Discussion:
"Telling Women They Don’t Need Men Is Hurting Their Children"
(too old to reply)
Siri Cruise
2021-10-15 12:32:51 UTC
Permalink
While the judiciary battles over Texas’s heartbeat law and the U.S.
You idiots fight if you want. It's not going to change anything
in California.
‘original Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.’” Unfortunately,
these days, the fundamental foundation for societal well-being – strong
marriages and intact families – is crumbling at an alarming rate, and
Yeah, those anti-social women who refuse to stay home and get
beaten up by their husbands.
--
:-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
Discordia: not just a religion but also a parody. This post / \
I am an Andrea Doria sockpuppet. insults Islam. Mohammed
e***@post.com
2021-10-15 12:40:34 UTC
Permalink
https://thefederalist.com/2021/10/14/telling-women-they-dont-need-men-is-hurting-their-children/
[...]
While the judiciary battles over Texas’s heartbeat law and the U.S.
Supreme Court near an opportunity to defend the unborn, one pro-abortion
argument insists men should be required to take care of their children
congratulations on discovering the family.
As the late Michael Novak, recipient of the Templeton Prize and renowned
philosopher, once remarked, “Marriage, the family unit, was the
‘original Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.’” Unfortunately,
these days, the fundamental foundation for societal well-being – strong
marriages and intact families – is crumbling at an alarming rate, and
not just among the poor. This disintegration has alarming consequences
for all aspects of our society.
[...]
Gee, I wonder if you can guess why the dearth of "strong marriages and intact families" is crumbling "societal well-being." And no, it has nothing to do with the government. You're a Mr. College Educated Man, so tell us why - and try not to be Disney-like over-simplistic in your response, as you often tend to be.
Mitchell Holman
2021-10-15 13:30:03 UTC
Permalink
https://thefederalist.com/2021/10/14/telling-women-they-dont-need-men-
is-
hurting-their-children/
[...]
While the judiciary battles over Texas’s heartbeat law and the U.
S.
Supreme Court near an opportunity to defend the unborn, one
pro-abortion
argument insists men should be required to take care of their
congratulations on discovering the family.
As the late Michael Novak, recipient of the Templeton Prize and renowned
philosopher, once remarked, “Marriage, the family unit, was the
‘original Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.’
” Unfortunately,
these days, the fundamental foundation for societal well-being –
strong
marriages and intact families – is crumbling at an alarming rate,
and
not just among the poor. This disintegration has alarming
consequences for all aspects of our society.
[...]
Gee, I wonder if you can guess why the dearth of "strong marriages and
intact families" is crumbling "societal well-being." And no, it has
nothing to do with the government.
Hartung broke up HIS first marriage but
now preaches about preserving marriages.

Oh, the irony................
AlleyCat
2021-10-16 04:12:31 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 15 Oct 2021 08:30:03 -0500, Mitchell Holman says...
Post by Mitchell Holman
Hartung broke up HIS first marriage but
now preaches about preserving marriages.
Oh, the irony................
At least he's BEEN married, ugly nerd.

This is how we know YOU haven't.

=====

Liberals Are Wimps (New Study Shocks Scientific Community...

https://freedomwire.com/liberals-are-wimps-new-study-shocks-scientific-
community/

Liberal men are physically smaller and weaker than conservative men - and it's
measurable.

=====

Vice Admits Liberal Men are Weaker, Less Attractive than...

https://phillipschneider.com/vice-admits-liberal-men-are-weaker-less-
attractive-than-conservatives/

Vice Admits Liberal Men are Weaker, Less Attractive than Conservatives By
Phillip Schneider on August 11, 2020 ( Leave a comment ) While the flames of
the culture war rage, even far-left media publication Vice admits that liberal
men are weaker and less competent than conservatives.

=====

TRUTH: Why Liberals Are WEAKER Than Conservatives
https://thefederalistpapers.org/us/truth-liberals-weaker-conservatives

TRUTH: Why Liberals Are WEAKER Than Conservatives. Speaking of weak liberals,
who can't even stand the sight of history: Texas Restaurant Defending
Controversial Sign Some Are Calling Racist - by Robert Gehl. A Texas restaurant
is under attack on social media for what many are calling its racist décor. The
neon sign hung at Cook's Garage...

