Discussion:
NASA NOAA Future Modeling - LOL
(too old to reply)
AlleyCat
2020-01-16 01:09:13 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 15 Jan 2020 16:47:51 -0600, Unum says...
NASA and NOAA... future
NASA NOAA future

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Is this the SAME NOAA and NASA who:

"Made Efforts To Discredit Their OWN Satellite Data"

"Corrected Historical Temperature Data And Fabricated Temperature Data"

"Refused To Give Data And Information Requested By The US House Of
Representatives Science, Space And Technology Committee"

"Caught In Climate Data Manipulation"

"Dramatically Altered US Temperatures After The Year 2000"

"Had Spectacularly Poor Climate Science"

"Mislead, Deceive and Lie About 'Hottest Year' Claim - And Had to Concede
that 2014 was NOT "Hottest Year"

"Climate Fraud: Recent Global Warming "Corrections" Equal a +95.0°C Per Century
Trend"

https://www.google.com/#newwindow=1&q=noaa+nasa+caught

Basement boy BEGS for attention, every day.
AlleyCat
2020-01-16 01:11:49 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 15 Jan 2020 15:42:29 -0800 (PST), Kym Horsell says...
You need something MUCH stronger than valium.
And YOU would be the expert.

Maybe THAT'S why you talk like a drunken bogan all the time?

Here... I'll boganize it for you, so you can understand me.

Mebbe DAT'S wha yoo tawk lahk uh drenkun bogan awl de tahm?
--
Australia's Weather Bureau Caught "Tweaking" Temperature Numbers
https://www.spartareport.com/2017/08/australias-weather-bureau-caught-tweaking-
temperature-numbers/

Australia Weather Bureau Caught Tampering With Climate Numbers
https://dailycaller.com/2017/07/31/australia-weather-bureau-caught-tampering-
with-climate-numbers/

Australia Weather Bureau Caught Tampering With Climate Numbers
https://www.cfact.org/2017/08/01/australiaw-weather-bureau-caught-tampering-
with-climate-numbers/

Australia Weather Bureau Caught Tampering With Climate Numbers
https://www.climatedepot.com/2017/07/31/australia-weather-bureau-caught-
tampering-with-climate-numbers/

Australia Weather Bureau Caught Tampering With Climate Numbers
https://climatechangedispatch.com/australia-weather-bureau-caught-tampering-
with-climate-numbers/

Australia Weather Bureau Caught Tampering With Climate Numbers
https://mothernature.com/2017/08/australia-weather-bureau-caught-tampering-
with-climate-numbers/

Australia Weather Bureau Caught Tampering With Climate Numbers
https://www.weaselzippers.us/351411-australia-weather-bureau-caught-tampering-
with-climate-numbers/

Australia Weather Bureau Caught Tampering With Climate Numbers
https://www.discussionist.com/10151423481

Australia Weather Bureau Caught Tampering With Climate Numbers
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread1180653/pg1

Tsk Tsk... bogans (Hillbilly Australians) never learn
super70s
2020-01-16 09:56:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
Australia's Weather Bureau Caught "Tweaking" Temperature Numbers
https://www.spartareport.com/2017/08/australias-weather-bureau-caught-tweaking
temperature-numbers/
Australia Weather Bureau Caught Tampering With Climate Numbers
https://dailycaller.com/2017/07/31/australia-weather-bureau-caught-tampering-
with-climate-numbers/
Australia Weather Bureau Caught Tampering With Climate Numbers
https://www.cfact.org/2017/08/01/australiaw-weather-bureau-caught-tampering-
with-climate-numbers/
Australia Weather Bureau Caught Tampering With Climate Numbers
https://www.climatedepot.com/2017/07/31/australia-weather-bureau-caught-
tampering-with-climate-numbers/
Australia Weather Bureau Caught Tampering With Climate Numbers
https://climatechangedispatch.com/australia-weather-bureau-caught-tampering-
with-climate-numbers/
Australia Weather Bureau Caught Tampering With Climate Numbers
https://mothernature.com/2017/08/australia-weather-bureau-caught-tampering-
with-climate-numbers/
Australia Weather Bureau Caught Tampering With Climate Numbers
https://www.weaselzippers.us/351411-australia-weather-bureau-caught-tampering-
with-climate-numbers/
Australia Weather Bureau Caught Tampering With Climate Numbers
https://www.discussionist.com/10151423481
Australia Weather Bureau Caught Tampering With Climate Numbers
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread1180653/pg1
You post URLs for the same cut 'n' paste post from 14 right-wing nutjob
sites and think you've made some devastating point.

What a maroon.
Unum
2020-01-16 16:51:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by super70s
Post by AlleyCat
Australia's Weather Bureau Caught "Tweaking" Temperature Numbers
https://www.spartareport.com/2017/08/australias-weather-bureau-caught-tweaking
temperature-numbers/
Australia Weather Bureau Caught Tampering With Climate Numbers
https://dailycaller.com/2017/07/31/australia-weather-bureau-caught-tampering-
with-climate-numbers/
Australia Weather Bureau Caught Tampering With Climate Numbers
https://www.cfact.org/2017/08/01/australiaw-weather-bureau-caught-tampering-
with-climate-numbers/
Australia Weather Bureau Caught Tampering With Climate Numbers
https://www.climatedepot.com/2017/07/31/australia-weather-bureau-caught-
tampering-with-climate-numbers/
Australia Weather Bureau Caught Tampering With Climate Numbers
https://climatechangedispatch.com/australia-weather-bureau-caught-tampering-
with-climate-numbers/
Australia Weather Bureau Caught Tampering With Climate Numbers
https://mothernature.com/2017/08/australia-weather-bureau-caught-tampering-
with-climate-numbers/
Australia Weather Bureau Caught Tampering With Climate Numbers
https://www.weaselzippers.us/351411-australia-weather-bureau-caught-tampering-
with-climate-numbers/
Australia Weather Bureau Caught Tampering With Climate Numbers
https://www.discussionist.com/10151423481
Australia Weather Bureau Caught Tampering With Climate Numbers
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread1180653/pg1
You post URLs for the same cut 'n' paste post from 14 right-wing nutjob
sites and think you've made some devastating point.
What a maroon.
And ratboy didn't even read the article, which clearly explains that
there wasn't any tampering. Hilarious!

“The bureau’s quality ­control system, designed to filter out spurious low or
high values was set at minus 10 minimum for Goulburn which is why the record
automatically adjusted,” a bureau spokeswoman told reporters
Rudy Canoza
2020-01-16 17:21:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by Unum
Post by super70s
Post by AlleyCat
Australia's Weather Bureau Caught "Tweaking" Temperature Numbers
https://www.spartareport.com/2017/08/australias-weather-bureau-caught-tweaking
temperature-numbers/
Australia Weather Bureau Caught Tampering With Climate Numbers
https://dailycaller.com/2017/07/31/australia-weather-bureau-caught-tampering-
with-climate-numbers/
Australia Weather Bureau Caught Tampering With Climate Numbers
https://www.cfact.org/2017/08/01/australiaw-weather-bureau-caught-tampering-
with-climate-numbers/
Australia Weather Bureau Caught Tampering With Climate Numbers
https://www.climatedepot.com/2017/07/31/australia-weather-bureau-caught-
tampering-with-climate-numbers/
Australia Weather Bureau Caught Tampering With Climate Numbers
https://climatechangedispatch.com/australia-weather-bureau-caught-tampering-
with-climate-numbers/
Australia Weather Bureau Caught Tampering With Climate Numbers
https://mothernature.com/2017/08/australia-weather-bureau-caught-tampering-
with-climate-numbers/
Australia Weather Bureau Caught Tampering With Climate Numbers
https://www.weaselzippers.us/351411-australia-weather-bureau-caught-tampering-
with-climate-numbers/
Australia Weather Bureau Caught Tampering With Climate Numbers
https://www.discussionist.com/10151423481
Australia Weather Bureau Caught Tampering With Climate Numbers
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread1180653/pg1
You post URLs for the same cut 'n' paste post from 14 right-wing nutjob
sites and think you've made some devastating point.
What a maroon.
And ratboy didn't even read the article, which clearly explains that
there wasn't any tampering. Hilarious!
“The bureau’s quality ­control system, designed to filter out spurious low or
high values was set at minus 10 minimum for Goulburn which is why the record
automatically adjusted,” a bureau spokeswoman told reporters
This is the classic pattern for climate change deniers. They don't know
climate science, and they don't know anyone who knows it. Instead, they
get their lies from right-wingnut lie sites that are infested with equally
ignorant liars like themselves, but who just happen to know how to slop
together a web site, which AlleyPussyBitch doesn't know how to do.

The other thing about this kind of lie site (and they exist on the left,
too, but far more prevalent on the right) is that, as you noted, they all
have the same, uncredited material on them. "wnd" repeats "breitbart"
which repeats "infowars" which repeats "gatewaypundit," eventually coming
back to "wnd."

This reminds me of two great passages from "Catch-22," the greatest
anti-war book ever. The first is at the "action board" hearing for Cadet
Clevinger, Yossarian's too-earnest and naïve pal. The red-faced bellowing
colonel has just been bawling Clevinger out and threatening to tear him
limb from limb, and the toady Major Metcalf jumps in:

"Do it! Do it!" cried Major Metcalf.

"Metcalf, you stinking son of a bitch. Didn't I tell you to keep you
stinking, cowardly, stupid mouth shut?"

"Yes, sir. I'm sorry sir."

"Then suppose you do it."

"I was only trying to learn, sir. The only way a person can learn is by
trying."

"Who says so?"

"Everybody says so, sir. Even Lieutenant Scheisskopf says so."

"Do you say so?"

"Yes, sir," said Lieutenant Scheisskopf. "But everybody says so."


And this is what the right-wingnut shitbags like ratboy do: he sees one
right-wingnut lie site after another saying the same thing, not realizing
they all pass it around, and he thinks it's a consensus because "everybody
says so."

