Discussion:
Bill Clinton and the *Lolita Express*
(too old to reply)
Joe Cooper
2017-11-25 16:20:21 UTC
Permalink
The belated attempt by the left to cover their hypocrisy on sexual
predators by throwing Bill and Hillary Clinton under the bus now that they
have no further political use for them is staggering. They forget their
mantra that his being serviced by Monica Lewinsky in the Oval Office was
personal and didn’t matter as long as he was doing a good job as President.
It was the GOP, you know, that was waging a war on women.

Republicans were the predators, as serial accuser and so-called feminist
lawyer Gloria Allred reminded us when she appeared with a box of tissue and
victims to accuse GOP candidates Herman Cain, Donald Trump and, now, Judge
Roy Moore, She is not going to be found at a press conference with the
victims of Sen. Bob Menendez, Sen. Al Franken, and Rep. John Conyers.

The “right on the issues” defense does not apply to Republicans like Judge
Roy Moore, nor does presumption of innocence. Democratic hypocrites rushed
to condemn Moore faster than you can say “Anthony Weiner.” Franken,
Menendez, and Conyers are right on the issues, which may be why the chorus
for their unseating is, to say the least, somewhat muted. Judge Moore has
been accused of dallying with underage girls, which is a charge his
accusers are mysteriously not bringing up against Bill Clinton, a frequent
passenger on the jet of accused pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. As noted by the
Daily Caller:

Former President Bill Clinton continues to remain silent about the 26
flights he took aboard convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein’s private
jet, dubbed the “Lolita Express,” which reportedly offered underage girls
to passengers to rape.

Fox News wrote in 2016 that the Lolita Express, a Boeing 727 jet, was
“reportedly outfitted with a bed where passengers had group sex with young
girls.”

Clinton flew on some trips where the flight logs showed only the first
names of female passengers…

Clinton traveled aboard the “Lolita Express” with a soft core porn actress
and traveled on 11 flights with Epstein’s assistant Sarah Kellen, who
allegedly procured underage girls for men, according to Gawker.

Gawker reported Kellam was “accused in court filings of acting as pimps for
him (Epstein), recruiting and grooming young girls into their network of
child sex workers, and frequently participating in sex acts with them.”

[/Daily Caller]

Bill Clinton had a habit of ditching his Secret Service protection when
flying with child predator Epstein on his “Lolita Express”:

[Washington Times]

Fox News reported Friday that records show Mr. Clinton declined Secret
Service protection on at least five flights.

The network’s investigation reveals Mr. Clinton flew on the Boeing 727
“Lolita Express” 26 times, more than doubling the previously reported 11
trips.

“Bill Clinton… associated with a man like Jeffrey Epstein, who everyone in
New York, certainly within his inner circles, knew was a pedophile. Why
would a former president associate with a man like that?” said Conchita

Sarnoff of the Washington, D.C.-based nonprofit Alliance to Rescue Victims
of Trafficking, Fox reported. Ms. Conchita also authored a book on Mr.
Epstein titled “TrafficKing.”

Mr. Epstein was arrested in 2005 and signed a plea agreement in 2007 with
the U.S. Attorney’s Office, accepting a single charge of soliciting
prostitution. He agreed to a 30-month sentence, registered as a “Tier 1”
sex offender with the U.S. Virgin Islands and paid dozens of young girls
under a federal statute providing for compensation to victims of child
sexual abuse.

A Clinton spokesperson did not return the network’s emails requesting
comment. Martin Weinberg, Mr. Epstein’s attorney, declined multiple
inquiries into the flights.

[/Washington Times]

It is not known how many times Bill Clinton had his seat and tray table in
the upright and locked position when flying with Jeffrey Epstein or whether
their conversations revolved around golf and grandchildren. It is not known
why Clinton flew so many times with a child sex predator. Given Bill
Clinton’s track record and Epstein’s expertise on procurement, one doubts
it was to solicit donations to the Clinton Foundation. As a Fox News report
noted:

Epstein, who counts among his pals royal figures, heads of state,
celebrities and fellow billionaires, spent 13 months in prison and home
detention for solicitation and procurement of minors for prostitution. He
allegedly had a team of traffickers who procured girls as young as 12 to
service his friends on “Orgy Island,” an estate on Epstein's 72-acre
island, called Little St. James, in the U.S. Virgin Islands….

Official flight logs filed with the Federal Aviation Administration show
Clinton traveled on some of the trips with as many as 10 U.S. Secret
Service agents. However, on a five-leg Asia trip between May 22 and May 25,
2002, not a single Secret Service agent is listed. The U.S. Secret Service
has declined to answer multiple Freedom of Information Act requests filed
by FoxNews.com seeking information on these trips. Clinton would have been
required to file a form to dismiss the agent detail, a former Secret
Service agent told FoxNews.com.

In response to a separate FOIA request from FoxNews.com, the U.S. Secret
Service said it has no records showing agents were ever on the island with
Clinton.

[/Fox News]

One can only suppose that this was a lot more fun than talking to AD
Loretta Lynch on the tarmac. There is more to chew on here than Roy Moore’s
stalking at a restaurant he says he never ate at or a mall the manager says
he was never banned from. Yet even as liberals engage in Clinton coverage
mea culpas, this is strangely not brought up.

It deserves to be brought up. “There is a special place in hell for people
who prey on children,” Ivanka Trump recently told the AP. The same could be
said of William Jefferson Clinton.

Source: http://bit.ly/2A4AuUt
--
"The Marxists, communists and fascists of the Democrat Party have launched
a strategy of deception, projection, and a new generation of brown shirts
who fanatically believe that their violence is honorable, and necessary, to
save America from some kind of a Fourth Reich perpetrated by the GOP."
(Douglas Gibbs )
Repugs a tad desperate
2017-11-26 01:28:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by Joe Cooper
The belated attempt by the left to cover their hypocrisy on sexual
predators by throwing Bill and Hillary Clinton under the bus now that they
have no further political use for them is staggering.
- cut -

When you deplorables have to reach back 20 years, 3 presidencies, & overlook the lives lost under the Bush administration - to attempt deflection from the current government's fiascos - things must be getting a bit hot in the kitchen, eh?
Salty Stan
2017-11-26 01:46:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by Repugs a tad desperate
Post by Joe Cooper
The belated attempt by the left to cover their hypocrisy on sexual
predators by throwing Bill and Hillary Clinton under the bus now that they
have no further political use for them is staggering.
- cut -
When you deplorables [sic] have to reach back 20 years,
Like Democrats are reaching back 20 years for Judge Moore? Care to explain that? no?
Post by Repugs a tad desperate
3 presidencies, & overlook the lives lost under the Bush administration - to attempt deflection from the current government's fiascos - things must be getting a bit hot in the kitchen, eh?
Why is it that liberals completely ignore Bill Clinton and the Lolita express?
Rudy Canoza
2017-11-26 03:37:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by Salty Stan
Post by Repugs a tad desperate
Post by Joe Cooper
The belated attempt by the left to cover their hypocrisy on sexual
predators by throwing Bill and Hillary Clinton under the bus now that they
have no further political use for them is staggering.
- cut -
When you deplorables [sic] have to reach back 20 years,
Like Democrats are reaching back 20 years for Judge Moore?
"Democrats" aren't reaching anywhere regarding Moore. *Nine* different
women - there will be more, you may be certain - have come forward
lately to state that Moore molested them, attempted to rape them, or
made other unwanted and *wrong* advances on them when they were minors
and he was in his 30s.

You drooling right-wingnut cocksuckers who keep sputtering "b-b-but what
about Bill?" and who stupidly accuse the media of "ignoring" the
accusations against Bill Clinton are simply too stupid to realize that
*LOTS* of Democrats are saying - publicly, in the mainstream media -
that they got the Clinton accusations wrong:
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/15/us/politics/bill-clinton-sexual-misconduct-debate.html?_r=0

The cultural conversation about women, power and sexual misconduct
that has consumed the United States in recent weeks has now raised a
question that is eagerly promoted by those on the political right
just as it discomfits those on the political left: What about Bill?
While Fox News and other conservative outlets revive years-old
charges against Mr. Clinton to accuse Mr. Moore’s critics of
hypocrisy, some liberals say it may be time to rethink their defense
of the 42nd president.

Matthew Yglesias, a liberal blogger who once worked at the Center for
American Progress, a pillar of the Clinton political world, wrote on
Vox.com on Wednesday that “I think we got it wrong” by defending Mr.
Clinton in the 1990s and that he should have resigned. Chris Hayes,
the liberal MSNBC host, said on Twitter that “Democrats and the
center left are overdue for a real reckoning with the allegations
against him.”

Caitlin Flanagan, a social critic who calls herself a “lifelong
Democrat, an enemy of machine feminism and a sexual assault
survivor,” wrote on The Atlantic’s website that “the Democratic Party
needs to make its own reckoning of the way it protected Bill
Clinton.” Michelle Goldberg wrote a New York Times column headlined,
“I Believe Juanita.” David Rothkopf, a former Clinton administration
official, said Monica S. Lewinsky “deserves an apology from many of
us she has never received.”


You stupid drooling lowbrow fat fucks really do owe it to America to
kill yourselves. You are always wrong.
Klaus Schadenfreude
2017-11-26 13:29:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rudy Canoza
*LOTS* of Democrats are saying - publicly, in the mainstream media -
Matthew Yglesias, Caitlin Flanagan,
WOW!

HOLY FUCK! Matt and Caitlin said something? Well, that's LOTS of
Democrats, huh?

You're SUCH an idiot, Rudolph.

LOL
Rudy Canoza
2017-11-26 16:36:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Rudy Canoza
*LOTS* of Democrats are saying - publicly, in the mainstream media -
Matthew Yglesias, Caitlin Flanagan,
WOW!
HOLY FUCK! Matt and Caitlin said something?
Tip of the iceberg, you dumb drooling felcher.
Klaus Schadenfreude
2017-11-26 20:06:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Rudy Canoza
*LOTS* of Democrats are saying - publicly, in the mainstream media -
Matthew Yglesias, Caitlin Flanagan,
WOW!
HOLY FUCK! Matt and Caitlin said something? Well, that's LOTS of
Democrats, huh?
You're SUCH an idiot, Rudolph.
LOL
Tip of the iceberg
ROFLMAO

So you say. But then, you're an idiot.
Post by Rudy Canoza
I'm a dumb drooling felcher.
This is a news group, Rudy, and that ain't news. [chuckle]
Rudy Canoza
2017-11-26 20:10:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Rudy Canoza
*LOTS* of Democrats are saying - publicly, in the mainstream media -
Matthew Yglesias, Caitlin Flanagan,
WOW!
HOLY FUCK! Matt and Caitlin said something?
Tip of the iceberg, you dumb drooling felcher.
Yes
Yes.

<chuckle>
Klaus Schadenfreude
2017-11-26 20:12:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Rudy Canoza
*LOTS* of Democrats are saying - publicly, in the mainstream media -
Matthew Yglesias, Caitlin Flanagan,
WOW!
HOLY FUCK! Matt and Caitlin said something? Well, that's LOTS of
Democrats, huh?
You're SUCH an idiot, Rudolph.
LOL
Tip of the iceberg
ROFLMAO
So you say. But then, you're an idiot.
Post by Rudy Canoza
I'm a dumb drooling felcher.
This is a news group, Rudy, and that ain't news. [chuckle]
Yes.
Yes, I'm right AGAIN.

LOL
Rudy Canoza
2017-11-26 20:13:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Rudy Canoza
*LOTS* of Democrats are saying - publicly, in the mainstream media -
Matthew Yglesias, Caitlin Flanagan,
WOW!
HOLY FUCK! Matt and Caitlin said something?
Tip of the iceberg, you dumb drooling felcher.
Yes
Yes.

<chuckle>
Klaus Schadenfreude
2017-11-26 20:24:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Rudy Canoza
*LOTS* of Democrats are saying - publicly, in the mainstream media -
Matthew Yglesias, Caitlin Flanagan,
WOW!
HOLY FUCK! Matt and Caitlin said something? Well, that's LOTS of
Democrats, huh?
You're SUCH an idiot, Rudolph.
LOL
Tip of the iceberg
ROFLMAO
So you say. But then, you're an idiot.
Post by Rudy Canoza
I'm a dumb drooling felcher.
This is a news group, Rudy, and that ain't news. [chuckle]
Yes.
Yes, I'm right AGAIN.
LOL
Yes.
You betcha, little fist-fightin' fella!

[chuckle]
Rudy Canoza
2017-11-26 20:24:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Rudy Canoza
*LOTS* of Democrats are saying - publicly, in the mainstream media -
Matthew Yglesias, Caitlin Flanagan,
WOW!
HOLY FUCK! Matt and Caitlin said something?
Tip of the iceberg, you dumb drooling felcher.
Yes
Yes.

<chuckle>
Klaus Schadenfreude
2017-11-26 20:46:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
So you say. But then, you're an idiot.
I'm a dumb drooling felcher.
This is a news group, Rudy, and that ain't news. [chuckle]
Yes.
Yes, I'm right AGAIN.
LOL
Yes.
You betcha, little fist-fightin' fella!
[chuckle]
Yes.
Are you done being humiliated?

