Discussion:
Because testing milk for safety is which: waste, or fraud, or abuse?
Add Reply
Alan
2025-04-22 19:52:46 UTC
Reply
Permalink
' The Food and Drug Administration is suspending a quality control
program for testing of fluid milk and other dairy products due to
reduced capacity in its food safety and nutrition division, according to
an internal email seen by Reuters.'


<https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/us-fda-suspends-milk-quality-tests-amid-workforce-cuts-2025-04-21/?ref=upstract.com>

But no problem for you, MAGAts, huh?

'The suspension is another disruption to the nation's food safety
programs after the termination and departure of 20,000 employees of the
Department of Health and Human Services, which includes the FDA, as part
of President Donald Trump's effort to shrink the federal workforce.'
Skeeter OG
2025-04-22 20:39:27 UTC
Reply
Permalink
In article <vu8s2e$196cb$***@dont-email.me>, nuh-***@nope.com
says...
Post by Alan
' The Food and Drug Administration is suspending a quality control
program for testing of fluid milk and other dairy products due to
reduced capacity in its food safety and nutrition division, according to
an internal email seen by Reuters.'
<https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/us-fda-suspends-milk-quality-tests-amid-workforce-cuts-2025-04-21/?ref=upstract.com>
But no problem for you, MAGAts, huh?
'The suspension is another disruption to the nation's food safety
programs after the termination and departure of 20,000 employees of the
Department of Health and Human Services, which includes the FDA, as part
of President Donald Trump's effort to shrink the federal workforce.'
No one had an issue with milk before the regulations.
Alan
2025-04-22 20:52:03 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
' The Food and Drug Administration is suspending a quality control
program for testing of fluid milk and other dairy products due to
reduced capacity in its food safety and nutrition division, according to
an internal email seen by Reuters.'
<https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/us-fda-suspends-milk-quality-tests-amid-workforce-cuts-2025-04-21/?ref=upstract.com>
But no problem for you, MAGAts, huh?
'The suspension is another disruption to the nation's food safety
programs after the termination and departure of 20,000 employees of the
Department of Health and Human Services, which includes the FDA, as part
of President Donald Trump's effort to shrink the federal workforce.'
No one had an issue with milk before the regulations.
LOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!

'We are living in a time when many see “deregulation” as a goal in
itself. Red tape is obnoxious and counterproductive, and government
should just leave businesses alone. That goes for an expanding array of
consumer choices. When it comes to food, for example, an odd combination
of the crunchy left and libertarian right now bridle at laws limiting
their right to access “natural” commodities, like raw milk.

...

I only made it to the second page without gagging. There Blum explains
how milk was often adulterated in the late 19th century. It was watered
down, and chalk or plaster powder was mixed in to get the color right.
To replace the layer of cream on top, pureed calf brains could be used.

...In the case of milk, formaldehyde was a favored option. Commercial
products such as “Preservaline” hit the market for precisely this
purpose. Added to fresh milk, it could prevent curdling for days, the
same way it could preserve dead bodies. Sadly, it didn’t have quite the
positive effect on the living children who consumed it. Clusters of
child deaths in various cities in the late 1890s turned public attention
to what was being put into milk. Blum suggests dozens of children died,
particularly those in orphanages and hospitals, which bought the
cheapest supplies.

...

For milk, a solution existed: pasteurization. It was already mandatory
in some countries, but U.S. producers resisted on the grounds of cost
and hassle. No, it would not allow old milk to stay shelf stable for
weeks without refrigeration (something some of the dairy firms were
obviously seeking when they used formaldehyde). But it would save
consumers from the risks of salmonella, listeria, campylobacter (then
known as “infant cholera”)—not to mention formaldehyde itself.'
Skeeter OG
2025-04-22 21:12:20 UTC
Reply
Permalink
In article <vu8vhj$1ctqu$***@dont-email.me>, nuh-***@nope.com
says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
' The Food and Drug Administration is suspending a quality control
program for testing of fluid milk and other dairy products due to
reduced capacity in its food safety and nutrition division, according to
an internal email seen by Reuters.'
<https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/us-fda-suspends-milk-quality-tests-amid-workforce-cuts-2025-04-21/?ref=upstract.com>
But no problem for you, MAGAts, huh?
'The suspension is another disruption to the nation's food safety
programs after the termination and departure of 20,000 employees of the
Department of Health and Human Services, which includes the FDA, as part
of President Donald Trump's effort to shrink the federal workforce.'
No one had an issue with milk before the regulations.
LOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!
'We are living in a time when many see ?deregulation? as a goal in
itself. Red tape is obnoxious and counterproductive, and government
should just leave businesses alone. That goes for an expanding array of
consumer choices. When it comes to food, for example, an odd combination
of the crunchy left and libertarian right now bridle at laws limiting
their right to access ?natural? commodities, like raw milk.
...
I only made it to the second page without gagging. There Blum explains
how milk was often adulterated in the late 19th century. It was watered
down, and chalk or plaster powder was mixed in to get the color right.
To replace the layer of cream on top, pureed calf brains could be used.
...In the case of milk, formaldehyde was a favored option. Commercial
products such as ?Preservaline? hit the market for precisely this
purpose. Added to fresh milk, it could prevent curdling for days, the
same way it could preserve dead bodies. Sadly, it didn?t have quite the
positive effect on the living children who consumed it. Clusters of
child deaths in various cities in the late 1890s turned public attention
to what was being put into milk. Blum suggests dozens of children died,
particularly those in orphanages and hospitals, which bought the
cheapest supplies.
...
For milk, a solution existed: pasteurization. It was already mandatory
in some countries, but U.S. producers resisted on the grounds of cost
and hassle. No, it would not allow old milk to stay shelf stable for
weeks without refrigeration (something some of the dairy firms were
obviously seeking when they used formaldehyde). But it would save
consumers from the risks of salmonella, listeria, campylobacter (then
known as ?infant cholera?)?not to mention formaldehyde itself.'
Did I make you grep all that? The fact is there are to
many regulations. Do you really think with our technology
that they wont keep making good milk? Moron.
Alan
2025-04-22 21:34:05 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
' The Food and Drug Administration is suspending a quality control
program for testing of fluid milk and other dairy products due to
reduced capacity in its food safety and nutrition division, according to
an internal email seen by Reuters.'
<https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/us-fda-suspends-milk-quality-tests-amid-workforce-cuts-2025-04-21/?ref=upstract.com>
But no problem for you, MAGAts, huh?
'The suspension is another disruption to the nation's food safety
programs after the termination and departure of 20,000 employees of the
Department of Health and Human Services, which includes the FDA, as part
of President Donald Trump's effort to shrink the federal workforce.'
No one had an issue with milk before the regulations.
LOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!
'We are living in a time when many see ?deregulation? as a goal in
itself. Red tape is obnoxious and counterproductive, and government
should just leave businesses alone. That goes for an expanding array of
consumer choices. When it comes to food, for example, an odd combination
of the crunchy left and libertarian right now bridle at laws limiting
their right to access ?natural? commodities, like raw milk.
...
I only made it to the second page without gagging. There Blum explains
how milk was often adulterated in the late 19th century. It was watered
down, and chalk or plaster powder was mixed in to get the color right.
To replace the layer of cream on top, pureed calf brains could be used.
...In the case of milk, formaldehyde was a favored option. Commercial
products such as ?Preservaline? hit the market for precisely this
purpose. Added to fresh milk, it could prevent curdling for days, the
same way it could preserve dead bodies. Sadly, it didn?t have quite the
positive effect on the living children who consumed it. Clusters of
child deaths in various cities in the late 1890s turned public attention
to what was being put into milk. Blum suggests dozens of children died,
particularly those in orphanages and hospitals, which bought the
cheapest supplies.
...
For milk, a solution existed: pasteurization. It was already mandatory
in some countries, but U.S. producers resisted on the grounds of cost
and hassle. No, it would not allow old milk to stay shelf stable for
weeks without refrigeration (something some of the dairy firms were
obviously seeking when they used formaldehyde). But it would save
consumers from the risks of salmonella, listeria, campylobacter (then
known as ?infant cholera?)?not to mention formaldehyde itself.'
Did I make you grep all that? The fact is there are to
many regulations. Do you really think with our technology
that they wont keep making good milk? Moron.
"grep" it? No.

Look it up in order to show you how stupid you are? Sure!