The other passage is when Yossarian aborts a bombing mission (he doesn't
want to fly any more missions) by causing a panic. He says into the
intercom, "What's wrong with the plane?" There's nothing wrong with the
plane, of course, but other crew members, including the pilot, Kid Sampson,
believe there is, and they start shrieking, "What's wrong with the plane?"
It comes back to Yossarian, who now succumbs to the panic *he* started, and
he shrieks, "Is something wrong with the plane?" The pilot turns back to
the base.

The right-wingnuts *here*, too stupid all of them to create a web site
where they can parrot lies from one another, mutually reinforce their own
stupidity.
AlleyCat
2020-01-16 18:50:28 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 03:56:43 -0600, super70s says...
Post by super70s
Post by AlleyCat
Australia's Weather Bureau Caught "Tweaking" Temperature Numbers
https://www.spartareport.com/2017/08/australias-weather-bureau-caught-tweaking
temperature-numbers/
Australia Weather Bureau Caught Tampering With Climate Numbers
https://dailycaller.com/2017/07/31/australia-weather-bureau-caught-tampering-
with-climate-numbers/
Australia Weather Bureau Caught Tampering With Climate Numbers
https://www.cfact.org/2017/08/01/australiaw-weather-bureau-caught-tampering-
with-climate-numbers/
Australia Weather Bureau Caught Tampering With Climate Numbers
https://www.climatedepot.com/2017/07/31/australia-weather-bureau-caught-
tampering-with-climate-numbers/
Australia Weather Bureau Caught Tampering With Climate Numbers
https://climatechangedispatch.com/australia-weather-bureau-caught-tampering-
with-climate-numbers/
Australia Weather Bureau Caught Tampering With Climate Numbers
https://mothernature.com/2017/08/australia-weather-bureau-caught-tampering-
with-climate-numbers/
Australia Weather Bureau Caught Tampering With Climate Numbers
https://www.weaselzippers.us/351411-australia-weather-bureau-caught-tampering-
with-climate-numbers/
Australia Weather Bureau Caught Tampering With Climate Numbers
https://www.discussionist.com/10151423481
Australia Weather Bureau Caught Tampering With Climate Numbers
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread1180653/pg1
You post URLs for the same cut 'n' paste post from 14 right-wing nutjob
sites and think you've made some devastating point.
That's because the left wing nutjob trash sites won't tell the truth about
GW/CC and what weather bureaus and government entities like NASA and The NOAA
are doing to make today's temps look like they're unprecedented, when they are
most definitely not.

The lamestream media won't carry ANYTHING that goes against their agendas of
socialism and anti-capitalism, unless you try to take it away from THEM.

We LEARN from history... you retards and Greta worshipers conveniently
"forget" about it. Disingenuous little lying shits.
Post by super70s
What a maroon.
I'm an ULTRA-Maroon... Bugs told me.

Try these on fer size.


Climate Change Scientists Caught Tampering With Data to Show Rising Sea Levels

"NOAA And NASA Corrected Historical Temperature Data And Fabricated
Temperature Data"

"NASA Made Efforts To Discredit Their Own Satellite Data"

"NASA Refused To Give Data And Information Requested By The US
House Of Representatives Science, Space And Technology Committee"

"NASA And NOAA Caught In Climate Data Manipulation"

"NASA Dramatically Altered US Temperatures After The Year 2000"

"Spectacularly Poor Climate Science At NASA"

"NASA/NOAA Mislead, Deceive and Lie About 'Hottest Year' Claim - Concede
2014 NOT "Hottest Year"

"Climate Fraud: NASA's Recent Global Warming "Corrections" Equal a +95.0°C
Per Century Trend"

https://www.google.com/#newwindow=1&q=noaa+nasa+caught
Unum
2020-01-16 04:42:14 UTC
Permalink
On 1/15/2020 7:09 PM, AlleyCat wrote:

https://www.inverse.com/article/62302-nasa-noaa-2019-climate-report-future

The last decade was the hottest on record, while last year was the second
warmest year recorded since 1880, according to the data. And humans are
driving the trend.

NASA and NOAA each conducted separate analyses, and found the same trends:
Global temperatures in 2019 were the warmest since modern record-keeping began
in 1880.

Every decade since the 1960’s has been warmer than the previous one, Schmidt
said — “and not by a small amount.”

In 2019, temperatures were 1.8 degrees Fahrenheit — or 0.98 degrees Celsius —
warmer than the average temperatures for 1951 to 1980.
AlleyCat
2020-01-16 05:10:36 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 15 Jan 2020 16:47:51 -0600, Unum says...
NASA and NOAA... future
NASA NOAA future

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Is this the SAME NOAA and NASA who:

"Made Efforts To Discredit Their OWN Satellite Data"

"Corrected Historical Temperature Data And Fabricated Temperature Data"

"Refused To Give Data And Information Requested By The US House Of
Representatives Science, Space And Technology Committee"

"Caught In Climate Data Manipulation"

"Dramatically Altered US Temperatures After The Year 2000"

"Had Spectacularly Poor Climate Science"

"Mislead, Deceive and Lie About 'Hottest Year' Claim - And Had to Concede
that 2014 was NOT "Hottest Year"

"Climate Fraud: Recent Global Warming "Corrections" Equal a +95.0°C Per Century
Trend"

https://www.google.com/#newwindow=1&q=noaa+nasa+caught

Basement boy BEGS for attention, every day.
Rudy Canoza
2020-01-16 05:52:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Wed, 15 Jan 2020 16:47:51 -0600, Unum says...
NASA and NOAA... future
NASA NOAA future
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
None of that happened. Every word about NASA & NOAA "faking" data is a lie
- completely debunked.
AlleyCat
2020-01-16 18:49:14 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 15 Jan 2020 21:52:52 -0800, Rudy Canoza says...
Post by Rudy Canoza
None of that happened. Every word about NASA & NOAA "faking" data is a lie
- completely debunked.
By whoM... and cite it, or you're a liar.

Since YOU won't do ANY fucking research, because you KNOW it will debunk your
"completely debunked" bullshit, I'll do it for you.

Poor lonely wittle Wudy.

=====

Top NASA Climate 'Data Fraudster' Named & Shamed

NASA's top climate scientist singled out as architect of the biggest data fraud
of all time. Anti-science con artist Gavin Schmidt is named and shamed for
deliberately falsifying global temperatures since 2000 and DOUBLING the actual
level of warming to fit a political agenda.

Respected climate analyst, Tony Heller, spotted on President Donald Trump's
radar, may have provided the administration with compelling evidence of a
criminal fraud. This would be fitting vindication for Trump who has for years
dismissed man-made global warming as "a hoax."

Heller has been on the attack against Schmidt (director of NASA's Goddard
Institute for Space Studies, which studies the changing atmosphere) since he
took over from former top dog James Hansen who retired in April 2013. Skeptics
believe fellow climate alarmist activist Hansen groomed Schmidt for the job.

But Schmidt has been outspoken about what Trump can do to stop him asserting it
won't be simple for the U.S. president to purge federal climate research during
his tenure. In an interview with Business Insider (Nov. 22 2016) Schmidt said:

"Chopping off science just to prevent people from talking about climate change
won't work. You need science for hazards, for weather forecasting, and climate
comes along for the ride."

But Gavin Schmidt may find he is in the cross hairs and tossed from the climate
gravy train once Trump and his science advisers take a cold, hard look at the
damning evidence Heller presents.

If prosecutors find probable cause then Schmidt could even face federal RICO
charges. This is because he has personally become enriched from climate
policies that have cost taxpayers trillions. Not only Schmidt but a tight-knit
cabal of government researchers have benefited from the alleged scam which
first gained public notoriety after the Climategate email leaks (2009).

Posting a series of telling graphs on his site, realclimatescience.com Heller
concludes:

"There was plenty of data tampering to the temperature record prior to the year
2000, but since the year 2000 the tampering has become very systematic and
cynical. Gavin Schmidt at NASA has more than doubled global warming by altering
his own temperature data since 2000."

Heller's series of graphs (below) allows readers to make up their own minds.

https://i0.wp.com/realclimatescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Screen-
Shot-2017-01-07-at-6.34.28-AM.gif?resize=567%2C360&ssl=1

NASA data

Note the spectacular hockey stick of data tampering since the year 2000.

https://i0.wp.com/realclimatescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Screen-
Shot-2017-01-07-at-6.39.10-AM.gif?ssl=1

This presents a huge problem for Gavin, because satellite temperatures show
little or no warming since the year 2000.

https://i1.wp.com/realclimatescience.com/wp-
content/uploads/2017/01/UAHRSSGISStrend-1.gif?resize=540%2C411&ssl=1

Furthermore, Gavin is continuously tampering with data to make his hockey stick
of temperature fraud even worse. Note the upwards change since before the
election.

https://i1.wp.com/realclimatescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Screen-
Shot-2016-12-17-at-2.29.02-AM.gif?ssl=1

Satellite data from RSS shows earth cooling at the fastest rate on record over
the last ten months This graph shows the current temperature anomaly minus the
anomaly ten months earlier.

https://i0.wp.com/realclimatescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Screen-
Shot-2017-01-04-at-8.25.43-PM.gif?ssl=1

http://data.remss.com/msu/graphics/TLT/time_series/RSS_TS_channel_TLT_Global_La
nd_And_Sea_v03_3.txt

Carl Mears at RSS has come to Gavin's rescue however, by telling people not to
use his lower troposphere data, and instead use his TTT data set which reaches
all the way up to 50,000 feet - where temperatures are about minus 100 degrees.

https://i0.wp.com/realclimatescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Screen-
Shot-2017-01-05-at-9.22.38-PM.gif?ssl=1

http://images.remss.com/papers/rsstech/Jan_5_2017_news_release.pdf

Carl's new TTT data set shows a lot more warming than the lower troposphere
data.