I know you're not.

[chuckle]
Rudy Canoza
2017-11-26 21:36:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Rudy Canoza
*LOTS* of Democrats are saying - publicly, in the mainstream media -
Matthew Yglesias, Caitlin Flanagan,
WOW!
HOLY FUCK! Matt and Caitlin said something?
Tip of the iceberg, you dumb drooling felcher.
Yes
Yes.

<chuckle>
Rudy Canoza
2017-11-26 21:36:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Rudy Canoza
*LOTS* of Democrats are saying - publicly, in the mainstream media -
Matthew Yglesias, Caitlin Flanagan,
WOW!
HOLY FUCK! Matt and Caitlin said something?
Tip of the iceberg, you dumb drooling felcher.
Yes
Yes.

<chuckle>
max headroom
2017-11-26 23:13:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Rudy Canoza
*LOTS* of Democrats are saying - publicly, in the mainstream media -
Matthew Yglesias, Caitlin Flanagan,
WOW!
HOLY FUCK! Matt and Caitlin said something?
Tip of the iceberg, you dumb drooling felcher.
Yes
Yes.
<chuckle>
Once again the 'nymmeister is reduced to impotently repeating himself.

[guffaw]
Klaus Schadenfreude
2017-11-27 14:05:19 UTC
Permalink
On Sun, 26 Nov 2017 15:13:09 -0800, "max headroom"
Post by max headroom
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Rudy Canoza
*LOTS* of Democrats are saying - publicly, in the mainstream media -
Matthew Yglesias, Caitlin Flanagan,
WOW!
HOLY FUCK! Matt and Caitlin said something?
Tip of the iceberg, you dumb drooling felcher.
Yes
Yes.
<chuckle>
Once again the 'nymmeister is reduced to impotently repeating himself.
[guffaw]
It's cool-- and kinda sad-- when he's reduced to that.
Rudy Canoza
2017-11-27 04:00:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Rudy Canoza
*LOTS* of Democrats are saying - publicly, in the mainstream media -
Matthew Yglesias, Caitlin Flanagan,
WOW!
HOLY FUCK! Matt and Caitlin said something?
Tip of the iceberg, you dumb drooling felcher.
Yes
Yes.

<chuckle>
Rudy Canoza
2017-11-27 04:00:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Rudy Canoza
*LOTS* of Democrats are saying - publicly, in the mainstream media -
Matthew Yglesias, Caitlin Flanagan,
WOW!
HOLY FUCK! Matt and Caitlin said something?
Tip of the iceberg, you dumb drooling felcher.
Yes
Yes.

<chuckle>
Rudy Canoza
2017-11-27 16:32:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Rudy Canoza
*LOTS* of Democrats are saying - publicly, in the mainstream media -
Matthew Yglesias, Caitlin Flanagan,
WOW!
HOLY FUCK! Matt and Caitlin said something?
Tip of the iceberg, you dumb drooling felcher.
Yes
Yes.

<chuckle>
Rudy Canoza
2017-11-27 16:32:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Rudy Canoza
*LOTS* of Democrats are saying - publicly, in the mainstream media -
Matthew Yglesias, Caitlin Flanagan,
WOW!
HOLY FUCK! Matt and Caitlin said something?
Tip of the iceberg, you dumb drooling felcher.
Yes
Yes.

<chuckle>
Rudy Canoza
2017-11-27 16:33:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Rudy Canoza
*LOTS* of Democrats are saying - publicly, in the mainstream media -
Matthew Yglesias, Caitlin Flanagan,
WOW!
HOLY FUCK! Matt and Caitlin said something?
Tip of the iceberg, you dumb drooling felcher.
Yes
Yes.

<chuckle>
Rudy Canoza
2017-11-27 16:33:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Rudy Canoza
*LOTS* of Democrats are saying - publicly, in the mainstream media -
Matthew Yglesias, Caitlin Flanagan,
WOW!
HOLY FUCK! Matt and Caitlin said something?
Tip of the iceberg, you dumb drooling felcher.
Yes
Yes.

<chuckle>
Rudy Canoza
2017-11-28 19:46:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Rudy Canoza
*LOTS* of Democrats are saying - publicly, in the mainstream media -
Matthew Yglesias, Caitlin Flanagan,
WOW!
HOLY FUCK! Matt and Caitlin said something?
Tip of the iceberg, you dumb drooling felcher.
Yes
Yes.

<chuckle>
Rudy Canoza
2017-11-28 19:46:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Rudy Canoza
*LOTS* of Democrats are saying - publicly, in the mainstream media -
Matthew Yglesias, Caitlin Flanagan,
WOW!
HOLY FUCK! Matt and Caitlin said something?
Tip of the iceberg, you dumb drooling felcher.
Yes
Yes.

<chuckle>
Rudy Canoza
2017-11-29 23:03:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Rudy Canoza
*LOTS* of Democrats are saying - publicly, in the mainstream media -
Matthew Yglesias, Caitlin Flanagan,
WOW!
HOLY FUCK! Matt and Caitlin said something?
Tip of the iceberg, you dumb drooling felcher.
Yes
Yes.

<chuckle>
Klaus Schadenfreude
2017-11-30 19:55:30 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 29 Nov 2017 15:03:01 -0800, Rudy Canoza <***@philhendrie.con>
wrote:

It's pretty fucking awesome that after three days you're STILL posting
replies to the same post.

Oh well, I never said being my bitch wouldn't be extra work!

[chuckle]
Rudy Canoza
2017-11-30 23:25:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Rudy Canoza
*LOTS* of Democrats are saying - publicly, in the mainstream media -
Matthew Yglesias, Caitlin Flanagan,
WOW!
HOLY FUCK! Matt and Caitlin said something?
Tip of the iceberg, you dumb drooling felcher.
Yes
Yes.
<chuckle>
It's pretty fucking awesome
I know.

<chuckle>
Klaus Schadenfreude
2017-12-01 00:29:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
It's pretty fucking awesome that after three days you're STILL posting
replies to the same post.
Oh well, I never said being my bitch wouldn't be extra work!
[chuckle]
I know.
I'll have to see if I can trick your other socks into doing the same
thing. When I get bored.

[chuckle]
Rudy Canoza
2017-12-01 00:32:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Rudy Canoza
*LOTS* of Democrats are saying - publicly, in the mainstream media -
Matthew Yglesias, Caitlin Flanagan,
WOW!
HOLY FUCK! Matt and Caitlin said something?
Tip of the iceberg, you dumb drooling felcher.
Yes
Yes.
<chuckle>
It's pretty fucking awesome
I know.
<chuckle>
I'll have to see
No, we already know. It's pretty fucking awesome the way I jerk you
around and slap the shit out of you.

<chuckle>
Klaus Schadenfreude
2017-12-01 00:57:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
It's pretty fucking awesome that after three days you're STILL posting
replies to the same post.
Oh well, I never said being my bitch wouldn't be extra work!
[chuckle]
I know.
I'll have to see if I can trick your other socks into doing the same
thing. When I get bored.
[chuckle]
No, we already know. It's pretty fucking awesome the way you jerk me
around and slap the shit out of me.
That it is, my feisty little parking lot brawler!

That it is!

[chuckle]
Rudy Canoza
2017-12-01 01:07:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Rudy Canoza
On Sat, 25 Nov 2017 19:37:10 -0800, Rudy Canoza
Post by Rudy Canoza
*LOTS* of Democrats are saying - publicly, in the mainstream media -
Matthew Yglesias, Caitlin Flanagan,
WOW!
HOLY FUCK! Matt and Caitlin said something?
Tip of the iceberg, you dumb drooling felcher.
Yes
Yes.
<chuckle>
It's pretty fucking awesome
I know.
<chuckle>
I'll have to see
No, we already know. It's pretty fucking awesome the way I jerk you
around and slap the shit out of you.
<chuckle>
That it is
Yes, indeed.

<chuckle>
Klaus Schadenfreude
2017-12-01 01:09:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
No, we already know. It's pretty fucking awesome the way you jerk me
around and slap the shit out of me.
That it is, my feisty little parking lot brawler!
That it is!
[chuckle]
Yes, indeed.
<chuckle>
You bet!
Rudy Canoza
2017-12-01 01:10:13 UTC
Permalink
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Rudy Canoza
On Sat, 25 Nov 2017 19:37:10 -0800, Rudy Canoza
Post by Rudy Canoza
*LOTS* of Democrats are saying - publicly, in the mainstream media -
Matthew Yglesias, Caitlin Flanagan,
WOW!
HOLY FUCK! Matt and Caitlin said something?
Tip of the iceberg, you dumb drooling felcher.
Yes
Yes.
<chuckle>
It's pretty fucking awesome
I know.
<chuckle>
I'll have to see
No, we already know. It's pretty fucking awesome the way I jerk you
around and slap the shit out of you.
<chuckle>
That it is
Yes, indeed.
<chuckle>
You bet!
I won the bet.

<chuckle>
Klaus Schadenfreude
2017-12-01 01:13:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
No, we already know. It's pretty fucking awesome the way you jerk me
around and slap the shit out of me.
That it is, my feisty little parking lot brawler!
That it is!
[chuckle]
Yes, indeed.
<chuckle>
You bet!
I lost the bet.
We knew that before we even started, Rudolph. You're way out of your
league.
Rudy Canoza
2017-12-01 05:55:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Rudy Canoza
On Sat, 25 Nov 2017 19:37:10 -0800, Rudy Canoza
Post by Rudy Canoza
*LOTS* of Democrats are saying - publicly, in the
mainstream media -
Matthew Yglesias, Caitlin Flanagan,
WOW!
HOLY FUCK! Matt and Caitlin said something?
Tip of the iceberg, you dumb drooling felcher.
Yes
Yes.
<chuckle>
It's pretty fucking awesome
I know.
<chuckle>
I'll have to see
No, we already know. It's pretty fucking awesome the way I jerk
you around and slap the shit out of you.
<chuckle>
That it is
Yes, indeed.
<chuckle>
You bet!
I won the bet.
<chuckle>
We knew that
So there is no point to your response. We knew that.

<chuckle>
Klaus Schadenfreude
2017-12-01 13:20:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
No, we already know. It's pretty fucking awesome the way you jerk me
around and slap the shit out of me.
That it is, my feisty little parking lot brawler!
That it is!
[chuckle]
Yes, indeed.
<chuckle>
You bet!
I lost the bet.
We knew that before we even started, Rudolph. You're way out of your
league.
So there is no point to your response. We knew that.
Well, it's not like YOU are going to learn anything from it- we
already knew that!

At this point I'm just humiliating you!

LOL
John Milner
2017-12-01 16:07:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
At this point I'm just humiliating you!
LOL
Let's revisit your stance on THIS current event K-Louse, then you tell
us what defines you and what you REALLY believe:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 23:20:39 +0000 (UTC), Baxter
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Marc Thiessen: Want to protest Trump? Disrespecting the flag is a
disgraceful way to do it
- wearing American flag clothing
- carrying flag flat
- drawing on the flag
- using disposable flag products
- flag advertisements
- flag uniforms
- tattered flag on your car
http://tinyurl.com/yczdy7hb
Kneeling during the Anthem is NOT disrespecting the flag.
Fuck the flag, and fuck the national anthem.

Wrap the fucking national anthem sheet music and a picture of Francis
Scott Key in the flag, and burn it.

Who. Gives. A. Fuck.

Only brain-dead, inbred, unread Trump supporters think this is a
sacrilege that needs avengin', and quick.

Loading Image...

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Care to explain THAT un_American outburst for us????
#BeamMeUpScotty
2017-12-01 16:55:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by John Milner
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
At this point I'm just humiliating you!
LOL
Let's revisit your stance on THIS current event K-Louse, then you tell
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 23:20:39 +0000 (UTC), Baxter
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Marc Thiessen: Want to protest Trump? Disrespecting the flag is a
disgraceful way to do it
- wearing American flag clothing
- carrying flag flat
- drawing on the flag
- using disposable flag products
- flag advertisements
- flag uniforms
- tattered flag on your car
http://tinyurl.com/yczdy7hb
Kneeling during the Anthem is NOT disrespecting the flag.
Mexico or Canada will be happy to have you....

Some countries might imprison you for that attitude.
--
That's Karma

We don't have a militia to guarantee that we can have guns, we have guns
to guarantee that we will always have a militia.
max headroom
2017-11-30 23:37:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
It's pretty fucking awesome that after three days you're STILL posting
replies to the same post.
Oh well, I never said being my bitch wouldn't be extra work!
[chuckle]
Really nice of Rudy to let you live rent-free inside his head. (It's not like he was using it,
anyway.)

