06-06 15:15:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by LinuxGal
Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam is expected to announce plans to
remove a statue of Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee in
The only people who are triggered about this are the same
ones that are against participation trophies. And isn¢t this
the biggest one there is?
Robert E Lee himself didn't want any statues
erected of him.


"After his surrender to Union Gen. Ulysses S. Grant,
at the close of our nation’s bloody Civil War, Lee
defied the illogic and passions of many of his fellow
Southerners. He publicly, repeatedly advised them to
move past the war, embrace peace and become stellar
citizens of the United States.

When a man in Richmond, Va., solicited donations
for a monument to honor Lee’s legendary comrade
Stonewall Jackson, Lee declined to contribute.

In Flood’s words, "Lee believed that the erection
of Confederate monuments would keep alive the wartime
passions that he was trying to eradicate."

https://www.kentucky.com/living/religion/paul-prather/article167095637.html
David Hartung
2020-06-06 15:26:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by LinuxGal
Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam is expected to announce plans to
remove a statue of Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee in
The only people who are triggered about this are the same
ones that are against participation trophies. And isn¢t this
the biggest one there is?
Robert E Lee himself didn't want any statues
erected of him.
"After his surrender to Union Gen. Ulysses S. Grant,
at the close of our nation’s bloody Civil War, Lee
defied the illogic and passions of many of his fellow
Southerners. He publicly, repeatedly advised them to
move past the war, embrace peace and become stellar
citizens of the United States.
When a man in Richmond, Va., solicited donations
for a monument to honor Lee’s legendary comrade
Stonewall Jackson, Lee declined to contribute.
In Flood’s words, "Lee believed that the erection
of Confederate monuments would keep alive the wartime
passions that he was trying to eradicate."
https://www.kentucky.com/living/religion/paul-prather/article167095637.html
Mitchell, for once you have made a post which makes sense. Lees words
were wise ones, and should have been heeded by his fellow southerners.
In the same way, we should heed them today, and not keep reopening those
wounds by making a big deal out of w=those monuments which do exist.
Rudy Canoza
2020-06-06 16:04:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by LinuxGal
Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam is expected to announce plans to
remove a statue of Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee in
The only people who are triggered about this are the same
ones that are against participation trophies. And isn¢t this
the biggest one there is?
Robert E Lee himself didn't want any statues
erected of him.
The statues of Lee and other confederate traitors were not erected to honor
those men. They were erected to cement white supremacy in place, and to
reinforce to blacks the inferior status they occupied.
David Hartung
2020-06-06 16:24:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by LinuxGal
Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam is expected to announce plans to
remove a statue of Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee in
The only people who are triggered about this are the same
ones that are against participation trophies. And isn¢t this
the biggest one there is?
     Robert E Lee himself didn't want any statues
erected of him.
The statues of Lee and other confederate traitors were not erected to
honor those men.  They were erected to cement white supremacy in place,
and to reinforce to blacks the inferior status they occupied.
I dislike calling people idiots, but when I see this sort of stupidity,
it is almost impossible to resist.
Mitchell Holman
2020-06-06 18:09:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by David Hartung
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by LinuxGal
Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam is expected to announce plans to
remove a statue of Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee in
The only people who are triggered about this are the same
ones that are against participation trophies. And isn¢t this
the biggest one there is?
     Robert E Lee himself didn't want any statues
erected of him.
The statues of Lee and other confederate traitors were not erected to
honor those men.  They were erected to cement white supremacy in
place, and to reinforce to blacks the inferior status they occupied.
I dislike calling people idiots, but when I see this sort of
stupidity, it is almost impossible to resist.
Ask yourself why the same group that erected many of
the confederate statues in the South also erected a
monument to the KKK. Coincidence? The statues do not
preserve history, they establish and project the idea
of White Supremecy

https://tinyurl.com/y7mptx49


Further:


"At a 1927 dedication ceremony for a federally-funded
statue of Jefferson Davis in Mississippi, Senator John
Sharp Williams of Mississippi proclaimed that the
Confederacy did not fight to preserve slavery, but to
preserve "the cause of White Racial Supremacy, which
is not a Lost Cause. It is a Cause Triumphant. It was
never as safe as now since the Missouri Compromise. The
white man’s family, life, his code of social ethics, his
racial integrity — in a word his civilization — the
destruction of which in the slave states was dreaded are
safe."