https://i0.wp.com/realclimatescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Screen-
Shot-2017-01-07-at-6.03.27-AM.gif?resize=620%2C397&ssl=1

http://images.remss.com/msu/msu_time_series.html

We see the same systematic hockey stick of data alteration, in an effort to
make satellite data match Gavin's altered temperature data.

https://i0.wp.com/realclimatescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Screen-
Shot-2017-01-07-at-6.59.51-AM.gif?resize=527%2C485&ssl=1

http://data.remss.com/msu/graphics/TTT_v40/time_series/RSS_TS_channel_TTT_Globa
l_Land_And_Sea_v04_0.txt

Are Carl Mears' changes legitimate? A good way to test them is to compare
versus radiosonde data of the troposphere. Unfortunately NOAA has done exactly
the same data tampering to the radiosonde data. Their original radiosonde data
showed only 0.2C warming since 1958, so they altered it to produce 0.8C
warming.

https://realclimatescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Screen-Shot-2017-01-
07-at-7.03.54-AM-768x527.gif

http://cdiac.esd.ornl.gov/ftp/trends/temp/angell/global.dat

ftp://ftp1.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/ratpac/ratpac-a/RATPAC-A-annual-
levels.txt.zip

Once again, we see the same hockey stick of data tampering to bring radiosonde
data in line with Gavin's highly altered temperature data.

https://i1.wp.com/realclimatescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Screen-
Shot-2017-01-07-at-7.04.10-AM.gif?resize=620%2C515&ssl=1

And NOAA has done exactly the same thing with US temperature data. It didn't
match the altered global temperature data, so NOAA altered US temperatures to
make them match fake global temperatures.

https://i1.wp.com/realclimatescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Screen-
Shot-2016-12-28-at-5.45.44-AM-1.gif?resize=602%2C560&ssl=1

ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/ushcn/v2.5/ushcn.tavg.latest.FLs.52j.tar.gz

ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/ushcn/v2.5/ushcn.tavg.latest.raw.tar.gz

Again, we see the same hockey stick of data tampering.

https://i0.wp.com/realclimatescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Screen-
Shot-2016-12-28-at-4.51.42-AM.gif?ssl=1

All of the data sets have been massively tampered with since the year 2000, in
an effort to bring them in line with the tampered NASA data set. And this
doesn't even include the massive tampering done prior to the year 2000 to erase
the 1940's temperature spike, and post-1940's global cooling.

https://i1.wp.com/realclimatescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Screen-
Shot-2016-12-19-at-3.56.00-AM-1.gif?resize=392%2C657&ssl=1

https://www.newspapers.com/image/43605894/?terms=global%2Bcooling%2Bburning%
2Bfossil%2Bfuels

All of this data tampering was committed intentionally, and in collusion
between agencies.

https://i1.wp.com/realclimatescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Screen-
Shot-2017-01-07-at-8.19.23-AM.gif?resize=457%2C461&ssl=1

http://di2.nu/foia/1254108338.txt

Climate science depends on the accuracy of this data, which is neither accurate
nor legitimate. Global warming is the biggest science scam in history.

Gavin Schmidt, has history of belittling skeptical scientists, suppressing
debate, condoning making climate data "impenetrable" and many of his scientific
claims and his website RealClimate.org, have been harshly criticized by
scientists from around the world.

Gavin Schmidt's history:

http://www.climatedepot.com/2011/11/29/nasas-gavin-schmidt-promotes-hiding-
data-i-would-simply-put-the-whole-cru-database-in-an-asimpenetrableaspossible-
form/

NASA's Gavin Schmidt promotes hiding data!? I would simply put the whole CRU
database (in an as-impenetrable-as-possible form' - Warmist AGU gave a $25,000
award to Gavin Schmidt being the 'best climate communicator in the world'

Physicist Dr. Motl rips Schmidt: 'So if you want to be the best climate science
communicator in the world, you have to release the data in an as-impenetrable-
as-possible form. ;-)'

http://www.climatedepot.com/2009/12/04/prof-pielke-jr-i-think-we-can-get-past-
the-lie-and-it-was-a-lie-that-these-activist-scientists-in-the-words-of-
realclimateorgs-gavin-schmidt-are-not-taking-a-political-stand/

Prof. Pielke Jr. 'I think we can get past the lie - and it was a lie - that
these activist scientists, in the words of RealClimate.org's Gavin Schmidt, are
not taking a political stand'

http://www.sciencebits.com/RealClimateSlurs

Israeli Astrophysicist Nir Shaviv has also been critical. "The aim of
[Schmidt's] RealClimate.org is not to engage a sincere scientific debate. Their
aim is to post a reply full of a straw man so their supporters can claim that
your point 'has been refuted by real scientists at RealClimate.org,'" Shaviv's
website reported. Shaviv, who calls the website "Wishfulclimate.org," noted
that the "writers (at RealClimaet.org) try again and again to concoct what
appears to be deep critiques against skeptic arguments, but end up doing a very
shallow job. All in the name of saving the world. How gallant of them."

http://www.sciencebits.com/RealClimateSlurs

Schmidt on Climategate:

RealClimate.org's Gavin Schmidt says skeptics are full of 'paranoia' and
Climategate 'has allowed the nutters to control the agenda'

http://www.climatedepot.com/2010/03/03/realclimateorgs-gavin-schmidt-says-
skeptics-are-full-of-paranoia-and-climategate-has-allowed-the-nutters-to-
control-the-agenda-gavinaschmidtnasagov/
--
A carbon tax will change NOTHING, other than the wealth of politicians and
countries who beg us for money. THAT was the purpose of the Paris Accord...
the ONLY purpose.

Funny... when the government no longer pays for bogus money-grabbing data, the
truth comes out.

It's "weather's not climate" when the temperatures don't agree with what ultra-
religious AGW screechers have to say... but when it does, it's climate change.

"It's all about money in the end. Keeping the Gravy Train running."


Australia Weather Bureau Caught Tampering With Climate Numbers

Climate Change Scientists Caught Tampering With Data to Show Rising Sea Levels

"NOAA And NASA Corrected Historical Temperature Data And Fabricated
Temperature Data"

"NASA Made Efforts To Discredit Their Own Satellite Data"

"NASA Refused To Give Data And Information Requested By The US
House Of Representatives Science, Space And Technology Committee"

"NASA And NOAA Caught In Climate Data Manipulation"

"NASA Dramatically Altered US Temperatures After The Year 2000"

"Spectacularly Poor Climate Science At NASA"

"NASA/NOAA Mislead, Deceive and Lie About 'Hottest Year' Claim - Concede
2014 NOT "Hottest Year"

"Climate Fraud: NASA's Recent Global Warming "Corrections" Equal a +95.0°C
Per Century Trend"

https://www.google.com/#newwindow=1&q=noaa+nasa+caught

**********************************************************

"And we're like... the world is going to end in 12 years if we don't address
climate change..."

AOC's Top Aide Admits Green New Deal About The Economy, Not Climate
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/aocs-top-aide-admits-green-new-deal-
about-the-economy-not-the-climate

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's chief of staff recently admitted that the
Green New Deal was not conceived as an effort to deal with climate change,
but instead a "how-do-you-change-the-entire economy thing" -- a remark
likely to fuel Republican claims that the deal is nothing more than a
thinly veiled socialist takeover of the U.S. economy.

"The interesting thing about the Green New Deal is it wasn't originally a
climate thing at all," Saikat Chakrabarti said in May, according to The
Washington Post.

*****

UN Official Admits That Climate Change Used As A Ruse To Control The
World's Economy
http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/diabolical-lie-called-climate-change-used-
un-promote-economic-agenda/

*****

"Unequal Distribution of Wealth and Power" Causes Climate Change
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2015/11/un-climate-summit-causes-of-
climate-change-unequal-distribution-of-wealth-and-power/

*****

U.N. Official Reveals Real Reason Behind Warming Scare
http://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/climate-change-scare-tool-to-
destroy-capitalism/

*****

Another Climate Alarmist Admits Real Motive Behind Warming Scare
http://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/another-climate-alarmist-
admits-real-motive-behind-warming-scare/

*****

United Nations Official Admits the Purpose of the Global Warming Hoax is
to Destroy Capitalism
http://lubbockonline.com/interact/blog-post/donald-r-may/2015-02-
27/united-nations-official-admits-purpose-global-warming#.V-nGUOM1HmE
Rudy Canoza
2020-01-16 22:32:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Wed, 15 Jan 2020 21:52:52 -0800, Rudy Canoza says...
Post by Rudy Canoza
None of that happened. Every word about NASA & NOAA "faking" data is a lie
- completely debunked.
By whoM... and cite it, or you're a liar.
Since YOU won't do ANY fucking research, because you KNOW it will debunk your
"completely debunked" bullshit, I'll do it for you.
Poor lonely wittle Wudy.
=====
Top NASA Climate 'Data Fraudster' Named & Shamed
NASA's top climate scientist singled out as architect of the biggest data fraud
of all time.
This is a lie.
Post by AlleyCat
Heller's series of graphs (below) allows readers to make up their own minds.
https://i0.wp.com/realclimatescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Screen-
Shot-2017-01-07-at-6.34.28-AM.gif?resize=567%2C360&ssl=1
This is a fake site.
Post by AlleyCat
NASA data
No, not "NASA data".
Post by AlleyCat
Note the spectacular hockey stick of data tampering since the year 2000.
https://i0.wp.com/realclimatescience.com/
You can't get to the root of this site. It's fake.
Post by AlleyCat
http://data.remss.com/msu/graphics/TLT/time_series/RSS_TS_channel_TLT_Global_La
nd_And_Sea_v03_3.txt
You don't even know what is being presented here.
Post by AlleyCat
https://i0.wp.com/
More fake bullshit. Everything at "https://i0.wp.com/" is fake bullshit.
Post by AlleyCat
http://data.remss.com/msu/graphics/TTT_v40/time_series/RSS_TS_channel_TTT_Globa
l_Land_And_Sea_v04_0.txt
More stuff that Ratboy doesn't understand.
Post by AlleyCat
[snip all the rest of the bullshit that Ratboy didn't even look at]
THAT...is what is called
a massive fail. Yes.