But I bet it's a dark, scary place.
Klaus Schadenfreude
2017-12-01 00:48:53 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 30 Nov 2017 15:37:50 -0800, "max headroom"
Post by max headroom
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
It's pretty fucking awesome that after three days you're STILL posting
replies to the same post.
Oh well, I never said being my bitch wouldn't be extra work!
[chuckle]
Really nice of Rudy to let you live rent-free inside his head. (It's not like he was using it,
anyway.)
But I bet it's a dark, scary place.
Right now I'm just storing some shit in there, it's not like it's
livable or anything. But I obviously have control of it, for whatever
THAT'S worth.
Rudy Canoza
2017-11-29 23:03:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Rudy Canoza
*LOTS* of Democrats are saying - publicly, in the mainstream media -
Matthew Yglesias, Caitlin Flanagan,
WOW!
HOLY FUCK! Matt and Caitlin said something?
Tip of the iceberg, you dumb drooling felcher.
Yes
Yes.

<chuckle>
Rudy Canoza
2017-11-30 19:19:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Rudy Canoza
*LOTS* of Democrats are saying - publicly, in the mainstream media -
Matthew Yglesias, Caitlin Flanagan,
WOW!
HOLY FUCK! Matt and Caitlin said something?
Tip of the iceberg, you dumb drooling felcher.
Yes
Yes.

<chuckle>
Rudy Canoza
2017-11-30 19:19:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Rudy Canoza
*LOTS* of Democrats are saying - publicly, in the mainstream media -
Matthew Yglesias, Caitlin Flanagan,
WOW!
HOLY FUCK! Matt and Caitlin said something?
Tip of the iceberg, you dumb drooling felcher.
Yes
Yes.

<chuckle>
Rudy Canoza
2017-12-01 01:10:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Rudy Canoza
*LOTS* of Democrats are saying - publicly, in the mainstream media -
Matthew Yglesias, Caitlin Flanagan,
WOW!
HOLY FUCK! Matt and Caitlin said something?
Tip of the iceberg, you dumb drooling felcher.
Yes
Yes.

<chuckle>
Rudy Canoza
2017-12-01 01:10:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Rudy Canoza
*LOTS* of Democrats are saying - publicly, in the mainstream media -
Matthew Yglesias, Caitlin Flanagan,
WOW!
HOLY FUCK! Matt and Caitlin said something?
Tip of the iceberg, you dumb drooling felcher.
Yes
Yes.

<chuckle>
Rudy Canoza
2017-12-01 18:03:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Rudy Canoza
*LOTS* of Democrats are saying - publicly, in the mainstream media -
Matthew Yglesias, Caitlin Flanagan,
WOW!
HOLY FUCK! Matt and Caitlin said something?
Tip of the iceberg, you dumb drooling felcher.
Yes
Yes.

<chuckle>
Rudy Canoza
2017-12-01 18:03:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Rudy Canoza
*LOTS* of Democrats are saying - publicly, in the mainstream media -
Matthew Yglesias, Caitlin Flanagan,
WOW!
HOLY FUCK! Matt and Caitlin said something?
Tip of the iceberg, you dumb drooling felcher.
Yes
Yes.

<chuckle>

M.I.Wakefield
2017-11-26 16:54:58 UTC
Permalink
By all means, let's get to the bottom of Jeffrey Epstein and the "Lolita
Express".

A lot of disgusting people did a lot of disgusting things, and should be in
prison.

But careful what you wish for ...

From:
http://www.dailywire.com/news/5556/7-things-you-need-know-about-trump-and-sex-slave-amanda-prestigiacomo#

5. Epstein admitted to knowing Trump under oath, and curiously pled the
fifth to Trump attending sex parties with underage girls.

Back in 2010, Epstein admitted to “socializing” with Trump, but when a
lawyer representing an under-aged victim of Epstein’s asked if he has “ever
socialized with Donald Trump in the presence of females under the age of
18,” Epstein curiously pled the Fifth. Per Vice News:

Q: Have you ever had a personal relationship with Donald Trump?
A. What do you mean by "personal relationship," sir?
Q. Have you socialized with him?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. Yes?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. Have you ever socialized with Donald Trump in the presence of females
under the age of 18?
A: Though I'd like to answer that question, at least today I'm going to have
to assert my Fifth, Sixth, and 14th Amendment rights, sir.
Joe Cooper
2017-11-27 15:06:13 UTC
Permalink
Post by M.I.Wakefield
By all means, let's get to the bottom of Jeffrey Epstein and the
"Lolita Express".
A lot of disgusting people did a lot of disgusting things, and should
be in prison.
But careful what you wish for ...
I don't much care who gets outed, as long as they are all treated in the
same manner - presumption of innocence, for instance, unless and until
proven guilty.

A pox on all their houses.
--
"The Marxists, communists and fascists of the Democrat Party have launched
a strategy of deception, projection, and a new generation of brown shirts
who fanatically believe that their violence is honorable, and necessary, to
save America from some kind of a Fourth Reich perpetrated by the GOP."
(Douglas Gibbs )
jap
2017-11-27 10:08:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Salty Stan
Post by Repugs a tad desperate
Post by Joe Cooper
The belated attempt by the left to cover their hypocrisy on sexual
predators by throwing Bill and Hillary Clinton under the bus now
that they have no further political use for them is staggering.
- cut -
When you deplorables [sic] have to reach back 20 years,
Like Democrats are reaching back 20 years for Judge Moore?
"Democrats" aren't reaching anywhere regarding Moore. *Nine*
different women - there will be more, you may be certain - have come
forward lately to state that Moore molested them,
Allegedly 40 years ago.

Long past the statute of limitations. If it was so horrible, why did they
not report it then? Why did they not tell their parents? Why didn't they
write it down? Why didn't they tell a friend? Why are all the accusers
democrats?

Leopards don't change their spots. Where are all the women he assaulted
since then? Why haven't they come forward?

At least one piece of "evidence" is an obvious forgery and the accuser's
own kin call her a bald-faced liar.

The mall incident never happened.

The sporting event incident never happened.

Every single accuser so far has been a lefty weirdo with an axe to grind.

The funniest part of this is how many REAL democrat perverts got caught up
in it and they're the ones who started it.
Salty Stan
2017-11-27 14:00:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by jap
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Salty Stan
Post by Repugs a tad desperate
Post by Joe Cooper
The belated attempt by the left to cover their hypocrisy on sexual
predators by throwing Bill and Hillary Clinton under the bus now
that they have no further political use for them is staggering.
- cut -
When you deplorables [sic] have to reach back 20 years,
Like Democrats are reaching back 20 years for Judge Moore?
"Democrats" aren't reaching anywhere regarding Moore. *Nine*
different women - there will be more, you may be certain - have come
forward lately to state that Moore molested them,
Allegedly 40 years ago.
Oh, 40 years, not 20 years as I had previously stated.

Apologies, my mistake.
Attaboy Luther!
2017-11-27 16:29:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by jap
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Salty Stan
Post by Repugs a tad desperate
Post by Joe Cooper
The belated attempt by the left to cover their hypocrisy on sexual
predators by throwing Bill and Hillary Clinton under the bus now
that they have no further political use for them is staggering.
- cut -
When you deplorables [sic] have to reach back 20 years,
Like Democrats are reaching back 20 years for Judge Moore?
"Democrats" aren't reaching anywhere regarding Moore. *Nine*
different women - there will be more, you may be certain - have come
forward lately to state that Moore molested them,
Allegedly 40 years ago.
Not "allegedly".
Post by jap
Long past the statute of limitations.
Not in the court of public opinion, cocksucker.
NoBody
2017-11-28 11:18:08 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 27 Nov 2017 08:29:21 -0800, Attaboy Luther!
Post by Attaboy Luther!
Post by jap
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Salty Stan
Post by Repugs a tad desperate
Post by Joe Cooper
The belated attempt by the left to cover their hypocrisy on sexual
predators by throwing Bill and Hillary Clinton under the bus now
that they have no further political use for them is staggering.
- cut -
When you deplorables [sic] have to reach back 20 years,
Like Democrats are reaching back 20 years for Judge Moore?
"Democrats" aren't reaching anywhere regarding Moore. *Nine*
different women - there will be more, you may be certain - have come
forward lately to state that Moore molested them,
Allegedly 40 years ago.
Not "allegedly".
What criminal charges has he been convicted of? What actual evidence
exists against him (that mall story has been debunked already).
Post by Attaboy Luther!
Post by jap
Long past the statute of limitations.
Not in the court of public opinion, cocksucker.
Apparently the "court of public opinion" which can't recognize a
political assasination when they see one.
Tom Sr.
2017-11-28 12:15:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by NoBody
What actual evidence
exists against him (that mall story has been debunked already).
Where are your *citations* for your *belief* that the mall/Moore reports have "been debunked", nobody???

. . .
NoBody
2017-11-29 11:09:28 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 04:15:59 -0800 (PST), "Tom Sr."
Post by Tom Sr.
Post by NoBody
What actual evidence
exists against him (that mall story has been debunked already).
Where are your *citations* for your *belief* that the mall/Moore reports have "been debunked", nobody???
. . .
Start here:

https://www.snopes.com/2017/11/17/roy-moore-banned-mall-harassing-teen-girls/

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/11/boom-witness-drops-bomb-proves-gloria-allred-accuser-nelson-lying-says-media-not-talk/

You're going to need to back YOUR claim with something more than
"sources say".
Attaboy Luther!
2017-11-29 17:31:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 04:15:59 -0800 (PST), "Tom Sr."
Post by Tom Sr.
Post by NoBody
What actual evidence
exists against him (that mall story has been debunked already).
Where are your *citations* for your *belief* that the mall/Moore reports have "been debunked", nobody???
. . .
https://www.snopes.com/2017/11/17/roy-moore-banned-mall-harassing-teen-girls/
Snopes does *not* say that the story is false. It says there are no
written records of a "ban" on Moore at the mall. It mentions numerous
people who say he was banned, and one toothless ol' Bubba who says he
wasn't. The people who say he was banned are inherently more credible,
and their stories match.

He likely was banned. The story is not "debunked". You, for purely
ideological reasons, just refuse to believe it.
Post by NoBody
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/
A total fake news site; won't even look at it.
NoBody
2017-11-30 11:04:55 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 29 Nov 2017 09:31:20 -0800, Attaboy Luther!
Post by Attaboy Luther!
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 04:15:59 -0800 (PST), "Tom Sr."
Post by Tom Sr.
Post by NoBody
What actual evidence
exists against him (that mall story has been debunked already).
Where are your *citations* for your *belief* that the mall/Moore reports have "been debunked", nobody???
. . .
https://www.snopes.com/2017/11/17/roy-moore-banned-mall-harassing-teen-girls/
Snopes does *not* say that the story is false. It says there are no
written records of a "ban" on Moore at the mall. It mentions numerous
people who say he was banned, and one toothless ol' Bubba who says he
wasn't. The people who say he was banned are inherently more credible,
and their stories match.
Snopes is a left leaning web site. If they could not find evidence of
fact, consider it debunked.
Post by Attaboy Luther!
He likely was banned. The story is not "debunked". You, for purely
ideological reasons, just refuse to believe it.
Post by NoBody
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/
A total fake news site; won't even look at it.
Because you're a coward who can't deal with reality.

Oh, and hi Rudy!

<plonk>
Attaboy Luther!
2017-11-30 16:31:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by NoBody
On Wed, 29 Nov 2017 09:31:20 -0800, Attaboy Luther!
Post by Attaboy Luther!
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 04:15:59 -0800 (PST), "Tom Sr."
Post by Tom Sr.
Post by NoBody
What actual evidence
exists against him (that mall story has been debunked already).
Where are your *citations* for your *belief* that the mall/Moore reports have "been debunked", nobody???
. . .
https://www.snopes.com/2017/11/17/roy-moore-banned-mall-harassing-teen-girls/
Snopes does *not* say that the story is false. It says there are no
written records of a "ban" on Moore at the mall. It mentions numerous
people who say he was banned, and one toothless ol' Bubba who says he
wasn't. The people who say he was banned are inherently more credible,
and their stories match.
Snopes is a left leaning web site.
They're not. That's just right-wingnut bullshit.
Post by NoBody
If they could not find evidence of fact, consider it debunked.
First of all, that's a logical fallacy: Argumentum ad Ignorantiam. The
fact that you can't find evidence of something doesn't mean it doesn't
exist. There's no evidence of extra-terrestrial life, at present, but
that doesn't mean extra-terrestrial life doesn't exist.