Do you really think that companies can be trusted to act in the best
interest of safety when they can make more money by doing otherwise?
Skeeter OG
2025-04-22 21:43:57 UTC
Reply
Permalink
In article <vu920d$1f8fm$***@dont-email.me>, nuh-***@nope.com
says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
' The Food and Drug Administration is suspending a quality control
program for testing of fluid milk and other dairy products due to
reduced capacity in its food safety and nutrition division, according to
an internal email seen by Reuters.'
<https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/us-fda-suspends-milk-quality-tests-amid-workforce-cuts-2025-04-21/?ref=upstract.com>
But no problem for you, MAGAts, huh?
'The suspension is another disruption to the nation's food safety
programs after the termination and departure of 20,000 employees of the
Department of Health and Human Services, which includes the FDA, as part
of President Donald Trump's effort to shrink the federal workforce.'
No one had an issue with milk before the regulations.
LOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!
'We are living in a time when many see ?deregulation? as a goal in
itself. Red tape is obnoxious and counterproductive, and government
should just leave businesses alone. That goes for an expanding array of
consumer choices. When it comes to food, for example, an odd combination
of the crunchy left and libertarian right now bridle at laws limiting
their right to access ?natural? commodities, like raw milk.
...
I only made it to the second page without gagging. There Blum explains
how milk was often adulterated in the late 19th century. It was watered
down, and chalk or plaster powder was mixed in to get the color right.
To replace the layer of cream on top, pureed calf brains could be used.
...In the case of milk, formaldehyde was a favored option. Commercial
products such as ?Preservaline? hit the market for precisely this
purpose. Added to fresh milk, it could prevent curdling for days, the
same way it could preserve dead bodies. Sadly, it didn?t have quite the
positive effect on the living children who consumed it. Clusters of
child deaths in various cities in the late 1890s turned public attention
to what was being put into milk. Blum suggests dozens of children died,
particularly those in orphanages and hospitals, which bought the
cheapest supplies.
...
For milk, a solution existed: pasteurization. It was already mandatory
in some countries, but U.S. producers resisted on the grounds of cost
and hassle. No, it would not allow old milk to stay shelf stable for
weeks without refrigeration (something some of the dairy firms were
obviously seeking when they used formaldehyde). But it would save
consumers from the risks of salmonella, listeria, campylobacter (then
known as ?infant cholera?)?not to mention formaldehyde itself.'
Did I make you grep all that? The fact is there are to
many regulations. Do you really think with our technology
that they wont keep making good milk? Moron.
"grep" it? No.
Look it up in order to show you how stupid you are? Sure!
Do you really think that companies can be trusted to act in the best
interest of safety when they can make more money by doing otherwise?
They still have to have a product people will buy.
Alan
2025-04-22 22:03:41 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
' The Food and Drug Administration is suspending a quality control
program for testing of fluid milk and other dairy products due to
reduced capacity in its food safety and nutrition division, according to
an internal email seen by Reuters.'
<https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/us-fda-suspends-milk-quality-tests-amid-workforce-cuts-2025-04-21/?ref=upstract.com>
But no problem for you, MAGAts, huh?
'The suspension is another disruption to the nation's food safety
programs after the termination and departure of 20,000 employees of the
Department of Health and Human Services, which includes the FDA, as part
of President Donald Trump's effort to shrink the federal workforce.'
No one had an issue with milk before the regulations.
LOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!
'We are living in a time when many see ?deregulation? as a goal in
itself. Red tape is obnoxious and counterproductive, and government
should just leave businesses alone. That goes for an expanding array of
consumer choices. When it comes to food, for example, an odd combination
of the crunchy left and libertarian right now bridle at laws limiting
their right to access ?natural? commodities, like raw milk.
...
I only made it to the second page without gagging. There Blum explains
how milk was often adulterated in the late 19th century. It was watered
down, and chalk or plaster powder was mixed in to get the color right.
To replace the layer of cream on top, pureed calf brains could be used.
...In the case of milk, formaldehyde was a favored option. Commercial
products such as ?Preservaline? hit the market for precisely this
purpose. Added to fresh milk, it could prevent curdling for days, the
same way it could preserve dead bodies. Sadly, it didn?t have quite the
positive effect on the living children who consumed it. Clusters of
child deaths in various cities in the late 1890s turned public attention
to what was being put into milk. Blum suggests dozens of children died,
particularly those in orphanages and hospitals, which bought the
cheapest supplies.
...
For milk, a solution existed: pasteurization. It was already mandatory
in some countries, but U.S. producers resisted on the grounds of cost
and hassle. No, it would not allow old milk to stay shelf stable for
weeks without refrigeration (something some of the dairy firms were
obviously seeking when they used formaldehyde). But it would save
consumers from the risks of salmonella, listeria, campylobacter (then
known as ?infant cholera?)?not to mention formaldehyde itself.'
Did I make you grep all that? The fact is there are to
many regulations. Do you really think with our technology
that they wont keep making good milk? Moron.
"grep" it? No.
Look it up in order to show you how stupid you are? Sure!
Do you really think that companies can be trusted to act in the best
interest of safety when they can make more money by doing otherwise?
They still have to have a product people will buy.
And that was true before safety regulations...