Ratboy didn't look at a bit of that, nor did you.
AlleyCat
2020-01-17 03:20:50 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 14:32:53 -0800, Rudy Canoza says...
Post by Rudy Canoza
None of that happened. Every word about NASA & NOAA "faking" data is a lie
- completely debunked.
By whoM... and cite it, or you're a liar.

Since YOU won't do ANY fucking research, because you KNOW it will debunk your
"completely debunked" bullshit, I'll do it for you.

Poor lonely wittle Wudy.

Can't and won't cite his "completely debunked" statement, so he lies.

Rudy's lies snipped.

=====

Top NASA Climate 'Data Fraudster' Named & Shamed

NASA's top climate scientist singled out as architect of the biggest data fraud
of all time. Anti-science con artist Gavin Schmidt is named and shamed for
deliberately falsifying global temperatures since 2000 and DOUBLING the actual
level of warming to fit a political agenda.

Respected climate analyst, Tony Heller, spotted on President Donald Trump's
radar, may have provided the administration with compelling evidence of a
criminal fraud. This would be fitting vindication for Trump who has for years
dismissed man-made global warming as "a hoax."

Heller has been on the attack against Schmidt (director of NASA's Goddard
Institute for Space Studies, which studies the changing atmosphere) since he
took over from former top dog James Hansen who retired in April 2013. Skeptics
believe fellow climate alarmist activist Hansen groomed Schmidt for the job.

But Schmidt has been outspoken about what Trump can do to stop him asserting it
won't be simple for the U.S. president to purge federal climate research during
his tenure. In an interview with Business Insider (Nov. 22 2016) Schmidt said:

"Chopping off science just to prevent people from talking about climate change
won't work. You need science for hazards, for weather forecasting, and climate
comes along for the ride."

But Gavin Schmidt may find he is in the cross hairs and tossed from the climate
gravy train once Trump and his science advisers take a cold, hard look at the
damning evidence Heller presents.

If prosecutors find probable cause then Schmidt could even face federal RICO
charges. This is because he has personally become enriched from climate
policies that have cost taxpayers trillions. Not only Schmidt but a tight-knit
cabal of government researchers have benefited from the alleged scam which
first gained public notoriety after the Climategate email leaks (2009).

Posting a series of telling graphs on his site, realclimatescience.com Heller
concludes:

"There was plenty of data tampering to the temperature record prior to the year
2000, but since the year 2000 the tampering has become very systematic and
cynical. Gavin Schmidt at NASA has more than doubled global warming by altering
his own temperature data since 2000."

Heller's series of graphs (below) allows readers to make up their own minds.

https://i0.wp.com/realclimatescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Screen-
Shot-2017-01-07-at-6.34.28-AM.gif?resize=567%2C360&ssl=1

NASA data

Note the spectacular hockey stick of data tampering since the year 2000.

https://i0.wp.com/realclimatescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Screen-
Shot-2017-01-07-at-6.39.10-AM.gif?ssl=1

This presents a huge problem for Gavin, because satellite temperatures show
little or no warming since the year 2000.

https://i1.wp.com/realclimatescience.com/wp-
content/uploads/2017/01/UAHRSSGISStrend-1.gif?resize=540%2C411&ssl=1

Furthermore, Gavin is continuously tampering with data to make his hockey stick
of temperature fraud even worse. Note the upwards change since before the
election.

https://i1.wp.com/realclimatescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Screen-
Shot-2016-12-17-at-2.29.02-AM.gif?ssl=1

Satellite data from RSS shows earth cooling at the fastest rate on record over
the last ten months This graph shows the current temperature anomaly minus the
anomaly ten months earlier.

https://i0.wp.com/realclimatescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Screen-
Shot-2017-01-04-at-8.25.43-PM.gif?ssl=1

http://data.remss.com/msu/graphics/TLT/time_series/RSS_TS_channel_TLT_Global_La
nd_And_Sea_v03_3.txt

Carl Mears at RSS has come to Gavin's rescue however, by telling people not to
use his lower troposphere data, and instead use his TTT data set which reaches
all the way up to 50,000 feet - where temperatures are about minus 100 degrees.

https://i0.wp.com/realclimatescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Screen-
Shot-2017-01-05-at-9.22.38-PM.gif?ssl=1

http://images.remss.com/papers/rsstech/Jan_5_2017_news_release.pdf

Carl's new TTT data set shows a lot more warming than the lower troposphere
data.

https://i0.wp.com/realclimatescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Screen-
Shot-2017-01-07-at-6.03.27-AM.gif?resize=620%2C397&ssl=1

http://images.remss.com/msu/msu_time_series.html

We see the same systematic hockey stick of data alteration, in an effort to
make satellite data match Gavin's altered temperature data.

https://i0.wp.com/realclimatescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Screen-
Shot-2017-01-07-at-6.59.51-AM.gif?resize=527%2C485&ssl=1

http://data.remss.com/msu/graphics/TTT_v40/time_series/RSS_TS_channel_TTT_Globa
l_Land_And_Sea_v04_0.txt

Are Carl Mears' changes legitimate? A good way to test them is to compare
versus radiosonde data of the troposphere. Unfortunately NOAA has done exactly
the same data tampering to the radiosonde data. Their original radiosonde data
showed only 0.2C warming since 1958, so they altered it to produce 0.8C
warming.

https://realclimatescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Screen-Shot-2017-01-
07-at-7.03.54-AM-768x527.gif

http://cdiac.esd.ornl.gov/ftp/trends/temp/angell/global.dat

ftp://ftp1.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/ratpac/ratpac-a/RATPAC-A-annual-
levels.txt.zip

Once again, we see the same hockey stick of data tampering to bring radiosonde
data in line with Gavin's highly altered temperature data.

https://i1.wp.com/realclimatescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Screen-
Shot-2017-01-07-at-7.04.10-AM.gif?resize=620%2C515&ssl=1

And NOAA has done exactly the same thing with US temperature data. It didn't
match the altered global temperature data, so NOAA altered US temperatures to
make them match fake global temperatures.

https://i1.wp.com/realclimatescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Screen-
Shot-2016-12-28-at-5.45.44-AM-1.gif?resize=602%2C560&ssl=1

ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/ushcn/v2.5/ushcn.tavg.latest.FLs.52j.tar.gz

ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/ushcn/v2.5/ushcn.tavg.latest.raw.tar.gz

Again, we see the same hockey stick of data tampering.

https://i0.wp.com/realclimatescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Screen-
Shot-2016-12-28-at-4.51.42-AM.gif?ssl=1

All of the data sets have been massively tampered with since the year 2000, in
an effort to bring them in line with the tampered NASA data set. And this
doesn't even include the massive tampering done prior to the year 2000 to erase
the 1940's temperature spike, and post-1940's global cooling.

https://i1.wp.com/realclimatescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Screen-
Shot-2016-12-19-at-3.56.00-AM-1.gif?resize=392%2C657&ssl=1

https://www.newspapers.com/image/43605894/?terms=global%2Bcooling%2Bburning%
2Bfossil%2Bfuels

All of this data tampering was committed intentionally, and in collusion
between agencies.

https://i1.wp.com/realclimatescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Screen-
Shot-2017-01-07-at-8.19.23-AM.gif?resize=457%2C461&ssl=1

http://di2.nu/foia/1254108338.txt

Climate science depends on the accuracy of this data, which is neither accurate
nor legitimate. Global warming is the biggest science scam in history.

Gavin Schmidt, has history of belittling skeptical scientists, suppressing
debate, condoning making climate data "impenetrable" and many of his scientific
claims and his website RealClimate.org, have been harshly criticized by
scientists from around the world.

Gavin Schmidt's history:

http://www.climatedepot.com/2011/11/29/nasas-gavin-schmidt-promotes-hiding-
data-i-would-simply-put-the-whole-cru-database-in-an-asimpenetrableaspossible-
form/

NASA's Gavin Schmidt promotes hiding data!? I would simply put the whole CRU
database (in an as-impenetrable-as-possible form' - Warmist AGU gave a $25,000
award to Gavin Schmidt being the 'best climate communicator in the world'

Physicist Dr. Motl rips Schmidt: 'So if you want to be the best climate science
communicator in the world, you have to release the data in an as-impenetrable-
as-possible form. ;-)'

http://www.climatedepot.com/2009/12/04/prof-pielke-jr-i-think-we-can-get-past-
the-lie-and-it-was-a-lie-that-these-activist-scientists-in-the-words-of-
realclimateorgs-gavin-schmidt-are-not-taking-a-political-stand/

Prof. Pielke Jr. 'I think we can get past the lie - and it was a lie - that
these activist scientists, in the words of RealClimate.org's Gavin Schmidt, are
not taking a political stand'

http://www.sciencebits.com/RealClimateSlurs

Israeli Astrophysicist Nir Shaviv has also been critical. "The aim of
[Schmidt's] RealClimate.org is not to engage a sincere scientific debate. Their
aim is to post a reply full of a straw man so their supporters can claim that
your point 'has been refuted by real scientists at RealClimate.org,'" Shaviv's
website reported. Shaviv, who calls the website "Wishfulclimate.org," noted
that the "writers (at RealClimaet.org) try again and again to concoct what
appears to be deep critiques against skeptic arguments, but end up doing a very
shallow job. All in the name of saving the world. How gallant of them."

http://www.sciencebits.com/RealClimateSlurs

Schmidt on Climategate:

RealClimate.org's Gavin Schmidt says skeptics are full of 'paranoia' and
Climategate 'has allowed the nutters to control the agenda'

http://www.climatedepot.com/2010/03/03/realclimateorgs-gavin-schmidt-says-
skeptics-are-full-of-paranoia-and-climategate-has-allowed-the-nutters-to-
control-the-agenda-gavinaschmidtnasagov/
--
A carbon tax will change NOTHING, other than the wealth of politicians and
countries who beg us for money. THAT was the purpose of the Paris Accord...
the ONLY purpose.