Secondly, they didn't find a written record of Moore having been banned.
They found *lots* of people who said he was, and only one extremely
dubious old duffer who said he wasn't. The evidence, such as it is, is
that he was banned. The story is *NOT* "debunked".
Post by NoBody
Post by Attaboy Luther!
He likely was banned. The story is not "debunked". You, for purely
ideological reasons, just refuse to believe it.
Post by NoBody
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/
A total fake news site; won't even look at it.
Because
Because it's a pure garbage site, just like "breitbart", "wnd",
"infowars" and all the others from which you get your garbage fake news.
NoBody
2017-12-01 11:09:40 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 30 Nov 2017 08:31:41 -0800, Attaboy Luther!
Post by Attaboy Luther!
Post by NoBody
On Wed, 29 Nov 2017 09:31:20 -0800, Attaboy Luther!
Post by Attaboy Luther!
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 04:15:59 -0800 (PST), "Tom Sr."
Post by Tom Sr.
Post by NoBody
What actual evidence
exists against him (that mall story has been debunked already).
Where are your *citations* for your *belief* that the mall/Moore reports have "been debunked", nobody???
. . .
https://www.snopes.com/2017/11/17/roy-moore-banned-mall-harassing-teen-girls/
Snopes does *not* say that the story is false. It says there are no
written records of a "ban" on Moore at the mall. It mentions numerous
people who say he was banned, and one toothless ol' Bubba who says he
wasn't. The people who say he was banned are inherently more credible,
and their stories match.
Snopes is a left leaning web site.
They're not. That's just right-wingnut bullshit.
How about *you* provide some actual evidence since no one seems to be
able to do so? Show any record that backs the claim up.
Post by Attaboy Luther!
Post by NoBody
If they could not find evidence of fact, consider it debunked.
First of all, that's a logical fallacy: Argumentum ad Ignorantiam. The
fact that you can't find evidence of something doesn't mean it doesn't
exist. There's no evidence of extra-terrestrial life, at present, but
that doesn't mean extra-terrestrial life doesn't exist.
By your same argument, lack of actual evidence does not support YOUR
claim. Back it up.
Post by Attaboy Luther!
Secondly, they didn't find a written record of Moore having been banned.
They found *lots* of people who said he was, and only one extremely
dubious old duffer who said he wasn't. The evidence, such as it is, is
that he was banned. The story is *NOT* "debunked".
Those people were often unnamed "sources" and referenced rumors. There
is no evidence...period.
Post by Attaboy Luther!
Post by NoBody
Post by Attaboy Luther!
He likely was banned. The story is not "debunked". You, for purely
ideological reasons, just refuse to believe it.
Post by NoBody
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/
A total fake news site; won't even look at it.
Because
Because it's a pure garbage site, just like "breitbart", "wnd",
"infowars" and all the others from which you get your garbage fake news.
Your sources haven't shown anything to date so you're certainly not in
any position to disregard mine.
Attaboy Luther!
2017-12-01 17:19:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by NoBody
On Thu, 30 Nov 2017 08:31:41 -0800, Attaboy Luther!
Post by Attaboy Luther!
Post by NoBody
On Wed, 29 Nov 2017 09:31:20 -0800, Attaboy Luther!
Post by Attaboy Luther!
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 04:15:59 -0800 (PST), "Tom Sr."
Post by Tom Sr.
Post by NoBody
What actual evidence
exists against him (that mall story has been debunked already).
Where are your *citations* for your *belief* that the mall/Moore reports have "been debunked", nobody???
. . .
https://www.snopes.com/2017/11/17/roy-moore-banned-mall-harassing-teen-girls/
Snopes does *not* say that the story is false. It says there are no
written records of a "ban" on Moore at the mall. It mentions numerous
people who say he was banned, and one toothless ol' Bubba who says he
wasn't. The people who say he was banned are inherently more credible,
and their stories match.
Snopes is a left leaning web site.
They're not. That's just right-wingnut bullshit.
How about *you* provide some actual evidence since no one seems to be
able to do so?
The evidence is the recollection of many credible people close to the
scene who say that Moore was banned. No one says that's *conclusive*
evidence, but it's evidence.

I have no interest in producing "actual evidence", which - again - is
Hartung's and your impossible standard. My only interest is in proving
that you lied when you said the story was "debunked". Snopes did not
"debunk" it, and they made no claim to having done so. All they did is
point out that the story can't be confirmed in written records. Written
records, of course, are not the only possible evidence.

The story has not been "debunked". Stop repeating that lie.
Post by NoBody
Post by Attaboy Luther!
Post by NoBody
If they could not find evidence of fact, consider it debunked.
First of all, that's a logical fallacy: Argumentum ad Ignorantiam. The
fact that you can't find evidence of something doesn't mean it doesn't
exist. There's no evidence of extra-terrestrial life, at present, but
that doesn't mean extra-terrestrial life doesn't exist.
By your same argument, lack of actual evidence does not support YOUR
claim.
No, that does not apply to my argument.
Post by NoBody
Post by Attaboy Luther!
Secondly, they didn't find a written record of Moore having been banned.
They found *lots* of people who said he was, and only one extremely
dubious old duffer who said he wasn't. The evidence, such as it is, is
that he was banned. The story is *NOT* "debunked".
Those people were often unnamed "sources" and referenced rumors.
No, they weren't.
Post by NoBody
Post by Attaboy Luther!
Post by NoBody
Post by Attaboy Luther!
He likely was banned. The story is not "debunked". You, for purely
ideological reasons, just refuse to believe it.
Post by NoBody
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/
A total fake news site; won't even look at it.
Because
Because it's a pure garbage site, just like "breitbart", "wnd",
"infowars" and all the others from which you get your garbage fake news.
Your sources haven't shown anything to date so you're certainly not in
any position to disregard mine.
I am in a position to disregard yours, because they don't do what you
claim. Snopes did not "debunk" the claim that Moore was banned from the
mall, nor did they claim to have "debunked" it. Saying they did is a lie.
#BeamMeUpScotty
2017-12-01 17:24:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by Attaboy Luther!
Post by NoBody
On Thu, 30 Nov 2017 08:31:41 -0800, Attaboy Luther!
Post by NoBody
On Wed, 29 Nov 2017 09:31:20 -0800, Attaboy Luther!
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 04:15:59 -0800 (PST), "Tom Sr."
Post by NoBody
What actual evidence
exists against him (that mall story has been debunked already).
                               Where are your *citations* for
your *belief* that the mall/Moore reports have "been debunked",
nobody???
            . . .
                                                       
https://www.snopes.com/2017/11/17/roy-moore-banned-mall-harassing-teen-girls/
Snopes does *not* say that the story is false.  It says there are no
written records of a "ban" on Moore at the mall.  It mentions numerous
people who say he was banned, and one toothless ol' Bubba who says he
wasn't.  The people who say he was banned are inherently more
credible,
and their stories match.
Snopes is a left leaning web site.
They're not.  That's just right-wingnut bullshit.
How about *you* provide some actual evidence since no one seems to be
able to do so?
The evidence is the recollection of many credible people close to the
scene who say that Moore was banned.  No one says that's *conclusive*
evidence, but it's evidence.
So far it's NOT even testimony.... much less any kind of evidence.

It's a story like fairytale....
--
That's Karma


*Rumination*
160 - Why is it called Gun Control and abortion RIGHTS, when in reality
it's GUN RIGHTS and abortion control.
Gunner Asch
2017-11-28 14:46:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by NoBody
On Mon, 27 Nov 2017 08:29:21 -0800, Attaboy Luther!
Post by Attaboy Luther!
Post by jap
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Salty Stan
Post by Repugs a tad desperate
Post by Joe Cooper
The belated attempt by the left to cover their hypocrisy on sexual
predators by throwing Bill and Hillary Clinton under the bus now
that they have no further political use for them is staggering.
- cut -
When you deplorables [sic] have to reach back 20 years,
Like Democrats are reaching back 20 years for Judge Moore?
"Democrats" aren't reaching anywhere regarding Moore. *Nine*
different women - there will be more, you may be certain - have come
forward lately to state that Moore molested them,
Allegedly 40 years ago.
Not "allegedly".
What criminal charges has he been convicted of? What actual evidence
exists against him (that mall story has been debunked already).
The Leftists really hate Moore dont they? (VBG)
Trying to corrupt the justice system this way...its funny as hell.
When its THEIR boy (or girl) who is in the corruption spotlight...they
are all protective and law abiding..but when someone from the other
side is in that spotlight...its Off with their heads!

No wonder the Left has become no longer relevent to politics.

(VBG)
Post by NoBody
Post by Attaboy Luther!
Post by jap
Long past the statute of limitations.
Not in the court of public opinion, cocksucker.
Apparently the "court of public opinion" which can't recognize a
political assasination when they see one.
Of course they recognize it. They have used it for 40 yrs. Now the
political winds have changed directions...and they hate it....(VBG)


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Gunner Asch
2017-11-28 15:22:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gunner Asch
Post by NoBody
Post by Attaboy Luther!
Post by jap
Post by Rudy Canoza
forward lately to state that Moore molested them,
Allegedly 40 years ago.
Not "allegedly".
What criminal charges has he been convicted of? What actual evidence
exists against him (that mall story has been debunked already).
The Leftists really hate Moore dont they? (VBG)
Trying to corrupt the justice system this way...its funny as hell.
When its THEIR boy (or girl) who is in the corruption spotlight...they
are all protective and law abiding..but when someone from the other
side is in that spotlight...its Off with their heads!
No wonder the Left has become no longer relevent to politics.
(VBG)
https://conservativetribune.com/moore-accuser-guilty-of-fraud/

https://conservativetribune.com/court-docs-roy-moore-allegation/

https://conservativetribune.com/susan-sarandon-claims-liberals/

Laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh!!!


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Attaboy Luther!
2017-11-28 17:08:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gunner Asch
Post by Gunner Asch
Post by NoBody
Post by Attaboy Luther!
Post by jap
Post by Rudy Canoza
forward lately to state that Moore molested them,
Allegedly 40 years ago.
Not "allegedly".
What criminal charges has he been convicted of? What actual evidence
exists against him (that mall story has been debunked already).
The Leftists really hate Moore dont they? (VBG)
Trying to corrupt the justice system this way...its funny as hell.
When its THEIR boy (or girl) who is in the corruption spotlight...they
are all protective and law abiding..but when someone from the other
side is in that spotlight...its Off with their heads!
No wonder the Left has become no longer relevent to politics.
(VBG)
https://conservativetribune.com/moore-accuser-guilty-of-fraud/
Bullshit. This is one bullshit right-wingnut fake news site citing another.

Rejected.
John Milner
2017-11-28 18:11:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by Attaboy Luther!
This is one bullshit right
Total Bullshit lie.

There is ZERO physical evidence - period.

Now FUCK OFF AND DIE you leftard scum.
Attaboy Luther!
2017-11-28 17:06:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gunner Asch
Post by NoBody
On Mon, 27 Nov 2017 08:29:21 -0800, Attaboy Luther!
Post by Attaboy Luther!
Post by jap
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Salty Stan
Post by Repugs a tad desperate
Post by Joe Cooper
The belated attempt by the left to cover their hypocrisy on sexual
predators by throwing Bill and Hillary Clinton under the bus now
that they have no further political use for them is staggering.
- cut -
When you deplorables [sic] have to reach back 20 years,
Like Democrats are reaching back 20 years for Judge Moore?
"Democrats" aren't reaching anywhere regarding Moore. *Nine*
different women - there will be more, you may be certain - have come
forward lately to state that Moore molested them,
Allegedly 40 years ago.
Not "allegedly".
What criminal charges has he been convicted of? What actual evidence
exists against him (that mall story has been debunked already).
The Leftists really hate Moore dont they?
All right-thinking people hate him. He's a rapist.
Post by Gunner Asch
Post by NoBody
Post by Attaboy Luther!
Post by jap
Long past the statute of limitations.
Not in the court of public opinion, cocksucker.
Apparently the "court of public opinion" which can't recognize a
political assasination when they see one.
Of course they recognize it.
It isn't one.
John Milner
2017-11-28 18:10:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by Attaboy Luther!
He's a rapist.
Total Bullshit lie.

There is ZERO physical evidence - period.

Now FUCK OFF AND DIE you leftard scum.
Attaboy Luther!
2017-11-28 16:48:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by NoBody
On Mon, 27 Nov 2017 08:29:21 -0800, Attaboy Luther!
Post by Attaboy Luther!
Post by jap
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Salty Stan
Post by Repugs a tad desperate
Post by Joe Cooper
The belated attempt by the left to cover their hypocrisy on sexual
predators by throwing Bill and Hillary Clinton under the bus now
that they have no further political use for them is staggering.
- cut -
When you deplorables [sic] have to reach back 20 years,
Like Democrats are reaching back 20 years for Judge Moore?
"Democrats" aren't reaching anywhere regarding Moore. *Nine*
different women - there will be more, you may be certain - have come
forward lately to state that Moore molested them,
Allegedly 40 years ago.
Not "allegedly".
What criminal charges has he been convicted of?
Irrelevant.
Post by NoBody
What actual evidence exists against him
"'Actual' evidence" - ha ha ha ha ha! The evidence consists of the
*corroborated* accusations themselves. So far, there are nine. There
will be more.
Post by NoBody
(that mall story has been debunked already).
No, it has not.
Post by NoBody
Post by Attaboy Luther!
Post by jap
Long past the statute of limitations.
Not in the court of public opinion, cocksucker.
Apparently the "court of public opinion" which can't recognize a
political assasination when they see one.
LOL! There isn't any, of course.
John Milner
2017-11-28 18:09:28 UTC
Permalink
The evidence consists of the *corroborated* accusations
Bullshit lie.