=====

Science Proves That Liberals Are Crazier Than Conservatives

https://freedomwire.com/liberals-are-crazy/

Well, I recently came across a fantastic article about another study of
Liberals - except this time, instead of focusing on the weak males, it focuses
on the average Liberal woman instead. A Ph.D. candidate at Georgia State
University has analyzed the data out of a recent Pew Research Center poll, and
the results are amazing.

=====

Shocker: Study Shows Physically Weak Men Tend to be Liberal

https://redstate.com/terichristoph/2017/05/26/shocker-study-shows-physically-
weak-men-tend-to-be-liberal-n72373

Shocker: Study Shows Physically Weak Men Tend to be Liberal. In news that will
surprise absolutely no one, a new study reveals that girly men are more likely
to favor socialist policies. The study, conducted by researchers at Brunel
University London, looked at the height, weight, physical strength, and bicep
circumference of 171 men, along...

=====

Liberalism Breeds Soft, Weak, Young "Men" - Louder With...

https://www.louderwithcrowder.com/liberalism-breeds-soft-weak-young-men

by Steven Crowder I know some of you think when I say "liberalism breeds weak,
fat men," that I'm merely politicizing an issue to be polarizing. I assure you
that's not the case. Allow me five hundred words to make my case. I was a
chubby kid. Strike that, I was a jiggly shrimp. Skinny-fat. The kind of kid who
was relatively thin, yet managed to ma

=====

Why Liberals Are So Physically Monstrous And Repulsive...

https://www.returnofkings.com/118536/why-liberals-are-so-physically-monstrous-
and-repulsive

Liberals are not born uglier. They voluntarily remain ugly or become uglier to
fit a narrative. "Appearance is ideology". It takes a special kind of hypocrisy
to call something that is universally seen as ugly "beautiful" and vice-versa.

=====

Science says liberals, not conservatives, are psychotic

https://nypost.com/2016/06/09/science-says-liberal-beliefs-are-linked-to-
pyschotic-traits/

Jun 9, 2016 Turns out liberals are the real authoritarians. A political-science
journal that published an oft-cited study claiming conservatives were more
likely to show traits associated with "psychoticism"...

=====

12 Reasons Why Liberals And Progressives Will Always Be...

https://www.returnofkings.com/100887/12-reasons-why-liberals-and-progressives-
will-always-be-losers

Liberal men however are inexcusable, they are either effeminate enough to be
emotionally manipulated or are weak and yielding to social pressures. December
10, 2016 Take The Red Pill Don't forget that Liberal men are usually the
offspring of domineering feminists or divorced feminists and sometimes single
mothers.

=====

Men With Weak Upper Bodies Tend to Be Liberal - Physically Strong Men Tend to
Be Conservative

Men who are physically strong are more likely to take a right wing political
stance, while weaker men are inclined to support the welfare state, according
to a new study.

Researchers discovered political motivations may have evolutionary links to
physical strength.

Men's upper-body strength predicts their political opinions on economic
redistribution, according to the research.

The principal investigators - psychological scientists Michael Bang Petersen,
of Aarhus University in Denmark, and Daniel Sznycer, of the University of
California in the U.S., believe that the link may reflect psychological traits
that evolved in response to our early ancestral environments and continue to
influence behavior today.

Professor Petersen said: 'While many think of politics as a modern phenomenon,
it has - in a sense - always been with our species.'

In the days of our early ancestors, decisions about the distribution of
resources were not made in courthouses or legislative offices, but through
shows of strength.

With this in mind, Professor Petersen and Professor Sznycer hypothesized that
upper-body strength - a proxy for the ability to physically defend or acquire
resources - would predict men's opinions about the redistribution of wealth.
AlleyCat
2021-10-15 17:58:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by e***@post.com
Gee, I wonder if you can guess why the dearth of "strong marriages and intact families" is crumbling "societal well-being."
Because racist DEMOCRATS give free shit to Blacks, knowing they'll vote for
them, while breaking up the family unit.