Funny... when the government no longer pays for bogus money-grabbing data, the
truth comes out.

It's "weather's not climate" when the temperatures don't agree with what ultra-
religious AGW screechers have to say... but when it does, it's climate change.

"It's all about money in the end. Keeping the Gravy Train running."
http://youtu.be/J9Oi7x2OBdI

Australia Weather Bureau Caught Tampering With Climate Numbers

Climate Change Scientists Caught Tampering With Data to Show Rising Sea Levels

"NOAA And NASA Corrected Historical Temperature Data And Fabricated
Temperature Data"

"NASA Made Efforts To Discredit Their Own Satellite Data"

"NASA Refused To Give Data And Information Requested By The US
House Of Representatives Science, Space And Technology Committee"

"NASA And NOAA Caught In Climate Data Manipulation"

"NASA Dramatically Altered US Temperatures After The Year 2000"

"Spectacularly Poor Climate Science At NASA"

"NASA/NOAA Mislead, Deceive and Lie About 'Hottest Year' Claim - Concede
2014 NOT "Hottest Year"

"Climate Fraud: NASA's Recent Global Warming "Corrections" Equal a +95.0°C
Per Century Trend"

https://www.google.com/#newwindow=1&q=noaa+nasa+caught

**********************************************************

"And we're like... the world is going to end in 12 years if we don't address
climate change..."

AOC's Top Aide Admits Green New Deal About The Economy, Not Climate
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/aocs-top-aide-admits-green-new-deal-
about-the-economy-not-the-climate

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's chief of staff recently admitted that the
Green New Deal was not conceived as an effort to deal with climate change,
but instead a "how-do-you-change-the-entire economy thing" -- a remark
likely to fuel Republican claims that the deal is nothing more than a
thinly veiled socialist takeover of the U.S. economy.

"The interesting thing about the Green New Deal is it wasn't originally a
climate thing at all," Saikat Chakrabarti said in May, according to The
Washington Post.

*****

UN Official Admits That Climate Change Used As A Ruse To Control The
World's Economy
http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/diabolical-lie-called-climate-change-used-
un-promote-economic-agenda/

*****

"Unequal Distribution of Wealth and Power" Causes Climate Change
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2015/11/un-climate-summit-causes-of-
climate-change-unequal-distribution-of-wealth-and-power/

*****

U.N. Official Reveals Real Reason Behind Warming Scare
http://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/climate-change-scare-tool-to-
destroy-capitalism/

*****

Another Climate Alarmist Admits Real Motive Behind Warming Scare
http://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/another-climate-alarmist-
admits-real-motive-behind-warming-scare/

*****

United Nations Official Admits the Purpose of the Global Warming Hoax is
to Destroy Capitalism
http://lubbockonline.com/interact/blog-post/donald-r-may/2015-02-
27/united-nations-official-admits-purpose-global-warming#.V-nGUOM1HmE
AlleyCat
2020-01-16 18:49:27 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 15 Jan 2020 16:47:51 -0600, Unum says...
NASA and NOAA... future
NASA NOAA future

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Is this the SAME NOAA and NASA who:

"Made Efforts To Discredit Their OWN Satellite Data"

"Corrected Historical Temperature Data And Fabricated Temperature Data"

"Refused To Give Data And Information Requested By The US House Of
Representatives Science, Space And Technology Committee"

"Caught In Climate Data Manipulation"

"Dramatically Altered US Temperatures After The Year 2000"

"Had Spectacularly Poor Climate Science"

"Mislead, Deceive and Lie About 'Hottest Year' Claim - And Had to Concede
that 2014 was NOT "Hottest Year"

"Climate Fraud: Recent Global Warming "Corrections" Equal a +95.0°C Per Century
Trend"

https://www.google.com/#newwindow=1&q=noaa+nasa+caught

Basement boy BEGS for attention, every day.
--
A carbon tax will change NOTHING, other than the wealth of politicians and
countries who beg us for money. THAT was the purpose of the Paris Accord...
the ONLY purpose.

Funny... when the government no longer pays for bogus money-grabbing data, the
truth comes out.

It's "weather's not climate" when the temperatures don't agree with what ultra-
religious AGW screechers have to say... but when it does, it's climate change.

"It's all about money in the end. Keeping the Gravy Train running."
http://youtu.be/J9Oi7x2OBdI

Australia Weather Bureau Caught Tampering With Climate Numbers

Climate Change Scientists Caught Tampering With Data to Show Rising Sea Levels

"NOAA And NASA Corrected Historical Temperature Data And Fabricated
Temperature Data"

"NASA Made Efforts To Discredit Their Own Satellite Data"

"NASA Refused To Give Data And Information Requested By The US
House Of Representatives Science, Space And Technology Committee"

"NASA And NOAA Caught In Climate Data Manipulation"

"NASA Dramatically Altered US Temperatures After The Year 2000"

"Spectacularly Poor Climate Science At NASA"

"NASA/NOAA Mislead, Deceive and Lie About 'Hottest Year' Claim - Concede
2014 NOT "Hottest Year"

"Climate Fraud: NASA's Recent Global Warming "Corrections" Equal a +95.0°C
Per Century Trend"

https://www.google.com/#newwindow=1&q=noaa+nasa+caught

**********************************************************

"And we're like... the world is going to end in 12 years if we don't address
climate change..."

AOC's Top Aide Admits Green New Deal About The Economy, Not Climate
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/aocs-top-aide-admits-green-new-deal-
about-the-economy-not-the-climate

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's chief of staff recently admitted that the
Green New Deal was not conceived as an effort to deal with climate change,
but instead a "how-do-you-change-the-entire economy thing" -- a remark
likely to fuel Republican claims that the deal is nothing more than a
thinly veiled socialist takeover of the U.S. economy.

"The interesting thing about the Green New Deal is it wasn't originally a
climate thing at all," Saikat Chakrabarti said in May, according to The
Washington Post.

*****

UN Official Admits That Climate Change Used As A Ruse To Control The
World's Economy
http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/diabolical-lie-called-climate-change-used-
un-promote-economic-agenda/

*****

"Unequal Distribution of Wealth and Power" Causes Climate Change
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2015/11/un-climate-summit-causes-of-
climate-change-unequal-distribution-of-wealth-and-power/

*****

U.N. Official Reveals Real Reason Behind Warming Scare
http://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/climate-change-scare-tool-to-
destroy-capitalism/

*****

Another Climate Alarmist Admits Real Motive Behind Warming Scare
http://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/another-climate-alarmist-
admits-real-motive-behind-warming-scare/

*****

United Nations Official Admits the Purpose of the Global Warming Hoax is
to Destroy Capitalism
http://lubbockonline.com/interact/blog-post/donald-r-may/2015-02-
27/united-nations-official-admits-purpose-global-warming#.V-nGUOM1HmE
Unum
2020-01-16 20:48:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Wed, 15 Jan 2020 16:47:51 -0600, Unum says...
NASA and NOAA... future
https://www.google.com/#newwindow=1&q=noaa+nasa+caught
Basement boy BEGS for attention, every day.
Following ratboy's link we see he didn't even check it, hilarious!
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/global-warming-data-faked/

To suggest — 14 years after the fact — that identifying publicly discussed
adjustments to raw data whose methods have been published in peer-reviewed
journals represents catching scientists “red-handed” in “the largest
scientific fraud ever uncovered” exposes only the ignorance of the author, not
some nefarious sleight of hand by climate scientists. As such, the claim is
rated “False.”
AlleyCat
2020-01-17 03:44:51 UTC
Permalink
[giggle] - Do you have Snopes' science credentials?

=====

Fact-Checking Snopes: Website's Political 'Fact-Checker' Is Just A Failed
Liberal BLOGGER

REUTERS

Popular myth-busting website Snopes originally gained recognition for being the
go-to site for disproving outlandish urban legends -such as the presence of
UFOs in Haiti or the existence of human-animal hybrids in the Amazon jungle.

Recently, however, the site has tried to pose as a political fact-checker. But
Snopes' "fact-checking" looks more like playing defense for prominent Democrats
like Hillary Clinton and it's political "fact-checker" describes herself as a
liberal and has called Republicans "regressive" and afraid of "female agency."

Snopes' main political fact-checker is a writer named Kim Lacapria. Before
writing for Snopes, Lacapria wrote for Inquisitr, a blog that - oddly enough -
is known for publishing fake quotes and even downright hoaxes as much as
anything else.

While at Inquisitr, the future "fact-checker" consistently displayed clear
partisanship (RELATED: Snopes Caught Lying About Lack Of American Flags At
Democratic Convention)

She described herself as "openly left-leaning" and a liberal. She trashed the
Tea Party as "teahadists." She called Bill Clinton "one of our greatest"
presidents. She claimed that conservatives only criticized Lena Dunham's
comparison of voting to sex because they "fear female agency."

She once wrote: "Like many GOP ideas about the poor, the panic about using food
stamps for alcohol, pornography or guns seems to have been cut from whole
cloth-or more likely, the ideas many have about the fantasy of poverty." (A
simple fact-check would show that food stamp fraud does occur and costs
taxpayers tens of millions.)

Lacapria even accused the Bush administration of being "at least guilty of
criminal negligience" in the September 11 attacks. (The future "fact-checker"
offered no evidence to support her accusation.)

Her columns apparently failed to impress her readership, oftentimes failing to
get more than 10-20 shares.