https://segregationinamerica.eji.org/report/confederate-icongraphy.html
Rudy Canoza
2020-06-06 18:16:51 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by David Hartung
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by LinuxGal
Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam is expected to announce plans to
remove a statue of Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee in
The only people who are triggered about this are the same
ones that are against participation trophies. And isn¢t this
the biggest one there is?
     Robert E Lee himself didn't want any statues
erected of him.
The statues of Lee and other confederate traitors were not erected to
honor those men.  They were erected to cement white supremacy in
place, and to reinforce to blacks the inferior status they occupied.
I dislike calling people idiots, but when I see this sort of
stupidity, it is almost impossible to resist.
Ask yourself why the same group that erected many of
the confederate statues in the South also erected a
monument to the KKK. Coincidence? The statues do not
preserve history, they establish and project the idea
of White Supremecy
https://tinyurl.com/y7mptx49
"At a 1927 dedication ceremony for a federally-funded
statue of Jefferson Davis in Mississippi, Senator John
Sharp Williams of Mississippi proclaimed that the
Confederacy did not fight to preserve slavery, but to
preserve "the cause of White Racial Supremacy, which
is not a Lost Cause. It is a Cause Triumphant. It was
never as safe as now since the Missouri Compromise. The
white man’s family, life, his code of social ethics, his
racial integrity — in a word his civilization — the
destruction of which in the slave states was dreaded are
safe."
https://segregationinamerica.eji.org/report/confederate-icongraphy.html
Excellent page.
David Hartung
2020-06-07 00:43:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by David Hartung
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by LinuxGal
Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam is expected to announce plans to
remove a statue of Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee in
The only people who are triggered about this are the same
ones that are against participation trophies. And isn¢t this
the biggest one there is?
     Robert E Lee himself didn't want any statues
erected of him.
The statues of Lee and other confederate traitors were not erected to
honor those men.  They were erected to cement white supremacy in
place, and to reinforce to blacks the inferior status they occupied.
I dislike calling people idiots, but when I see this sort of
stupidity, it is almost impossible to resist.
    Ask yourself why the same group that erected many of
the confederate statues in the South also erected a
monument to the KKK. Coincidence? The statues do not
preserve history, they establish and project the idea
of White Supremecy
https://tinyurl.com/y7mptx49
"At a 1927 dedication ceremony for a federally-funded
statue of Jefferson Davis in Mississippi, Senator John
Sharp Williams of Mississippi proclaimed that the
Confederacy did not fight to preserve slavery, but to
preserve "the cause of White Racial Supremacy, which
is not a Lost Cause. It is a Cause Triumphant. It was
never as safe as now since the Missouri Compromise. The
white man’s family, life, his code of social ethics, his
racial integrity — in a word his civilization — the
destruction of which in the slave states was dreaded are
safe."
https://segregationinamerica.eji.org/report/confederate-icongraphy.html
Excellent page.
After all these years in which you claimed that the civil war was about
slavery, you now say that it was something else?
Mitchell Holman
2020-06-07 01:50:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by David Hartung
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by David Hartung
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by LinuxGal
Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam is expected to announce plans to
remove a statue of Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee in
The only people who are triggered about this are the same
ones that are against participation trophies. And isn¢t this
the biggest one there is?
     Robert E Lee himself didn't want any statues
erected of him.
The statues of Lee and other confederate traitors were not erected to
honor those men.  They were erected to cement white supremacy in
place, and to reinforce to blacks the inferior status they
occupied.
Post by David Hartung
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by David Hartung
I dislike calling people idiots, but when I see this sort of
stupidity, it is almost impossible to resist.
    Ask yourself why the same group that erected many of
the confederate statues in the South also erected a
monument to the KKK. Coincidence? The statues do not
preserve history, they establish and project the idea
of White Supremecy
https://tinyurl.com/y7mptx49
"At a 1927 dedication ceremony for a federally-funded
statue of Jefferson Davis in Mississippi, Senator John
Sharp Williams of Mississippi proclaimed that the
Confederacy did not fight to preserve slavery, but to
preserve "the cause of White Racial Supremacy, which
is not a Lost Cause. It is a Cause Triumphant. It was
never as safe as now since the Missouri Compromise. The
white man’s family, life, his code of social ethics, his
racial integrity — in a word his civilization — the
destruction of which in the slave states was dreaded are
safe."
https://segregationinamerica.eji.org/report/confederate-
icongraphy.html
Post by David Hartung
Post by Rudy Canoza
Excellent page.
After all these years in which you claimed that the civil war was about
slavery, you now say that it was something else?
Learn to read, Hartung. The Civil War was about
slavery, the movement to put Confederate monuments
everywhere was about White Supremecy.
Salty Stan
2020-06-07 02:04:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by David Hartung
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by David Hartung
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by LinuxGal
Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam is expected to announce plans to
remove a statue of Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee in
The only people who are triggered about this are the same
ones that are against participation trophies. And isn¢t this
the biggest one there is?
     Robert E Lee himself didn't want any statues
erected of him.
The statues of Lee and other confederate traitors were not erected
to
Post by David Hartung
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by David Hartung
Post by Rudy Canoza
honor those men.  They were erected to cement white supremacy in
place, and to reinforce to blacks the inferior status they
occupied.
Post by David Hartung
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by David Hartung
I dislike calling people idiots, but when I see this sort of
stupidity, it is almost impossible to resist.
    Ask yourself why the same group that erected many of
the confederate statues in the South also erected a
monument to the KKK. Coincidence? The statues do not
preserve history, they establish and project the idea
of White Supremecy
https://tinyurl.com/y7mptx49
"At a 1927 dedication ceremony for a federally-funded
statue of Jefferson Davis in Mississippi, Senator John
Sharp Williams of Mississippi proclaimed that the
Confederacy did not fight to preserve slavery, but to
preserve "the cause of White Racial Supremacy, which
is not a Lost Cause. It is a Cause Triumphant. It was
never as safe as now since the Missouri Compromise. The
white man’s family, life, his code of social ethics, his
racial integrity — in a word his civilization — the
destruction of which in the slave states was dreaded are
safe."
https://segregationinamerica.eji.org/report/confederate-
icongraphy.html
Post by David Hartung
Post by Rudy Canoza
Excellent page.
After all these years in which you claimed that the civil war was about
slavery, you now say that it was something else?
Learn to read, Hartung. The Civil War was about
slavery, the movement to put Confederate monuments
everywhere was about White Supremecy. [Supremacy]
I'll agree to destroying these historical monuments, once the Democrat party is disbanded, since it is the party of the confederacy, slavery, Jim Crow , and lynchings.

Its very existence I find offensive.
Harcourt Fenton Mudd
2020-06-07 13:40:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by Salty Stan
I'll agree to destroying these historical monuments, once the Democrat
party is disbanded
Everybody wants a one-party system. I bet the Framers were of the same mind.
Trump says we'll save billions once we cancel the elections. He said it
worked in North Korea and China, so why not here?


It's too bad that Mitch McConnell / Rand Paul and Matt Gaetz will lose their
jobs because when Donald Trump becomes the ultimate decider, we'll all fall
in line and politician services will no longer be required.