...but they clearly adulterated products then.
Skeeter OG
2025-04-22 23:13:37 UTC
Reply
Permalink
In article <vu93nt$1gtg2$***@dont-email.me>, nuh-***@nope.com
says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
' The Food and Drug Administration is suspending a quality control
program for testing of fluid milk and other dairy products due to
reduced capacity in its food safety and nutrition division, according to
an internal email seen by Reuters.'
<https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/us-fda-suspends-milk-quality-tests-amid-workforce-cuts-2025-04-21/?ref=upstract.com>
But no problem for you, MAGAts, huh?
'The suspension is another disruption to the nation's food safety
programs after the termination and departure of 20,000 employees of the
Department of Health and Human Services, which includes the FDA, as part
of President Donald Trump's effort to shrink the federal workforce.'
No one had an issue with milk before the regulations.
LOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!
'We are living in a time when many see ?deregulation? as a goal in
itself. Red tape is obnoxious and counterproductive, and government
should just leave businesses alone. That goes for an expanding array of
consumer choices. When it comes to food, for example, an odd combination
of the crunchy left and libertarian right now bridle at laws limiting
their right to access ?natural? commodities, like raw milk.
...
I only made it to the second page without gagging. There Blum explains
how milk was often adulterated in the late 19th century. It was watered
down, and chalk or plaster powder was mixed in to get the color right.
To replace the layer of cream on top, pureed calf brains could be used.
...In the case of milk, formaldehyde was a favored option. Commercial
products such as ?Preservaline? hit the market for precisely this
purpose. Added to fresh milk, it could prevent curdling for days, the
same way it could preserve dead bodies. Sadly, it didn?t have quite the
positive effect on the living children who consumed it. Clusters of
child deaths in various cities in the late 1890s turned public attention
to what was being put into milk. Blum suggests dozens of children died,
particularly those in orphanages and hospitals, which bought the
cheapest supplies.
...
For milk, a solution existed: pasteurization. It was already mandatory
in some countries, but U.S. producers resisted on the grounds of cost
and hassle. No, it would not allow old milk to stay shelf stable for
weeks without refrigeration (something some of the dairy firms were
obviously seeking when they used formaldehyde). But it would save
consumers from the risks of salmonella, listeria, campylobacter (then
known as ?infant cholera?)?not to mention formaldehyde itself.'
Did I make you grep all that? The fact is there are to
many regulations. Do you really think with our technology
that they wont keep making good milk? Moron.
"grep" it? No.
Look it up in order to show you how stupid you are? Sure!
Do you really think that companies can be trusted to act in the best
interest of safety when they can make more money by doing otherwise?
They still have to have a product people will buy.
And that was true before safety regulations...
...but they clearly adulterated products then.
It's a new age. Relax.
Alan
2025-04-22 23:18:40 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
' The Food and Drug Administration is suspending a quality control
program for testing of fluid milk and other dairy products due to
reduced capacity in its food safety and nutrition division, according to
an internal email seen by Reuters.'
<https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/us-fda-suspends-milk-quality-tests-amid-workforce-cuts-2025-04-21/?ref=upstract.com>
But no problem for you, MAGAts, huh?
'The suspension is another disruption to the nation's food safety
programs after the termination and departure of 20,000 employees of the
Department of Health and Human Services, which includes the FDA, as part
of President Donald Trump's effort to shrink the federal workforce.'
No one had an issue with milk before the regulations.
LOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!
'We are living in a time when many see ?deregulation? as a goal in
itself. Red tape is obnoxious and counterproductive, and government
should just leave businesses alone. That goes for an expanding array of
consumer choices. When it comes to food, for example, an odd combination
of the crunchy left and libertarian right now bridle at laws limiting
their right to access ?natural? commodities, like raw milk.
...
I only made it to the second page without gagging. There Blum explains
how milk was often adulterated in the late 19th century. It was watered
down, and chalk or plaster powder was mixed in to get the color right.
To replace the layer of cream on top, pureed calf brains could be used.
...In the case of milk, formaldehyde was a favored option. Commercial
products such as ?Preservaline? hit the market for precisely this
purpose. Added to fresh milk, it could prevent curdling for days, the
same way it could preserve dead bodies. Sadly, it didn?t have quite the
positive effect on the living children who consumed it. Clusters of
child deaths in various cities in the late 1890s turned public attention
to what was being put into milk. Blum suggests dozens of children died,
particularly those in orphanages and hospitals, which bought the
cheapest supplies.
...
For milk, a solution existed: pasteurization. It was already mandatory
in some countries, but U.S. producers resisted on the grounds of cost
and hassle. No, it would not allow old milk to stay shelf stable for
weeks without refrigeration (something some of the dairy firms were
obviously seeking when they used formaldehyde). But it would save
consumers from the risks of salmonella, listeria, campylobacter (then
known as ?infant cholera?)?not to mention formaldehyde itself.'
Did I make you grep all that? The fact is there are to
many regulations. Do you really think with our technology
that they wont keep making good milk? Moron.
"grep" it? No.
Look it up in order to show you how stupid you are? Sure!
Do you really think that companies can be trusted to act in the best
interest of safety when they can make more money by doing otherwise?
They still have to have a product people will buy.
And that was true before safety regulations...
...but they clearly adulterated products then.
It's a new age. Relax.
What makes you think that people and greed are any different?
Skeeter OG
2025-04-22 23:39:17 UTC
Reply
Permalink
In article <vu984g$1kpjj$***@dont-email.me>, nuh-***@nope.com
says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
' The Food and Drug Administration is suspending a quality control
program for testing of fluid milk and other dairy products due to
reduced capacity in its food safety and nutrition division, according to
an internal email seen by Reuters.'
<https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/us-fda-suspends-milk-quality-tests-amid-workforce-cuts-2025-04-21/?ref=upstract.com>
But no problem for you, MAGAts, huh?
'The suspension is another disruption to the nation's food safety
programs after the termination and departure of 20,000 employees of the
Department of Health and Human Services, which includes the FDA, as part
of President Donald Trump's effort to shrink the federal workforce.'
No one had an issue with milk before the regulations.
LOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!
'We are living in a time when many see ?deregulation? as a goal in
itself. Red tape is obnoxious and counterproductive, and government
should just leave businesses alone. That goes for an expanding array of
consumer choices. When it comes to food, for example, an odd combination
of the crunchy left and libertarian right now bridle at laws limiting
their right to access ?natural? commodities, like raw milk.
...
I only made it to the second page without gagging. There Blum explains
how milk was often adulterated in the late 19th century. It was watered
down, and chalk or plaster powder was mixed in to get the color right.
To replace the layer of cream on top, pureed calf brains could be used.
...In the case of milk, formaldehyde was a favored option. Commercial
products such as ?Preservaline? hit the market for precisely this
purpose. Added to fresh milk, it could prevent curdling for days, the
same way it could preserve dead bodies. Sadly, it didn?t have quite the
positive effect on the living children who consumed it. Clusters of
child deaths in various cities in the late 1890s turned public attention
to what was being put into milk. Blum suggests dozens of children died,
particularly those in orphanages and hospitals, which bought the
cheapest supplies.
...
For milk, a solution existed: pasteurization. It was already mandatory
in some countries, but U.S. producers resisted on the grounds of cost
and hassle. No, it would not allow old milk to stay shelf stable for
weeks without refrigeration (something some of the dairy firms were
obviously seeking when they used formaldehyde). But it would save
consumers from the risks of salmonella, listeria, campylobacter (then
known as ?infant cholera?)?not to mention formaldehyde itself.'
Did I make you grep all that? The fact is there are to
many regulations. Do you really think with our technology
that they wont keep making good milk? Moron.
"grep" it? No.
Look it up in order to show you how stupid you are? Sure!
Do you really think that companies can be trusted to act in the best
interest of safety when they can make more money by doing otherwise?
They still have to have a product people will buy.
And that was true before safety regulations...
...but they clearly adulterated products then.
It's a new age. Relax.
What makes you think that people and greed are any different?
I never said anything about that.
Alan
2025-04-22 23:45:51 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
' The Food and Drug Administration is suspending a quality control
program for testing of fluid milk and other dairy products due to
reduced capacity in its food safety and nutrition division, according to
an internal email seen by Reuters.'
<https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/us-fda-suspends-milk-quality-tests-amid-workforce-cuts-2025-04-21/?ref=upstract.com>
But no problem for you, MAGAts, huh?
'The suspension is another disruption to the nation's food safety
programs after the termination and departure of 20,000 employees of the
Department of Health and Human Services, which includes the FDA, as part
of President Donald Trump's effort to shrink the federal workforce.'
No one had an issue with milk before the regulations.
LOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!
'We are living in a time when many see ?deregulation? as a goal in
itself. Red tape is obnoxious and counterproductive, and government
should just leave businesses alone. That goes for an expanding array of
consumer choices. When it comes to food, for example, an odd combination
of the crunchy left and libertarian right now bridle at laws limiting
their right to access ?natural? commodities, like raw milk.
...
I only made it to the second page without gagging. There Blum explains
how milk was often adulterated in the late 19th century. It was watered
down, and chalk or plaster powder was mixed in to get the color right.
To replace the layer of cream on top, pureed calf brains could be used.
...In the case of milk, formaldehyde was a favored option. Commercial
products such as ?Preservaline? hit the market for precisely this
purpose. Added to fresh milk, it could prevent curdling for days, the
same way it could preserve dead bodies. Sadly, it didn?t have quite the
positive effect on the living children who consumed it. Clusters of
child deaths in various cities in the late 1890s turned public attention
to what was being put into milk. Blum suggests dozens of children died,
particularly those in orphanages and hospitals, which bought the
cheapest supplies.
...
For milk, a solution existed: pasteurization. It was already mandatory
in some countries, but U.S. producers resisted on the grounds of cost
and hassle. No, it would not allow old milk to stay shelf stable for
weeks without refrigeration (something some of the dairy firms were
obviously seeking when they used formaldehyde). But it would save
consumers from the risks of salmonella, listeria, campylobacter (then
known as ?infant cholera?)?not to mention formaldehyde itself.'
Did I make you grep all that? The fact is there are to
many regulations. Do you really think with our technology
that they wont keep making good milk? Moron.
"grep" it? No.
Look it up in order to show you how stupid you are? Sure!
Do you really think that companies can be trusted to act in the best
interest of safety when they can make more money by doing otherwise?
They still have to have a product people will buy.
And that was true before safety regulations...
...but they clearly adulterated products then.
It's a new age. Relax.
What makes you think that people and greed are any different?
I never said anything about that.
But it's what we need regulations to protect us FROM, doofus.

It isn't TECHNOLOGY that keeps us safe.

It is companies being required to make safe products...