There is ZERO physical evidence - period.

now FUCK OFF AND DIE you leftard scum.
NoBody
2017-11-29 11:04:21 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 08:48:16 -0800, Attaboy Luther!
Post by Attaboy Luther!
Post by NoBody
On Mon, 27 Nov 2017 08:29:21 -0800, Attaboy Luther!
Post by Attaboy Luther!
Post by jap
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Salty Stan
Post by Repugs a tad desperate
Post by Joe Cooper
The belated attempt by the left to cover their hypocrisy on sexual
predators by throwing Bill and Hillary Clinton under the bus now
that they have no further political use for them is staggering.
- cut -
When you deplorables [sic] have to reach back 20 years,
Like Democrats are reaching back 20 years for Judge Moore?
"Democrats" aren't reaching anywhere regarding Moore. *Nine*
different women - there will be more, you may be certain - have come
forward lately to state that Moore molested them,
Allegedly 40 years ago.
Not "allegedly".
What criminal charges has he been convicted of?
Irrelevant.
Totallly relevant (except to non-thinking libs such as yourself).
Post by Attaboy Luther!
Post by NoBody
What actual evidence exists against him
"'Actual' evidence" - ha ha ha ha ha! The evidence consists of the
*corroborated* accusations themselves. So far, there are nine. There
will be more.
May you never be convicted of something based on a political attack.
Post by Attaboy Luther!
Post by NoBody
(that mall story has been debunked already).
No, it has not.
Absolutely has.
Post by Attaboy Luther!
Post by NoBody
Post by Attaboy Luther!
Post by jap
Long past the statute of limitations.
Not in the court of public opinion, cocksucker.
Apparently the "court of public opinion" which can't recognize a
political assasination when they see one.
LOL! There isn't any, of course.
Oh, so you're blind as well as dumb...
Attaboy Luther!
2017-11-29 17:28:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 08:48:16 -0800, Attaboy Luther!
Post by Attaboy Luther!
Post by NoBody
On Mon, 27 Nov 2017 08:29:21 -0800, Attaboy Luther!
Post by Attaboy Luther!
Post by jap
Post by Rudy Canoza
On Saturday, November 25, 2017 at 8:28:06 PM UTC-5, Repugs a tad
Post by Repugs a tad desperate
Post by Joe Cooper
The belated attempt by the left to cover their hypocrisy on sexual
predators by throwing Bill and Hillary Clinton under the bus now
that they have no further political use for them is staggering.
- cut -
When you deplorables [sic] have to reach back 20 years,
Like Democrats are reaching back 20 years for Judge Moore?
"Democrats" aren't reaching anywhere regarding Moore. *Nine*
different women - there will be more, you may be certain - have come
forward lately to state that Moore molested them,
Allegedly 40 years ago.
Not "allegedly".
What criminal charges has he been convicted of?
Irrelevant.
Totallly relevant (except to non-thinking libs such as yourself).
Post by Attaboy Luther!
Post by NoBody
What actual evidence exists against him
"'Actual' evidence" - ha ha ha ha ha! The evidence consists of the
*corroborated* accusations themselves. So far, there are nine. There
will be more.
May you never be convicted of something based on a political attack.
Post by Attaboy Luther!
Post by NoBody
(that mall story has been debunked already).
No, it has not.
Absolutely has.
Absolutely it has not.
Post by NoBody
Post by Attaboy Luther!
Post by NoBody
Post by Attaboy Luther!
Post by jap
Long past the statute of limitations.
Not in the court of public opinion, cocksucker.
Apparently the "court of public opinion" which can't recognize a
political assasination when they see one.
LOL! There isn't any, of course.
Oh, so you're blind as well as dumb...
Nope. There was no orchestration of this at all. Only two of the nine
(at least) accusers were even remotely acquainted with one another.
These people all came out now because the climate changed, starting last
summer with Weinstein. Surely you didn't think that only eeeeeeeeevil
leftists engaged in sexual assault? That kind of behavior is not
connected with ideology.

Moore did what his accusers said. They have no political motive to tell
their stories. The ones who have told the worst stories all identify as
Republicans and Trump voters.
Wile E. Coyote
2017-11-29 17:35:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by Attaboy Luther!
Nope. There was no orchestration of this at all.
You are one dumb, pathetic, stupid son of a whore.
--
It's time for the students to step up their game and kill people like
Coulter.

Siri Cruise <***@yahoo.com> April 25, 2017
Rudy Canoza
2017-11-29 19:13:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by Wile E. Coyote
Post by Attaboy Luther!
Nope. There was no orchestration of this at all.
You are one dumb, pathetic, stupid son of a whore.
You are one HIV+ stupid cocksucker who squats to piss and can't fight.

There is no orchestration of the Moore accusers. That's a fact.
John Milner
2017-11-29 19:16:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rudy Canoza
There is no orchestration of the Moore accusers.
Oh really?!?!?!

40 years later it just happens to become a big deal?

It never surfaced when his 10 Commandments monument was in play some
years back, now did it liar?

You and your fellow traveler DNC hacks are going DOWN!
Rudy Canoza
2017-11-29 19:18:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by John Milner
Post by Rudy Canoza
There is no orchestration of the Moore accusers.
Oh really?!?!?!
That's right, spammy, you HIV+ squat-to-piss no-fight faggot.
John Milner
2017-11-29 19:20:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by John Milner
Post by Rudy Canoza
There is no orchestration of the Moore accusers.
Oh really?!?!?!
That's right,
No, that's a LIE, you sick little failed home appraiser fuckwit.

40 years later it just happens to become a big deal?

It never surfaced when his 10 Commandments monument was in play some
years back, now did it liar?

You and your fellow traveler DNC hacks are going DOWN!
#BeamMeUpScotty
2017-11-29 23:50:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by John Milner
Post by Rudy Canoza
There is no orchestration of the Moore accusers.
Oh really?!?!?!
40 years later it just happens to become a big deal?
It never surfaced when his 10 Commandments monument was in play some
years back, now did it liar?
You and your fellow traveler DNC hacks are going DOWN!
Hillary's threats are probably sounding hollow these days, she can't
even orchestrate a scandal attack on Roy Moore that will work....
Hillary is the Queen with no clothes.... BBbbbllllllaaaaaaaacchchchc!!!
Gouge my eyes out....please!!!! There's NOT enough Bourbon in a bottle
to erase that metaphoric image.

Hillary has been using threats to destroy people and the reason things
are going all to hell is that Hillary has no power to even defeat Roy
Moore so chaos has been created as all these people that were held at
bay by the threat of Hillary destroying them... is NOW gone so they can
come forward and tell all without Hillary squashing them like a bug.

This is what freedom in the Democratic party looks like.
--
That's Karma

Have you ever noticed that Marxists think that the history of white
heterosexual men taking over lands was evil but when Marxists take over
lands it's progress?
Rudy Canoza
2017-11-30 05:58:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by John Milner
Post by Rudy Canoza
There is no orchestration of the Moore accusers.
Oh really?!?!?!
40 years later it just happens to become a big deal?
It never surfaced when his 10 Commandments monument was in play some
years back, now did it liar?
You and your fellow traveler DNC hacks are going DOWN, tRudey 'little
man' Ball!
Sexually abused women often don't report their abuse because of
assholes like you. They know they won't be believed by many; defense
attorneys will brutalize them in the press; and their lives can be
ruined.
I have a close friend who was date-raped by a football player at
Michigan State in '67. She reported it to the police. They told her
that the player had been charged with rape six times and he was never
found guilty, but some of the women left school and were a wreck. They
advised her to let it go unless she had a witness. She never told
anyone else but a few close friends.
That's the way it goes.
No...that's the way it USED to go!
Now Dems are unwittingly proving to be the cure to this rampant
perversion by their own systemic abuses.
So things DO change.
Meanwhile this is 40 year old hearsay not even close to the more recent
groping Bush Sr. has been doing.
It is OBVIOUSLY politically motivated and that is that!
Cope.
There is enough collaboration, if you've listened to it, to make it
close to a slam-dunk. And this isn't a court of law. It's an election,
in which people make their best judgment and then vote.
I'm not very hopeful.
Nope. It's Alabama, the second worst and second most benighted state in
the union.

https://www.bizjournals.com/birmingham/blog/2014/10/alabama-ranked-second-worst-state-for-quality-of.html

I guess they get to look down their noses at Mississippi. Whoop-ti-do.
Ed Huntress
2017-11-30 15:47:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by John Milner
Post by Rudy Canoza
There is no orchestration of the Moore accusers.
Oh really?!?!?!
40 years later it just happens to become a big deal?
It never surfaced when his 10 Commandments monument was in play some
years back, now did it liar?
You and your fellow traveler DNC hacks are going DOWN, tRudey 'little
man' Ball!
Sexually abused women often don't report their abuse because of
assholes like you. They know they won't be believed by many; defense
attorneys will brutalize them in the press; and their lives can be
ruined.
I have a close friend who was date-raped by a football player at
Michigan State in '67. She reported it to the police. They told her
that the player had been charged with rape six times and he was never
found guilty, but some of the women left school and were a wreck. They
advised her to let it go unless she had a witness. She never told
anyone else but a few close friends.
That's the way it goes.
No...that's the way it USED to go!
Now Dems are unwittingly proving to be the cure to this rampant
perversion by their own systemic abuses.
So things DO change.
Meanwhile this is 40 year old hearsay not even close to the more recent
groping Bush Sr. has been doing.
It is OBVIOUSLY politically motivated and that is that!
Cope.
There is enough collaboration, if you've listened to it, to make it
close to a slam-dunk. And this isn't a court of law. It's an election,
in which people make their best judgment and then vote.
I'm not very hopeful.
Nope. It's Alabama, the second worst and second most benighted state in
the union.
https://www.bizjournals.com/birmingham/blog/2014/10/alabama-ranked-second-worst-state-for-quality-of.html
I guess they get to look down their noses at Mississippi. Whoop-ti-do.
But you gotta admit, if they elect him, he'll be a fitting
representative for the values of the people of his state.

I wonder if he'll wear his Roy Rogers costume on the floor of the
Senate?
--
Ed Huntress
Rudy Canoza
2017-11-30 06:33:23 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 29 Nov 2017 23:29:20 -0000 (UTC), "Wile E. Coyote"
Post by John Milner
Post by Rudy Canoza
There is no orchestration of the Moore accusers.
Oh really?!?!?!
40 years later it just happens to become a big deal?
It never surfaced when his 10 Commandments monument was in play some
years back, now did it liar?
You and your fellow traveler DNC hacks are going DOWN, tRudey 'little
man' Ball!
Sexually abused women often don't report their abuse because of
assholes like you. They know they won't be believed by many; defense
attorneys will brutalize them in the press; and their lives can be
ruined.
I have a close friend who was date-raped by a football player at
Michigan State in '67. She reported it to the police. They told her
that the player had been charged with rape six times and he was never
found guilty, but some of the women left school and were a wreck. They
advised her to let it go unless she had a witness. She never told
anyone else but a few close friends.
That's the way it goes. It's clear from listening to such women that
they can find safety in numbers; one decides to tough it out, and
others come out with their stories.
As for never reporting it when the 10 Commandments ruckus was going
on, he wasn't running for the Senate. He was known to be a vicious and
dangerous adversary in court. And he was the top man in the Alabama
courts.
He'll likely get away with it. He has plenty of assholes to support
him.
Juanitta Broderick/Bill Clinton
Now, though, we have a revolution, and there is no evidence that
there's an underlying conspiracy going on, as Brock reported about the
hit squad against Clinton when he was part of it, and wrote _The Real
Anita Hill_, which he later acknowledged was a pack of lies.
Democrats and liberals -- from Harvey Weinstein to Matt Lauer, Al
Franken, and John Conyers -- are being caught up in the same net.
There's no partisan divide on this issue.
If you wanted to believe Clinton, it was a lot easier to do so then.
With Moore, it's much harder -- partly because attitudes about abusing
women have changed, and partly because there is a better realization
that they have little or nothing to lose by telling the truth.
But, as I said, some people are going to attack the women, and scare
more of them off from coming out with their experiences. We see that
going on right here. None of Moore's defenders have any evidence that
the women aren't telling the truth, but those same Moore defenders are
going after those women anyway.
The age in which we live is one in which the majority of conservatives
have taken complete leave of their senses, if they ever had a grip on
them in the first place. I was briefly thinking, and nearly wrote, that
it is "almost as if" there is a coordinated effort to get these
knuckle-draggers all to sing from the same hymnal, but there is *no*
"almost as if" about it - that is *exactly* what is going on.
Knuckle-draggers like "Wiley", scooter, Wieber, myriad others whom you
don't ordinarily read unless it's cross-posted to r.c.m. - these idiots
all go to "breitbart" and "cns" and "wnd" and "daily bullshitter"
("dailycaller") and a bunch of other 99.99% pure right-wingnut fake news
sites to get their marching orders - their bullshitting orders - every
day. It's uncanny. They all say the same things, in virtually the same
words.