How Liberal Policies Destroyed Black Families

https://www.dailysignal.com/2016/03/29/how-liberal-policies-destroyed-black-
families

It's well known how in 1965 Daniel Patrick Moynihan, assistant secretary of
labor to Democrat President Johnson, warned that the black family was on the
verge of a "complete breakdown" because of...






The Black Family: 40 Years of Lies | Daniel Patrick ...

https://www.city-journal.org/html/black-family-40-years-lies-12872.html

The Black Family: 40 Years of Lies. R ead through the megazillion words on
class, income mobility, and poverty in the recent New York Times series "Class
Matters" and you still won't grasp two of the most basic truths on the subject:
1. entrenched, multigenerational poverty is largely black; and 2. it is
intricately intertwined with the ...






The Decline of the African-American family - American Thinker

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2014/03/
the_decline_of_the_africanamerican_family.html

Even factoring for economic differences and severe social disadvantages,
examples of a vibrant black family institution in America's are too numerous to
ignore. o In the 1890s, there were four ...






The Black Family in 1965 and Today - Reason.com

https://reason.com/2015/02/26/the-black-family-in-1965-and-today

The Black Family in 1965 and Today. Poor black neighborhoods are not the
unassisted creation of poor black people, but largely the malignant result of
factors beyond their control. The breakdown ...






Black America Before LBJ's "Great Society": How the ...

https://ammo.com/articles/lbj-great-society-war-on-poverty-welfare-state-
helped-ruin-black-communities

The Breakdown of the Black Family "The black family, which had survived
centuries of slavery and discrimination, began rapidly disintegrating in the
liberal welfare state that subsidized unwed pregnancy and changed welfare from
an emergency rescue to a way of life." Thomas Sowell. The biggest problem
resulting from the Great Society is the ...






The Black Family Is Struggling, and It's Not Because of ...

https://www.dailysignal.com/2017/09/20/black-family-struggling-not-slavery

The black family structure is not the only retrogression suffered by blacks in
the age of racial enlightenment. In every census from 1890 to 1954, blacks were
either just as active or more so than ...






The Black Family in the Age of Mass ... - The Atlantic

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2015/10/the-black-family-in-the-
age-of-mass-incarceration/403246
American politicians are now eager to disown a failed criminal-justice system
that's left the U.S. with the largest incarcerated population in the world. But
they've failed to reckon with history....






The Breakdown of the Traditional Family: Why Conservative ...

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/the-breakdown-of-the-trad_b_675444

But when these structures break down, people look to mega-structures, such as
the state, for help. According to Wilcox, the public costs of family breakdown
among working-class and poor communities exceed $112 billion a year "as
federal, state, and local governments spend more money on police, prisons,
welfare, and court costs, trying to pick ...

============================================================================

Colonial Canada Had Slavery For More Than 200 Years. And Yes, It Still Matters
Today

More Canadians Say Racism Is A "Serious Problem" Today Than 1 Year Ago

Canada Urged To Open Its Eyes To Systemic Racism In Wake Of Police Violence

Racism In Canada Is Ever-Present, But We Have A Long History Of Denial

Majority (60%) See Racism as a Serious Problem in Canada Today, Up 13 points
Since Last Year

Nearly a Third of Canadians (28%) Say They Have Personally Experienced Racism
in the Past Year - 24 July 2020

https://www.ipsos.com/en-ca/majority-60-see-racism-serious-problem-canada-
today-13-points-last-year

Canada's Enduring Legacy Of Power, Politics And Racism
https://theclarion.ca/politicslaw/canadians-no-less-racist-than-americans/

75 Per Cent of Canadians Polled, Say Royal Canadian Mounted Police Has Systemic
Racism Issue

Systemic Racism In The Royal Canadian Mounted Police Force
https://www.citynews1130.com/2020/07/11/study-canadians-agree-rcmp-systemic-
racism/

Racist Canada Kicks Indian Out of Parliament
https://edition.cnn.com/2020/06/18/world/canada-jagmeet-singh-opponent-racist-
scli-intl/index.html

Canada's Shameful, Modern-Day Slave Trade
https://torontosun.com/2012/02/10/canadas-shameful-modern-day-slave-
trade/wcm/2e410af6-9dc4-4ef7-bc3e-821a5970ed41

Black Enslavement in Canada
https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/black-enslavement