...by regulation.
Skeeter OG
2025-04-23 00:05:03 UTC
Reply
Permalink
In article <vu99nf$1m1vc$***@dont-email.me>, nuh-***@nope.com
says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
' The Food and Drug Administration is suspending a quality control
program for testing of fluid milk and other dairy products due to
reduced capacity in its food safety and nutrition division, according to
an internal email seen by Reuters.'
<https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/us-fda-suspends-milk-quality-tests-amid-workforce-cuts-2025-04-21/?ref=upstract.com>
But no problem for you, MAGAts, huh?
'The suspension is another disruption to the nation's food safety
programs after the termination and departure of 20,000 employees of the
Department of Health and Human Services, which includes the FDA, as part
of President Donald Trump's effort to shrink the federal workforce.'
No one had an issue with milk before the regulations.
LOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!
'We are living in a time when many see ?deregulation? as a goal in
itself. Red tape is obnoxious and counterproductive, and government
should just leave businesses alone. That goes for an expanding array of
consumer choices. When it comes to food, for example, an odd combination
of the crunchy left and libertarian right now bridle at laws limiting
their right to access ?natural? commodities, like raw milk.
...
I only made it to the second page without gagging. There Blum explains
how milk was often adulterated in the late 19th century. It was watered
down, and chalk or plaster powder was mixed in to get the color right.
To replace the layer of cream on top, pureed calf brains could be used.
...In the case of milk, formaldehyde was a favored option. Commercial
products such as ?Preservaline? hit the market for precisely this
purpose. Added to fresh milk, it could prevent curdling for days, the
same way it could preserve dead bodies. Sadly, it didn?t have quite the
positive effect on the living children who consumed it. Clusters of
child deaths in various cities in the late 1890s turned public attention
to what was being put into milk. Blum suggests dozens of children died,
particularly those in orphanages and hospitals, which bought the
cheapest supplies.
...
For milk, a solution existed: pasteurization. It was already mandatory
in some countries, but U.S. producers resisted on the grounds of cost
and hassle. No, it would not allow old milk to stay shelf stable for
weeks without refrigeration (something some of the dairy firms were
obviously seeking when they used formaldehyde). But it would save
consumers from the risks of salmonella, listeria, campylobacter (then
known as ?infant cholera?)?not to mention formaldehyde itself.'
Did I make you grep all that? The fact is there are to
many regulations. Do you really think with our technology
that they wont keep making good milk? Moron.
"grep" it? No.
Look it up in order to show you how stupid you are? Sure!
Do you really think that companies can be trusted to act in the best
interest of safety when they can make more money by doing otherwise?
They still have to have a product people will buy.
And that was true before safety regulations...
...but they clearly adulterated products then.
It's a new age. Relax.
What makes you think that people and greed are any different?
I never said anything about that.
But it's what we need regulations to protect us FROM, doofus.
It isn't TECHNOLOGY that keeps us safe.
It is companies being required to make safe products...
...by regulation.
True but there to many driving the prices up.
-hh
2025-04-23 02:33:21 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
' The Food and Drug Administration is suspending a quality control
program for testing of fluid milk and other dairy products due to
reduced capacity in its food safety and nutrition division, according to
an internal email seen by Reuters.'
<https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/us-fda-suspends-milk-quality-tests-amid-workforce-cuts-2025-04-21/?ref=upstract.com>
But no problem for you, MAGAts, huh?
'The suspension is another disruption to the nation's food safety
programs after the termination and departure of 20,000 employees of the
Department of Health and Human Services, which includes the FDA, as part
of President Donald Trump's effort to shrink the federal workforce.'
No one had an issue with milk before the regulations.
LOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!
'We are living in a time when many see ?deregulation? as a goal in
itself. Red tape is obnoxious and counterproductive, and government
should just leave businesses alone. That goes for an expanding array of
consumer choices. When it comes to food, for example, an odd combination
of the crunchy left and libertarian right now bridle at laws limiting
their right to access ?natural? commodities, like raw milk.
...
I only made it to the second page without gagging. There Blum explains
how milk was often adulterated in the late 19th century. It was watered
down, and chalk or plaster powder was mixed in to get the color right.
To replace the layer of cream on top, pureed calf brains could be used.
...In the case of milk, formaldehyde was a favored option. Commercial
products such as ?Preservaline? hit the market for precisely this
purpose. Added to fresh milk, it could prevent curdling for days, the
same way it could preserve dead bodies. Sadly, it didn?t have quite the
positive effect on the living children who consumed it. Clusters of
child deaths in various cities in the late 1890s turned public attention
to what was being put into milk. Blum suggests dozens of children died,
particularly those in orphanages and hospitals, which bought the
cheapest supplies.
...
For milk, a solution existed: pasteurization. It was already mandatory
in some countries, but U.S. producers resisted on the grounds of cost
and hassle. No, it would not allow old milk to stay shelf stable for
weeks without refrigeration (something some of the dairy firms were
obviously seeking when they used formaldehyde). But it would save
consumers from the risks of salmonella, listeria, campylobacter (then
known as ?infant cholera?)?not to mention formaldehyde itself.'
Did I make you grep all that? The fact is there are to
many regulations. Do you really think with our technology
that they wont keep making good milk? Moron.
"grep" it? No.
Look it up in order to show you how stupid you are? Sure!
Do you really think that companies can be trusted to act in the best
interest of safety when they can make more money by doing otherwise?
They still have to have a product people will buy.
And that was true before safety regulations...
...but they clearly adulterated products then.
It's a new age. Relax.
What makes you think that people and greed are any different?
I never said anything about that.
But it's what we need regulations to protect us FROM, doofus.
It isn't TECHNOLOGY that keeps us safe.
It is companies being required to make safe products...
...by regulation.
True but there to many driving the prices up.
Enforcement laxity also drives prices up too, since it has allowed
corporations to pay their way out of violations, without admitting guilt
(avoiding civil lawsuits), and with no corporate officers ever spending a
single day in jail for their crimes.

Likewise, make lawyers more accountable too: I can recall when traditional
“workmanship” clauses got struck down as legally unenforceable. The legal
standard became that all workers had to be assumed to be morons who must be
given profoundly explicit go/nogo instructions, instead of the workers
being considered to be adequately knowledgeable craftsmen who knew what
they’re doing, including what was good/bad in addition to the formal
critical/mjor/minor requirements.

-hh
Alan
2025-04-23 20:28:58 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by -hh
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
' The Food and Drug Administration is suspending a quality control
program for testing of fluid milk and other dairy products due to
reduced capacity in its food safety and nutrition division, according to
an internal email seen by Reuters.'
<https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/us-fda-suspends-milk-quality-tests-amid-workforce-cuts-2025-04-21/?ref=upstract.com>
But no problem for you, MAGAts, huh?
'The suspension is another disruption to the nation's food safety
programs after the termination and departure of 20,000 employees of the
Department of Health and Human Services, which includes the FDA, as part
of President Donald Trump's effort to shrink the federal workforce.'
No one had an issue with milk before the regulations.
LOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!
'We are living in a time when many see ?deregulation? as a goal in
itself. Red tape is obnoxious and counterproductive, and government
should just leave businesses alone. That goes for an expanding array of
consumer choices. When it comes to food, for example, an odd combination
of the crunchy left and libertarian right now bridle at laws limiting
their right to access ?natural? commodities, like raw milk.
...
I only made it to the second page without gagging. There Blum explains
how milk was often adulterated in the late 19th century. It was watered
down, and chalk or plaster powder was mixed in to get the color right.
To replace the layer of cream on top, pureed calf brains could be used.
...In the case of milk, formaldehyde was a favored option. Commercial
products such as ?Preservaline? hit the market for precisely this
purpose. Added to fresh milk, it could prevent curdling for days, the
same way it could preserve dead bodies. Sadly, it didn?t have quite the
positive effect on the living children who consumed it. Clusters of
child deaths in various cities in the late 1890s turned public attention
to what was being put into milk. Blum suggests dozens of children died,
particularly those in orphanages and hospitals, which bought the
cheapest supplies.
...
For milk, a solution existed: pasteurization. It was already mandatory
in some countries, but U.S. producers resisted on the grounds of cost
and hassle. No, it would not allow old milk to stay shelf stable for
weeks without refrigeration (something some of the dairy firms were
obviously seeking when they used formaldehyde). But it would save
consumers from the risks of salmonella, listeria, campylobacter (then
known as ?infant cholera?)?not to mention formaldehyde itself.'
Did I make you grep all that? The fact is there are to
many regulations. Do you really think with our technology
that they wont keep making good milk? Moron.
"grep" it? No.
Look it up in order to show you how stupid you are? Sure!
Do you really think that companies can be trusted to act in the best
interest of safety when they can make more money by doing otherwise?
They still have to have a product people will buy.
And that was true before safety regulations...
...but they clearly adulterated products then.
It's a new age. Relax.
What makes you think that people and greed are any different?
I never said anything about that.
But it's what we need regulations to protect us FROM, doofus.
It isn't TECHNOLOGY that keeps us safe.
It is companies being required to make safe products...
...by regulation.
True but there to many driving the prices up.
Enforcement laxity also drives prices up too, since it has allowed
corporations to pay their way out of violations, without admitting guilt
(avoiding civil lawsuits), and with no corporate officers ever spending a
single day in jail for their crimes.
Likewise, make lawyers more accountable too: I can recall when traditional
“workmanship” clauses got struck down as legally unenforceable. The legal
standard became that all workers had to be assumed to be morons who must be
given profoundly explicit go/nogo instructions, instead of the workers
being considered to be adequately knowledgeable craftsmen who knew what
they’re doing, including what was good/bad in addition to the formal
critical/mjor/minor requirements.
Case on point:

'Court: Tightened lug nuts not guaranteed in tire rotation

As an attorney, Steve Lehto is not supposed to disparage the courts. But
after an appeals panel's decision last month involving lug nuts, legal
fees and the definition of the word "perform," he said he's off the hook
because "they ruled in such an idiotic fashion that they are disparaging
themselves."

Specifically, three judges from the Michigan Court of Appeals office in
Grand Rapids agreed that a tire rotation by a mechanic could be
considered performed even if the left front lug nuts weren't tightened
and the wheel fell off less than two blocks down the road.'