Steve Bannon is one of the worst and most racist shitbags on the face of
the earth at present, but he's a genius. He absolutely knows how to
light a fire under that 13% or so who are die-hard, Trump supporting
right-wingnuts, and that they will be able to pull another 25% or so
with them. 35-40% of the populace embracing compete right-wingnut fake
news bullshit is going to have an effect. It changes the debate.
Of course most women going to keep quiet, unless and until they have a
sense that they will be defended. Even decades later.
It's funny to observe what I call the threshold effect. A threshold has
been breached, and I think it started with Cosby. That led to Ailes,
then to Weinstein, then O'Reilly (maybe it was O'Reilly and then
Weinstein), and now the floodgates are open. Not *one* known accuser (a
few, e.g. a couple against Franken, are anonymous...for now) has been
discredited. The right-wingnut knuckle-draggers keep bullshitting about
some of them being "paid" (by "Dems" or "libs"), but without a shred of
evidence to support it. They point to some minor inconsistencies -
*alleged* inconsistencies - in stories, e.g. the girl whom Moore
attempted to rape behind the restaurant saying she worked there at age
15 when someone else *not* in a position to know the restaurant's
policies claims employees had to be at least 16. The inconsistencies do
little - virtually nothing - to undermine their stories.

The moment may not last, but I think that for a while at least, a lot
more women - and perhaps some men - who have been sexually abused by
people in positions of power are going to feel emboldened and will come
forward. There's still a long way to go. Just today in my local paper
(in the state capital), a female lobbyist testifying before a state
assembly committee investigating sexual harassment and abuse said that
an elected legislator trapped her in a bathroom and jerked off in front
of her, but she still wouldn't name him out of fear of damage to her
career. That's too bad, because another assemblyman who has been named
very abruptly resigned, even while maintaining he did nothing wrong
(here's hoping it's the same asshole who abused the lobbyist.)
If Clinton's exploitation was uncovered today, he probably would have
been found guilty. Likewise, if Clarence Thomas had to face Anita Hill
today, he wouldn't be a Supreme Court Justice.
Almost certainly correct.
Ed Huntress
2017-11-30 16:19:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rudy Canoza
On Wed, 29 Nov 2017 23:29:20 -0000 (UTC), "Wile E. Coyote"
Post by John Milner
Post by Rudy Canoza
There is no orchestration of the Moore accusers.
Oh really?!?!?!
40 years later it just happens to become a big deal?
It never surfaced when his 10 Commandments monument was in play some
years back, now did it liar?
You and your fellow traveler DNC hacks are going DOWN, tRudey 'little
man' Ball!
Sexually abused women often don't report their abuse because of
assholes like you. They know they won't be believed by many; defense
attorneys will brutalize them in the press; and their lives can be
ruined.
I have a close friend who was date-raped by a football player at
Michigan State in '67. She reported it to the police. They told her
that the player had been charged with rape six times and he was never
found guilty, but some of the women left school and were a wreck. They
advised her to let it go unless she had a witness. She never told
anyone else but a few close friends.
That's the way it goes. It's clear from listening to such women that
they can find safety in numbers; one decides to tough it out, and
others come out with their stories.
As for never reporting it when the 10 Commandments ruckus was going
on, he wasn't running for the Senate. He was known to be a vicious and
dangerous adversary in court. And he was the top man in the Alabama
courts.
He'll likely get away with it. He has plenty of assholes to support
him.
Juanitta Broderick/Bill Clinton
Now, though, we have a revolution, and there is no evidence that
there's an underlying conspiracy going on, as Brock reported about the
hit squad against Clinton when he was part of it, and wrote _The Real
Anita Hill_, which he later acknowledged was a pack of lies.
Democrats and liberals -- from Harvey Weinstein to Matt Lauer, Al
Franken, and John Conyers -- are being caught up in the same net.
There's no partisan divide on this issue.
If you wanted to believe Clinton, it was a lot easier to do so then.
With Moore, it's much harder -- partly because attitudes about abusing
women have changed, and partly because there is a better realization
that they have little or nothing to lose by telling the truth.
But, as I said, some people are going to attack the women, and scare
more of them off from coming out with their experiences. We see that
going on right here. None of Moore's defenders have any evidence that
the women aren't telling the truth, but those same Moore defenders are
going after those women anyway.
The age in which we live is one in which the majority of conservatives
have taken complete leave of their senses, if they ever had a grip on
them in the first place. I was briefly thinking, and nearly wrote, that
it is "almost as if" there is a coordinated effort to get these
knuckle-draggers all to sing from the same hymnal, but there is *no*
"almost as if" about it - that is *exactly* what is going on.
Knuckle-draggers like "Wiley", scooter, Wieber, myriad others whom you
don't ordinarily read unless it's cross-posted to r.c.m. - these idiots
all go to "breitbart" and "cns" and "wnd" and "daily bullshitter"
("dailycaller") and a bunch of other 99.99% pure right-wingnut fake news
sites to get their marching orders - their bullshitting orders - every
day. It's uncanny. They all say the same things, in virtually the same
words.
Oral traditions, passed down from their parents, who are also their
cousins.
Post by Rudy Canoza
Steve Bannon is one of the worst and most racist shitbags on the face of
the earth at present, but he's a genius. He absolutely knows how to
light a fire under that 13% or so who are die-hard, Trump supporting
right-wingnuts, and that they will be able to pull another 25% or so
with them. 35-40% of the populace embracing compete right-wingnut fake
news bullshit is going to have an effect. It changes the debate.
I predict more dating by mature men of teenage girls. It will be the
new normal. And boardroom fashion will include shredded field jackets
and ratty, unkempt beards. Like Trump, many will be lusting after
their own daughters.

We're in for some cultural changes, all right. Fact-checking will
become a criminal offense, and our premier industry will be laundering
money for Russian oligarchs.

We'll change our name to the Banana Republic of America.

Mark my words....
Post by Rudy Canoza
Of course most women going to keep quiet, unless and until they have a
sense that they will be defended. Even decades later.
It's funny to observe what I call the threshold effect. A threshold has
been breached, and I think it started with Cosby.
Yes! That was so disgusting that it knocked us off of our bar stools.
Post by Rudy Canoza
That led to Ailes,
then to Weinstein, then O'Reilly (maybe it was O'Reilly and then
Weinstein), and now the floodgates are open. Not *one* known accuser (a
few, e.g. a couple against Franken, are anonymous...for now) has been
discredited. The right-wingnut knuckle-draggers keep bullshitting about
some of them being "paid" (by "Dems" or "libs"), but without a shred of
evidence to support it. They point to some minor inconsistencies -
*alleged* inconsistencies - in stories, e.g. the girl whom Moore
attempted to rape behind the restaurant saying she worked there at age
15 when someone else *not* in a position to know the restaurant's
policies claims employees had to be at least 16. The inconsistencies do
little - virtually nothing - to undermine their stories.
Hey, they've decided that truth is an inconvenient value. Facts are no
more substantial than Jell-O. Kellyann Conway said as much.
Post by Rudy Canoza
The moment may not last, but I think that for a while at least, a lot
more women - and perhaps some men - who have been sexually abused by
people in positions of power are going to feel emboldened and will come
forward.
I'm counting on it.
Post by Rudy Canoza
There's still a long way to go. Just today in my local paper
(in the state capital), a female lobbyist testifying before a state
assembly committee investigating sexual harassment and abuse said that
an elected legislator trapped her in a bathroom and jerked off in front
of her, but she still wouldn't name him out of fear of damage to her
career.
Those cases make my head spin. What is the mental disturbance that
makes those men want to jerk off in front of women? Is it genetic, or
some kind of unknown virus?
Post by Rudy Canoza
That's too bad, because another assemblyman who has been named
very abruptly resigned, even while maintaining he did nothing wrong
(here's hoping it's the same asshole who abused the lobbyist.)
If Clinton's exploitation was uncovered today, he probably would have
been found guilty. Likewise, if Clarence Thomas had to face Anita Hill
today, he wouldn't be a Supreme Court Justice.
Almost certainly correct.
--
Ed Huntress
Bone Chain
2017-11-30 17:05:24 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 30 Nov 2017 11:19:54 -0500, Ed Huntress
Post by Ed Huntress
Post by Rudy Canoza
There's still a long way to go. Just today in my local paper
(in the state capital), a female lobbyist testifying before a state
assembly committee investigating sexual harassment and abuse said that
an elected legislator trapped her in a bathroom and jerked off in front
of her, but she still wouldn't name him out of fear of damage to her
career.
Those cases make my head spin. What is the mental disturbance that
makes those men want to jerk off in front of women? Is it genetic, or
some kind of unknown virus?
Just another feeling-fact. They're positive their targets *want* to
see that.
Ed Huntress
2017-11-30 17:27:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bone Chain
On Thu, 30 Nov 2017 11:19:54 -0500, Ed Huntress
Post by Ed Huntress
Post by Rudy Canoza
There's still a long way to go. Just today in my local paper
(in the state capital), a female lobbyist testifying before a state
assembly committee investigating sexual harassment and abuse said that
an elected legislator trapped her in a bathroom and jerked off in front
of her, but she still wouldn't name him out of fear of damage to her
career.
Those cases make my head spin. What is the mental disturbance that
makes those men want to jerk off in front of women? Is it genetic, or
some kind of unknown virus?
Just another feeling-fact. They're positive their targets *want* to
see that.
They're fucked up in the head.
--
Ed Huntress
NoBody
2017-11-30 11:02:13 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 29 Nov 2017 09:28:22 -0800, Attaboy Luther!
Post by Attaboy Luther!
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 08:48:16 -0800, Attaboy Luther!
Post by Attaboy Luther!
Post by NoBody
On Mon, 27 Nov 2017 08:29:21 -0800, Attaboy Luther!
Post by Attaboy Luther!
Post by jap
Post by Rudy Canoza
On Saturday, November 25, 2017 at 8:28:06 PM UTC-5, Repugs a tad
Post by Repugs a tad desperate
Post by Joe Cooper
The belated attempt by the left to cover their hypocrisy on sexual
predators by throwing Bill and Hillary Clinton under the bus now
that they have no further political use for them is staggering.
- cut -
When you deplorables [sic] have to reach back 20 years,
Like Democrats are reaching back 20 years for Judge Moore?
"Democrats" aren't reaching anywhere regarding Moore. *Nine*
different women - there will be more, you may be certain - have come
forward lately to state that Moore molested them,
Allegedly 40 years ago.
Not "allegedly".
What criminal charges has he been convicted of?
Irrelevant.
Totallly relevant (except to non-thinking libs such as yourself).
Post by Attaboy Luther!
Post by NoBody
What actual evidence exists against him
"'Actual' evidence" - ha ha ha ha ha! The evidence consists of the
*corroborated* accusations themselves. So far, there are nine. There
will be more.
May you never be convicted of something based on a political attack.
Post by Attaboy Luther!
Post by NoBody
(that mall story has been debunked already).
No, it has not.
Absolutely has.
Absolutely it has not.
Post by NoBody
Post by Attaboy Luther!
Post by NoBody
Post by Attaboy Luther!
Post by jap
Long past the statute of limitations.
Not in the court of public opinion, cocksucker.
Apparently the "court of public opinion" which can't recognize a
political assasination when they see one.
LOL! There isn't any, of course.
Oh, so you're blind as well as dumb...
Nope. There was no orchestration of this at all. Only two of the nine
(at least) accusers were even remotely acquainted with one another.
These people all came out now because the climate changed, starting last
summer with Weinstein. Surely you didn't think that only eeeeeeeeevil
leftists engaged in sexual assault? That kind of behavior is not
connected with ideology.
Moore did what his accusers said. They have no political motive to tell
their stories. The ones who have told the worst stories all identify as
Republicans and Trump voters.
You're full of garbage as usual, Rudy.

<plonk>
Joe Cooper
2017-11-28 15:24:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by Attaboy Luther!
Post by jap
Allegedly 40 years ago.
Not "allegedly".
Post by jap
Long past the statute of limitations.
Not in the court of public opinion, cocksucker.
Accusing Moore's Accusers

By way of full disclosure, I will tell you that I support Roy Moore, I
have known him a long time, and have contributed to his campaign. I
recommended to then-Governor Robert Bentley that he appoint him to fill
the unexpired term of Senator Jeff Sessions when the latter was appointed
attorney general. I was in the company of Moore within the last week.
With all that said, I will proceed to offer you my opinion on the
accusations against him presently jamming the American electromagnetic
spectrum.

First of all, I think it important to make clear exactly what, true or
false, the accusations are. The accusations first came from four middle-
age women who claim that Moore dated them when they were at a tender age.

Three of the four can be dealt with summarily. Yes, they were young, in
their teens, but they only allege that Moore hugged and kissed them,
nothing more. Further, these girls, or some of them, had the consent of
their parents to date Moore. These three in no way should even be called
“accusers.” They are just telling some innocent reminiscences.

The fourth lady, Leigh Corfman, says that Moore took off some of their
clothes, but did not engage in sex. She asked him to take her home, and
he did. None of this is a crime, even if it happened. But did it?

According to the records, the accuser has been divorced three times, has
declared bankruptcy more than once, and has accused three ministers of
sexual abuse.