They'll be a signed Trump bible for every son in the family!
Salty Stan
2020-06-07 13:53:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by Harcourt Fenton Mudd
Post by Salty Stan
I'll agree to destroying these historical monuments, once the Democrat
party is disbanded
Everybody wants a one-party system. I bet the Framers were of the same mind.
Trump says we'll save billions once we cancel the elections. He said it
worked in North Korea and China, so why not here?
It's too bad that Mitch McConnell / Rand Paul and Matt Gaetz will lose their
jobs because when Donald Trump becomes the ultimate decider, we'll all fall
in line and politician services will no longer be required.
They'll be a signed Trump bible for every son in the family!
The left-wing wacko-mobile has gone into overdrive.
John Carlson
2020-06-07 21:41:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by Salty Stan
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by David Hartung
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by David Hartung
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by LinuxGal
Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam is expected to announce plans to
remove a statue of Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee in
The only people who are triggered about this are the same
ones that are against participation trophies. And isn¢t this
the biggest one there is?
     Robert E Lee himself didn't want any statues
erected of him.
The statues of Lee and other confederate traitors were not erected
to
Post by David Hartung
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by David Hartung
Post by Rudy Canoza
honor those men.  They were erected to cement white supremacy in
place, and to reinforce to blacks the inferior status they
occupied.
Post by David Hartung
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by David Hartung
I dislike calling people idiots, but when I see this sort of
stupidity, it is almost impossible to resist.
    Ask yourself why the same group that erected many of
the confederate statues in the South also erected a
monument to the KKK. Coincidence? The statues do not
preserve history, they establish and project the idea
of White Supremecy
https://tinyurl.com/y7mptx49
"At a 1927 dedication ceremony for a federally-funded
statue of Jefferson Davis in Mississippi, Senator John
Sharp Williams of Mississippi proclaimed that the
Confederacy did not fight to preserve slavery, but to
preserve "the cause of White Racial Supremacy, which
is not a Lost Cause. It is a Cause Triumphant. It was
never as safe as now since the Missouri Compromise. The
white man’s family, life, his code of social ethics, his
racial integrity — in a word his civilization — the
destruction of which in the slave states was dreaded are
safe."
https://segregationinamerica.eji.org/report/confederate-
icongraphy.html
Post by David Hartung
Post by Rudy Canoza
Excellent page.
After all these years in which you claimed that the civil war was about
slavery, you now say that it was something else?
Learn to read, Hartung. The Civil War was about
slavery, the movement to put Confederate monuments
everywhere was about White Supremecy. [Supremacy]
I'll agree to destroying these historical monuments, once the Democrat party is disbanded, since it is the party of the confederacy, slavery, Jim Crow , and lynchings.
Was. Now, the Republiscums have taken over that role.
Limp Dick Eric Garcetti
2020-06-08 04:16:05 UTC
Permalink
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2019/01/09/17/8321528-6573905-image-
a-6_1547055571738.jpg

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2019/01/09/17/8321230-6573905-image-
m-12_1547055672514.jpg

LOS ANGELES — A black member of Congress on Wednesday called it
"incomprehensible" that after the overdose deaths of two African
American men at the apartment of wealthy and influential Los
Angeles area gay activist Edward Buck, a third man nearly died
there before authorities arrested Buck.

The men died in 2017 and early 2019 but Buck skirted charges
until prosecutors announced his arrest late Tuesday after the
latest overdose victim escaped Buck's West Hollywood home
despite what officials called efforts by Buck to prevent him
from leaving.

"It's incomprehensible to me that it took a third black gay man
to be attacked and almost die to finally dissolve the
unconscionable apathy that has allowed Ed Buck, a racist sexual
predator, to roam free," said Democratic U.S. Rep. Karen Bass,
whose district lies just south of West Hollywood. "Everyone knew
that he preyed on young black men. ... The inaction in response
had a message was loud and clear: Black gay lives obviously
didn't matter."

In court documents, authorities said Buck used his position of
power to manipulate male victims into participating in sexual
fetishes that involved injecting them with methamphetamine,
adding that he "has no regard for human life."

Buck was charged with operating a drug house, furnishing
methamphetamine and with battery causing serious bodily injury.
He was awaiting arraignment. Messages to his attorney, Seymour
Amster, were not immediately returned.

Buck, 65, has donated tens of thousands of dollars to California
candidates, including Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom, and is well
known in LGBTQ political circles.

Buck remained in custody Wednesday and prosecutors argued in
court documents that he should be held on $4 million bail
because he is a "violent, dangerous sexual predator" who offered
drugs, money and shelter to mainly addicted and homeless men in
exchange for participating in sexual fetishes. One fetish
involved administering dangerous doses of drugs, the documents
said.

Buck came under investigation in January after 55-year-old
Timothy Dean was found dead of an accidental methamphetamine
overdose in his apartment. In July 2017, Gemmel Moore, 26, also
died from a methamphetamine overdose at Buck's home.

Both men were black. Buck, who is white, was not charged and
critics later questioned if wealth, race or political ties
influenced the investigation.

Moore's mother, LaTisha Nixon, "is relieved that Ed Buck is no
longer on the streets and free to continue harming black men,"
her lawyer, Hussain Turk, said Wednesday.

"She is also disappointed that the county's criminal charges
against Ed Buck do not include charges for homicide," Turk said.

The investigation into the deaths continues, county district
attorney's spokesman Greg Risling said.

Buck's attorney, Amster, had said Dean came to Buck's home under
the influence and did not ingest any drugs while there.

But prosecutors in court documents blamed Buck's actions for the
two deaths and alleged he personally gave a dangerous dose of
methamphetamine to an unnamed man who survived an overdose
earlier this month.

On Sept. 11, the man returned and Buck injected him with two
more dangerous doses, refused to help him and "thwarted" his
efforts to get help until the man fled the apartment and called
911 from a gas station, prosecutors alleged.

"His deadly behavior has not stopped," prosecutors said in the
court documents.

Buck's "predatory acts and willful disregard for human life must
be stopped before another life is lost," the documents said.

https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/incomprehensible-
lawmaker-blasts-authorities-letting-ed-buck-roam-free-n1056376

TAGS: Barack Obama Homosexual Degenerate Gay Pedophile Democrat
Liberalism Pervert CNN CBS ABC NBC Disney MSNBC Faggots Hillary
Clinton Racist Queer Progressive Antifa Faggots

ß
Limp Dick Eric Garcetti
2020-06-08 06:52:30 UTC
Permalink
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2019/01/09/17/8321528-6573905-image-
a-6_1547055571738.jpg

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2019/01/09/17/8321230-6573905-image-
m-12_1547055672514.jpg

LOS ANGELES — A black member of Congress on Wednesday called it
"incomprehensible" that after the overdose deaths of two African
American men at the apartment of wealthy and influential Los
Angeles area gay activist Edward Buck, a third man nearly died
there before authorities arrested Buck.

The men died in 2017 and early 2019 but Buck skirted charges
until prosecutors announced his arrest late Tuesday after the
latest overdose victim escaped Buck's West Hollywood home
despite what officials called efforts by Buck to prevent him
from leaving.