<https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/local/michigan/2019/11/09/court-tightened-lug-nuts-not-guaranteed-tire-rotation/4101005002/>
Creon
2025-04-23 00:09:05 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
' The Food and Drug Administration is suspending a quality
control program for testing of fluid milk and other dairy
products due to reduced capacity in its food safety and
nutrition division, according to an internal email seen by
Reuters.'
<https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/
us-fda-suspends-milk-quality-tests-amid-workforce-cuts-2025-04-21/?
ref=upstract.com>
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
But no problem for you, MAGAts, huh?
'The suspension is another disruption to the nation's food
safety programs after the termination and departure of 20,000
employees of the Department of Health and Human Services,
which includes the FDA, as part of President Donald Trump's
effort to shrink the federal workforce.'
No one had an issue with milk before the regulations.
LOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!
'We are living in a time when many see ?deregulation? as a goal
in itself. Red tape is obnoxious and counterproductive, and
government should just leave businesses alone. That goes for an
expanding array of consumer choices. When it comes to food, for
example, an odd combination of the crunchy left and libertarian
right now bridle at laws limiting their right to access
?natural? commodities, like raw milk.
...
I only made it to the second page without gagging. There Blum
explains how milk was often adulterated in the late 19th
century. It was watered down, and chalk or plaster powder was
mixed in to get the color right. To replace the layer of cream
on top, pureed calf brains could be used.
...In the case of milk, formaldehyde was a favored option.
Commercial products such as ?Preservaline? hit the market for
precisely this purpose. Added to fresh milk, it could prevent
curdling for days, the same way it could preserve dead bodies.
Sadly, it didn?t have quite the positive effect on the living
children who consumed it. Clusters of child deaths in various
cities in the late 1890s turned public attention to what was
being put into milk. Blum suggests dozens of children died,
particularly those in orphanages and hospitals, which bought the
cheapest supplies.
...
For milk, a solution existed: pasteurization. It was already
mandatory in some countries, but U.S. producers resisted on the
grounds of cost and hassle. No, it would not allow old milk to
stay shelf stable for weeks without refrigeration (something
some of the dairy firms were obviously seeking when they used
formaldehyde). But it would save consumers from the risks of
salmonella, listeria, campylobacter (then known as ?infant
cholera?)?not to mention formaldehyde itself.'
Did I make you grep all that? The fact is there are to many
regulations. Do you really think with our technology that they
wont keep making good milk? Moron.
"grep" it? No.
Look it up in order to show you how stupid you are? Sure!
Do you really think that companies can be trusted to act in the
best interest of safety when they can make more money by doing
otherwise?
They still have to have a product people will buy.
And that was true before safety regulations...
...but they clearly adulterated products then.
It's a new age. Relax.
What makes you think that people and greed are any different?
I never said anything about that.
But it's what we need regulations to protect us FROM, doofus.
It isn't TECHNOLOGY that keeps us safe.
It is companies being required to make safe products...
...by regulation.
You wouldn't have a pro football game without referees.
--
-c System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti
OS: Linux 6.14.3 Release: Mint 22.1 Mem: 258G
"To think on your level means grunting to myself a lot"
pothead
2025-04-24 01:30:19 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
' The Food and Drug Administration is suspending a quality control
program for testing of fluid milk and other dairy products due to
reduced capacity in its food safety and nutrition division, according to
an internal email seen by Reuters.'
<https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/us-fda-suspends-milk-quality-tests-amid-workforce-cuts-2025-04-21/?ref=upstract.com>
But no problem for you, MAGAts, huh?
'The suspension is another disruption to the nation's food safety
programs after the termination and departure of 20,000 employees of the
Department of Health and Human Services, which includes the FDA, as part
of President Donald Trump's effort to shrink the federal workforce.'
No one had an issue with milk before the regulations.
LOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!
'We are living in a time when many see ?deregulation? as a goal in
itself. Red tape is obnoxious and counterproductive, and government
should just leave businesses alone. That goes for an expanding array of
consumer choices. When it comes to food, for example, an odd combination
of the crunchy left and libertarian right now bridle at laws limiting
their right to access ?natural? commodities, like raw milk.
...
I only made it to the second page without gagging. There Blum explains
how milk was often adulterated in the late 19th century. It was watered
down, and chalk or plaster powder was mixed in to get the color right.
To replace the layer of cream on top, pureed calf brains could be used.
...In the case of milk, formaldehyde was a favored option. Commercial
products such as ?Preservaline? hit the market for precisely this
purpose. Added to fresh milk, it could prevent curdling for days, the
same way it could preserve dead bodies. Sadly, it didn?t have quite the
positive effect on the living children who consumed it. Clusters of
child deaths in various cities in the late 1890s turned public attention
to what was being put into milk. Blum suggests dozens of children died,
particularly those in orphanages and hospitals, which bought the
cheapest supplies.
...
For milk, a solution existed: pasteurization. It was already mandatory
in some countries, but U.S. producers resisted on the grounds of cost
and hassle. No, it would not allow old milk to stay shelf stable for
weeks without refrigeration (something some of the dairy firms were
obviously seeking when they used formaldehyde). But it would save
consumers from the risks of salmonella, listeria, campylobacter (then
known as ?infant cholera?)?not to mention formaldehyde itself.'
Did I make you grep all that? The fact is there are to
many regulations. Do you really think with our technology
that they wont keep making good milk? Moron.
"grep" it? No.
Look it up in order to show you how stupid you are? Sure!
Do you really think that companies can be trusted to act in the best
interest of safety when they can make more money by doing otherwise?
They still have to have a product people will buy.
And that was true before safety regulations...
...but they clearly adulterated products then.
It's a new age. Relax.
And look at the various food processing plants that get inspected regularly
yet still have appalling conditions. So something is not working.

Boars Head comes to mind.