Now, who are you going to believe? The respected gentleman lawyer in the
small town where “everyone knows everyone,” or this lady with this rough
biography? This story has not sold well, so Moore’s enemies have doubled
down. And in doing so they have shot themselves in the foot. They have
produced a story so preposterous that Moore’s supporters should vote them
a resolution of thanks. Here is their story:

Gloria Allred, the feminist lawyer who champions transgender females, and
who frequently pummels Trump, found, or had sent to her, one 57-year-old
lady by name of Beverly Young Nelson. Allred brought her to New York --
at what expense and by whom paid unknown -- and before a dozen
microphones, with Allred beside her with her arm around her, she told a
fabulous story about Moore. She says that one night as she left the
restaurant where she worked, Moore offered to take her home, and as soon
as she got in the car he swung around to the back of the restaurant,
stopped, and immediately attacked her by groping and squeezing her neck.
He then put her out of the car. Now, let’s just stop right here for a
moment.

Is this the way a sane, intelligent man, with no record of violence, nor
even any misdemeanor, goes about winning the favor of a girl? And a few
questions for Ms. Nelson flood the mind. She alleges that this happened
40 years ago. She says that she’s still traumatized today by the memory
of this horrible act. Why would that be? If it did happen as she alleges,
it would amount to no more than a man getting fresh with her. She could
have screamed if necessary, and probably been heard by some in the
restaurant, or she could simply have walked around to the front of the
restaurant and gone in. She was not harmed, so why would a stable lady of
57 years be in emotional trauma after so long a time? The YouTube video
of this press conference is well worth viewing. Here is the pitiful Ms.
Nelson, oh, so much in pain, dabbing the tears in her eyes with a tissue,
convincing perhaps to the naïve or unobservant. But where were the tears?
Not one was visible.

On the very face of it we can see that this is a puerile farce. But there
is much more. The Still Report has done an excellent job in analyzing
this claim. I will just mention one of his seven points, then hand you
off to his video for the others.

Allred exhibited an old high-school annual of Ms. Nelson’s, which
purports to contain a glowing inscription written by Judge Moore. But the
writing was in two different color inks, and was written by two different
people. The Still Report is devastating, and you must see the whole
thing.

In sum, by frantically trying to defend their case, the malevolent
persons have sailed far out from shore into turbulent water, and are
likely to suffer their ruin.

The most disappointing aspect of this case, for me and other
conservatives of my kind, is the judgmental behavior of Senator Richard
Shelby and Attorney General Jeff Sessions, heretofore admired sons of
Alabama. Both have abandoned Moore, our duly nominated Republican
candidate for the Senate, and joined forces with the infamous Gloria
Allred. I can only hypothesize that, through their years in Washington,
they have been captured by the enemy, and now are exhibiting the well-
known symptoms of Stockholm Syndrome.

My longtime friend, and the man who is my congressman, Mo Brooks,
deserves special accolades. He alone among the Alabama congressional
delegation has resisted the blitzkrieg of Democrats and Republicans
accepting the accusations of the infamous Gloria Allred, and pronouncing
judgement without any considering of the facts. Bless him!

Source: http://bit.ly/2AbCKJ0
--
"The Marxists, communists and fascists of the Democrat Party have
launched a strategy of deception, projection, and a new generation of
brown shirts who fanatically believe that their violence is honorable,
and necessary, to save America from some kind of a Fourth Reich
perpetrated by the GOP." (Douglas Gibbs )
Creepy A. L.
2017-11-28 00:17:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by jap
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Salty Stan
Post by Repugs a tad desperate
Post by Joe Cooper
The belated attempt by the left to cover their hypocrisy on sexual
predators by throwing Bill and Hillary Clinton under the bus now
that they have no further political use for them is staggering.
- cut -
When you deplorables [sic] have to reach back 20 years,
Like Democrats are reaching back 20 years for Judge Moore?
"Democrats" aren't reaching anywhere regarding Moore. *Nine*
different women - there will be more, you may be certain - have come
forward lately to state that Moore molested them,
Allegedly 40 years ago.
Never happened.
Post by jap
Long past the statute of limitations. If it was so horrible, why did they
not report it then? Why did they not tell their parents? Why didn't they
write it down? Why didn't they tell a friend? Why are all the accusers
democrats?
Leopards don't change their spots. Where are all the women he assaulted
since then? Why haven't they come forward?
The Bill Clinton victims came forward and Hillary, armed with the
media and DNC went after them.
Post by jap
At least one piece of "evidence" is an obvious forgery and the accuser's
own kin call her a bald-faced liar.
The mall incident never happened.
The sporting event incident never happened.
Every single accuser so far has been a lefty weirdo with an axe to grind.
The funniest part of this is how many REAL democrat perverts got caught up
in it and they're the ones who started it.
Yeah they want Moore to quit in the face of zero evidence, while
Franken with photos and the other nimrods with settlements and written
apologies (Admissions) stay in office
Scout
2017-11-28 00:16:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by jap
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Salty Stan
Post by Repugs a tad desperate
Post by Joe Cooper
The belated attempt by the left to cover their hypocrisy on sexual
predators by throwing Bill and Hillary Clinton under the bus now
that they have no further political use for them is staggering.
- cut -
When you deplorables [sic] have to reach back 20 years,
Like Democrats are reaching back 20 years for Judge Moore?
"Democrats" aren't reaching anywhere regarding Moore. *Nine*
different women - there will be more, you may be certain - have come
forward lately to state that Moore molested them,
Allegedly 40 years ago.
Further, I note that the news is now stating that Gloria Allred's
assertions, which have been asserted by liberals as the most creditable,
have been proven to be false because the details she gave fails to match
reality.

https://www.americanewshub.com/2017/11/22/every-detail-gloria-allreds-attack-roy-moore-now-debunked-calls-arrest-continue-grow/

Yep, people like Rudy, and his sock puppet General Swill, swallowed the
unsupported accusations hook, line, and sinker.

He never asked or even considered if the allegations might by less than
utterly factual......and now he's got egg all over his face.

I will note that as the left tries to weaponize such accusations, actual
victims of rape are being hurt because people are far less likely to believe
them enough to even consider investigating.
Salty Stan
2017-11-27 13:59:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Salty Stan
Post by Repugs a tad desperate
Post by Joe Cooper
The belated attempt by the left to cover their hypocrisy on sexual
predators by throwing Bill and Hillary Clinton under the bus now that they
have no further political use for them is staggering.
- cut -
When you deplorables [sic] have to reach back 20 years,
Like Democrats are reaching back 20 years for Judge Moore?
"Democrats" aren't reaching anywhere regarding Moore. *Nine* different
women - there will be more, you may be certain - have come forward
lately to state that Moore molested them, attempted to rape them, or
made other unwanted and *wrong* advances on them when they were minors
and he was in his 30s.
You drooling right-wingnut cocksuckers who keep sputtering "b-b-but what
about Bill?" and who stupidly accuse the media of "ignoring" the
accusations against Bill Clinton are simply too stupid to realize that
*LOTS* of Democrats are saying - publicly, in the mainstream media -
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/15/us/politics/bill-clinton-sexual-misconduct-debate.html?_r=0
The cultural conversation about women, power and sexual misconduct
that has consumed the United States in recent weeks has now raised a
question that is eagerly promoted by those on the political right
just as it discomfits those on the political left: What about Bill?
While Fox News and other conservative outlets revive years-old
charges against Mr. Clinton to accuse Mr. Moore’s critics of
hypocrisy, some liberals say it may be time to rethink their defense
of the 42nd president.
Matthew Yglesias, a liberal blogger who once worked at the Center for
American Progress, a pillar of the Clinton political world, wrote on
Vox.com on Wednesday that “I think we got it wrong” by defending Mr.
Clinton in the 1990s and that he should have resigned. Chris Hayes,
the liberal MSNBC host, said on Twitter that “Democrats and the
center left are overdue for a real reckoning with the allegations
against him.”
Caitlin Flanagan, a social critic who calls herself a “lifelong
Democrat, an enemy of machine feminism and a sexual assault
survivor,” wrote on The Atlantic’s website that “the Democratic Party
needs to make its own reckoning of the way it protected Bill
Clinton.” Michelle Goldberg wrote a New York Times column headlined,
“I Believe Juanita.” David Rothkopf, a former Clinton administration
official, said Monica S. Lewinsky “deserves an apology from many of
us she has never received.”
You stupid drooling lowbrow fat fucks really do owe it to America to
kill yourselves. You are always wrong.
The left is milking this for all that it's worth. But I'm not defending Moore, my point it that while Democrats are up in arms about allegations against Morrow while at the same time give Bill Clinton a free pass.

Do you know what the word "hypocrisy" means?
Rudy Canoza
2017-11-27 16:27:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by Salty Stan
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Salty Stan
Post by Repugs a tad desperate
Post by Joe Cooper
The belated attempt by the left to cover their hypocrisy on sexual
predators by throwing Bill and Hillary Clinton under the bus now that they
have no further political use for them is staggering.
- cut -
When you deplorables [sic] have to reach back 20 years,
Like Democrats are reaching back 20 years for Judge Moore?
"Democrats" aren't reaching anywhere regarding Moore. *Nine* different
women - there will be more, you may be certain - have come forward
lately to state that Moore molested them, attempted to rape them, or
made other unwanted and *wrong* advances on them when they were minors
and he was in his 30s.
You drooling right-wingnut cocksuckers who keep sputtering "b-b-but what
about Bill?" and who stupidly accuse the media of "ignoring" the
accusations against Bill Clinton are simply too stupid to realize that
*LOTS* of Democrats are saying - publicly, in the mainstream media -
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/15/us/politics/bill-clinton-sexual-misconduct-debate.html?_r=0
The cultural conversation about women, power and sexual misconduct
that has consumed the United States in recent weeks has now raised a
question that is eagerly promoted by those on the political right
just as it discomfits those on the political left: What about Bill?
While Fox News and other conservative outlets revive years-old
charges against Mr. Clinton to accuse Mr. Moore’s critics of
hypocrisy, some liberals say it may be time to rethink their defense
of the 42nd president.
Matthew Yglesias, a liberal blogger who once worked at the Center for
American Progress, a pillar of the Clinton political world, wrote on
Vox.com on Wednesday that “I think we got it wrong” by defending Mr.
Clinton in the 1990s and that he should have resigned. Chris Hayes,
the liberal MSNBC host, said on Twitter that “Democrats and the
center left are overdue for a real reckoning with the allegations
against him.”
Caitlin Flanagan, a social critic who calls herself a “lifelong
Democrat, an enemy of machine feminism and a sexual assault
survivor,” wrote on The Atlantic’s website that “the Democratic Party
needs to make its own reckoning of the way it protected Bill
Clinton.” Michelle Goldberg wrote a New York Times column headlined,
“I Believe Juanita.” David Rothkopf, a former Clinton administration
official, said Monica S. Lewinsky “deserves an apology from many of
us she has never received.”
You stupid drooling lowbrow fat fucks really do owe it to America to
kill yourselves. You are always wrong.
The left is milking this for all that it's worth.
Bullshit. *Republicans* don't want Moore to stay in the race. Between
what that fucking cocksucker Trump has done to Republican prospects and
what the election of Moore will do to them in 2018, they're falling
apart at the seams.
Post by Salty Stan
But I'm not defending Moore,
Like fuck you're not, you rancid cunt.
Wile E. Coyote
2017-11-29 17:08:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rudy Canoza
"Democrats" aren't reaching anywhere regarding Moore. *Nine* different
women - there will be more, you may be certain - have come forward
lately to state that Moore molested them, attempted to rape them, or
made other unwanted and *wrong* advances on them when they were minors
and he was in his 30s.
Nmae the 9 women scumbag.

Allred won't release the yearbook for forensic testing.

The mall ban story has been discredited.

The other bitch has so many issues it is sad. Moore helped her mom take her
son away becuase whe was an unfit, boozing, fraud committing ho.

What else you got you filthy piece of shit?
--
It's time for the students to step up their game and kill people like
Coulter.

Siri Cruise <***@yahoo.com> April 25, 2017
Rudy Canoza
2017-11-29 19:45:55 UTC
Permalink
"Wiley" - just fucking hilarious!
Post by Wile E. Coyote
Post by Rudy Canoza
"Democrats" aren't reaching anywhere regarding Moore. *Nine* different
women - there will be more, you may be certain - have come forward
lately to state that Moore molested them, attempted to rape them, or
made other unwanted and *wrong* advances on them when they were minors
and he was in his 30s.
Nmae the 9 women scumbag.
http://time.com/5029172/roy-moore-accusers/
Post by Wile E. Coyote
Allred won't release the yearbook for forensic testing.
Fuck off. The Moore autograph is legitimate.
Post by Wile E. Coyote
The mall ban story has been discredited.
No, it hasn't, you fucking squat-to-piss no-fight little rancid cunt,
"Wiley". Fuck off, bitch.
John Milner
2017-11-29 23:14:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rudy Canoza
Fuck off, bitch.
ESAD you sick little failed home appraiser fuckwit.

40 years later it just happens to become a big deal?

It never surfaced when his 10 Commandments monument was in play some
years back, now did it liar?