"It's incomprehensible to me that it took a third black gay man
to be attacked and almost die to finally dissolve the
unconscionable apathy that has allowed Ed Buck, a racist sexual
predator, to roam free," said Democratic U.S. Rep. Karen Bass,
whose district lies just south of West Hollywood. "Everyone knew
that he preyed on young black men. ... The inaction in response
had a message was loud and clear: Black gay lives obviously
didn't matter."

In court documents, authorities said Buck used his position of
power to manipulate male victims into participating in sexual
fetishes that involved injecting them with methamphetamine,
adding that he "has no regard for human life."

Buck was charged with operating a drug house, furnishing
methamphetamine and with battery causing serious bodily injury.
He was awaiting arraignment. Messages to his attorney, Seymour
Amster, were not immediately returned.

Buck, 65, has donated tens of thousands of dollars to California
candidates, including Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom, and is well
known in LGBTQ political circles.

Buck remained in custody Wednesday and prosecutors argued in
court documents that he should be held on $4 million bail
because he is a "violent, dangerous sexual predator" who offered
drugs, money and shelter to mainly addicted and homeless men in
exchange for participating in sexual fetishes. One fetish
involved administering dangerous doses of drugs, the documents
said.

Buck came under investigation in January after 55-year-old
Timothy Dean was found dead of an accidental methamphetamine
overdose in his apartment. In July 2017, Gemmel Moore, 26, also
died from a methamphetamine overdose at Buck's home.

Both men were black. Buck, who is white, was not charged and
critics later questioned if wealth, race or political ties
influenced the investigation.

Moore's mother, LaTisha Nixon, "is relieved that Ed Buck is no
longer on the streets and free to continue harming black men,"
her lawyer, Hussain Turk, said Wednesday.

"She is also disappointed that the county's criminal charges
against Ed Buck do not include charges for homicide," Turk said.

The investigation into the deaths continues, county district
attorney's spokesman Greg Risling said.

Buck's attorney, Amster, had said Dean came to Buck's home under
the influence and did not ingest any drugs while there.

But prosecutors in court documents blamed Buck's actions for the
two deaths and alleged he personally gave a dangerous dose of
methamphetamine to an unnamed man who survived an overdose
earlier this month.

On Sept. 11, the man returned and Buck injected him with two
more dangerous doses, refused to help him and "thwarted" his
efforts to get help until the man fled the apartment and called
911 from a gas station, prosecutors alleged.

"His deadly behavior has not stopped," prosecutors said in the
court documents.

Buck's "predatory acts and willful disregard for human life must
be stopped before another life is lost," the documents said.

https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/incomprehensible-
lawmaker-blasts-authorities-letting-ed-buck-roam-free-n1056376

TAGS: Barack Obama Homosexual Degenerate Gay Pedophile Democrat
Liberalism Pervert CNN CBS ABC NBC Disney MSNBC Faggots Hillary
Clinton Racist Queer Progressive Antifa Faggots

)

John Carlson
2020-06-07 21:47:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by Salty Stan
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by David Hartung
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by David Hartung
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by LinuxGal
Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam is expected to announce plans to
remove a statue of Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee in
The only people who are triggered about this are the same
ones that are against participation trophies. And isn¢t this
the biggest one there is?
     Robert E Lee himself didn't want any statues
erected of him.
The statues of Lee and other confederate traitors were not erected
to
Post by David Hartung
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by David Hartung
Post by Rudy Canoza
honor those men.  They were erected to cement white supremacy in
place, and to reinforce to blacks the inferior status they
occupied.
Post by David Hartung
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by David Hartung
I dislike calling people idiots, but when I see this sort of
stupidity, it is almost impossible to resist.
    Ask yourself why the same group that erected many of
the confederate statues in the South also erected a
monument to the KKK. Coincidence? The statues do not
preserve history, they establish and project the idea
of White Supremecy
https://tinyurl.com/y7mptx49
"At a 1927 dedication ceremony for a federally-funded
statue of Jefferson Davis in Mississippi, Senator John
Sharp Williams of Mississippi proclaimed that the
Confederacy did not fight to preserve slavery, but to
preserve "the cause of White Racial Supremacy, which
is not a Lost Cause. It is a Cause Triumphant. It was
never as safe as now since the Missouri Compromise. The
white man’s family, life, his code of social ethics, his
racial integrity — in a word his civilization — the
destruction of which in the slave states was dreaded are
safe."
https://segregationinamerica.eji.org/report/confederate-
icongraphy.html
Post by David Hartung
Post by Rudy Canoza
Excellent page.
After all these years in which you claimed that the civil war was about
slavery, you now say that it was something else?
Learn to read, Hartung. The Civil War was about
slavery, the movement to put Confederate monuments
everywhere was about White Supremecy. [Supremacy]
I'll agree to destroying these historical monuments, once the Democrat party
No such part, Fredo.
David Hartung
2020-06-07 02:13:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by David Hartung
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by David Hartung
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by LinuxGal
Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam is expected to announce plans to
remove a statue of Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee in
The only people who are triggered about this are the same
ones that are against participation trophies. And isn¢t this
the biggest one there is?
     Robert E Lee himself didn't want any statues
erected of him.
The statues of Lee and other confederate traitors were not erected
to
Post by David Hartung
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by David Hartung
Post by Rudy Canoza
honor those men.  They were erected to cement white supremacy in
place, and to reinforce to blacks the inferior status they
occupied.
Post by David Hartung
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by David Hartung
I dislike calling people idiots, but when I see this sort of
stupidity, it is almost impossible to resist.
    Ask yourself why the same group that erected many of
the confederate statues in the South also erected a
monument to the KKK. Coincidence? The statues do not
preserve history, they establish and project the idea
of White Supremecy
https://tinyurl.com/y7mptx49
"At a 1927 dedication ceremony for a federally-funded
statue of Jefferson Davis in Mississippi, Senator John
Sharp Williams of Mississippi proclaimed that the
Confederacy did not fight to preserve slavery, but to
preserve "the cause of White Racial Supremacy, which
is not a Lost Cause. It is a Cause Triumphant. It was
never as safe as now since the Missouri Compromise. The
white man’s family, life, his code of social ethics, his
racial integrity — in a word his civilization — the
destruction of which in the slave states was dreaded are
safe."
https://segregationinamerica.eji.org/report/confederate-
icongraphy.html
Post by David Hartung
Post by Rudy Canoza
Excellent page.
After all these years in which you claimed that the civil war was about
slavery, you now say that it was something else?
Learn to read, Hartung. The Civil War was about
slavery, the movement to put Confederate monuments
everywhere was about White Supremecy.
Relax Holman, I understand. The problem is that you have no idea what
you are talking about, and you never have. You have been saying foe
years that the Civil War was about slavery, and you were largely (but
not completely) right. The you quote a white supremacist who says
something different, and now you have to cover. The funny thing is,
Senator Williams was also largely, but not completely correct.
Mitchell Holman
2020-06-07 02:47:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by David Hartung
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by David Hartung
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by David Hartung
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by LinuxGal
Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam is expected to announce plans to
remove a statue of Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee in
The only people who are triggered about this are the same
ones that are against participation trophies. And
isn¢t this the biggest one there is?
     Robert E Lee himself
didn't want any statues erected of him.
The statues of Lee and other confederate traitors were not erected
to
Post by David Hartung
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by David Hartung
Post by Rudy Canoza
honor those men.  They were erected to cement white
supremacy in place, and to reinforce to blacks the inferior
status they
occupied.
Post by David Hartung
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by David Hartung
I dislike calling people idiots, but when I see this sort of
stupidity, it is almost impossible to resist.
    Ask yourself why the same group that erected many of
the confederate statues in the South also erected a
monument to the KKK. Coincidence? The statues do not
preserve history, they establish and project the idea
of White Supremecy
https://tinyurl.com/y7mptx49
"At a 1927 dedication ceremony for a federally-funded
statue of Jefferson Davis in Mississippi, Senator John
Sharp Williams of Mississippi proclaimed that the
Confederacy did not fight to preserve slavery, but to
preserve "the cause of White Racial Supremacy, which
is not a Lost Cause. It is a Cause Triumphant. It was
never as safe as now since the Missouri Compromise. The
white man’s family, life, his code of social ethics, his
racial integrity — in a word his civilization — the
destruction of which in the slave states was dreaded are
safe."
https://segregationinamerica.eji.org/report/confederate-
icongraphy.html
Post by David Hartung
Post by Rudy Canoza
Excellent page.
After all these years in which you claimed that the civil war was
about slavery, you now say that it was something else?
Learn to read, Hartung. The Civil War was about
slavery, the movement to put Confederate monuments
everywhere was about White Supremecy.
Relax Holman, I understand. The problem is that you have no idea what
you are talking about, and you never have. You have been saying foe
years that the Civil War was about slavery, and you were largely (but
not completely) right. The you quote a white supremacist who says
something different, and now you have to cover. The funny thing is,
Senator Williams was also largely, but not completely correct.
Tell us, Hartung, why you think these
monuments to the Confederacy (AND the KKK)
started being erected as soon as a black
middle class started emerging and needed
to be "kept in its place"?