After blogging the Inquisitr, Lacapria joined Snopes, where she regularly plays
defense for her fellow liberals.

She wrote a "fact check" article about Jimmy Carter's unilateral ban of Iranian
nationals from entering the country that looks more like an opinion column
arguing against Donald Trump's proposed Muslim ban.

Similarly, Lacapria - in another "fact check" article - argued Hillary Clinton
hadn't included Benghazi at all in her infamous "we didn't lose a single person
in Libya" gaffe. Lacapria claimed Clinton only meant to refer to the 2011
invasion of Libya (but not the 2012 Benghazi attack) but offered little fact-
based evidence to support her claim.

After the Orlando terror attack, Lacapria claimed that just because Omar Mateen
was a registered Democrat with an active voter registration status didn't mean
he was actually a Democrat. Her "fact check" argued that he might "have chosen
a random political affiliation when he initially registered."

Lacapria even tried to contradict the former Facebook workers who admitted that
Facebook regularly censors conservative news, dismissing the news as "rumors."

In that "fact check" article, Lacapria argued that "Facebook Trending's
blacklisting of 'junk topics' was not only not a scandalous development, but to
be expected following the social network's crackdown on fake news sites." The
opinion-heavy article was mockingly titled: The Algorithm Is Gonna Get You.

Lacapria again played defense for Clinton in a fact check article when she
claimed: "Outrage over an expensive Armani jacket worn by Hillary Clinton was
peppered with inaccurate details."

One of the "inaccurate details" cited by Lacapria was that, "The cost of men's
suits worn by fellow politicians didn't appear in the article for contrast."
She also argued the speech Clinton gave while wearing the $12,495 jacket, which
discussed "raising wages and reducing inequality," wasn't actually about income
inequality.
--
A carbon tax will change NOTHING, other than the wealth of politicians and
countries who beg us for money. THAT was the purpose of the Paris Accord...
the ONLY purpose.

"It's all about money in the end. Keeping the Gravy Train running."
http://youtu.be/J9Oi7x2OBdI

Funny... when the government no longer pays for bogus money-grabbing data, the
truth comes out.

This is sad... The Usenet Trolls in this group have a new hero... a retard. Get
that testosterone checked, girls!

https://imgur.com/wSbtL1g

https://imgur.com/YoRzkcX

https://imgur.com/7WkuvyE

https://imgur.com/R7fX4Zm
AlleyCat
2020-01-17 03:45:02 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 14:48:08 -0600, Unum says...
Post by Unum
snopes.com
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Do you have Snopes' science credentials?

[snicker]

=====

Top NASA Climate 'Data Fraudster' Named & Shamed

NASA's top climate scientist singled out as architect of the biggest data fraud
of all time. Anti-science con artist Gavin Schmidt is named and shamed for
deliberately falsifying global temperatures since 2000 and DOUBLING the actual
level of warming to fit a political agenda.

Respected climate analyst, Tony Heller, spotted on President Donald Trump's
radar, may have provided the administration with compelling evidence of a
criminal fraud. This would be fitting vindication for Trump who has for years
dismissed man-made global warming as "a hoax."

Heller has been on the attack against Schmidt (director of NASA's Goddard
Institute for Space Studies, which studies the changing atmosphere) since he
took over from former top dog James Hansen who retired in April 2013. Skeptics
believe fellow climate alarmist activist Hansen groomed Schmidt for the job.

But Schmidt has been outspoken about what Trump can do to stop him asserting it
won't be simple for the U.S. president to purge federal climate research during
his tenure. In an interview with Business Insider (Nov. 22 2016) Schmidt said:

"Chopping off science just to prevent people from talking about climate change
won't work. You need science for hazards, for weather forecasting, and climate
comes along for the ride."

But Gavin Schmidt may find he is in the cross hairs and tossed from the climate
gravy train once Trump and his science advisers take a cold, hard look at the
damning evidence Heller presents.

If prosecutors find probable cause then Schmidt could even face federal RICO
charges. This is because he has personally become enriched from climate
policies that have cost taxpayers trillions. Not only Schmidt but a tight-knit
cabal of government researchers have benefited from the alleged scam which
first gained public notoriety after the Climategate email leaks (2009).

Posting a series of telling graphs on his site, realclimatescience.com Heller
concludes:

"There was plenty of data tampering to the temperature record prior to the year
2000, but since the year 2000 the tampering has become very systematic and
cynical. Gavin Schmidt at NASA has more than doubled global warming by altering
his own temperature data since 2000."

Heller's series of graphs (below) allows readers to make up their own minds.

https://i0.wp.com/realclimatescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Screen-
Shot-2017-01-07-at-6.34.28-AM.gif?resize=567%2C360&ssl=1

NASA data

Note the spectacular hockey stick of data tampering since the year 2000.

https://i0.wp.com/realclimatescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Screen-
Shot-2017-01-07-at-6.39.10-AM.gif?ssl=1

This presents a huge problem for Gavin, because satellite temperatures show
little or no warming since the year 2000.

https://i1.wp.com/realclimatescience.com/wp-
content/uploads/2017/01/UAHRSSGISStrend-1.gif?resize=540%2C411&ssl=1

Furthermore, Gavin is continuously tampering with data to make his hockey stick
of temperature fraud even worse. Note the upwards change since before the
election.

https://i1.wp.com/realclimatescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Screen-
Shot-2016-12-17-at-2.29.02-AM.gif?ssl=1

Satellite data from RSS shows earth cooling at the fastest rate on record over
the last ten months This graph shows the current temperature anomaly minus the
anomaly ten months earlier.

https://i0.wp.com/realclimatescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Screen-
Shot-2017-01-04-at-8.25.43-PM.gif?ssl=1

http://data.remss.com/msu/graphics/TLT/time_series/RSS_TS_channel_TLT_Global_La
nd_And_Sea_v03_3.txt

Carl Mears at RSS has come to Gavin's rescue however, by telling people not to
use his lower troposphere data, and instead use his TTT data set which reaches
all the way up to 50,000 feet - where temperatures are about minus 100 degrees.

https://i0.wp.com/realclimatescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Screen-
Shot-2017-01-05-at-9.22.38-PM.gif?ssl=1

http://images.remss.com/papers/rsstech/Jan_5_2017_news_release.pdf

Carl's new TTT data set shows a lot more warming than the lower troposphere
data.

https://i0.wp.com/realclimatescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Screen-
Shot-2017-01-07-at-6.03.27-AM.gif?resize=620%2C397&ssl=1

http://images.remss.com/msu/msu_time_series.html

We see the same systematic hockey stick of data alteration, in an effort to
make satellite data match Gavin's altered temperature data.

https://i0.wp.com/realclimatescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Screen-
Shot-2017-01-07-at-6.59.51-AM.gif?resize=527%2C485&ssl=1

http://data.remss.com/msu/graphics/TTT_v40/time_series/RSS_TS_channel_TTT_Globa
l_Land_And_Sea_v04_0.txt

Are Carl Mears' changes legitimate? A good way to test them is to compare
versus radiosonde data of the troposphere. Unfortunately NOAA has done exactly
the same data tampering to the radiosonde data. Their original radiosonde data
showed only 0.2C warming since 1958, so they altered it to produce 0.8C
warming.

https://realclimatescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Screen-Shot-2017-01-
07-at-7.03.54-AM-768x527.gif

http://cdiac.esd.ornl.gov/ftp/trends/temp/angell/global.dat

ftp://ftp1.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/ratpac/ratpac-a/RATPAC-A-annual-
levels.txt.zip

Once again, we see the same hockey stick of data tampering to bring radiosonde
data in line with Gavin's highly altered temperature data.

https://i1.wp.com/realclimatescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Screen-
Shot-2017-01-07-at-7.04.10-AM.gif?resize=620%2C515&ssl=1

And NOAA has done exactly the same thing with US temperature data. It didn't
match the altered global temperature data, so NOAA altered US temperatures to
make them match fake global temperatures.

https://i1.wp.com/realclimatescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Screen-
Shot-2016-12-28-at-5.45.44-AM-1.gif?resize=602%2C560&ssl=1

ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/ushcn/v2.5/ushcn.tavg.latest.FLs.52j.tar.gz

ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/ushcn/v2.5/ushcn.tavg.latest.raw.tar.gz

Again, we see the same hockey stick of data tampering.

https://i0.wp.com/realclimatescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Screen-
Shot-2016-12-28-at-4.51.42-AM.gif?ssl=1

All of the data sets have been massively tampered with since the year 2000, in
an effort to bring them in line with the tampered NASA data set. And this
doesn't even include the massive tampering done prior to the year 2000 to erase
the 1940's temperature spike, and post-1940's global cooling.

https://i1.wp.com/realclimatescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Screen-
Shot-2016-12-19-at-3.56.00-AM-1.gif?resize=392%2C657&ssl=1

https://www.newspapers.com/image/43605894/?terms=global%2Bcooling%2Bburning%
2Bfossil%2Bfuels

All of this data tampering was committed intentionally, and in collusion
between agencies.

https://i1.wp.com/realclimatescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Screen-
Shot-2017-01-07-at-8.19.23-AM.gif?resize=457%2C461&ssl=1

http://di2.nu/foia/1254108338.txt

Climate science depends on the accuracy of this data, which is neither accurate
nor legitimate. Global warming is the biggest science scam in history.

Gavin Schmidt, has history of belittling skeptical scientists, suppressing
debate, condoning making climate data "impenetrable" and many of his scientific
claims and his website RealClimate.org, have been harshly criticized by
scientists from around the world.