Colonial Canada Had Slavery For More Than 200 Years. And Yes, It Still Matters
Today
https://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2017/06/17/slavery-canada-history_n_16806804.html

Canada's Slavery Secret: The Whitewashing Of 200 Years Of Enslavement
https://www.cbc.ca/radio/ideas/canada-s-slavery-secret-the-whitewashing-of-200-
years-of-enslavement-1.4726313
BeamMeUpScotty
2021-10-15 13:37:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by Siri Cruise
While the judiciary battles over Texas’s heartbeat law and the U.S.
You idiots fight if you want. It's not going to change anything
in California.
‘original Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.’” Unfortunately,
these days, the fundamental foundation for societal well-being – strong
marriages and intact families – is crumbling at an alarming rate, and
Yeah, those anti-social women who refuse to stay home and get
beaten up by their husbands.
Actually the husbands are taken away to jail.... And the government
tried to stop wife beating by blaming alcohol and they teamed up with
religious groups and created an Amendment to the Constitution bringing
in PROHIBITION, but wife beating went up.... and at the end of
PROHIBITION there were more bar-stools than when it started.

How's the Government's success rate this time?

Did it create more CRIME like Prohibition did with the GANGS and the
violence and fatherless kids of the prohibition period?
--
That's karma,

Your attempt at mandated assimilation is futile, a successful resistance
is inevitable.

Loading Image...
BeamMeUpScotty
2021-10-15 15:38:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by Siri Cruise
While the judiciary battles over Texas’s heartbeat law and
the U.S.
Post by Siri Cruise
You idiots fight if you want. It's not going to change anything
in California.
‘original Department of Health, Education, and
Welfare.’” Unfortunately, >> these days, the fundamental
foundation for societal well-being – strong >> marriages and
intact families – is crumbling at an alarming rate, and
Post by Siri Cruise
Yeah, those anti-social women who refuse to stay home and get
beaten up by their husbands.
Actually the husbands are taken away to jail.... And the government
tried to stop wife beating by blaming alcohol and they teamed up with
religious groups and created an Amendment to the Constitution bringing
in PROHIBITION, but wife beating went up.... and at the end of
PROHIBITION there were more bar-stools than when it started.
How's the Government's success rate this time?
Did it create more CRIME like Prohibition did with the GANGS and the
violence and fatherless kids of the prohibition period?
So you are opposed to the prohibition
on drugs which is failing for the same
reason the prohibition on alcohol failed?
Yes I've posted that plenty of times....

That doesn't mean they should be smuggled into OUR NATION but that any
marijuana you grow is legal under the U.S. Constitution. It's NOT
because it was legalize by any State it, legal because the Constitution
doesn't allow for food to be banned or weeds to be banned.

Which means yes Mescaline and other NATURAL DRUGS are legal according to
the Constitution as are poisons that kill people but are legal.

Water can kill you if you drink too much of it, does that mean that the
government has the DELEGATED POWER to ban all water?
--
That's karma,

Your attempt at mandated assimilation is futile, a successful resistance
is inevitable.

https://media.gettr.com/group31/getter/2021/10/01/03/74cb082a-ae4b-6124-e748-82145a8a32ed/25ad95587f0c3a0858c8347a465933df_500x0.jpg
Mitchell Holman
2021-10-15 13:28:13 UTC
Permalink
https://thefederalist.com/2021/10/14/telling-women-they-dont-need-men-i
s-hurting-their-children/
[...]
While the judiciary battles over Texas’s heartbeat law and the U.S.
Supreme Court near an opportunity to defend the unborn, one
pro-abortion argument insists men should be required to take care of
their children and the women they impregnate. To which conservatives
reply: congratulations on discovering the family.
As the late Michael Novak, recipient of the Templeton Prize and
renowned philosopher, once remarked, “Marriage, the family unit, was
the ‘original Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.’”
Unfortunately, these days, the fundamental foundation for societal
well-being – strong marriages and intact families – is crumbling
at an alarming rate, and not just among the poor. This disintegration
has alarming consequences for all aspects of our society.
[...]
Defenders of serial adulterer Trump
(5 children by 3 baby-mamas) dare to
preach to us about "strong marriages and
intact families"?
Loading...