https://tinyurl.com/yctogehg
mr_antone
2020-06-07 13:22:59 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 06 Jun 2020 21:47:37 -0500, Mitchell Holman
Post by Mitchell Holman
Tell us, Hartung, why you think these
monuments to the Confederacy (AND the KKK)
started being erected as soon as a black
middle class started emerging and needed
to be "kept in its place"?
https://tinyurl.com/yctogehg
Link times out.
Mitchell Holman
2020-06-07 17:58:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by mr_antone
On Sat, 06 Jun 2020 21:47:37 -0500, Mitchell Holman
Post by Mitchell Holman
Tell us, Hartung, why you think these
monuments to the Confederacy (AND the KKK)
started being erected as soon as a black
middle class started emerging and needed
to be "kept in its place"?
https://tinyurl.com/yctogehg
Link times out.
True.

Let us try another.




The group behind Confederate monuments also built a memorial to the Klan
June 8, 2018


Did the UDC — a group responsible for most of the
Confederate monuments roiling communities today,
and that still promotes itself as "historical,
educational, benevolent, memorial and patriotic" —
erect a monument to a white-supremacist terrorist
group?

The answer was yes. Sixty-one years after the end
of the Civil War, the UDC constructed a memorial to
the Ku Klux Klan outside of the city of Concord,
North Carolina.

The UDC was organized in 1894 in Tennessee by a
group of daughters* of affluent and influential
Confederate veterans. While the UDC singlehandedly
created a social safety net for Confederate veterans
and their families, built veterans homes and hospitals,
and engaged in historic preservation, the group also
had another agenda. They and leaders of associated
organizations like the Confederate Veterans realized
that, with the military battles over, they would have
to wage a long-term struggle for hearts and minds to
solidify white control of the South. It would be a war
of ideas.

To that end, the UDC launched a long-term campaign to
re-write the history of the Civil War, the South, and
the country. By building monuments to the Confederacy
and gaining control of school curricula, the Daughters
spread a false history aimed at perpetuating the
culture and ideals of the Civil War-era South, a
society built on white supremacy. And they were
remarkably successful.

Their delivery vehicle was the "Lost Cause" ideology,
which promoted broad, romanticized, largely fictional
assertions designed to absolve the South from any
blame in the Civil War and to vindicate the Southern
cause. It was pure propaganda. Its core assertions:

- States rights (usually, the right to
secede) and not slavery were the cause
of the Civil War.

- Slaves were content and happy and not
mistreated in slavery. In fact, they
benefitted from slavery.

- Confederate soldiers were heroic, mythical
figures to be revered for defending the
South and its way of life.