Gavin Schmidt's history:

http://www.climatedepot.com/2011/11/29/nasas-gavin-schmidt-promotes-hiding-
data-i-would-simply-put-the-whole-cru-database-in-an-asimpenetrableaspossible-
form/

NASA's Gavin Schmidt promotes hiding data!? I would simply put the whole CRU
database (in an as-impenetrable-as-possible form' - Warmist AGU gave a $25,000
award to Gavin Schmidt being the 'best climate communicator in the world'

Physicist Dr. Motl rips Schmidt: 'So if you want to be the best climate science
communicator in the world, you have to release the data in an as-impenetrable-
as-possible form. ;-)'

http://www.climatedepot.com/2009/12/04/prof-pielke-jr-i-think-we-can-get-past-
the-lie-and-it-was-a-lie-that-these-activist-scientists-in-the-words-of-
realclimateorgs-gavin-schmidt-are-not-taking-a-political-stand/

Prof. Pielke Jr. 'I think we can get past the lie - and it was a lie - that
these activist scientists, in the words of RealClimate.org's Gavin Schmidt, are
not taking a political stand'

http://www.sciencebits.com/RealClimateSlurs

Israeli Astrophysicist Nir Shaviv has also been critical. "The aim of
[Schmidt's] RealClimate.org is not to engage a sincere scientific debate. Their
aim is to post a reply full of a straw man so their supporters can claim that
your point 'has been refuted by real scientists at RealClimate.org,'" Shaviv's
website reported. Shaviv, who calls the website "Wishfulclimate.org," noted
that the "writers (at RealClimaet.org) try again and again to concoct what
appears to be deep critiques against skeptic arguments, but end up doing a very
shallow job. All in the name of saving the world. How gallant of them."

http://www.sciencebits.com/RealClimateSlurs

Schmidt on Climategate:

RealClimate.org's Gavin Schmidt says skeptics are full of 'paranoia' and
Climategate 'has allowed the nutters to control the agenda'

http://www.climatedepot.com/2010/03/03/realclimateorgs-gavin-schmidt-says-
skeptics-are-full-of-paranoia-and-climategate-has-allowed-the-nutters-to-
control-the-agenda-gavinaschmidtnasagov/
--
A carbon tax will change NOTHING, other than the wealth of politicians and
countries who beg us for money. THAT was the purpose of the Paris Accord...
the ONLY purpose.

Funny... when the government no longer pays for bogus money-grabbing data, the
truth comes out.

It's "weather's not climate" when the temperatures don't agree with what ultra-
religious AGW screechers have to say... but when it does, it's climate change.

"It's all about money in the end. Keeping the Gravy Train running."
http://youtu.be/J9Oi7x2OBdI

Australia Weather Bureau Caught Tampering With Climate Numbers

Climate Change Scientists Caught Tampering With Data to Show Rising Sea Levels

"NOAA And NASA Corrected Historical Temperature Data And Fabricated
Temperature Data"

"NASA Made Efforts To Discredit Their Own Satellite Data"

"NASA Refused To Give Data And Information Requested By The US
House Of Representatives Science, Space And Technology Committee"

"NASA And NOAA Caught In Climate Data Manipulation"

"NASA Dramatically Altered US Temperatures After The Year 2000"

"Spectacularly Poor Climate Science At NASA"

"NASA/NOAA Mislead, Deceive and Lie About 'Hottest Year' Claim - Concede
2014 NOT "Hottest Year"

"Climate Fraud: NASA's Recent Global Warming "Corrections" Equal a +95.0°C
Per Century Trend"

https://www.google.com/#newwindow=1&q=noaa+nasa+caught

**********************************************************

"And we're like... the world is going to end in 12 years if we don't address
climate change..."

AOC's Top Aide Admits Green New Deal About The Economy, Not Climate
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/aocs-top-aide-admits-green-new-deal-
about-the-economy-not-the-climate

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's chief of staff recently admitted that the
Green New Deal was not conceived as an effort to deal with climate change,
but instead a "how-do-you-change-the-entire economy thing" -- a remark
likely to fuel Republican claims that the deal is nothing more than a
thinly veiled socialist takeover of the U.S. economy.

"The interesting thing about the Green New Deal is it wasn't originally a
climate thing at all," Saikat Chakrabarti said in May, according to The
Washington Post.

*****

UN Official Admits That Climate Change Used As A Ruse To Control The
World's Economy
http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/diabolical-lie-called-climate-change-used-
un-promote-economic-agenda/

*****

"Unequal Distribution of Wealth and Power" Causes Climate Change
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2015/11/un-climate-summit-causes-of-
climate-change-unequal-distribution-of-wealth-and-power/

*****

U.N. Official Reveals Real Reason Behind Warming Scare
http://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/climate-change-scare-tool-to-
destroy-capitalism/

*****

Another Climate Alarmist Admits Real Motive Behind Warming Scare
http://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/another-climate-alarmist-
admits-real-motive-behind-warming-scare/

*****

United Nations Official Admits the Purpose of the Global Warming Hoax is
to Destroy Capitalism
http://lubbockonline.com/interact/blog-post/donald-r-may/2015-02-
27/united-nations-official-admits-purpose-global-warming#.V-nGUOM1HmE
AlleyCat
2020-01-17 03:45:13 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 14:48:08 -0600, Unum says...
Post by Unum
snopes.com
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Do you have Snopes' science credentials?

[giggle]

You're citing two LEFT WING FANATICS as FACT?

God help you, son.

=====

EXPOSED - Guess Who is REALLY Behind Snopes.com?

Those who have been at least partially aware of the goings on of the Internet
has, no doubt, come across the website Snopes.com, a self-proclaimed "myth-
busting" site. At its genesis, Snopes popped the bubbles surrounding urban
legends and, at times even provided some accurate insight into the stories
behind those urban legends. If nothing else, it was mildly entertaining. That
was then.

Chief among the Progressive stalwarts at Snopes is "main political fact-
checker," Kim Lacapria, according to the Daily Caller. Ironically, or not,
prior to her position as political fact-checker for Snopes, Lacapria was wrote
for the Inquisitr, a blog with less than stellar reputation.

Today, Snopes has turned into a sycophantic political surrogate for the
Progressive Left, the Obama Administration, and Hillary Clinton. Fancying
itself as a "political fact-checker," it has become completely unreliable,
existing as an excuse making machine for the morally relativistic and a
propaganda apparatus fueled by unfounded accusations and political talking
points; talking points seemingly crafted and issued directly from the
Progressive minions of Chicago.

To say Lacapria exhibited "clear partisanship" while writing for Inquisitr
would be to ignore her writing sounded more like that of a Democrat
speechwriter than that of an objective journalist.

Lacapria violated the very first rule of journalistic ethics in describing
herself as "openly left-leaning" and a liberal. To stake out a position with
such fervor is to admit there exists not an objective bone in her body, which,
by that very fact, makes her disqualified - ethically - from "fact-checking"
anything political.

While with Inquisitr, she routinely disparaged the whole of the TEA Party
Movement, calling those who took to the streets to protest over-taxation and
over-reaching government as "TEAhadists." Lacapria's comparison of the TEA
Party to the fascists of Islam, of course, is a signature trait of the
caustically Left.

Aside from fawning over the presidency of Bill Clinton, whose only two real
achievements were pretending the financial surplus created by the ending of the
Cold War was somehow his economic genius, and escaping impeachment for
perjuring himself, Lacapria blindly regurgitated the Progressive talking points
of welfare fraud:

"Like many GOP ideas about the poor, the panic about using food stamps for
alcohol, pornography or guns seems to have been cut from whole cloth - or more
likely, the ideas many have about the fantasy of poverty."

It would appear the future "fact-checker" missed the Congressional Budget
Office and General Accounting Office reports on the cost of welfare fraud. In
food stamp and EBT card fraud alone, the US government is scammed out of tens
of millions of dollars - if not hundreds of millions - annually. That's a
pretty big "fact" to miss for a "fact-checker."

Exposing her frothing-at-the-mouth hatred for Republicans and Conservatives,
Lacapria went so far as to accuse the Bush administration of "criminal
negligence" in the September 11, 2001, attacks. Of course, she provided no
evidence to support her accusation, a typical tactic of those Progressives who
manufacture false narratives and deceptive memes to advance the Leftist cause.

Lacapria has manufactured, nuanced, and spun facts about Hillary Clinton and
Benghazi, Omar Mateem not "really being" a Democrat despite his official party
registration, and Facebook being an above-board and non-manipulative news
source.

But Lacapria simply joins the very small crew at Snopes who have existed as
bias from the start. David and Barbara Mikkelson, the founders and proprietors
of Snopes, have been found on many occasions to have "erred" on the side of the
truth best benefiting the Left's narrative on issues. The very fact the website
quotes heavily from the self-identified Left-leaning New York Times illustrates
an out-of-the-box bias from the start.

To wit, just as with any online "resource," you should do your own homework
when it comes to fact-checking. Most often it isn't that hard to divine the
truth and you will be better informed with first-source information for doing
so. In a world where everyone believes their opinions to be valid, all of us
are forced to do our due diligence in the quest for the truth.
--
A carbon tax will change NOTHING, other than the wealth of politicians and
countries who beg us for money. THAT was the purpose of the Paris Accord...
the ONLY purpose.

Funny... when the government no longer pays for bogus money-grabbing data, the
truth comes out.

It's "weather's not climate" when the temperatures don't agree with what ultra-
religious AGW screechers have to say... but when it does, it's climate change.

"It's all about money in the end. Keeping the Gravy Train running."
http://youtu.be/J9Oi7x2OBdI

Australia Weather Bureau Caught Tampering With Climate Numbers

Climate Change Scientists Caught Tampering With Data to Show Rising Sea Levels

"NOAA And NASA Corrected Historical Temperature Data And Fabricated
Temperature Data"

"NASA Made Efforts To Discredit Their Own Satellite Data"

"NASA Refused To Give Data And Information Requested By The US
House Of Representatives Science, Space And Technology Committee"

"NASA And NOAA Caught In Climate Data Manipulation"

"NASA Dramatically Altered US Temperatures After The Year 2000"

"Spectacularly Poor Climate Science At NASA"

"NASA/NOAA Mislead, Deceive and Lie About 'Hottest Year' Claim - Concede
2014 NOT "Hottest Year"

"Climate Fraud: NASA's Recent Global Warming "Corrections" Equal a +95.0°C
Per Century Trend"

https://www.google.com/#newwindow=1&q=noaa+nasa+caught

**********************************************************

"And we're like... the world is going to end in 12 years if we don't address
climate change..."