--
pothead
Liberalism Is A Mental Disease
Treat it accordingly
<https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-14512427/Doctors-reveal-symptoms-Trump-Derangement-Syndrome-tell-youve-got-it.html>
Alan
2025-04-24 01:50:21 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
' The Food and Drug Administration is suspending a quality control
program for testing of fluid milk and other dairy products due to
reduced capacity in its food safety and nutrition division, according to
an internal email seen by Reuters.'
<https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/us-fda-suspends-milk-quality-tests-amid-workforce-cuts-2025-04-21/?ref=upstract.com>
But no problem for you, MAGAts, huh?
'The suspension is another disruption to the nation's food safety
programs after the termination and departure of 20,000 employees of the
Department of Health and Human Services, which includes the FDA, as part
of President Donald Trump's effort to shrink the federal workforce.'
No one had an issue with milk before the regulations.
LOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!
'We are living in a time when many see ?deregulation? as a goal in
itself. Red tape is obnoxious and counterproductive, and government
should just leave businesses alone. That goes for an expanding array of
consumer choices. When it comes to food, for example, an odd combination
of the crunchy left and libertarian right now bridle at laws limiting
their right to access ?natural? commodities, like raw milk.
...
I only made it to the second page without gagging. There Blum explains
how milk was often adulterated in the late 19th century. It was watered
down, and chalk or plaster powder was mixed in to get the color right.
To replace the layer of cream on top, pureed calf brains could be used.
...In the case of milk, formaldehyde was a favored option. Commercial
products such as ?Preservaline? hit the market for precisely this
purpose. Added to fresh milk, it could prevent curdling for days, the
same way it could preserve dead bodies. Sadly, it didn?t have quite the
positive effect on the living children who consumed it. Clusters of
child deaths in various cities in the late 1890s turned public attention
to what was being put into milk. Blum suggests dozens of children died,
particularly those in orphanages and hospitals, which bought the
cheapest supplies.
...
For milk, a solution existed: pasteurization. It was already mandatory
in some countries, but U.S. producers resisted on the grounds of cost
and hassle. No, it would not allow old milk to stay shelf stable for
weeks without refrigeration (something some of the dairy firms were
obviously seeking when they used formaldehyde). But it would save
consumers from the risks of salmonella, listeria, campylobacter (then
known as ?infant cholera?)?not to mention formaldehyde itself.'
Did I make you grep all that? The fact is there are to
many regulations. Do you really think with our technology
that they wont keep making good milk? Moron.
"grep" it? No.
Look it up in order to show you how stupid you are? Sure!
Do you really think that companies can be trusted to act in the best
interest of safety when they can make more money by doing otherwise?
They still have to have a product people will buy.
And that was true before safety regulations...
...but they clearly adulterated products then.
It's a new age. Relax.
And look at the various food processing plants that get inspected regularly
yet still have appalling conditions. So something is not working.
So you think not inspecting them will make it better?
Skeeter OG
2025-04-24 14:21:06 UTC
Reply
Permalink
In article <vuc5cu$cuvp$***@dont-email.me>, nuh-***@nope.com
says...
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
' The Food and Drug Administration is suspending a quality control
program for testing of fluid milk and other dairy products due to
reduced capacity in its food safety and nutrition division, according to
an internal email seen by Reuters.'
<https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/us-fda-suspends-milk-quality-tests-amid-workforce-cuts-2025-04-21/?ref=upstract.com>
But no problem for you, MAGAts, huh?
'The suspension is another disruption to the nation's food safety
programs after the termination and departure of 20,000 employees of the
Department of Health and Human Services, which includes the FDA, as part
of President Donald Trump's effort to shrink the federal workforce.'
No one had an issue with milk before the regulations.
LOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!
'We are living in a time when many see ?deregulation? as a goal in
itself. Red tape is obnoxious and counterproductive, and government
should just leave businesses alone. That goes for an expanding array of
consumer choices. When it comes to food, for example, an odd combination
of the crunchy left and libertarian right now bridle at laws limiting
their right to access ?natural? commodities, like raw milk.
...
I only made it to the second page without gagging. There Blum explains
how milk was often adulterated in the late 19th century. It was watered
down, and chalk or plaster powder was mixed in to get the color right.
To replace the layer of cream on top, pureed calf brains could be used.
...In the case of milk, formaldehyde was a favored option. Commercial
products such as ?Preservaline? hit the market for precisely this
purpose. Added to fresh milk, it could prevent curdling for days, the
same way it could preserve dead bodies. Sadly, it didn?t have quite the
positive effect on the living children who consumed it. Clusters of
child deaths in various cities in the late 1890s turned public attention
to what was being put into milk. Blum suggests dozens of children died,
particularly those in orphanages and hospitals, which bought the
cheapest supplies.
...
For milk, a solution existed: pasteurization. It was already mandatory
in some countries, but U.S. producers resisted on the grounds of cost
and hassle. No, it would not allow old milk to stay shelf stable for
weeks without refrigeration (something some of the dairy firms were
obviously seeking when they used formaldehyde). But it would save
consumers from the risks of salmonella, listeria, campylobacter (then
known as ?infant cholera?)?not to mention formaldehyde itself.'
Did I make you grep all that? The fact is there are to
many regulations. Do you really think with our technology
that they wont keep making good milk? Moron.
"grep" it? No.
Look it up in order to show you how stupid you are? Sure!
Do you really think that companies can be trusted to act in the best
interest of safety when they can make more money by doing otherwise?
They still have to have a product people will buy.
And that was true before safety regulations...
...but they clearly adulterated products then.
It's a new age. Relax.
And look at the various food processing plants that get inspected regularly
yet still have appalling conditions. So something is not working.
So you think not inspecting them will make it better?
Who said that? Oh YOU did.
pothead
2025-04-24 19:00:21 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
' The Food and Drug Administration is suspending a quality control
program for testing of fluid milk and other dairy products due to
reduced capacity in its food safety and nutrition division, according to
an internal email seen by Reuters.'
<https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/us-fda-suspends-milk-quality-tests-amid-workforce-cuts-2025-04-21/?ref=upstract.com>
But no problem for you, MAGAts, huh?
'The suspension is another disruption to the nation's food safety
programs after the termination and departure of 20,000 employees of the
Department of Health and Human Services, which includes the FDA, as part
of President Donald Trump's effort to shrink the federal workforce.'
No one had an issue with milk before the regulations.
LOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!
'We are living in a time when many see ?deregulation? as a goal in
itself. Red tape is obnoxious and counterproductive, and government
should just leave businesses alone. That goes for an expanding array of
consumer choices. When it comes to food, for example, an odd combination
of the crunchy left and libertarian right now bridle at laws limiting
their right to access ?natural? commodities, like raw milk.
...
I only made it to the second page without gagging. There Blum explains
how milk was often adulterated in the late 19th century. It was watered
down, and chalk or plaster powder was mixed in to get the color right.
To replace the layer of cream on top, pureed calf brains could be used.
...In the case of milk, formaldehyde was a favored option. Commercial
products such as ?Preservaline? hit the market for precisely this
purpose. Added to fresh milk, it could prevent curdling for days, the
same way it could preserve dead bodies. Sadly, it didn?t have quite the
positive effect on the living children who consumed it. Clusters of
child deaths in various cities in the late 1890s turned public attention
to what was being put into milk. Blum suggests dozens of children died,
particularly those in orphanages and hospitals, which bought the
cheapest supplies.
...
For milk, a solution existed: pasteurization. It was already mandatory
in some countries, but U.S. producers resisted on the grounds of cost
and hassle. No, it would not allow old milk to stay shelf stable for
weeks without refrigeration (something some of the dairy firms were
obviously seeking when they used formaldehyde). But it would save
consumers from the risks of salmonella, listeria, campylobacter (then
known as ?infant cholera?)?not to mention formaldehyde itself.'
Did I make you grep all that? The fact is there are to
many regulations. Do you really think with our technology
that they wont keep making good milk? Moron.
"grep" it? No.
Look it up in order to show you how stupid you are? Sure!
Do you really think that companies can be trusted to act in the best
interest of safety when they can make more money by doing otherwise?
They still have to have a product people will buy.
And that was true before safety regulations...
...but they clearly adulterated products then.
It's a new age. Relax.
And look at the various food processing plants that get inspected regularly
yet still have appalling conditions. So something is not working.
So you think not inspecting them will make it better?
Who said that? Oh YOU did.
He seems to do that a lot.
--
pothead
Liberalism Is A Mental Disease
Treat it accordingly
<https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-14512427/Doctors-reveal-symptoms-Trump-Derangement-Syndrome-tell-youve-got-it.html>
%
2025-04-24 19:31:03 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
' The Food and Drug Administration is suspending a quality control
program for testing of fluid milk and other dairy products due to
reduced capacity in its food safety and nutrition division, according to
an internal email seen by Reuters.'
<https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/us-fda-suspends-milk-quality-tests-amid-workforce-cuts-2025-04-21/?ref=upstract.com>
But no problem for you, MAGAts, huh?
'The suspension is another disruption to the nation's food safety
programs after the termination and departure of 20,000 employees of the
Department of Health and Human Services, which includes the FDA, as part
of President Donald Trump's effort to shrink the federal workforce.'
No one had an issue with milk before the regulations.
LOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!
'We are living in a time when many see ?deregulation? as a goal in
itself. Red tape is obnoxious and counterproductive, and government
should just leave businesses alone. That goes for an expanding array of
consumer choices. When it comes to food, for example, an odd combination
of the crunchy left and libertarian right now bridle at laws limiting
their right to access ?natural? commodities, like raw milk.
...
I only made it to the second page without gagging. There Blum explains
how milk was often adulterated in the late 19th century. It was watered
down, and chalk or plaster powder was mixed in to get the color right.
To replace the layer of cream on top, pureed calf brains could be used.
...In the case of milk, formaldehyde was a favored option. Commercial
products such as ?Preservaline? hit the market for precisely this
purpose. Added to fresh milk, it could prevent curdling for days, the
same way it could preserve dead bodies. Sadly, it didn?t have quite the
positive effect on the living children who consumed it. Clusters of
child deaths in various cities in the late 1890s turned public attention
to what was being put into milk. Blum suggests dozens of children died,
particularly those in orphanages and hospitals, which bought the
cheapest supplies.
...
For milk, a solution existed: pasteurization. It was already mandatory
in some countries, but U.S. producers resisted on the grounds of cost
and hassle. No, it would not allow old milk to stay shelf stable for
weeks without refrigeration (something some of the dairy firms were
obviously seeking when they used formaldehyde). But it would save
consumers from the risks of salmonella, listeria, campylobacter (then
known as ?infant cholera?)?not to mention formaldehyde itself.'
Did I make you grep all that? The fact is there are to
many regulations. Do you really think with our technology
that they wont keep making good milk? Moron.
"grep" it? No.
Look it up in order to show you how stupid you are? Sure!
Do you really think that companies can be trusted to act in the best
interest of safety when they can make more money by doing otherwise?
They still have to have a product people will buy.
And that was true before safety regulations...
...but they clearly adulterated products then.
It's a new age. Relax.
And look at the various food processing plants that get inspected regularly
yet still have appalling conditions. So something is not working.
So you think not inspecting them will make it better?
Who said that? Oh YOU did.
He seems to do that a lot.
The Doctor
2025-04-25 00:52:30 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
' The Food and Drug Administration is suspending a quality control
program for testing of fluid milk and other dairy products due to
reduced capacity in its food safety and nutrition division,
according to
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
an internal email seen by Reuters.'
<https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/us-fda-suspends-milk-quality-tests-amid-workforce-cuts-2025-04-21/?ref=upstract.com>
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
But no problem for you, MAGAts, huh?
'The suspension is another disruption to the nation's food safety
programs after the termination and departure of 20,000
employees of the
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Department of Health and Human Services, which includes the
FDA, as part
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
of President Donald Trump's effort to shrink the federal
workforce.'
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
No one had an issue with milk before the regulations.
LOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!
'We are living in a time when many see ?deregulation? as a goal in
itself. Red tape is obnoxious and counterproductive, and government
should just leave businesses alone. That goes for an
expanding array of
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
consumer choices. When it comes to food, for example, an odd
combination
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
of the crunchy left and libertarian right now bridle at laws limiting
their right to access ?natural? commodities, like raw milk.
...
I only made it to the second page without gagging. There Blum
explains
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
how milk was often adulterated in the late 19th century. It
was watered
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
down, and chalk or plaster powder was mixed in to get the
color right.
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
To replace the layer of cream on top, pureed calf brains
could be used.
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
...In the case of milk, formaldehyde was a favored option. Commercial
products such as ?Preservaline? hit the market for precisely this
purpose. Added to fresh milk, it could prevent curdling for days, the
same way it could preserve dead bodies. Sadly, it didn?t have
quite the
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
positive effect on the living children who consumed it. Clusters of
child deaths in various cities in the late 1890s turned
public attention
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
to what was being put into milk. Blum suggests dozens of
children died,
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
particularly those in orphanages and hospitals, which bought the
cheapest supplies.
...
For milk, a solution existed: pasteurization. It was already