Although never named as its goal, white supremacy
underpins the entire "Lost Cause" ideology. To focus
only on one part, like the monument building, means
missing the forest for the trees.

https://tinyurl.com/y7mptx49
mr_antone
2020-06-07 18:22:42 UTC
Permalink
On Sun, 07 Jun 2020 12:58:03 -0500, Mitchell Holman
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by mr_antone
On Sat, 06 Jun 2020 21:47:37 -0500, Mitchell Holman
Post by Mitchell Holman
Tell us, Hartung, why you think these
monuments to the Confederacy (AND the KKK)
started being erected as soon as a black
middle class started emerging and needed
to be "kept in its place"?
https://tinyurl.com/yctogehg
Link times out.
True.
Let us try another.
The group behind Confederate monuments also built a memorial to the Klan
June 8, 2018
Did the UDC — a group responsible for most of the
Confederate monuments roiling communities today,
and that still promotes itself as "historical,
educational, benevolent, memorial and patriotic" —
erect a monument to a white-supremacist terrorist
group?
The answer was yes. Sixty-one years after the end
of the Civil War, the UDC constructed a memorial to
the Ku Klux Klan outside of the city of Concord,
North Carolina.
The UDC was organized in 1894 in Tennessee by a
group of daughters* of affluent and influential
Confederate veterans. While the UDC singlehandedly
created a social safety net for Confederate veterans
and their families, built veterans homes and hospitals,
and engaged in historic preservation, the group also
had another agenda. They and leaders of associated
organizations like the Confederate Veterans realized
that, with the military battles over, they would have
to wage a long-term struggle for hearts and minds to
solidify white control of the South. It would be a war
of ideas.
To that end, the UDC launched a long-term campaign to
re-write the history of the Civil War, the South, and
the country. By building monuments to the Confederacy
and gaining control of school curricula, the Daughters
spread a false history aimed at perpetuating the
culture and ideals of the Civil War-era South, a
society built on white supremacy. And they were
remarkably successful.
Their delivery vehicle was the "Lost Cause" ideology,
which promoted broad, romanticized, largely fictional
assertions designed to absolve the South from any
blame in the Civil War and to vindicate the Southern
- States rights (usually, the right to
secede) and not slavery were the cause
of the Civil War.
- Slaves were content and happy and not
mistreated in slavery. In fact, they
benefitted from slavery.
- Confederate soldiers were heroic, mythical
figures to be revered for defending the
South and its way of life.
Although never named as its goal, white supremacy
underpins the entire "Lost Cause" ideology. To focus
only on one part, like the monument building, means
missing the forest for the trees.
https://tinyurl.com/y7mptx49
Thank you,
David Hartung
2020-06-07 12:20:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by David Hartung
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by David Hartung
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by David Hartung
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by LinuxGal
Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam is expected to announce plans to
remove a statue of Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee in
The only people who are triggered about this are the same
ones that are against participation trophies. And isn¢t this
the biggest one there is?
     Robert E Lee himself didn't want any statues
erected of him.
The statues of Lee and other confederate traitors were not erected
to
Post by David Hartung
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by David Hartung
Post by Rudy Canoza
honor those men.  They were erected to cement white supremacy in
place, and to reinforce to blacks the inferior status they
occupied.
Post by David Hartung
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by David Hartung
I dislike calling people idiots, but when I see this sort of
stupidity, it is almost impossible to resist.
    Ask yourself why the same group that erected many of
the confederate statues in the South also erected a
monument to the KKK. Coincidence? The statues do not
preserve history, they establish and project the idea
of White Supremecy
https://tinyurl.com/y7mptx49
"At a 1927 dedication ceremony for a federally-funded
statue of Jefferson Davis in Mississippi, Senator John
Sharp Williams of Mississippi proclaimed that the
Confederacy did not fight to preserve slavery, but to
preserve "the cause of White Racial Supremacy, which
is not a Lost Cause. It is a Cause Triumphant. It was
never as safe as now since the Missouri Compromise. The
white man’s family, life, his code of social ethics, his
racial integrity — in a word his civilization — the
destruction of which in the slave states was dreaded are
safe."
https://segregationinamerica.eji.org/report/confederate-
icongraphy.html
Post by David Hartung
Post by Rudy Canoza
Excellent page.
After all these years in which you claimed that the civil war was about
slavery, you now say that it was something else?
   Learn to read, Hartung. The Civil War was about
slavery, the movement to put Confederate monuments
everywhere was about White Supremecy.
Relax Holman, I understand. The problem is that you have no idea what
you are talking about,
That's a lie.
Once again you define a difference of opinion as a lie.
e***@post.com
2020-06-07 17:22:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by David Hartung
Post by David Hartung
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by David Hartung
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by David Hartung
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by LinuxGal
Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam is expected to announce plans to
remove a statue of Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee in
The only people who are triggered about this are the same
ones that are against participation trophies. And isn¢t this
the biggest one there is?
     Robert E Lee himself didn't want any statues
erected of him.
The statues of Lee and other confederate traitors were not erected
to
Post by David Hartung
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by David Hartung
Post by Rudy Canoza
honor those men.  They were erected to cement white supremacy in
place, and to reinforce to blacks the inferior status they
occupied.
Post by David Hartung
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by David Hartung
I dislike calling people idiots, but when I see this sort of
stupidity, it is almost impossible to resist.
    Ask yourself why the same group that erected many of
the confederate statues in the South also erected a
monument to the KKK. Coincidence? The statues do not
preserve history, they establish and project the idea
of White Supremecy
https://tinyurl.com/y7mptx49
"At a 1927 dedication ceremony for a federally-funded
statue of Jefferson Davis in Mississippi, Senator John
Sharp Williams of Mississippi proclaimed that the
Confederacy did not fight to preserve slavery, but to
preserve "the cause of White Racial Supremacy, which
is not a Lost Cause. It is a Cause Triumphant. It was
never as safe as now since the Missouri Compromise. The
white man’s family, life, his code of social ethics, his
racial integrity — in a word his civilization — the
destruction of which in the slave states was dreaded are
safe."
https://segregationinamerica.eji.org/report/confederate-
icongraphy.html
Post by David Hartung
Post by Rudy Canoza
Excellent page.
After all these years in which you claimed that the civil war was about
slavery, you now say that it was something else?
   Learn to read, Hartung. The Civil War was about
slavery, the movement to put Confederate monuments
everywhere was about White Supremecy.
Relax Holman, I understand. The problem is that you have no idea what
you are talking about,
That's a lie.
Once again you define a difference of opinion as a lie.
A difference of opinion can contain lies.
David Hartung
2020-06-07 12:19:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by David Hartung
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by David Hartung
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by LinuxGal
Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam is expected to announce plans to
remove a statue of Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee in
The only people who are triggered about this are the same
ones that are against participation trophies. And isn¢t this
the biggest one there is?
     Robert E Lee himself didn't want any statues
erected of him.
The statues of Lee and other confederate traitors were not erected
to
Post by David Hartung
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by David Hartung
Post by Rudy Canoza
honor those men.  They were erected to cement white supremacy in
place, and to reinforce to blacks the inferior status they
occupied.
Post by David Hartung
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by David Hartung
I dislike calling people idiots, but when I see this sort of
stupidity, it is almost impossible to resist.
    Ask yourself why the same group that erected many of
the confederate statues in the South also erected a
monument to the KKK. Coincidence? The statues do not
preserve history, they establish and project the idea
of White Supremecy
https://tinyurl.com/y7mptx49
"At a 1927 dedication ceremony for a federally-funded
statue of Jefferson Davis in Mississippi, Senator John
Sharp Williams of Mississippi proclaimed that the
Confederacy did not fight to preserve slavery, but to
preserve "the cause of White Racial Supremacy, which
is not a Lost Cause. It is a Cause Triumphant. It was
never as safe as now since the Missouri Compromise. The
white man’s family, life, his code of social ethics, his
racial integrity — in a word his civilization — the
destruction of which in the slave states was dreaded are
safe."
https://segregationinamerica.eji.org/report/confederate-
icongraphy.html
Post by David Hartung
Post by Rudy Canoza
Excellent page.
After all these years in which you claimed that the civil war was about
slavery, you now say that it was something else?
Learn to read, Hartung. The Civil War was about
slavery, the movement to put Confederate monuments
everywhere was about White Supremecy.
But that is not what you quote above says.
Gronk
2020-06-07 04:57:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by David Hartung
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by LinuxGal
Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam is expected to announce plans to
remove a statue of Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee in
The only people who are triggered about this are the same
ones that are against participation trophies. And isn¢t this
the biggest one there is?
     Robert E Lee himself didn't want any statues
erected of him.
The statues of Lee and other confederate traitors were not erected to
honor those men.  They were erected to cement white supremacy in
place, and to reinforce to blacks the inferior status they occupied.
I dislike calling people idiots, but when I see this sort of
stupidity, it is almost impossible to resist.
Ask yourself why the same group that erected many of
the confederate statues in the South also erected a
monument to the KKK. Coincidence? The statues do not
preserve history, they establish and project the idea
of White Supremecy
https://tinyurl.com/y7mptx49
"At a 1927 dedication ceremony for a federally-funded
statue of Jefferson Davis in Mississippi, Senator John
Sharp Williams of Mississippi proclaimed that the
Confederacy did not fight to preserve slavery, but to
preserve "the cause of White Racial Supremacy, which
is not a Lost Cause. It is a Cause Triumphant. It was
never as safe as now since the Missouri Compromise. The
white man’s family, life, his code of social ethics, his
racial integrity — in a word his civilization — the
destruction of which in the slave states was dreaded are
safe."
https://segregationinamerica.eji.org/report/confederate-icongraphy.html
Case closed.
Gerry
2020-06-07 12:27:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gronk
Post by Mitchell Holman
https://segregationinamerica.eji.org/report/confederate-icongraphy.html
Case closed.
YOUR A LIEBRAL JUST LIKE HITLAR!
BeamMeUpScotty
2020-06-07 19:01:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by David Hartung
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by LinuxGal
Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam is expected to announce plans to
remove a statue of Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee in
The only people who are triggered about this are the same
ones that are against participation trophies. And isn¢t this
the biggest one there is?
     Robert E Lee himself didn't want any statues
erected of him.
The statues of Lee and other confederate traitors were not erected to
honor those men.  They were erected to cement white supremacy in
place, and to reinforce to blacks the inferior status they occupied.
I dislike calling people idiots, but when I see this sort of
stupidity, it is almost impossible to resist.
    Ask yourself why the same group that erected many of
the confederate statues in the South also erected a
monument to the KKK. Coincidence? The statues do not
preserve history, they establish and project the idea
of White Supremecy
https://tinyurl.com/y7mptx49
"At a 1927 dedication ceremony for a federally-funded
statue of Jefferson Davis in Mississippi, Senator John
Sharp Williams of Mississippi proclaimed that the
Confederacy did not fight to preserve slavery,
It was true up to that point and after that it went off the rails and
there have been many years and many things happened that proved that the
Confederacy didn't fight for slavery but for States RIGHTS as listed in
the 10th Amendment Since slavery was legal then mandating its end would
have violated the States 10th Amendment RIGHTS. the States have a right
to powers NOT denied to them by the Constitution.