AOC's Top Aide Admits Green New Deal About The Economy, Not Climate
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/aocs-top-aide-admits-green-new-deal-
about-the-economy-not-the-climate

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's chief of staff recently admitted that the
Green New Deal was not conceived as an effort to deal with climate change,
but instead a "how-do-you-change-the-entire economy thing" -- a remark
likely to fuel Republican claims that the deal is nothing more than a
thinly veiled socialist takeover of the U.S. economy.

"The interesting thing about the Green New Deal is it wasn't originally a
climate thing at all," Saikat Chakrabarti said in May, according to The
Washington Post.

*****

UN Official Admits That Climate Change Used As A Ruse To Control The
World's Economy
http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/diabolical-lie-called-climate-change-used-
un-promote-economic-agenda/

*****

"Unequal Distribution of Wealth and Power" Causes Climate Change
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2015/11/un-climate-summit-causes-of-
climate-change-unequal-distribution-of-wealth-and-power/

*****

U.N. Official Reveals Real Reason Behind Warming Scare
http://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/climate-change-scare-tool-to-
destroy-capitalism/

*****

Another Climate Alarmist Admits Real Motive Behind Warming Scare
http://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/another-climate-alarmist-
admits-real-motive-behind-warming-scare/

*****

United Nations Official Admits the Purpose of the Global Warming Hoax is
to Destroy Capitalism
http://lubbockonline.com/interact/blog-post/donald-r-may/2015-02-
27/united-nations-official-admits-purpose-global-warming#.V-nGUOM1HmE
AlleyCat
2020-01-17 03:45:34 UTC
Permalink
[giggle] - Do you have Snopes' science credentials?

=====

Snopes LIES. Here is Proof That Snopes.com is FAKE NEWS.

The "fact checking" website Snopes.com has come under considerable fire during
the last few months and for good reason.

As many publications have noted, while Snopes pretends to be a neutral site
looking only for the true facts, many of its writers, and the actual owners,
lean a little bit to the left when they walk down the street.

It has also become painfully obvious more and more of the "true" stories
support a liberal agenda whereas most of the stories that would support the
right tend to be considered "fake news" by the "neutral" publication.

After doing some digging on various websites, I believe The Angry Patriot has
found ample proof that Snopes is indeed FAKE NEWS!

1 - The first reason is not so much reason as it is a suspicion. Liberal
Facebook is all of a sudden deciding it wants to monitor the news to ensure its
members are getting only REAL news. Now, Facebook's leadership is notoriously
left-wing oriented, so it would make sense it would find a left-friendly "fact-
checking" website to back its own agenda.

2 - Snopes has made it a point to go after right-wing oriented publications as
all fake news. However, a publication that publishes real news with a political
opinion is not fake news - it is news with an opinion. If the writer's opinion
differs from that of the Snopes fact-checker, they deem it to be fake news.

3 - Ownership of Snopes is questionable at best. Barbara and David Mikkelson
are less than reputable individuals, with David allegedly embezzling close to
$100,000 from his own company. And this is the man Facebook is entrusting to
decide what is real and what is fake.

4 - David and Barbara are now divorced, but David has since been remarried to
Elyssa Young, another less than reputable individual. She is an alleged former
escort and porn actress who ran for Congress as a Libertarian. She is now on
the Snopes payroll, yet they still claim the publication has no political
agenda or influence at all.

5 - A fact checking organization needs to be completely transparent, yet Snopes
appears to be anything but. According to one of our sources, a Daily Mail
article specifically asked them for comments about a legal issue David had
regarding his salary, but both David and Barbara refused to comment on the
situation. Meaning, the organization's transparency is not so transparent,
which is not exactly what one would expect from the company responsible for
what is and what is not considered news for the American people.

6 - As far as we can tell, Snopes will pretty much hire anyone off the street
with ZERO qualifications for fact checking. For an organization such as this,
significant research is required, which means more than quickly Googling a few
articles that counter the story. There needs to be actual proof the source
article in question is wrong, and that requires some training. Looking over the
roster of writers, there are some people working there with very definitive
leanings and no prior experience as fact checkers.

For a publication this influential, I would expect to see every staff member
with a list of credentials as long as my arm. Instead, we see maybe two people
with legitimate credentials, and the rest of the staff is nothing more than
recirculated online writers and bloggers. And, unless I am mistaken, I did not
SEE anyone on staff with a significant background in fact checking.

7 - Several significant stories have come under question prior to this election
cycle. One of the most notable was a story about aspartame where Snopes used
one doctor's testimony to debunk a story. However, numerous professionals came
out to decry that doctor's comments, proving at the very least his "opinion" on
the matter was questionable at best.

This goes to an earlier point where I stated the publication has a tendency to
find one article or source that will prove the decision they want to make, and
they use that to back up their story. Any debunking must be backed by numerous
legitimate sources that, without doubt, debunk the story. That is not the norm
for Snopes.

8 - A recent story that Snopes debunked was that Keith Ellison and Debbie
Wasserman Schultz did not get out of their seats during Trump's joint session
address when he was honoring the widow of a fallen Navy SEAL. The problem here
is that nobody claimed they did not stand at all - the claim was they remained
seated during the two-minute ovation given to the widow.

We actually did a story on this very topic and specifically mentioned the
moment many of the Dems chose to stay seated during President Trump's speech.
Our claim, like the one above, is that they did not stand during the two-minute
plus ovation.

When Trump initially introduced the widow, everyone at the session, at least
most of them, stood to applaud her presence. Not much later, Trump again
pointed to the widow to honor her after making some comments about her fallen
husband, and she received the extended standing ovation - at least from people
with respect for the sacrifice her husband gave for this country.

Snopes debunked the story by pointing to the initial introduction and
proclaimed the story as fake news. Once again, Snopes twisted the actual facts
to support a liberal point of view.

9 - During the election period, SuperStation95 reported an anchor for WABC TV
in New York City was reporting on Hillary Clinton's death. Snopes debunked the
story with the reason that if it were true, it would have blown up social
media.

Unfortunately for Snopes, the anchor actually DID start off his broadcast by
saying "Good evening, we begin with the breaking news of Hillary Clinton's
death."

As you may recall, this happened during the 9/11 tribute ceremony after Hillary
collapsed going back to her van from what we were later told was heat
exhaustion. In the hours that followed, Hillary's camp was not exactly
forthcoming with information, and there was a lot of speculation there was
something seriously wrong with the former first lady.

The station later admitted to the error by the anchor, but at the time of the
broadcast, the error was never corrected, and this intro blew up all over the
place. So, while the anchor did make an error, Snopes was completely wrong in
saying SuperStation95 erroneously reported the story.

10 - Snopes also debunked a story that we and several other publications ran
that claimed, "Hillary Clinton successfully defended an accused child rapist
and later laughed about the case." While they conceded that Hillary did in fact
defend him, what they proved false has nothing at all to do with the case.

Snopes' debunking gave this specific reason for the Mostly False rating:
"Hillary Clinton did not volunteer to be the defendant's lawyer, she did not
laugh about the case's outcome, she did not assert that the complainant 'made
up the rape story,' she did not claim she knew the defendant to be guilty, and
she did not 'free' the defendant."

Now, as far as I can tell, that "False" claim has nothing to do with the actual
claim of Hillary defending the rapist. The rating should have been TRUE because
she did defend him, AND she did laugh about it while doing an interview with
Roy Reed in the 1980s.

The moment of the laugh came when she was describing the case where she stated,
"It was a fascinating case. The guy was accused of raping a 12-year-old. Of
course, he claimed that he didn't. He took a lie detector test. I had him take
a polygraph, which he passed, which forever destroyed my faith in polygraphs."
And then she laughed.

This is not fake news folks - listen to it for yourself...

Again, I am no legal expert, but that sure does sound like an admission of
someone who once defended a man for raping a 12-year-old girl, knowing he was
guilty, and then laughing about it, yet Snopes still decided the original claim
was "Mostly False."

The internet is littered with stories of Snopes mishaps and actual evidence
proving the fact checkers are in fact WRONG!

If a fact checking publication is to be considered legitimate, they simply
cannot be wrong EVER! They have to meticulously check and recheck the facts and
not actually report a story until they are 100 percent sure they have every
little detail correct. Then, and only then, can they publish a story.

Snopes has an agenda when it comes to politics, and it is not one that can be
trusted for proving or debunking stories. The publication had more than a few
mistakes when it was merely debunking urban legends, but when they got into the
political business, they were in over their heads because their own writers
cannot leave their liberal agendas at the door when they report to work.

Snopes is not meant to be an opinion based blog but a very influential and
powerful fact checking organization responsible for differentiating fact from
fiction for the biggest social media outlet in the world... and they are
reporting opinions instead of fact.

When it comes to fake news, Snopes should be an example of fake news reporting,
not the outlet responsible for policing it.
--
A carbon tax will change NOTHING, other than the wealth of politicians and
countries who beg us for money. THAT was the purpose of the Paris Accord...
the ONLY purpose.

"It's all about money in the end. Keeping the Gravy Train running."
http://youtu.be/J9Oi7x2OBdI

Funny... when the government no longer pays for bogus money-grabbing data, the
truth comes out.

This is sad... The Usenet Trolls in this group have a new hero... a retard. Get
that testosterone checked, girls!

https://imgur.com/wSbtL1g

https://imgur.com/YoRzkcX

https://imgur.com/7WkuvyE

https://imgur.com/R7fX4Zm
Continue reading on narkive:
Loading...