mandatory
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
in some countries, but U.S. producers resisted on the grounds of cost
and hassle. No, it would not allow old milk to stay shelf stable for
weeks without refrigeration (something some of the dairy firms were
obviously seeking when they used formaldehyde). But it would save
consumers from the risks of salmonella, listeria, campylobacter (then
known as ?infant cholera?)?not to mention formaldehyde itself.'
Did I make you grep all that? The fact is there are to
many regulations. Do you really think with our technology
that they wont keep making good milk? Moron.
"grep" it? No.
Look it up in order to show you how stupid you are? Sure!
Do you really think that companies can be trusted to act in the best
interest of safety when they can make more money by doing otherwise?
They still have to have a product people will buy.
And that was true before safety regulations...
...but they clearly adulterated products then.
It's a new age. Relax.
And look at the various food processing plants that get inspected regularly
yet still have appalling conditions. So something is not working.
So you think not inspecting them will make it better?
Who said that? Oh YOU did.
He seems to do that a lot.
--
pothead
Liberalism Is A Mental Disease
Treat it accordingly
<https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-14512427/Doctors-reveal-symptoms-Trump-Derangement-Syndrome-tell-youve-got-it.html>
What does this have to do with Canadian Politics?
--
Member - Liberal International This is ***@nk.ca Ici ***@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
Canada -Save the Nation from Donald Trump - Vote Liberal!
The Doctor
2025-04-25 00:38:55 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
' The Food and Drug Administration is suspending a quality control
program for testing of fluid milk and other dairy products due to
reduced capacity in its food safety and nutrition division,
according to
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
an internal email seen by Reuters.'
<https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/us-fda-suspends-milk-quality-tests-amid-workforce-cuts-2025-04-21/?ref=upstract.com>
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
But no problem for you, MAGAts, huh?
'The suspension is another disruption to the nation's food safety
programs after the termination and departure of 20,000
employees of the
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Department of Health and Human Services, which includes the
FDA, as part
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
of President Donald Trump's effort to shrink the federal workforce.'
No one had an issue with milk before the regulations.
LOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!
'We are living in a time when many see ?deregulation? as a goal in
itself. Red tape is obnoxious and counterproductive, and government
should just leave businesses alone. That goes for an expanding
array of
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
consumer choices. When it comes to food, for example, an odd
combination
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
of the crunchy left and libertarian right now bridle at laws limiting
their right to access ?natural? commodities, like raw milk.
...
I only made it to the second page without gagging. There Blum explains
how milk was often adulterated in the late 19th century. It
was watered
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
down, and chalk or plaster powder was mixed in to get the color right.
To replace the layer of cream on top, pureed calf brains could
be used.
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
...In the case of milk, formaldehyde was a favored option. Commercial
products such as ?Preservaline? hit the market for precisely this
purpose. Added to fresh milk, it could prevent curdling for days, the
same way it could preserve dead bodies. Sadly, it didn?t have
quite the
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
positive effect on the living children who consumed it. Clusters of
child deaths in various cities in the late 1890s turned public
attention
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
to what was being put into milk. Blum suggests dozens of
children died,
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
particularly those in orphanages and hospitals, which bought the
cheapest supplies.
...
For milk, a solution existed: pasteurization. It was already mandatory
in some countries, but U.S. producers resisted on the grounds of cost
and hassle. No, it would not allow old milk to stay shelf stable for
weeks without refrigeration (something some of the dairy firms were
obviously seeking when they used formaldehyde). But it would save
consumers from the risks of salmonella, listeria, campylobacter (then
known as ?infant cholera?)?not to mention formaldehyde itself.'
Did I make you grep all that? The fact is there are to
many regulations. Do you really think with our technology
that they wont keep making good milk? Moron.
"grep" it? No.
Look it up in order to show you how stupid you are? Sure!
Do you really think that companies can be trusted to act in the best
interest of safety when they can make more money by doing otherwise?
They still have to have a product people will buy.
And that was true before safety regulations...
...but they clearly adulterated products then.
It's a new age. Relax.
And look at the various food processing plants that get inspected regularly
yet still have appalling conditions. So something is not working.
So you think not inspecting them will make it better?
Who said that? Oh YOU did.
What does this have to do with Canadian Politics?
--
Member - Liberal International This is ***@nk.ca Ici ***@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
Canada -Save the Nation from Donald Trump - Vote Liberal!
Alan
2025-04-25 03:33:14 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
' The Food and Drug Administration is suspending a quality control
program for testing of fluid milk and other dairy products due to
reduced capacity in its food safety and nutrition division, according to
an internal email seen by Reuters.'
<https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/us-fda-suspends-milk-quality-tests-amid-workforce-cuts-2025-04-21/?ref=upstract.com>
But no problem for you, MAGAts, huh?
'The suspension is another disruption to the nation's food safety
programs after the termination and departure of 20,000 employees of the
Department of Health and Human Services, which includes the FDA, as part
of President Donald Trump's effort to shrink the federal workforce.'
No one had an issue with milk before the regulations.
LOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!
'We are living in a time when many see ?deregulation? as a goal in
itself. Red tape is obnoxious and counterproductive, and government
should just leave businesses alone. That goes for an expanding array of
consumer choices. When it comes to food, for example, an odd combination
of the crunchy left and libertarian right now bridle at laws limiting
their right to access ?natural? commodities, like raw milk.
...
I only made it to the second page without gagging. There Blum explains
how milk was often adulterated in the late 19th century. It was watered
down, and chalk or plaster powder was mixed in to get the color right.
To replace the layer of cream on top, pureed calf brains could be used.
...In the case of milk, formaldehyde was a favored option. Commercial
products such as ?Preservaline? hit the market for precisely this
purpose. Added to fresh milk, it could prevent curdling for days, the
same way it could preserve dead bodies. Sadly, it didn?t have quite the
positive effect on the living children who consumed it. Clusters of
child deaths in various cities in the late 1890s turned public attention
to what was being put into milk. Blum suggests dozens of children died,
particularly those in orphanages and hospitals, which bought the
cheapest supplies.
...
For milk, a solution existed: pasteurization. It was already mandatory
in some countries, but U.S. producers resisted on the grounds of cost
and hassle. No, it would not allow old milk to stay shelf stable for
weeks without refrigeration (something some of the dairy firms were
obviously seeking when they used formaldehyde). But it would save
consumers from the risks of salmonella, listeria, campylobacter (then
known as ?infant cholera?)?not to mention formaldehyde itself.'
Did I make you grep all that? The fact is there are to
many regulations. Do you really think with our technology
that they wont keep making good milk? Moron.
"grep" it? No.
Look it up in order to show you how stupid you are? Sure!
Do you really think that companies can be trusted to act in the best
interest of safety when they can make more money by doing otherwise?
They still have to have a product people will buy.
And that was true before safety regulations...
...but they clearly adulterated products then.
It's a new age. Relax.
And look at the various food processing plants that get inspected regularly
yet still have appalling conditions. So something is not working.
So you think not inspecting them will make it better?
Who said that? Oh YOU did.
That was your implication.
The Doctor
2025-04-25 12:44:35 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
says...
Post by Alan
' The Food and Drug Administration is suspending a quality control
program for testing of fluid milk and other dairy products due to
reduced capacity in its food safety and nutrition division,
according to
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
an internal email seen by Reuters.'
<https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/us-fda-suspends-milk-quality-tests-amid-workforce-cuts-2025-04-21/?ref=upstract.com>
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
But no problem for you, MAGAts, huh?
'The suspension is another disruption to the nation's food safety
programs after the termination and departure of 20,000
employees of the
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Department of Health and Human Services, which includes the
FDA, as part
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
of President Donald Trump's effort to shrink the federal workforce.'
No one had an issue with milk before the regulations.
LOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!
'We are living in a time when many see ?deregulation? as a goal in
itself. Red tape is obnoxious and counterproductive, and government
should just leave businesses alone. That goes for an expanding
array of
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
consumer choices. When it comes to food, for example, an odd
combination
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
of the crunchy left and libertarian right now bridle at laws limiting
their right to access ?natural? commodities, like raw milk.
...
I only made it to the second page without gagging. There Blum explains
how milk was often adulterated in the late 19th century. It
was watered
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
down, and chalk or plaster powder was mixed in to get the color right.
To replace the layer of cream on top, pureed calf brains could
be used.
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
...In the case of milk, formaldehyde was a favored option. Commercial
products such as ?Preservaline? hit the market for precisely this
purpose. Added to fresh milk, it could prevent curdling for days, the
same way it could preserve dead bodies. Sadly, it didn?t have
quite the
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
positive effect on the living children who consumed it. Clusters of
child deaths in various cities in the late 1890s turned public
attention
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
to what was being put into milk. Blum suggests dozens of
children died,
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
particularly those in orphanages and hospitals, which bought the
cheapest supplies.
...
For milk, a solution existed: pasteurization. It was already mandatory
in some countries, but U.S. producers resisted on the grounds of cost
and hassle. No, it would not allow old milk to stay shelf stable for
weeks without refrigeration (something some of the dairy firms were
obviously seeking when they used formaldehyde). But it would save
consumers from the risks of salmonella, listeria, campylobacter (then
known as ?infant cholera?)?not to mention formaldehyde itself.'
Did I make you grep all that? The fact is there are to
many regulations. Do you really think with our technology
that they wont keep making good milk? Moron.
"grep" it? No.
Look it up in order to show you how stupid you are? Sure!
Do you really think that companies can be trusted to act in the best
interest of safety when they can make more money by doing otherwise?
They still have to have a product people will buy.
And that was true before safety regulations...
...but they clearly adulterated products then.
It's a new age. Relax.
And look at the various food processing plants that get inspected regularly
yet still have appalling conditions. So something is not working.
So you think not inspecting them will make it better?
Who said that? Oh YOU did.
That was your implication.
What does this have to do with Canadian politics?
--
Member - Liberal International This is ***@nk.ca Ici ***@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
Canada -Save the Nation from Donald Trump - Vote Liberal!
Gronk
2025-04-28 05:48:13 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter OG
Post by Alan
' The Food and Drug Administration is suspending a quality control
program for testing of fluid milk and other dairy products due to
reduced capacity in its food safety and nutrition division, according to
an internal email seen by Reuters.'
<https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/us-fda-suspends-milk-quality-tests-amid-workforce-cuts-2025-04-21/?ref=upstract.com>
But no problem for you, MAGAts, huh?
'The suspension is another disruption to the nation's food safety
programs after the termination and departure of 20,000 employees of the
Department of Health and Human Services, which includes the FDA, as part
of President Donald Trump's effort to shrink the federal workforce.'
No one had an issue with milk before the regulations.
LOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!
'We are living in a time when many see ?deregulation? as a goal in
itself. Red tape is obnoxious and counterproductive, and government
should just leave businesses alone. That goes for an expanding array of
consumer choices. When it comes to food, for example, an odd combination
of the crunchy left and libertarian right now bridle at laws limiting
their right to access ?natural? commodities, like raw milk.
...
I only made it to the second page without gagging. There Blum explains
how milk was often adulterated in the late 19th century. It was watered
down, and chalk or plaster powder was mixed in to get the color right.
To replace the layer of cream on top, pureed calf brains could be used.
...In the case of milk, formaldehyde was a favored option. Commercial
products such as ?Preservaline? hit the market for precisely this
purpose. Added to fresh milk, it could prevent curdling for days, the
same way it could preserve dead bodies. Sadly, it didn?t have quite the
positive effect on the living children who consumed it. Clusters of
child deaths in various cities in the late 1890s turned public attention
to what was being put into milk. Blum suggests dozens of children died,
particularly those in orphanages and hospitals, which bought the
cheapest supplies.
...
For milk, a solution existed: pasteurization. It was already mandatory
in some countries, but U.S. producers resisted on the grounds of cost
and hassle. No, it would not allow old milk to stay shelf stable for
weeks without refrigeration (something some of the dairy firms were
obviously seeking when they used formaldehyde). But it would save
consumers from the risks of salmonella, listeria, campylobacter (then
known as ?infant cholera?)?not to mention formaldehyde itself.'
Did I make you grep all that? The fact is there are to
many regulations. Do you really think with our technology
that they wont keep making good milk? Moron.
"grep" it? No.
Look it up in order to show you how stupid you are? Sure!
Do you really think that companies can be trusted to act in the best
interest of safety when they can make more money by doing otherwise?
They still have to have a product people will buy.
And that was true before safety regulations...
...but they clearly adulterated products then.
It's a new age. Relax.
And look at the various food processing plants that get inspected regularly
yet still have appalling conditions. So something is not working.
So you think not inspecting them will make it better?
All that there testin' ta make shure food
is safe ta eat jus makes it more 'spensive. Who
cares if people get sick or sumthin