The fact that one HITLER follower that believed as hitler did and made
remarks that were simply false has no bearing on what Jefferson Davis
did or why he did it. Democrats still today constantly try to rewrite
history and change our traditions.



Obama says you will have to change your traditions and history.
*Obama was an elected Democrat*

*John Sharp Williams*
John Sharp Williams was a prominent American politician in the
*Democratic Party from the* 1890s through the 1920s, and served as the
*Minority Leader of the United States House of Representatives* from
1903 to 1908.Wikipedia
*Born:July 30, 1854, Memphis, Tennessee*
Died:September 27, 1932, Yazoo City, Mississippi, U.S.
*Political party:Democratic*


*Liberalism is unsustainable, self destructive and contradicting*
--
*That's Karma*

If race doesn't matter then why do Democrats blame it for all their
failures?
BeamMeUpScotty
2020-06-07 20:11:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by David Hartung
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by LinuxGal
Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam is expected to announce plans to
remove a statue of Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee in
The only people who are triggered about this are the same
ones that are against participation trophies. And isn¢t this
the biggest one there is?
     Robert E Lee himself didn't want any statues
erected of him.
The statues of Lee and other confederate traitors were not erected to
honor those men.  They were erected to cement white supremacy in
place, and to reinforce to blacks the inferior status they occupied.
I dislike calling people idiots, but when I see this sort of
stupidity, it is almost impossible to resist.
    Ask yourself why the same group that erected many of
the confederate statues in the South also erected a
monument to the KKK. Coincidence? The statues do not
preserve history, they establish and project the idea
of White Supremecy
https://tinyurl.com/y7mptx49
"At a 1927 dedication ceremony for a federally-funded
statue of Jefferson Davis in Mississippi, Senator John
Sharp Williams of Mississippi proclaimed that the
Confederacy did not fight to preserve slavery,
It was true up to that point and after that it went off the rails and
there have been many years and many things happened that proved that the
Confederacy didn't fight for slavery but for States RIGHTS as listed in
the 10th Amendment Since slavery was *CONSTITUTIONAL* then mandating
its end would have violated the States 10th Amendment RIGHTS. the States
have a right to powers NOT denied to them by the Constitution.