You and your fellow traveler DNC hacks are going DOWN!
Fred Oinka
2017-11-26 04:10:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by Repugs a tad desperate
Post by Joe Cooper
The belated attempt by the left to cover their hypocrisy on sexual
predators by throwing Bill and Hillary Clinton under the bus now that they
have no further political use for them is staggering.
- cut -
When you deplorables have to reach back 20 years, 3 presidencies, & overlook the lives lost under the Bush administration
Deflect much, dipshit?
Creepy A. L.
2017-11-26 19:33:17 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 25 Nov 2017 16:20:21 -0000 (UTC), Joe Cooper
Post by Joe Cooper
The belated attempt by the left to cover their hypocrisy on sexual
predators by throwing Bill and Hillary Clinton under the bus now that they
have no further political use for them is staggering. They forget their
mantra that his being serviced by Monica Lewinsky in the Oval Office was
personal and didn’t matter as long as he was doing a good job as President.
It was the GOP, you know, that was waging a war on women.
Republicans were the predators, as serial accuser and so-called feminist
lawyer Gloria Allred reminded us when she appeared with a box of tissue and
victims to accuse GOP candidates Herman Cain, Donald Trump and, now, Judge
Roy Moore, She is not going to be found at a press conference with the
victims of Sen. Bob Menendez, Sen. Al Franken, and Rep. John Conyers.
The “right on the issues” defense does not apply to Republicans like Judge
Roy Moore, nor does presumption of innocence. Democratic hypocrites rushed
to condemn Moore faster than you can say “Anthony Weiner.” Franken,
Menendez, and Conyers are right on the issues, which may be why the chorus
for their unseating is, to say the least, somewhat muted. Judge Moore has
been accused of dallying with underage girls, which is a charge his
accusers are mysteriously not bringing up against Bill Clinton, a frequent
passenger on the jet of accused pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. As noted by the
Former President Bill Clinton continues to remain silent about the 26
flights he took aboard convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein’s private
jet, dubbed the “Lolita Express,” which reportedly offered underage girls
to passengers to rape.
Fox News wrote in 2016 that the Lolita Express, a Boeing 727 jet, was
“reportedly outfitted with a bed where passengers had group sex with young
girls.”
Clinton flew on some trips where the flight logs showed only the first
names of female passengers…
Clinton traveled aboard the “Lolita Express” with a soft core porn actress
and traveled on 11 flights with Epstein’s assistant Sarah Kellen, who
allegedly procured underage girls for men, according to Gawker.
Gawker reported Kellam was “accused in court filings of acting as pimps for
him (Epstein), recruiting and grooming young girls into their network of
child sex workers, and frequently participating in sex acts with them.”
[/Daily Caller]
Bill Clinton had a habit of ditching his Secret Service protection when
[Washington Times]
Fox News reported Friday that records show Mr. Clinton declined Secret
Service protection on at least five flights.
The network’s investigation reveals Mr. Clinton flew on the Boeing 727
“Lolita Express” 26 times, more than doubling the previously reported 11
trips.
“Bill Clinton… associated with a man like Jeffrey Epstein, who everyone in
New York, certainly within his inner circles, knew was a pedophile. Why
would a former president associate with a man like that?” said Conchita
Sarnoff of the Washington, D.C.-based nonprofit Alliance to Rescue Victims
of Trafficking, Fox reported. Ms. Conchita also authored a book on Mr.
Epstein titled “TrafficKing.”
Mr. Epstein was arrested in 2005 and signed a plea agreement in 2007 with
the U.S. Attorney’s Office, accepting a single charge of soliciting
prostitution. He agreed to a 30-month sentence, registered as a “Tier 1”
sex offender with the U.S. Virgin Islands and paid dozens of young girls
under a federal statute providing for compensation to victims of child
sexual abuse.
A Clinton spokesperson did not return the network’s emails requesting
comment. Martin Weinberg, Mr. Epstein’s attorney, declined multiple
inquiries into the flights.
[/Washington Times]
It is not known how many times Bill Clinton had his seat and tray table in
the upright and locked position when flying with Jeffrey Epstein or whether
their conversations revolved around golf and grandchildren. It is not known
why Clinton flew so many times with a child sex predator. Given Bill
Clinton’s track record and Epstein’s expertise on procurement, one doubts
it was to solicit donations to the Clinton Foundation. As a Fox News report
Epstein, who counts among his pals royal figures, heads of state,
celebrities and fellow billionaires, spent 13 months in prison and home
detention for solicitation and procurement of minors for prostitution. He
allegedly had a team of traffickers who procured girls as young as 12 to
service his friends on “Orgy Island,” an estate on Epstein's 72-acre
island, called Little St. James, in the U.S. Virgin Islands….
Official flight logs filed with the Federal Aviation Administration show
Clinton traveled on some of the trips with as many as 10 U.S. Secret
Service agents. However, on a five-leg Asia trip between May 22 and May 25,
2002, not a single Secret Service agent is listed. The U.S. Secret Service
has declined to answer multiple Freedom of Information Act requests filed
by FoxNews.com seeking information on these trips. Clinton would have been
required to file a form to dismiss the agent detail, a former Secret
Service agent told FoxNews.com.
In response to a separate FOIA request from FoxNews.com, the U.S. Secret
Service said it has no records showing agents were ever on the island with
Clinton.
[/Fox News]
One can only suppose that this was a lot more fun than talking to AD
Loretta Lynch on the tarmac. There is more to chew on here than Roy Moore’s
stalking at a restaurant he says he never ate at or a mall the manager says
he was never banned from. Yet even as liberals engage in Clinton coverage
mea culpas, this is strangely not brought up.
It deserves to be brought up. “There is a special place in hell for people
who prey on children,” Ivanka Trump recently told the AP. The same could be
said of William Jefferson Clinton.
Source: http://bit.ly/2A4AuUt
Interesting how Democrat pedophiles and homosexual perverts get a pass
from the hypocratic mass media.

Bill Clinton should have been meathooked through his anus and hung up
for rape years ago.
Richard Clayton Webber
2017-11-26 19:40:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by Creepy A. L.
On Sat, 25 Nov 2017 16:20:21 -0000 (UTC), Joe Cooper
Post by Joe Cooper
The belated attempt by the left to cover their hypocrisy on sexual
predators by throwing Bill and Hillary Clinton under the bus now that they
have no further political use for them is staggering. They forget their
mantra that his being serviced by Monica Lewinsky in the Oval Office was
personal and didn’t matter as long as he was doing a good job as President.
It was the GOP, you know, that was waging a war on women.
Republicans were the predators, as serial accuser and so-called feminist
lawyer Gloria Allred reminded us when she appeared with a box of tissue and
victims to accuse GOP candidates Herman Cain, Donald Trump and, now, Judge
Roy Moore, She is not going to be found at a press conference with the
victims of Sen. Bob Menendez, Sen. Al Franken, and Rep. John Conyers.
The “right on the issues” defense does not apply to Republicans like Judge
Roy Moore, nor does presumption of innocence. Democratic hypocrites rushed
to condemn Moore faster than you can say “Anthony Weiner.” Franken,
Menendez, and Conyers are right on the issues, which may be why the chorus
for their unseating is, to say the least, somewhat muted. Judge Moore has
been accused of dallying with underage girls, which is a charge his
accusers are mysteriously not bringing up against Bill Clinton, a frequent
passenger on the jet of accused pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. As noted by the
Former President Bill Clinton continues to remain silent about the 26
flights he took aboard convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein’s private
jet, dubbed the “Lolita Express,” which reportedly offered underage girls
to passengers to rape.
Fox News wrote in 2016 that the Lolita Express, a Boeing 727 jet, was
“reportedly outfitted with a bed where passengers had group sex with young
girls.”
Clinton flew on some trips where the flight logs showed only the first
names of female passengers…
Clinton traveled aboard the “Lolita Express” with a soft core porn actress
and traveled on 11 flights with Epstein’s assistant Sarah Kellen, who
allegedly procured underage girls for men, according to Gawker.
Gawker reported Kellam was “accused in court filings of acting as pimps for
him (Epstein), recruiting and grooming young girls into their network of
child sex workers, and frequently participating in sex acts with them.”
[/Daily Caller]
Bill Clinton had a habit of ditching his Secret Service protection when
[Washington Times]
Fox News reported Friday that records show Mr. Clinton declined Secret
Service protection on at least five flights.
The network’s investigation reveals Mr. Clinton flew on the Boeing 727
“Lolita Express” 26 times, more than doubling the previously reported 11
trips.
“Bill Clinton… associated with a man like Jeffrey Epstein, who everyone in
New York, certainly within his inner circles, knew was a pedophile. Why
would a former president associate with a man like that?” said Conchita
Sarnoff of the Washington, D.C.-based nonprofit Alliance to Rescue Victims
of Trafficking, Fox reported. Ms. Conchita also authored a book on Mr.
Epstein titled “TrafficKing.”
Mr. Epstein was arrested in 2005 and signed a plea agreement in 2007 with
the U.S. Attorney’s Office, accepting a single charge of soliciting
prostitution. He agreed to a 30-month sentence, registered as a “Tier 1”
sex offender with the U.S. Virgin Islands and paid dozens of young girls
under a federal statute providing for compensation to victims of child
sexual abuse.
A Clinton spokesperson did not return the network’s emails requesting
comment. Martin Weinberg, Mr. Epstein’s attorney, declined multiple
inquiries into the flights.
[/Washington Times]
It is not known how many times Bill Clinton had his seat and tray table in
the upright and locked position when flying with Jeffrey Epstein or whether
their conversations revolved around golf and grandchildren. It is not known
why Clinton flew so many times with a child sex predator. Given Bill
Clinton’s track record and Epstein’s expertise on procurement, one doubts
it was to solicit donations to the Clinton Foundation. As a Fox News report
Epstein, who counts among his pals royal figures, heads of state,
celebrities and fellow billionaires, spent 13 months in prison and home
detention for solicitation and procurement of minors for prostitution. He
allegedly had a team of traffickers who procured girls as young as 12 to
service his friends on “Orgy Island,” an estate on Epstein's 72-acre
island, called Little St. James, in the U.S. Virgin Islands….
Official flight logs filed with the Federal Aviation Administration show
Clinton traveled on some of the trips with as many as 10 U.S. Secret
Service agents. However, on a five-leg Asia trip between May 22 and May 25,
2002, not a single Secret Service agent is listed. The U.S. Secret Service
has declined to answer multiple Freedom of Information Act requests filed
by FoxNews.com seeking information on these trips. Clinton would have been
required to file a form to dismiss the agent detail, a former Secret
Service agent told FoxNews.com.
In response to a separate FOIA request from FoxNews.com, the U.S. Secret
Service said it has no records showing agents were ever on the island with
Clinton.
[/Fox News]
One can only suppose that this was a lot more fun than talking to AD
Loretta Lynch on the tarmac. There is more to chew on here than Roy Moore’s
stalking at a restaurant he says he never ate at or a mall the manager says
he was never banned from. Yet even as liberals engage in Clinton coverage
mea culpas, this is strangely not brought up.
It deserves to be brought up. “There is a special place in hell for people
who prey on children,” Ivanka Trump recently told the AP. The same could be
said of William Jefferson Clinton.
Source: http://bit.ly/2A4AuUt
Interesting how Democrat pedophiles and homosexual perverts get a pass
from the hypocratic mass media.
They don't.
Siri Cruise
2017-11-26 21:26:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by Creepy A. L.
Interesting how Democrat pedophiles and homosexual perverts get a pass
Anyone else visitting Epstein you forgot to mention?
--
:-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
I'm saving up to buy the Donald a blue stone This post / \
from Metebelis 3. All praise the Great Don! insults Islam. Mohammed
#BeamMeUpScotty
2017-11-27 05:56:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by Creepy A. L.
Interesting how Democrat pedophiles and homosexual perverts get a pass
Anyone else visitting Epstein you forgot to mention?
Hillary made a visit....
--
That's Karma


*Rumination*
1161 - A paradox... you have to be able to use your brain to coherently
understand, explain and express your failures. Liberals aren't smart
enough to know that they're a failure?

Hillary still thinks she won.
Joe Cooper
2017-11-27 15:06:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by #BeamMeUpScotty
Hillary made a visit....
Kevin Kostner
--
"The Marxists, communists and fascists of the Democrat Party have launched
a strategy of deception, projection, and a new generation of brown shirts
who fanatically believe that their violence is honorable, and necessary, to
save America from some kind of a Fourth Reich perpetrated by the GOP."
(Douglas Gibbs )
Creepy A. L.
2017-11-28 00:04:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by Creepy A. L.
Interesting how Democrat pedophiles and homosexual perverts get a pass
Anyone else visitting Epstein you forgot to mention?
Now that you mention it, let's give an honorable mention to David
Epstein, formerly of Columbia U. You know, where Obama claimed to
attend?

Ivy League professor charged with incest after 'three-year sexual
relationship with his daughter'

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1337416/David-Epstein-Ivy-League-professor-charged-incest-relationship-daughter.html

You remember David don't you?

He was the pious prof who regularly pilloried Sarah Palin on his blog
- that instantly vanished when he got caught dipping his dick in his
daughter.

He did plead guilty to "attempted incest" because his daughter refused
to testify against him. The authorities had whole piles of pictures
and texts between the two when they were busting nuts for each other.

Interesting how all these "*steins" are such detestable perverts and
rabid democrats.
Continue reading on narkive:
Loading...