Governor Swill
2025-04-24 19:35:16 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by pothead
And look at the various food processing plants that get inspected regularly
yet still have appalling conditions. So something is not working.
"FDA suspends quality tests for milk, other dairy products after Trump
budget cuts"
<https://www.mlive.com/news/2025/04/fda-suspends-quality-tests-for-milk-other-dairy-products-after-trump-budget-cuts.html>

I smell hypocrisy. Cutting spending *isn't* an improvement.

That's throwing the baby out with the bath water.

To prevent the next Boar's Head:
Tighten regulations.
Increase inspections.
Increase spending.
Grant government authority to close facilities not in compliance
sooner than currently allowed.
Post by pothead
Boars Head comes to mind.
http://youtu.be/GS-13isaJ9g
Because government lacked the authority to enforce regulations. It
could only report compliance levels.

Btw, per your above report, there was no listeria found at the Boar's
Head plant.
--
Eighty years of empire building and Trump is flushing it
all down the can.
The Doctor
2025-04-25 00:52:36 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Governor Swill
Post by pothead
And look at the various food processing plants that get inspected regularly
yet still have appalling conditions. So something is not working.
"FDA suspends quality tests for milk, other dairy products after Trump
budget cuts"
<https://www.mlive.com/news/2025/04/fda-suspends-quality-tests-for-milk-other-dairy-products-after-trump-budget-cuts.html>
I smell hypocrisy. Cutting spending *isn't* an improvement.
That's throwing the baby out with the bath water.
Tighten regulations.
Increase inspections.
Increase spending.
Grant government authority to close facilities not in compliance
sooner than currently allowed.
Post by pothead
Boars Head comes to mind.
http://youtu.be/GS-13isaJ9g
Because government lacked the authority to enforce regulations. It
could only report compliance levels.
Btw, per your above report, there was no listeria found at the Boar's
Head plant.
--
Eighty years of empire building and Trump is flushing it
all down the can.
What does this have to do with Canadian Politics?
--
Member - Liberal International This is ***@nk.ca Ici ***@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
Canada -Save the Nation from Donald Trump - Vote Liberal!
Governor Swill
2025-04-25 03:18:01 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Fri, 25 Apr 2025 00:52:36 -0000 (UTC), ***@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
(The Doctor) wrote:

<snip>
Post by The Doctor
What does this have to do with Canadian Politics?
If you cared, you would have cut the can groups out of the headers
with every one of these identical replies.
--
Eighty years of empire building and Trump is flushing it
all down the can.
Siri Cruz
2025-04-25 17:55:33 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Governor Swill
<snip>
Post by The Doctor
What does this have to do with Canadian Politics?
If you cared, you would have cut the can groups out of the headers
with every one of these identical replies.
I used to but I got so tired from newsgroup added back on
follow-ups that I stopped.
--
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-999. Disavowed. Denied. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 4.0 / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed
Loading...