Amendment X
*The powers not delegated to the United States* by the Constitution,
*nor prohibited by it to the States* , *are reserved to the States*
respectively* , or to the people.

The fact that one HITLER follower in 1927 that believed as Hitler did
and made remarks that were simply false has no bearing on what Jefferson
Davis did or why he did it. Democrats still today constantly try to
rewrite history and change our traditions.

http://youtu.be/afGz0dzVSIU

Obama says you will have to change your traditions and history.
*Obama was an elected Democrat*

*John Sharp Williams*
John Sharp Williams was a prominent American politician in the
*Democratic Party from the* 1890s through the 1920s, and served as the
*Minority Leader of the United States House of Representatives* from
1903 to 1908
*Born:July 30, 1854, Memphis, Tennessee*
Died:September 27, 1932, Yazoo City, Mississippi, U.S.
*Political party:Democratic*


*Liberalism is unsustainable, self destructive and contradicting*
--
That's Karma


*Mama'says*
224 - If Liberals don't believe in biological gender then why did they
march for women's rights?
BeamMeUpScotty
2020-06-07 21:09:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by David Hartung
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by LinuxGal
Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam is expected to announce plans to
remove a statue of Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee in
The only people who are triggered about this are the same
ones that are against participation trophies. And isn¢t this
the biggest one there is?
     Robert E Lee himself didn't want any statues
erected of him.
The statues of Lee and other confederate traitors were not erected to
honor those men.  They were erected to cement white supremacy in
place, and to reinforce to blacks the inferior status they occupied.
I dislike calling people idiots, but when I see this sort of
stupidity, it is almost impossible to resist.
    Ask yourself why the same group that erected many of
the confederate statues in the South also erected a
monument to the KKK. Coincidence? The statues do not
preserve history, they establish and project the idea
of White Supremecy
https://tinyurl.com/y7mptx49
"At a 1927 dedication ceremony for a federally-funded
statue of Jefferson Davis in Mississippi, Senator John
Sharp Williams of Mississippi proclaimed that the
Confederacy did not fight to preserve slavery,
It was true up to that point and after that it went off the rails and
there have been many years and many things happened that proved that the
Confederacy didn't fight for slavery but for States RIGHTS as listed in
the 10th Amendment Since slavery was *CONSTITUTIONAL* then mandating
its end would have violated the States 10th Amendment RIGHTS. the States
have a right to powers NOT denied to them by the Constitution.

Amendment X
*The powers not delegated to the United States* by the Constitution,
*nor prohibited by it to the States* , *are reserved to the States*
respectively* , or to the people.

The fact that one HITLER follower in 1927 that believed as Hitler did
and made remarks that were simply false has no bearing on what Jefferson
Davis did or why he did it. Democrats still today constantly try to
rewrite history and change our traditions.

http://youtu.be/afGz0dzVSIU

Obama says you will have to change your traditions and history.
*Obama was an elected Democrat*

*John Sharp Williams*
John Sharp Williams was a prominent American politician in the
*Democratic Party from the* 1890s through the 1920s, and served as the
*Minority Leader of the United States House of Representatives* from
1903 to 1908
*Born:July 30, 1854, Memphis, Tennessee*
Died:September 27, 1932, Yazoo City, Mississippi, U.S.
*Political party:Democratic*


*Liberalism is unsustainable, self destructive and contradicting*
--
That's Karma


*Mama'says*
224 - If Liberals don't believe in biological gender then why did they
march for women's rights?
M I Wakefield
2020-06-07 21:40:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by BeamMeUpScotty
It was true up to that point and after that it went off the rails and
there have been many years and many things happened that proved that the
Confederacy didn't fight for slavery but for States RIGHTS as listed in
the 10th Amendment Since slavery was *CONSTITUTIONAL* then mandating its
end would have violated the States 10th Amendment RIGHTS. the States have
a right to powers NOT denied to them by the Constitution.
Scotty: You're nothing but a lying, racist, fucktard.
Gord Green
2020-06-06 15:18:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by LinuxGal
Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam is expected to announce plans to
remove a statue of Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee in
The only people who are triggered about this are the same
ones that are against participation trophies. And isnœt this
the biggest one there is?
Rightwing Virginia Senator Amanda Chase says tearing down Confederate
statues is an attempt to erase her proud white history of catching and
enslaving blacks, raping them, lynching them and most of all, getting our
asses in a civil war over them. She goes around adorning those statues with
Nazi swastika flags every April 20th, Hitler's birthday!
David Hartung
2020-06-06 15:26:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gord Green
Post by LinuxGal
Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam is expected to announce plans to
remove a statue of Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee in
The only people who are triggered about this are the same
ones that are against participation trophies. And isn½t this
the biggest one there is?
Rightwing Virginia Senator Amanda Chase says tearing down Confederate
statues is an attempt to erase her proud white history of catching and
enslaving blacks, raping them, lynching them and most of all, getting our
asses in a civil war over them. She goes around adorning those statues with
Nazi swastika flags every April 20th, Hitler's birthday!
I seriously doubt it.
Rudy Canoza
2020-06-06 16:07:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by David Hartung
Post by LinuxGal
Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam is expected to announce plans to
remove a statue of Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee in
The only people who are triggered about this are the same
ones that are against participation trophies. And isn½t this
the biggest one there is?
Rightwing Virginia Senator  Amanda Chase says tearing down Confederate
statues is an attempt to erase her proud white history of catching and
enslaving blacks, raping them, lynching them and most of all, getting our
asses in a civil war over them.   She goes around adorning those statues
with
Nazi swastika flags every April 20th, Hitler's birthday!
I seriously doubt it.
She doesn't do that. However, she does say that the removal of Confederate
statues is an "overt effort to erase all white history." Those are the
words of a white supremacist.

All white supremacists are Republiscums - 100% of them.
Continue reading on narkive:
Loading...